Bug#731255: synergy: Jessie synergyc (1.4.12-3) cannot connect to Wheezy synergys (1.3.8-2)

2014-03-31 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 03/31/2014 07:29 AM, Axel Beckert wrote: > From my point of view it does not render the package generally > unusable, just for the case where the server is an significantly older > version. > > Then again, the case with Jessie and Wheezy is likely no seldom one, > so I think if there's a chance

Bug#714634: [lsb-discuss] Bug#714634: Clarification of general LSB requirements

2013-07-11 Thread Jeff Licquia
ent, and not to indicate any kind of implied legal requirement or promise beyond the usual concern an upstream has that a package be as bug-free and correct as possible. So feel free to do what you wish regarding the disclaimer, including dropping it entirely. (Though I will defer to someone else

Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead

2013-07-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 07/07/2013 04:09 AM, Aaron Sowry wrote: > Ubuntu has another long-standing (at least 11.10 - 13.04) LSB bug[1] > which makes install_initd fail. This means that it's not possible to > install services on Ubuntu as per the LSB spec. It's been fixed, I see. > Pretend you're developing software t

Bug#714634: lsb-core: Remove lsb-invalid-mta as a dependency of lsb-core; require an actual MTA instead

2013-07-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
a command called "sendmail" which does nothing; > rather, it is intended to be a functional interface through which > applications can send email. I've CC'd Jeff Licquia on this mail, > hopefully he can chime in with his thoughts. The LSB is, first and foremost,

Bug#710157: potential patch for essex

2013-06-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1177830/comments/21 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#692791: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#692791: Bug#692791: members of lpadmin can read every file on server via cups

2012-11-10 Thread Jeff Licquia
her idea ? > > cupsd could temporarily drop privileges to lp when reading log files; > with that you are restricted to reading world-readable files as well > as cups' own files, which should be fine? I suspect this fix would end up in a game of "whack-a-mole", as we find int

Bug#692791: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#692791: members of lpadmin can read every file on server via cups

2012-11-10 Thread Jeff Licquia
Control: found -1 1.4.4-7+squeeze1 On 11/10/2012 06:48 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > I have successfully used your exploit script on the Sid version, tagging as > found there. Just to complete the picture, I tried the exploit on squeeze, and it works there too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#691422: init-functions: order of arguments is not context-free

2012-11-10 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 11/10/2012 11:16 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Now I am slightly relunctant to add it to wheezy, not sure it would warrant > an > unblock (although [0] shows no forecoming problem). This fix could > potentially > break existing initscripts (admittedly relying on that broken behaviour), s

Bug#691422: init-functions: order of arguments is not context-free

2012-11-10 Thread Jeff Licquia
ave the bug "wontfix". >From 5772eb3bfb45ea3de2f0e06bb4f3dd3eeafccdf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Licquia Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:26:30 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Sanity-check pidofproc parameters per Debian bug 691422. --- init-functions |4 test/lsb-test.sh | 28 +++

Bug#681598: Anything else required?

2012-11-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 11/07/2012 06:21 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > I'll wait until it happens again and you can take a look. Can you send > me your ssh key? You don't need root access, right? We'll have to > coordinate a time, the machine doesn't have a fixed ip. Nope, shouldn't need root. I'll send the ssh key out-

Bug#691422: init-functions: order of arguments is not context-free

2012-11-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 10/25/2012 09:53 AM, Arno Töll wrote: > As spotted in #691365, it turns out that the pidofproc function provided in > /lib/lsb/init-functions is not context free. Calling > > pidofproc "$DAEMON" -p $PIDFILE" > > in contrast to > > pidofproc -p $PIDFILE "$DAEMON" > > > yields differe

Bug#691119: bug: crashing on a simple pages

2012-11-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 10/21/2012 12:28 PM, patrick295767 wrote: > I did try to convert a html to pdf. Is this bug related to the previous bug you filed? If not, do you have the HTML which caused this error? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Bug#691118: htmldoc: problem with some site with windows server

2012-11-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 10/21/2012 12:26 PM, patrick295767 wrote: > If you try to get it to an html: > wget -k http://www.energetics.eu/contact > > and then : > htmldoc --links --numbered --landscape --continuous file.html -f > myfileaspdf.pdf > > then you will see that ^M is giving a error. > > It crashes al

Bug#681598: Anything else required?

2012-11-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 10/22/2012 09:24 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > This problem continues to occur regularly. Is there something else I can > do to help? I took another look to see if I could figure out what might be happening, and came up empty. About the only possibility left would be to debug the Python code when

Bug#681598: update

2012-08-26 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/11/2012 09:49 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Here we go: I've played with this a little, using the results from the dir listings (which don't look odd to me). >From what I can tell, the ultimate cause of the failure is when apt decides to invalidate all repositories and "apt-cache policy" only

Bug#504654: test fix in recent synergy?

2012-08-26 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/08/2012 08:24 AM, Nathan Schulte wrote: > I wasn't subscribed to this bug report, so I didn't see the updates. I > no longer have this specific setup, so I cannot verify that I still > receive the error. I have a setup available at work that I can try to > reproduce this error, and if so, I

Bug#681598: Same problem

2012-08-04 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/04/2012 11:26 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Problem happened again today. sources.list hasn't been touched, but > suddenly release detection fails: [...] > Based on previous experiments, it will now work for a while and then > suddenly start failing again. Next time it does, could you send on

Bug#681598: /usr/share/pyshared/lsb_release.py: release detection fails with http.debian.net redirector in sources.list

2012-07-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 07/14/2012 11:45 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > When using the http.debian.net redirector, though > > | deb-src http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing main contrib non-free > | deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing main contrib non-free > > the detection fails: Cannot duplicate on my system:

Bug#504654: test fix in recent synergy?

2012-07-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
I'm fairly certain this fix has made it into upstream. Could you try with either 1.3.8-2 from unstable or the 1.4.x version in experimental? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#658366: synergy: segfault fix in unstable

2012-07-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
I've uploaded 1.3.8-2 of synergy to unstable, which fixes at least one segfault problem. It also seems to have fixed problems in a number of places, from upstream reports. Can you test with that version and see if it has fixed your problem with the clipboard and NX? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#664217: synergy: multiple crashes fixed in 1.3.8-1

2012-07-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
I've uploaded 1.3.8-2, with a segfault fix that seems to have fixed a number of reported problems (both in and out of Debian). Can you test with that version, and let me know if you still see the problem? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Bug#670382: Update to 1.3.x may also fix this

2012-07-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
I've uploaded 1.3.8-2 to unstable, which contains a segfault fix which may also solve this problem. If anyone is seeing this issue, could you please test with the unstable version? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Bug#554967: Still a problem with newer versions?

2012-07-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
Can you test that synergy still has this problem with newer versions? Unstable has 1.3.8-2, and experimental has 1.4.8-1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#680592: lsb-base: reporting errors and diagnostics in init scripts

2012-07-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 07/07/2012 01:21 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > To take an example, the openafs-client init script. It loads a > kernel module and then starts a daemon. It can't load the kernel > module unless the module is present; if it's not present, it does: > > cat <&2 > AFS module $MODULEDIR/$LIBAFS

Bug#513161: Seems to be solved in the newer version

2012-07-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 06/05/2012 06:47 AM, ilya brik wrote: > See: > http://synergy-foss.org/tracker/issues/3066 > > I've downloaded the last .deb (1.4.8) from Synergy's site and the issue > does not occur anymore (2 PCs with an updated Debian wheezy installed) It's not 100% clear that the issue you mention is rela

Bug#675051: synergy: keyboard autorepeat is turned off sporadically

2012-06-24 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 05/29/2012 11:04 AM, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > With the synergy client running, keyboard autorepeat is sporadically and > unpredictably disabled. It can be re-enabled with 'xset r', but this is at > best > a band-aid. Hi, Mason; sorry for the late reply. Can you try downloading the wheezy v

Bug#625502: Inquiry re: adopting qt3

2012-05-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
I'd like to ask to adopt Qt 3, entirely for the sake of the LSB. The LSB is working on removing Qt 3, but that effort won't be ready in time for wheezy, and I'd like for full LSB support to remain possible in Debian. What are your thoughts? I don't think this would take away from the release goa

Bug#660156: Fwd: Re: synergy and gedit bug

2012-05-12 Thread Jeff Licquia
Original Message Subject: Re: synergy and gedit bug Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 14:37:25 +0200 From: Bzzz Organization: Anyone, anywhere BUT in banana demokratik republik of france To: Jeff Licquia On Sun, 06 May 2012 23:19:47 -0400 Jeff Licquia wrote: > Hi! I'm the ma

Bug#507047: message to original filer bounced

2012-05-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
My message to Ignacio Díez Arias bounced; the account apparently no longer exists. I will close shortly if there is no new activity on the bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#660156: synergy and gedit bug

2012-05-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
Hi! I'm the maintainer of synergy for Debian. The bug you filed against gedit was forwarded to me to look at. Have you still been having the problem? If so, which versions of synergy are you running client-side and server-side? If I read the bug correctly, gedit is dying on the server side; wh

Bug#534239: 1.3.8 segfaults too :-(

2012-05-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 04/04/2012 10:48 AM, Javier Barroso wrote: > Finally synergyc 1.3.8 in squeeze got segfault (not significative > trace with -d DEBUG (and now I haven't access to exact log / strace > trace)). > > Now I'm trying synergy 1.4.7 and seems like it is working fine, but > really will have to wait two

Bug#507047: Are you still having problems with synergy on Debian?

2012-05-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
I'm going through some old bugs, and noticed that your bug dropped through the cracks. It was a bug in synergy, where full-screen applications on the server caused synergy to act strange. Here's the bug report, in case you need to refresh your memory: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Bug#505573: Still having problems with 32- and 64-bit synergy?

2012-05-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
I'm going through old bugs on synergy's Debian package, and noted that there never was a conclusion to the 32- and 64-bit issues we were discussion in this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505573 I realize that your situation has probably changed since then, but I want

Bug#382063: Are you still having problems with synergy?

2012-05-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
I know it's been a long time ago, but you once filed a bug with Debian reporting problems with synergy losing its connection occasionally. You can refresh your memory here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=382063 I was wondering: are you still having the problem? If so, have the

Bug#670382: Fwd: Re: Bug#670382: synergys segfaults when losing connection with client

2012-05-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
Original Message Subject: Re: Bug#670382: synergys segfaults when losing connection with client Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 06:38:44 + From: David, Erwan To: Jeff Licquia The client is running Fedora 14, synergyc 1.3.7 -- Erwan DAVID IT Unix/Network, France tel: +33 155 006

Bug#671730: /etc/lsb-base is there. Do mv /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh /etc/lsb-base/logging.sh

2012-05-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 05/06/2012 05:23 PM, Adrian Fita wrote: > Hi. Please excuse my tresspassing into this discussion, but wouldn't > putting lsb-base configuration vars in a file in the /etc/default > directory (something like /etc/default/lsb-base) be more in accordance > with the Debian Policy and FHM recommendat

Bug#671730: /etc/lsb-base is there. Do mv /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh /etc/lsb-base/logging.sh

2012-05-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
retitle 671730 /etc/lsb-base is unused; consider removing it severity 671730 minor tags 671730 - patch thanks On 05/06/2012 11:06 AM, Regid Ichira wrote: > And, in my case, the directory is empty. There's the problem; we create the directory, but don't use it. Since /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh has

Bug#671730: /etc/lsb-base is there. Do mv /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh /etc/lsb-base/logging.sh

2012-05-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 05/06/2012 09:17 AM, Regid Ichira wrote: > I think it is more obvious, and less cluttering /etc: I'm not sure how replacing a file with a directory creates less clutter in /etc. It would be different if there were multiple lsb-base-* files we could move in there. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Bug#670990: setup/uninst GUI setup programs not built on all archs

2012-04-30 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: epm Version: 4.2-6 Severity: normal The setup and uninst GUI programs used by epm to build wizard-like installers are limited to building on i386 and amd64 only. This is an artificial limitation, and is only needed because of the inconsistent state of libfltk and its dependencies with re

Bug#670382: synergys segfaults when losing connection with client

2012-04-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 04/23/2012 08:22 AM, Erwan David wrote: > Each time the connection between client and server is lost (eg client is > disconnected from network), server crashes with error A few questions: - I assume the info from reportbug is for the server; what's the client running? - I've uploaded 1.4.8

Bug#667930: epm: CPPFLAGS hardening flags missing

2012-04-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
severity 667930 normal forwarded 667930 http://www.epmhome.org/str.php?L38+P0+S-2+C0+I0+E0+M10+Q thanks I've forwarded part of the patch upstream, as indicated above; it's the part where CPPFLAGS is not respected. I'm not particularly interested in the patch to doc/Makefile.in, since the resultin

Bug#630411: #630411: libc6 should define /lib/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 on AMD64

2012-03-02 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 03/02/2012 12:20 PM, Didier Raboud wrote: >> François Petitjean wrote: >> In other words, on small (embedded?) systems it would be useful to be >> able to run some LSB binaries without pulling in the entire LSB core. >> Does that sound like something worth supporting to you? Perhaps we >> just

Bug#604360: Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries

2012-02-23 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 02/23/2012 09:31 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Given that LSB has deprecated the use of Qt3 libraries since its 3.2 > version, I propose to demote the relationship on libqt3-mt from Depends > to Recommends. > > This would mean that Qt3 would still be installed by lsb-desktop in > default in

Bug#616131: ITA: LSB package maintenance in Debian

2012-02-16 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 02/16/2012 12:12 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > I just noticed the worrying state of the LSB package in Debian: > > * Still in version 3.2 (released in January 2008) while 4.1 is out > since a year (coincidently today); > * RFA'd - #616131; > * "behind" Ubuntu since at least Karmic

Bug#658366: synergy: when clipboard include text copied from NX client, cursor move from server to client causes segfault

2012-02-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
The log file didn't appear to make it; I have just a blank file, as does the Debian BTS. I recently uploaded synergy 1.4.5-1 to experimental. Does using that help? (possibly with 1.4.x on the Mac as well) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#652455: doclifter does not support tables

2012-01-10 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 12/17/2011 07:41 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > it would be nice if doclifter would support tables, for > openslide-show-properties.1 it converts: Can you try the version in testing currently, and see if it works better? (That version is 2.7-1.) If it is not better, could you send a sample m

Bug#653257: Synergy bug 3063

2011-12-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: synergy Version: 1.3.8-1 On 12/25/2011 03:23 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: Hi, I hit Synergy's bug 3063 - a crash on cross-machine paste. I've pulled in one of the patches that fix it into an ubuntu bzr branch and thought I should tell you; see: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubunt

Bug#649208: synergy: 'synergys doesn't work with gnome3'

2011-12-04 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 11/29/2011 01:26 PM, Igor Soares wrote: > Here it is. > It's a simple 2 PCs side by side. Thanks for that. In the future, could you "reply all" so the information is included in the bug report, too? That way, other people can look at the bug and check things out on their own. I've reproduced

Bug#649208: synergy: 'synergys doesn't work with gnome3'

2011-11-28 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 11/18/2011 04:06 PM, Igor Bruno Pereira Soares wrote: > 'synergys' is not working with gnome3, using gnome-shell or the fallback. > The mouse pointer simply don't go from one screen to another through the > screen edge. > It works fine with other window managers (I tried KDE,Fluxbox,LXDE). > If

Bug#557220: any news about this bug 557220?

2011-11-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 11/07/2011 01:51 PM, Andres Cimmarusti wrote: Have you had a chance to test the more recent version in testing/unstable? (1.3.7-1) I have not and I would like to. However my systems are running stable and at this point I can't upgrade to testing. If synergy is a trivial package to backpor

Bug#557220: any news about this bug 557220?

2011-11-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 11/04/2011 05:55 PM, Andres Cimmarusti wrote: Are there any new developments regarding this bug? In my case, Alt+tab is not what causes it. I haven't been able to isolate what is the cause of the problem. I get many disconnections and like I said before, the server refuses to take the client

Bug#415604: new gui upstream

2011-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
The 1.4.x series of synergy includes a Qt-based setup GUI. I'm looking into uploading 1.4.4 to experimental, since it's currently advertised as "beta" by upstream, but when 1.4.x (or its successor) finally makes it into unstable, I'll close this bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-

Bug#421512: tracked upstream

2011-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
forwarded 421512 http://synergy-foss.org/pm/issues/13 thanks I believe this feature is being implemented upstream; the above bug is being used to track it. There are some notes about implementing this as an add-on/optional feature due to possible legal issues; anyone with experience in this m

Bug#321055: new upstream bug

2011-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
forwarded 321055 http://synergy-foss.org/pm/issues/20 thanks Upstream has changed hands, and this bug's new home upstream appears to be the link above. The SourceForge bug appears to have been imported, then closed as too old. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debi

Bug#446061: new upstream bug

2011-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
forwarded 446061 http://synergy-foss.org/pm/issues/72 thanks There have been some project shuffles, and upstream is no longer using SourceForge. The original bug(s) have been marked invalid, but the duplicate filed above now seems to be the proper upstream bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#449255: Testing with recent synergy

2011-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
If anyone is still having this problem, can they test with a more recent version? We're up to 1.3.6 as of this moment, with 1.3.7 on the way. Quite a few fixes have been made since the squeeze version. If anyone has trouble getting this running on stable, please let me know. -- To UNSUBSCRI

Bug#534239: Any better?

2011-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
Have you had this problem recently? There's some indication that this bug may have been fixed with newer xcb versions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#642039: Downgrading

2011-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
severity 642039 normal thanks We've transmitted some logs. At this point, I'm not convinced that there isn't some issue with the X server or video driver here, and I can't reproduce the problem. So I'm dropping the severity to normal. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@l

Bug#596831: Wishlist item

2011-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
severity 596831 wishlist thanks Setting up a Synergy configuration via debconf will be a lot of work, and I'm definitely not convinced it's needed. And without such configuration, there's no way it would be appropriate to add Synergy to the X configuration. Feel free to provide a set of pat

Bug#642039: speed is an issue

2011-09-19 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 09/19/2011 06:51 PM, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote: I'd switch to a different window manager if I could find one that switches between virtual desktops when I hit the edge of the current desktop. In fact no others seem to allow virtual desktops inside a workspace, or perhaps I'm reading the documentat

Bug#642039: speed is an issue

2011-09-19 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 09/19/2011 04:01 PM, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote: I should mention that in each case when there was a crash, I moved the mouse very rapidly from one screen to the other. Thanks for all the testing; it's very helpful. When you move the mouse rapidly between screens, does it crash every time? If

Bug#642039: synergy: switch to another computer causes immediate gdm restart

2011-09-18 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 09/18/2011 04:34 PM, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote: I have synergy server running on Linux, and a synergy client running on the Mac. Both client and server run at 1.3.6. When I move my cursor from the Linux to the Mac, from time to time gdm will immediately halt and restart. This makes using syslog c

Bug#624366: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#624366: Bug#624366: Bug#624366: Hello?

2011-09-10 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/26/2011 02:48 PM, Jeff Licquia wrote: As it turns out, I find myself serving a printer from squeeze, and with a Window 7 VM I haven't set up printing for. I'll try to get some time to try setting up printing. And I've now done this successfully, with no issues. If you&#

Bug#624366: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#624366: Bug#624366: Bug#624366: Hello?

2011-08-26 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/26/2011 02:20 PM, Chris wrote: Have you tried to replicate what I'm talking about here though? It was pretty easily replicable with a stock install. I have been following well documented materials in what I'm doing regarding setting up cups with raw print queues. I was not doing anything st

Bug#624366: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#624366: Bug#624366: Hello?

2011-08-26 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/26/2011 12:54 PM, Chris wrote: I did tell cupsd that everyone is authorized to print. I opened it up to all computers on the network. It didn't matter who sent the job, if I used raw queues, it would not go through. It would seem that cupsd doesn't agree, if the log posted to the bug is

Bug#624366: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#624366: Hello?

2011-08-26 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/25/2011 04:13 PM, Chris wrote: This is a pretty major issue, why hasn't anyone acknowledged this yet? It has been 4 months. Raw printing is integral to print serving for print serving to windows boxes... I took a look at the bug. The biggest problem, it appears, is here: D [27/Apr/2011:

Bug#638358: synergys causes hover/focus issues with gnome-panel

2011-08-22 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 08/18/2011 04:09 PM, Andres Cimmarusti wrote: The conclusion seems to be that gtk+ needs to be rebuilt using the patch attached to comment #21. Though only one user has reported back with success, but a price... The patch makes me nervous; passing on GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS looks to me (from my

Bug#620870: FHS update regarding this issue

2011-05-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
FWIW, the LSB workgroup is working on an update to the FHS, and this issue is one of the primary motivations for the update. The FHS bug linked above is where we are coordinating our work. In addition, see the fhs-discuss thread here: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/fhs-discuss/

Bug#620026: synergy: Mouse stuck on left edge of client computer

2011-03-29 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 03/29/2011 07:13 AM, Sam Morris wrote: When I move the mouse off the left edge of the server (leela)'s, it warps to the left edge of jeffry (the client)'s screen and stays there. There is no way to move it back. Moving the mouse up and down does result in vertical motion in the mouse cursor,

Bug#554803: Additional notes on FTBFS

2011-02-20 Thread Jeff Licquia
The proper fix for the problem, IMHO, is to simply Build-Depend on libxpm-dev, since the call to XCreateBitmapFromData is only used if libXpm is not detected by configure. My Debian upload fixes the problem in this way. Nevertheless, there is a bug in the fallback code; if the intent is to s

Bug#552568: getting synergy-plus into Debian

2010-12-12 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 10/08/2010 08:25 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Please don't upload to unstable during the freeze and use experimental instead. 1.3.4-1 is now in experimental. Sorry for taking so long, everyone. I'll close this bug when the unstable upload is done (after squeeze). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#529630: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#529630: cups-bsd contains incorrect dependency fields

2009-05-20 Thread Jeff Licquia
j t wrote: I think that this is incorrect: I don't think that cups-bsd should recommend cups, although I am not sure about the depends on debconf and update-inetd. The cups-bsd package contains a lpd server which can accept jobs via the lpd protocol and send them to cupsd. Both debconf and up

Bug#527975: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#527975: Lost ability to start OpenVPN connection after upgrade

2009-05-11 Thread Jeff Licquia
Michael Biebl wrote: Have you actually read the bug report? Your proposed patch opens a security hole and doesn't really fix the issue (it's a very ugly and bad workaround) Thought I had, but obviously I missed that part. The problem you run into only happens when you are logged in as root, w

Bug#527975: Lost ability to start OpenVPN connection after upgrade

2009-05-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: network-manager-openvpn Version: 0.7.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch After upgrading from the previous version of the package in squeeze to the current version, I was unable to start the OpenVPN connection I use to secure my wireless network. Looking in /var/log/syslog revealed this:

Bug#505573: [Fwd: Re: Synergy keypress bug]

2009-04-23 Thread Jeff Licquia
--- Begin Message --- Hi Jeff, yep exactly that's the case, I didn't think about that... On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:04:23PM -0400, Jeff Licquia wrote: > There have been some reports of issues with 32-to-64-bit interaction. > Are you using "mixed word size" platforms?

Bug#505573: Synergy keypress bug

2009-04-23 Thread Jeff Licquia
Christoph Blank wrote: Hi, I came across this bug when using synergy in debian unstable: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505573 Is there any information about this? The report seems to be quite old, and the bug still exists. Greetings, Christoph There have been some reports

Bug#449255: Synergy SegFault Patch

2009-04-13 Thread Jeff Licquia
tags 449255 + patch thanks Alex wrote: I made a patch that will fix a bug that causes a segmentation fault in synergys. The problem occurs when a hotkey is used to switch. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=449255 Thanks. I've forwarded the patch to the bug, so I can keep track

Bug#449255: [Fwd: Synergy SegFault Patch]

2009-04-13 Thread Jeff Licquia
--- Begin Message --- Hello, I saw your name posted as the maintainer for synergy in debian. I'm not sure if synergy is actively maintained (latest release is 2006), so I figured you might be the best person to send this to: I made a patch that will fix a bug that causes a segmentation fault in

Bug#522135: ITP: python-pip -- Alternative Python package installer

2009-03-31 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeff Licquia * Package name: python-pip Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Ian Bicking * URL : http://pip.openplans.org/ * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: Python Description : Alternative Python package

Bug#507896: epm: does not allows non-alphanum characters in product names

2009-03-30 Thread Jeff Licquia
Hi! Sorry for taking so long to reply. I wasn't able to find out more information about the patch. Has this patch been introduced upstream? What was the response? What problem is it trying to solve? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#504322: htmldoc: Incorrect package homepage

2008-11-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: Please change the package homepage to http://www.htmldoc.org/. That's a bit confusing that it is not quite the same as http://htmldoc.org/ Thanks! It seems to work for me. Are you experiencing any problems with the original URL? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#501257: ITA: cvsps -- Tool to generate CVS patch set information

2008-10-26 Thread Jeff Licquia
retitle 501257 ITA: cvsps -- Tool to generate CVS patch set information owner 501257 Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thanks I think I'll adopt this package, as it's still important for people converting their CVS repositories to other version control systems. I'm also i

Bug#503168: virtualenv bin/activate: PYTHONPATH

2008-10-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
Adrian von Bidder wrote: > My mistake. I moved the environment and didn't realise that the problem > I've been having stems from having the old absolute path inside > bin/activate and not from not having PYTHONPATH. > > So the proper solution [for me] would be to look at $0 and pwd and figure

Bug#503168: virtualenv bin/activate: PYTHONPATH

2008-10-23 Thread Jeff Licquia
Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Shouldn't PYTHONPATH be set inside a virtual environment to allow easy > installation of local modules? I don't think so. Wouldn't that break if the user sets PYTHONPATH manually? It shouldn't be necessary, either. I just tested installing new local modules in a virt

Bug#464090: git repo does not appear to be accessible

2008-10-22 Thread Jeff Licquia
Jeff Licquia wrote: > Not being a git expert, I'm not sure how to fix this, but at the moment > it doesn't appear possible to get a hold of those patches. Never mind. I educated myself. FWIW, after the clone attempt, you have to do something like this in the partially clone

Bug#464090: git repo does not appear to be accessible

2008-10-21 Thread Jeff Licquia
When I try to clone the git repository mentioned on the cvsps page, I get this error: error: Couldn't get http://ydirson.free.fr/soft/git/cvsps.git/HEAD for HEAD The requested URL returned error: 404 And later: warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout. Not being a git

Bug#502638: oo.o packages don't depend on ttf-bitstream-vera for ui font

2008-10-18 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1:2.4.1-11 Severity: normal If the Bitstream Vera fonts (package ttf-bitstream-vera) are not installed, OpenOffice.org uses ugly fonts for the UI. Worse, the font metrics are way off, resulting in huge drop-downs, text boxes, menus, etc. Most of the toolbars a

Bug#502428: epm: double free or corruption

2008-10-16 Thread Jeff Licquia
Also, if you see this, can you update your email address, so I can send replies to you? My last message bounced: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail.dev.drweb.com[84.204.76.120] said: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to

Bug#502428: epm: double free or corruption

2008-10-16 Thread Jeff Licquia
Al Nikolov wrote: > $ epm -f rpm package > *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0xb7fa9090 *** > Packaging failed! Can you send me your "package.list", and the files you have listed there? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Bug#497056: lsb-base: /lib/lsb/init-functions NON-DSFG Licence ?

2008-08-29 Thread Jeff Licquia
root wrote: Please investigate if files included in lsb-base conform to DFSG. A lincense change to GPL would be better suited for Debian. I'm confused. The license posted looks like a straight 3-clause BSD license to me, which is surely DFSG-free. What problems do you have with it? --

Bug#495498: xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion `((int) ((xcb_req) - (dpy->request)) >= 0)' failed.

2008-08-19 Thread Jeff Licquia
Carlo Wood wrote: Any progress yet? Things I can test? Nope, sorry. I probably won't have much to report for a while; day job interferes. I noticed that you are using threads in synergys. The assertion that we run into can be caused if multiple threads do calls to GUI calls (X, Xt). All s

Bug#495498: xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion `((int) ((xcb_req) - (dpy->request)) >= 0)' failed.

2008-08-18 Thread Jeff Licquia
Carlo Wood wrote: Note that I already am running/testing synergy 1.3.1-4. But no, I only have debian lenny/sid on both machines. I could run synergys in an etch chroot though, 64bit or 32bit. The only difference would be the versions of the libraries it links with. That's exactly what I'm want

Bug#495498: xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion `((int) ((xcb_req) - (dpy->request)) >= 0)' failed.

2008-08-18 Thread Jeff Licquia
Carlo Wood wrote: Please ask if you need more info. Those are helpful, but please be sure to CC the bug, so there's a record that anyone can see and comment on. I've asked the others, but it's worth asking you: do you have the ability to test synergys from 1.3.1-4 on etch? -- To UNSUBSC

Bug#495498: xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion `((int) ((xcb_req) - (dpy->request)) >= 0)' failed.

2008-08-17 Thread Jeff Licquia
Carlo Wood wrote: Since my last apt-get update/upgrade, synergys crashes more often than before. It now crashes with the output: ... DEBUG1: CClientProxy1_0.cpp,253: send enter to "taryn", 0,881 3 DEBUG1: CServer.cpp,780: try to leave "taryn" on left INFO: CServer.cpp,447: switch from "tary

Bug#494368: synergy: Synergy quits with assertion failure.

2008-08-12 Thread Jeff Licquia
Marc Oscar Singer wrote: Jeff Licquia wrote: Do you have any etch boxes you could test for this with? It may be too much to ask, I know, to run etch for a few days. :-) what test do you want run? Just try to duplicate the crash you're seeing when running synergys under etch.

Bug#494368: synergy: Synergy quits with assertion failure.

2008-08-11 Thread Jeff Licquia
Marc Oscar Singer wrote: Jeff Licquia wrote: Looks similar to me; I think I'll end up merging them. As you wish. The assert makes it very debug-able. IMHO, this looks like memory corruption. I haven't run with MALLOC_CHECK_ (IIRC) just to see if the libc can tell us something ab

Bug#494368: synergy: Synergy quits with assertion failure.

2008-08-11 Thread Jeff Licquia
Marc Singer wrote: Started synergys with the following command line: synergys -f -d INFO After running for a couple of days, it reported an assertion failure on the console. synergys: ../../src/xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion `((int)((xcb_req) - (dpy->request)) >= 0)' failed. T

Bug#493706: synergys dumps core frequently

2008-08-05 Thread Jeff Licquia
Gregoire Banderet wrote: XFCE, nothing special. The PC where synergys is running has a multi-head GFX card but I use only one output. Thanks. My second monitor is connected to a Windows PC (where synergyc 1.3.1) is running. I had no problem during 3 years with the same setup but Debian Etch

Bug#493706: synergys dumps core frequently

2008-08-04 Thread Jeff Licquia
Gregoire Banderet wrote: Package: synergy Version: 1.3.1-4 Severity: important Output when run with --no-daemon: DEBUG: CXWindowsClipboard.cpp,555: added format 2 for target text/html (508) (360 bytes) DEBUG: CXWindowsClipboard.cpp,555: added format 0 for target UTF8_STRING (243) (22 bytes

Bug#489691: synergy: ::leave() should allow (configurable) hiding of cursor

2008-07-14 Thread Jeff Licquia
supaplex wrote: Please hide the cursor on a client when focus leaves that window. Unhide the cursor when it enters, or when direct input on the client is received. Hi! Sorry for the late reply; just got back from vacation. I'm a little confused about what the problem is: - Synergy already d

  1   2   >