Bug#830066: tidy: fails to use ~/.tidy.conf , unless HTML_TIDY is appropriately set

I upload a fix for this to got today On Jul 6, 2016 6:00 PM, "Jeremy Bicha" wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Francesco Poli (wintermute) > wrote: > > I think this is a bug: the HTML_TIDY environment variable should > > be used to change the

Bug#655200: make tidy ready for HTML5

Hi, I would recommend this new package replace the existing one, as it appears the old one is abandoned upstream. Thanks. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Kacper Perschke kacper.persc...@gmail.comwrote: Dear package tidy maintainer, On 30 January 2013 17:03, Kacper Perschke

Bug#655200: make tidy ready for HTML5

Actually I have a couple questions. - Why the new version has removed all the autoconf stuff? - Is it backwards compatible with html4 etc. if its not does it need to be? - Is the ABI in libtidy compatible, does the major version need to change? Thanks. On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Jason

Bug#673708: RM: nagios-statd -- RoQA; RC-buggy; unmaintained; low popcon; unsatisfiable Depends

Hi, The package has had no upstream activity since 2005. I have no objections. As for MIA, I haven't made any uploads for a far while but I have voted in all the elections, and GR. If someone was specifically looking for me I'm not hiding. Thanks. On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Jonathan

Bug#605784: nagios-statd: diff for NMU version 3.12-1.1

Hi Jonathan, I've looked over the changes and they are okay with me, what you have done is fine. Thank you. On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: tags 605784 + patch tags 605784 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for

Bug#605784: nagios-statd-server: test with python2.5 sucessful

Hi Vladislav, Thanks for your debugging work. I'll upload a new package soon, with your recommendations. Jason On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Vladislav Kurz vladislav.k...@webstep.netwrote: Package: nagios-statd-server Version: 3.12-1 Followup-For: Bug #605784 Hello, i have tested

Bug#572277: pstree to see fork

Hi, Try looking at the processess with pstree. It will show you the parent and child processes. As for a fix I have no idea. Thanks. -- Jason Thomas Operations Manager Link Innovations - 02 9634 0400 http://www.linkinnovations.com/

Bug#562004: Upstream bug

to upstream? -- Jason Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#521862: backtrace with more info

Hi, Here is a backtrace with hopefully more useful information. Thanks. Starting program: /usr/bin/evolution [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] warning: Lowest section in /usr/lib/libicudata.so.40 is .hash at 00b4 [New Thread 0xb522b9a0 (LWP 17425)] [New Thread 0xb4dfbb90 (LWP

Bug#508281: update-grub: dramatically fails at reporting errors

You could try the following: # sh -x update-grub On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:16 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: So be it. Let's debug: ,-- | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /sbin/update-grub -h | Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /sbin/update-grub

Bug#503047: amavisd-new: false-positive matches on CLSID banned regexp again

Yes, unfortunately. I don't know what mail client is sending it, but I believe it may be something custom. On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 15:02 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jason Thomas wrote: Here is an example of what I consider a valid filename. name={2CC67A0A

Bug#503047: amavisd-new: false-positive matches on CLSID banned regexp again

Package: amavisd-new Version: 2.6.1.dfsg-1 Severity: normal It appears that the banned filename CLSID regex is still matching on what I believe are valid filenames. You can find a lot of history abount this regex in this old bug report. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373159

Bug#480254: grub-pc: post-install fails with grub linux cmdline (leaning toothpics)

Package: grub-pc Version: 1.96+20080429-1 Severity: normal When I set the grub linux cmd line through debconf the post.install script fails with the following error. The install script fails to pull my old linux cmd line from menu.lst, so I typed it in. my linxu cmd line is root=/dev/hdc1 ro

Bug#470764: Segfaults with -help-config or -show-config specified

Versions of packages tidy depends on: ii libc6 2.7-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libtidy-0.99-020051018-1 HTML syntax checker and reformatte tidy recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Jason Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#466320: audacious fails on url with GET parameters

Package: audacious Version: 1.4.6-2 Severity: normal audacious does not seem to like urls like the following. http://www.181.fm/winamp.pls?station=181-kickincountrybitrate=hi see the output below. Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ audacious

Bug#463872: (no subject)

5.2.4 and 5.2.5 from clean php.net from source, the tidy extension works. The PHP package tidy version exhibits this problem reproduceable on different machines for me. Should this file against PHP instead? -- Jason Thomas Network Operations Manager Link Innovations - 02 9634 0400

Bug#463872: libtidy-0.99-0: Exceeds allowed memory size when used with php5-tidy 5.2.4-2+b1

: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libtidy-0.99-0 depends on: ii libc6 2.7-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries libtidy-0.99-0 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Jason Thomas Network Operations Manager Link Innovations - 02 9634

Bug#461655: not provided

tag 461655 + wontfix thanks Upstream do not provide one. Nothing I can do. :-( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#449243: please retest

Hi, I have just retested this bug here and it appears that it is no longer current. Also I am packaging a new version and have tested that it does not happen with it either, can you please test and see if it still applies to the new version when it is available. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#356926: still current

Just an update that this bug is still current. Even in the new version I am packaging now 20080116cvs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#352789: retest

Are you able to retest and see if this bug still applies? Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377650: wont fix

severity 377650 wishlist tags 377650 + wontfix thanks This is how upstream do it so we will stick with this. Unless there is a documented standard somewhere that I can put to upstream. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#355042: not provided

tag 355042 + wontfix thanks Upstream do not provide one. Nothing I can do. :-( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#460177: update-grub updates menu.lst with incorrect boot device

[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grub-devel -- Jason Thomas Network Operations Manager Link Innovations - 02 9634 0400 http://www.linkinnovations.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#429604: patch to add -dbg package support

tags 429604 +patch stop Hi, please find a patch attached that add -dbg package support to evolution-exchange. Thanks. -- Jason Thomas Network Operations Manager Link Innovations - 02 9634 0400 http://www.linkinnovations.com/ diff -Naur evolution-exchange-2.10.2.dfsg.orig/debian/control

Bug#429604: evolution-exchange: there is no debug package

Package: evolution-exchange Version: 2.10.2.dfsg-1 Severity: normal Hi, gnome support asked me to install evolutuion-exchange-dbg which does not exist. This is needed to produce readable backtraces. I assume this means that it should exist. If this is the case could you please add it.

Bug#423412: grub2: grub-install fails on PPC

try # sudo grub-install hd0 On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:24:13PM -0300, Zoho Vignochi wrote: Package: grub2 Version: 1.95-5 Severity: important I installed grub2 and invoked grub-install (hd,0). The output is ~$ sudo grub-install (hd,0) /boot/grub must be a mount point. I use lvm but

Bug#412021: grub fails to cope with '/boot' on different partition to '/'

Your changing (hd0,?) in the wrong place. Look a little higher up in the menu.lst file. The entries you are changing are regenerated every time update-grub is run. On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:28:13PM +, Bernard Boudet wrote: Package: grub Version: 0.97-23 Severity: critical

Bug#410592: spfquery: short description is not correct

Package: spfquery Severity: normal The short description for spfquery claims that it is a library when it is not. It should say something like 'Sender Policy Framework Query Tool'. Long decription could state that it uses libspf. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers

Bug#398419: Seems to on my system

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S kernel-img.conf kernel-package: /usr/share/man/man5/kernel-img.conf.5.gz kernel-package: /usr/share/man/fr/man5/kernel-img.conf.5.gz kernel-package: /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/examples/sample.kernel-img.conf kernel-package:

Bug#348985: This bug still seems to be current

This bug is still in the current version. Although it has moved to around line 190. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#106399: GRUB Legacy is feature frozen

This bug started with simply turning on existing networking support. I've just read over all the messages and from memory there are problems with turning them all on at once. Now the patch that Fr?d?ric sent in does something completely different and adds a whole bunch of new code. Unfortunately

Bug#345931: If the problem is that the user doesn't know ...

If stage2 and stage1.5 are correct then most likely stage1 is correct as well. So would say just checking there version matches grub-shell would be enough. On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:01:02AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: Solution 2: (Since stage1 does not change a lot) we can usually

Bug#388424: update-grub sets an '!' into root-device-path: root=/dev/rd!c0d0p4

Actually the bang '!' was correct. perhaps it depends on your version of the kernel. But anyway. menu.lst is a config file. edit the kroot entry and re-run update-grub. On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 01:04:53PM +0200, Robert Resch wrote: Package: grub Version: 0.97-15 Severity: important

Bug#345931: If the problem is that the user doesn't know he won't be able to reboot...

option C, we create a way to extract the version information from every grub file. So that the grub shell can check that its version matches the stage files and if not generate an ERROR message. On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:05:38AM +0200, Marc Fargas wrote: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Bug#385391: update-grub still uses /bin/sh as its interpreter, fails with dash

Because the people that wrote it knew of no other way. If you are skilled in bash scripting we would love your input. Patch or Advice are both welcome. Thanks. On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:41:45PM +0300, R??mi Denis-Courmont wrote: Le jeudi 31 ao?t 2006 02:24, vous avez ?crit : But

Bug#341535: Bug#360849: grub-install: /dev/evms/newroot does not have any corresponding BIOS drive [Problem analysis]

This particulary bug is caused by the user not updating the file in /boot/grub He is not using grub-install, and therefore the new grub files are not being copied into place. Yes this is a bug and the files should some sort of version indetification so that this does not happen. Please try

Bug#383282: update-grub and current menu.lst are not user-friendly

Yay, someone else can see the problem. I wrote a replacement for update-grub and nobody wanted to test it. Good Luck! On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 04:33:34PM -0300, Maximiliano Curia wrote: severity 383282 important retitle 383282 update-grub and current menu.lst file are not user-friendly

Bug#384152: update-grub: generates wrong device entries in menu.lst

update-grub does not do any device detection. There is a configuration option in your menu.lst which you need to set. This is all documented in the update-grub man page. This is also documented in README.Debian. ## default grub root device ## e.g. groot=(hd0,0) # groot=(hd1,0) Please close

Bug#382457: rp-pppoe: enable pppoe-server kernel mode

Package: rp-pppoe Severity: normal Hi, Below is a simple patch to the debian package that will enable kernel mode in pppoe-server. diff -Naur rp-pppoe-3.8.orig/debian/control rp-pppoe-3.8/debian/control --- rp-pppoe-3.8.orig/debian/control2003-09-17 04:21:06.0 +1000 +++

Bug#380281: update-grub doesn't update vmlinuz and initrd.img entries correctly

That value comes from a configuration option in menu.lst. It is not automatic. You need to edit menu.lst On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 07:11:59PM -0300, Gleidson Echeli Leopoldo wrote: Package: grub Version: 0.97-12 Severity: important Hi, i compile my own kernel and installed today. I observed

Bug#374375: Spell error at the menu.lst

I acutally put that spelling in there on purpose. But there is no reason why it can not be changed. On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:05:13AM +0200, Patrick Matth??i wrote: Package: grub Version: 0.97-11 Hello, There is a little spellerror at the end of the automatic generatec menu.lst written

Bug#354175: python2.4-scgi: Please include init scripts

a example cron entry, to start it on reboot, and to restart it if its not running? or peharps an example inittab entry. or all of the above? On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 03:44:55PM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:46:15AM +1100, Jason Thomas wrote: It would be nice if your

Bug#354175: python2.4-scgi: Please include init scripts

at 10:24:43AM +1100, Jason Thomas wrote: hmm, I was thinking that it could be controlled from /etc/default/scgi_server. In there you could have an `ENABLE` option. and perhaps a PORT LIST that way you could have it start up multiple servers on different PORTS. There are SCGI servers

Bug#354175: python2.4-scgi: Please include init scripts

Package: python2.4-scgi Version: 1.9-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, It would be nice if your package could include init scripts to start the scgi server on boot. The init script could source /etc/default/scgi to determine if the server should be started. The port that is used could also be

Bug#345931: grub 0.97 doesn't work on several machines

close 345931 thanks Hi, grub-install copies the various stage* files into /boot/grub. grub shell does not. If you do not copy the stage* files then they will be incompatible with the boot sector that is installed. grub-install is the recommeneded method to install. On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at

Bug#348985: apt-proxy: no longer handles ftp username/password

Package: apt-proxy Version: 1.9.32 Severity: normal somewhere along the line apt-proxy stopped handling ftp username/password correctly and was leaving the '@' symbol on the start of the host name. Below is a copy of the error from the logs and two patches. There are two patches as I'm not

Bug#343395: make this optional

I rather like this function so if you are going to change it please make it optional via config file. off by default is fine by me. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#345931: grub 0.97 doesn't work on several machines

Hi, Please check your menu.lst for a splashimage line. If one or more exists comment them out and try to boot again. How where the menu.lst files created? You could also try pressing 'c' for the command line interface, when the random garbage is on the screen. But I've no idea if that will

Bug#343260: more info please

Can you please send a copy of: - menu.lst - copy of menu.lst with winxp as the first entry. - fstab - output of `mount` command Do you have any idea why this has happened? Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#167445: patch

tags 167445 patch thanks Hi, Heres a simple patch that can make this happen. diff -Naur xzgv-0.8.orig/debian/mime xzgv-0.8/debian/mime --- xzgv-0.8.orig/debian/mime 1970-01-01 10:00:00.0 +1000 +++ xzgv-0.8/debian/mime2005-12-19 20:42:11.0 +1100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +image/*;

Bug#308383: patch

diff -Naur orig/rp-pppoe-3.5/debian/rules rp-pppoe-3.5/debian/rules --- orig/rp-pppoe-3.5/debian/rules 2005-12-09 16:21:58.0 +1100 +++ rp-pppoe-3.5/debian/rules 2005-11-05 18:00:55.0 +1100 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ dh_testdir # test -f configure || (aclocal; autoconf)

Bug#342222: grub: impossible to specify no altoptions at all

close 34 thanks ## should update-grub create alternative automagic boot options ## e.g. alternative=true ## alternative=false # alternative=false On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:22:07PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: Package: grub Version: 0.97-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, I have a system

Bug#341897: grub: update-grub has stopped finding kernels not in /boot

My theory is, that the debian installer created those entries. or perhaps grubconf. but not update-grub. On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 10:34:31AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: Weird - my old menu.lst didn't have such a line. I've added the new boot options after this line in my new version. -- To

Bug#338371: What is wrong?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:04:28PM +0100, John Plate wrote: Otavio Salvador wrote: I didn't understand what update-grub did wrong. kopt comment express exactly what it intend to do and looks like it did its job. The problem is that, fx after installation, you have entries that can boot

Bug#338371: What is wrong?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:27:45PM +0100, John Plate wrote: Jason Thomas wrote: The problem is that, fx after installation, you have entries that can boot the system. What, So after you install the system it is working fine. After installing the system, it works fine

Bug#338371: What is wrong?

# kopt=root=/dev/hdc1 ro # kopt_2_6_8=root=/dev/hdc1 ro # kopt_2_6_8_2_686=root=/dev/hdc2 ro # kopt_2_6_8_mppe=root=/dev/hdc3 ro On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:45:29PM +0100, John Plate wrote: Jason Thomas wrote: As said, after installing, raid-1 is installed. For future kernels, the raid

Bug#338371: What is wrong?

:26PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Jason Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # kopt=root=/dev/hdc1 ro # kopt_2_6_8=root=/dev/hdc1 ro # kopt_2_6_8_2_686=root=/dev/hdc2 ro Ok. So I think we need one thing. Jason, could you please to write a comment in menu.lst as an example of use

Bug#337886: cacti: No Graphs Listed in 'Graph Management'

, sean finney wrote: hi jason, On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:38:57PM +1100, Jason Thomas wrote: The default graphs that come with the debian install don't show when you look at the 'Graph Management' section. does simply changing the order of the tables really fix the problem? my guess

Bug#337886: cacti: No Graphs Listed in 'Graph Management'

Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6g-2 Severity: important Hi, The default graphs that come with the debian install don't show when you look at the 'Graph Management' section. Is there a way to turn sql debugging? --- graphs.php.orig 2005-11-07 13:34:19.0 +1100 +++ graphs.php

Bug#314210: grub: wishlist, beep (\007) in menu.lst for blind people

Looks fine, I doubt they will add it to upstream. On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:37:47PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Jason: do you have any problem with the proposed patch? I fell very confortable with it and doesn't have any problem to apply it on 0.97. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#333058: Issue resolved, still an issue for the Debian installer

Hi Jon, I'm at a loss as to what the problem is. Generally people install grub into the boot sector of the drive. Which is loaded by the bios on boot. Nothing to mark as bootable here. Grub does not require a partition to be marked bootable in order to boot the operating system on it. On Tue,

Bug#308883: package does not include /etc/tidy.conf

even better add to debian/tidy.install: debian/tidy.conf /etc/tidy On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:05:36AM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: tags 308883 patch thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:37:50 -0400, Demetrio Rey wrote: Previous packages had a default /etc/tidy.conf file.

Bug#327199: actually

Yes lets put them all together under pkg-nagios, or you can take over if you like. I have uploaded a new version which changed the 'depends' to 'recommends'. On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:49:39PM -0400, Sean Finney wrote: Subject: nagios-nrpe-server: actually... Followup-For: Bug #327199

Bug#329154: possible solution

This patch removes the error and makes the key available from the object with no value. not sure if its the right way to do it. --- ConfigFile.pm.orig 2005-09-28 09:11:00.0 +1000 +++ ConfigFile.pm 2005-09-28 09:26:43.0 +1000 @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ # Split up the key

Bug#329205: update-grub ignores memtest86=false

Don't uncomment it. Just change it. These entries are not part of grub. They are specific to update-grub. Yes I know its ugly. On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:29:54PM +0200, root wrote: Package: grub Version: 0.95+cvs20040624-17 Severity: minor my /boot/grub/menu.lst says memtest86=false;

Bug#329154: errors parsing /etc/apache/modules.conf

Package: libapache-configfile-perl Version: 1.18-4 errors parsing /etc/apache/modules.conf at 'ClearModuleList' error: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/share/perl5/Apache/Con figFile.pm line 278. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at

Bug#328837: very old package, should this be removed?

I no longer use the software either and it is no longer maintained upstream. I agree with removal of the package, What should happen now? On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:23:07PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Package: titrax Version: 1.98.1-6 Severity: serious Hi, During the Debian QA

Bug#315774: grub segfault - Debian Bug report

The menu.lst has always been in /boot/grub/ since I've been maintaining it. Grub will still install fine if it is missing. On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:28:45AM -0700, Tim Freeman wrote: Daniel Sievers said: I was just wondering, if you could solve the grub segfault meanwhile? I am experiencing

Bug#309721: patch

tags 309721 patch thanks Heres a patch that seems to get rid of the errors. Not sure if it breaks functionality but it works for me. It does not handle trailing '\'. This would require some sort of state and temporary buffer. --- ConfigFile.pm.orig 2005-05-19 16:47:22.129242392 +1000 +++

Bug#309721: libapache-configfile-perl: Fails parsing ServerAlias entry with trailing \ for continue to next line

Package: libapache-configfile-perl Version: 1.18-3 Severity: important The following entries causes a parsing problem: entry 1: ServerAlias domain \ domain domain \ domain \ domain entry 2: SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/apache/ssl/FREESSL.webinc.linkinnovations.com.npkey I added the following

Bug#304841: patch

tags 304841 patch thanks heres a patch for this. -- Jason I hope you learn speaking English proper I hope speak I me you. -- Branden Robinson, 2001 diff -Naur grub-0.95+cvs20040624.orig/debian/update-grub grub-0.95+cvs20040624/debian/update-grub ---

Bug#298240: grub: Include DebBlue splash screen

Because the splashimages may not work for everyone and could leave them with an unbootable system. But, most things you do to the boot sector/record could leave your system in an unbootable state. So, If you think that the splashimage code is reliable enough go for it. Have we fixed it yet so

Bug#297480: grub: doesn't boot with Error 17

Please provide: cat /etc/fstab fdisk -l /dev/hda mount -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297480: grub: doesn't boot with Error 17

Your best bet is to try installing using the floppy. cat stage1 stage2 /dev/fd0 then do what you did last time root/setup. My theory is that when you boot the bios is possibly seeing the scsi controller first. This may be changeable in your bios settings. bios: (hd0) - scsi linux: (hd0) - ide

Bug#293807: patch

tags 293807 patch thanks Attached is very simple patch to fix this. -- Jason I hope you learn speaking English proper I hope speak I me you. -- Branden Robinson, 2001 diff -Naur diskless-0.3.18.0.5.orig/debian/rules diskless-0.3.18.0.5/debian/rules ---

Bug#266101: [georg.wittenburg@gmx.net: Debian Grub Patch]

- Forwarded message from Georg Wittenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:00:14 +0100 From: Georg Wittenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jason Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Debian Grub Patch Dear Jason, I'd really appreciate if you could spent two minutes fixing bug

Bug#295749: update-grub segfault with vmlinuz-good kernel image in /boot

please run update-grub with vmlinuz-good like so. sh -x update-grub Thanks. On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:57:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Package: grub Version: 0.95+cvs20040624-14 Severity: normal I put a kernel called vmlinuz-good in /boot, and update-grub did this: Searching for GRUB

Bug#295749: patch

tags 295749 patch thanks -- Jason I hope you learn speaking English proper I hope speak I me you. -- Branden Robinson, 2001 --- grub-0.95+cvs20040624/debian/update-grub2005-02-18 10:15:45.0 +1100 +++ ../update-grub 2005-02-18 10:10:10.0 +1100 @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@

Bug#285931: AOL

I had the same problem. Piotr are you running a 2.6 kernel like me? This could be the problem. -- Jason I hope you learn speaking English proper I hope speak I me you. -- Branden Robinson, 2001 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#290474: FYI

you will need to add your required modules before you install the kernel or you can run mkinitrd by hand after having added your modules. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/mkinitrd/modules # /etc/mkinitrd/modules: Kernel modules to load for initrd. # # This file should contain the names of kernel