Package: logwatch
Version: 7.5.5-1
Severity: normal
Running logwatch with the dhcpd service doesn't result in any output despite
there being lots of dhcpd log lines. I've spent a little while trying to
understand how dhcpd parsing is supposed to work, but I'm not quickly able to
figure out
a problem with the peer setup. Perhaps something along the
lines of Jan 2 16:27:00 artemis dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from
00:24:14:2e:15:19 via 134.173.131.254: client member of class denied
access to pool or something like that would be helpful.
--
Thank You
Jefferson Cowart
Network and Systems Administrator
Package: dhcp3-server
Version: 3.1.1-6+lenny3
Severity: normal
I have a pair of servers running the dhcp3-server package using the failover
funcationality. Periodically I get log entries like the following:
Jan 2 16:27:00 artemis dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:24:14:2e:15:19 via
134.173.131.254:
, [], NULL, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [], 8) = 0
read(0, , 1) = 0
exit_group(0) = ?
Process 13351 detached
--
Thank You
Jefferson Cowart
Network and Systems Administrator
Libraries Information Technology
-Original Message
in '$@'
+ test t = t
+ case $file in
+ file=./pdficon
+ test '!' -f ./pdficon
+ test -r ./pdficon
+ echo ldd: 'error: you do not have read permission for' '`./pdficon'\'''
ldd: error: you do not have read permission for `./pdficon'
+ result=1
+ exit 1
--
Thank You
Jefferson Cowart
Network and Systems
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13etch7
Severity: normal
ldd doesn't work properly with ACLs. As you can see below I have read access to
the pdficon file. However ldd insists I
don't.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/Content4.3/bin$ ldd pdficon
ldd: error: you do not have
Package: libapache-htpasswd-perl
Version: 1.8-0.1
Severity: normal
Starting with version 1.7 this module has support for checking SHA1
passwords. It would be nice if it would let me write SHA1 passwords.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500,
Package: clamav-freshclam
Version: 0.93.1.dfsg-volatile1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
With the update to clamav 0.93, the file extension that is used to store
the database files on disk changed. Currently the following line exists
in the /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/clamav-freshclam file:
Package: clamav-freshclam
Version: 0.91.1-1~volatile1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
At some point freshclam started logging lines like this:
Jul 22 18:38:21 p450 freshclam[24475]: Downloading daily-3737.cdiff
[100%]
Here is a rule that supresses those messages from logcheck:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}
. They then seem to level off. Perhaps there is a memory leak
somewhere?
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: clamav-freshclam
Version: 0.90.1-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The current clamav-freshclam package includes the following line in the
logcheck ignore file:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ freshclam\[[0-9]+\]:
(daily|main)\.cvd (is up to date|updated) \(version: [0-9]+, sigs:
haven't needed to make any modifications to any of those. (So either
they are fine or postfix hasn't thrown that message.)
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix
I just tried to build and use this with apache2.2. It was able to build,
but I got a 500 server error when trying to access the page. (I got the
error independent of if I entered the proper username/password.)
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.52
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
At least one of the postfix logcheck ignore lines is missing the
extended dsn. I had to modify the following one. There may be others.
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: NOQUEUE:
reject:
=sent \(250 [0-9.]+ Ok(,
id=[-0-9]+, from MTA(\([^[:space:]]+\))?: 250 ([0-9.]+ )?Ok: queued as
[0-9A-F]+|, discarded, UBE, id=[-0-9]+|, DSN sent \(.+\))?$
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
: . -2 - AWL,BAYES_00,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NO_RELAYS
scantime=13.2,size=1157,user=jeff,uid=110,required_score=5.0,rhost=P450,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=59428,mid=[EMAIL PROTECTED],bayes=5.55111512312578e-17,autolearn=ham
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.51
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The sarge version of logcheck-database has a few violations.ignore
entries for postfix that appear to be missing in etch. Scanning the
changelogs and related bug reports I don't see a reason that they
disappeared. These
Package: fail2ban
Version: 0.7.5-2
Severity: normal
By default the postfix log looks at /var/log/postfix.log. By default
postfix logs to /var/log/mail.log. (The other two mail server entries properly
look at /var/log/mail.log.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
=SMTP helo=indio
Thus I'd say that regex is proper.
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fail2ban
Severity: wishlist
I've been having problems with some abusive clients running dictionary
attacks against my mail servers for a few years. It would be nice if
fail2ban had support for postfix and could automatically ban these IPs.
I've included a sample line below:
Jul 10
Package: owl-dms
Version: 0.90-1
Severity: normal
There are two copies of owl.php shipped in this package. Onc ends up in
/etc/owl-dms. Another ends up in /usr/share/owl-dms/config. It looks
like owl is sometimes reading the latter. I suspect the latter should
simply be a symlink to the former.
for the help.
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just realized that the one in /etc/owl-dms is actually called
config.php. In any case it looks very similar to the other file.
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
:
$default-owl_root_url = /owl-dms;
This is part of my confusion here. We have the same parameter in both
places, and it appears that I have to actually modify the file in
/usr/share/owl-dms to get the desired settings.
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED
will has a problem.
Regards
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: owl-dms
Severity: wishlist
I would like to use the owl-dms package on a sarge system. At the moment
the only thing that prevents me from doing so is the fact that it
depends on a version of php4 newer than what is in sarge. The upstream
website seems to say that it would work with the
life substantially easier for people that want to run the package on sarge.)
Regards
JOse Carlos
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reopen 349943
I was running the stock Debian sarge 2.6 kernel. The documentation in sarge
says that option exists. If it doesn't (which appears to be the case) there
should be a note in the docs saying you need at least kernel 2.6.x.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: iptables
Version: 1.2.11-10
Severity: normal
The CONNMARK and ROUTE targets for the mangle table don't appear to
work. I have the iptable_mangle module loaded, but when I try to add a
rule using that target I get an error:
jcc02003-1:/home/jeff# /sbin/iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING
I just installed 2.6.14 (from backports) and it appears that all the
problems are fixed. I would close this bug, but I don't know how to do
it properly so the version tracking and such works.
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.0a-1bpo1
Severity: minor
I've been getting the above error message with some frequency in my
spamassassin logs. It appears that it usually happens right after the
master spamassassin process cleans up a child process. I've pasted 2
examples below. Let me know if
submitter 344953 !
--
Fixing my submitter e-mail address.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.0a-1bpo1
Severity: minor
The logcheck files in spamassassin need a few minor tweaks.
1. The following rules appear to be out of date and don't match anything
anymore:
a)^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]:( spamd:)? server hit by
SIGCHLD$
I just wanted to note that this patch appeared to work for me. If
someone that is a DD could actually package it that would be great.
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
tags 333793 +fixed-upstream +patch
I also got bit by this one and I just wanted to record that the patch
upstream (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3310)
appears to apply cleanly against 3.1.0a-1bpo1 (from backports.org).
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
Package: fail2ban
Version: 0.5.4-7
Severity: minor
There is a minor race condition in the default iptables rules in
fwstart. Right now it creates the new chain, creates a rule at the start
of INPUT to the new chain, and then puts a rule in the new chain with a
result of RETURN. It should instead,
I was just wondering what the status of this bug is? Do the current kernels
in Sid fix this?
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the record this bug appears to have gone away when I upgraded the
rest of my system to Sarge. Don't know what exactly fixed it, but it is
now showing up in syslog as spamd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Sorry this took so long for me to get. The person I was hoping was
going to be able to get it for me was on vacation for a while and then I
forgot about it. In any case below is what I get when trying to boot
2.4.27.)
hda3: bad access: block=4, count=4
end_request: I/O error, dev 03:03
I'd just like to add that I'd also really like to see this. Just trying to
manage a sudoers file across 10 systems is getting to be a pain. If I could
centralize it that would be very very nice.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
I am not physically in front of the system at the moment and I just
discovered the person I was going to ask to record the exact error message
and pass it on to me is away for a few days. As such it might take me a
little longer to get you the exact error sorry.
Thanks
Jefferson
an upgrade on 2.6.8 I
have some other kernel around to fall back on.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Horms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 03:09
To: Jefferson Cowart; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc
Version: 2.4.27-10
Severity: important
I installed kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc on my system. After rebooting
the system failed to boot with a kernel panic and something about
killing init. (Sorry I don't remember the exact error, but it is the
kind of error
Package: analog
Version: 2:5.32-13
Severity: important
Tags: sarge
Upgrading from the woody version of analog to the version in sarge
fails:
# aptitude install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading
-freshclam to tell it not to notify clamd.)
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Thilo Pfennig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 02:09
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#308300: clamav-freshclam: freshclam
Now that .84-2 is in sarge is a -3 upload expected anytime soon? As the
logcheck entries for clamav are quite good it would be nice to see this
little bug fixed (preferably for sarge).
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
package (2.2.2-0|1) don't generate a postfix-tls package, I would
presume that tls support is now in the main package.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Cedric Blancher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 02:43
problems, that might fix this problem.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Lefevre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 15:20
To: Jefferson Cowart
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#301587: apt: Odd
I thought the freeze at this point was on ABI changes? I would assume this
doesn't change the ABI and thus wouldn't be as big of a problem.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Horms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 11
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: maximilian attems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 07:34
To: Jefferson Cowart
Cc: 'Daniel Ritz'; 'Dominik Brodowski';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#270376: PCMCIA Nic
into the Debian kernel
packages.
Thanks to everyone for their help.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: maximilian attems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 05:48
To: Jefferson Cowart
Cc: 'Daniel Ritz'; 'Dominik
to track the status of this in
sarge. (Sorry to handle this in a non-standard way, but I believe the
thread below explains why this is needed.)
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Gran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday
Looks like the patch fixed the problem. What are the chances of getting this
included in sarge?
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: maximilian attems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 12:07
To: Jefferson Cowart
one).
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: maximilian attems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 12:07
To: Jefferson Cowart
Cc: 'Daniel Ritz'; 'Dominik Brodowski';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Thanks for the response.
maximilian attems - Let me know when the kernel is built and I'll go ahead
and try that.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: maximilian attems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 16:26
*
080 7020 2844 3822 0ba4
090 82c0 6062
0a0 0001 7e21 0080 0809 001e
0b0
*
100
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message
help to resolve that issue.
i volountary test build kernels for bug reporter with proposed patches.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
(For reference my primary card is a 3C574. My secondary is a 3C589.)
..
(I put that card into a Windows XP laptop and it worked fine there so
Daniel Ritz wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2005 19:52, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
Seems to be the IRQ storm issue again... Daniel, IIRC you worked on that
issue before: do you have an idea on how to write a proper patch for this
issue?
nope it looks more like something else. looking at the debian bug
-Original Message-
From: maximilian attems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
I'm downloading and testing all 3 now.
The short version is none of the 3 worked (same problem as
what I've already
seen on 2.6.6-10. Further details, dmsg, etc
I'm downloading and testing all 3 now.
The short version is none of the 3 worked (same problem as what I've already
seen on 2.6.6-10. Further details, dmsg, etc. below.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: maximilian attems [mailto
have a programmable solution at the moment.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Matt Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 20:04
To: Jefferson Cowart; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#301587: apt: Odd
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc-pmac
Version: 2.4.27-1
Severity: minor
I'm running the 2.4.27 kernel image from sarge on my debian woody
system. For the most part it is working properly, however I'm getting
odd error messages in my system log from dhcpd. I see error messages
similar to the
Package: clamav-freshclam
Version: 0.83-3
Severity: wishlist
I get the following lines in my hourly logcheck e-mail. They should
probably be added the default ignore file.
freshclam: --
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT
tags 299469 +security
Thanks
As this bug can lead to a DOS condition I'm tagging it as a security bug. (I
got bit by this one this morning when this bug was created with the bad
message attached.)
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
it appears
that this was due to clamd consuming all the CPU so other messages were not
able to be scanned.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Gran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 18:48
To: Jefferson Cowart
freshclam[2484]:
--
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Gran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 19:08
To: Jefferson Cowart; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian BTS control
Subject
freshclam\[[0-9]+\]: ClamAV update process started at
freshclam\[[0-9]+\]: Received signal 14, wake up
freshclam\[[0-9]+\]: (daily|main).cvd is up to date
I think you just need to add a 4th line to that to ignore the line of -'s.
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-newpmac
Version: 2.4.18-1woody5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
When I run /etc/init.d/networking restart on my system the network dies.
It appears to come up properly - the interface is up and configured, the
routing tables appear proper,
would be happy to install the 2.6.8 kernel from sarge.
(However I don't want to upgrade the entire machine to sarge.)
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 01:34
.
Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 07:51:54AM -0800, Jefferson Cowart wrote:
tags 295046 + woody
thanks
(Sorry meant to tag this woody originally.)
I've been trying to install 2.6 from sarge, but have been running into some
problems. I haven't been able to find PowerPC binary debs of
module
The machine I'm running this on is an old Cyrix 233 (or maybe 266). As such
I really don't want to compile my own kernel as in my experience that takes
a few days. Any chance you could provide an appropriate kernel?
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Any update on this?
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: maximilian attems [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 07:04
To: Jefferson Cowart
Subject: Re: PCMCIA Nic stops working after upgrading to 2.6.6/7/8
10, hw_addr 00:50:DA:E4:D2:CC.
ASIC rev 10, 64K FIFO split 1:1 Rx:Tx, autoselect MII interface.
eth0: found link beat
eth0: autonegotiation complete: 100baseT-FD selected
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: maximilian attems [mailto
Package: honeyd
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: normal
The section below has been copied out of the README.Debian file that ships with
honeyd. It appears to be inconsistent. The first section says the default
configuration in debian uses the honeyd user. The next section says that it
runs as
downloads clamav
virus databases from the Internet
# locate clam|grep logch
#
Thanks
Jefferson Cowart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: clamav-freshclam
Version: 0.80-6.backports.org.1
Severity: normal
This may be related to 274255 or 274646, but I'm not sure so I'll report
it seperately and I'll let you merge as appropriate.
This afternoon I noticed that one of my servers was not putting stuff
into syslog about having
76 matches
Mail list logo
