Hi,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:59:44PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Rhonda, Otto, Gregor, please have a glance at
> http://www.escape.de/~tolot/mutt/t-prot/downloads/t-prot-3.3-WIP.tar.gz
> and see if I did miss something. Otherwise, a release will follow
> sometime around
Hi again,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:34:22PM +0100, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> -c1 also is expected to work. That's the way Getopt::Long handles
> bundling of options and values when using short options. The equal sign
> can only be used in the long variant.
Ah, ok. Hm. Well.
> I think t
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:58:42PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:38:22 +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
>
> > That said, it's Getopt::Long that does not behave correctly. -c=1 should
> > be fine with them AFAICS, so the right thing sh
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:18:10PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > Yes. Using -c1 works as well at my Debian testing machine. T-prot's
> > command line processing is all handled by Getopt::Long, so I guess
> > we're stuck here. I'm sorry
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#780779: option "merge multiple blank lines to n lines" not
configurable as documented
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <20150319104536.3605.13775.report...@piccione.ffm.andrena.de>
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:45:36AM +0100, Carsten Otto wrote:
> The option "-c", docum
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 10:36:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > message run through a filter before it's displayed. If you use such a
> > program
> > we'd be interested if you could send in your setup.
>
> (Did anybody ever do this?)
Yes, as pointed out in <20120713120708.gg12.
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:45:34AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
> The package description for t-prot has a couple of typos and language
> issues. While fixing them I've reshuffled it quite a bit.
Thanks for reviewing. Since the package description is a Debian issue,
I will leave any
Hello,
On 08 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
> It is my understanding that -Mmutt should inhibit the exit code for
> --max-lines. Since the --max-lines handling changed since 2.8.1 (it
> moved out of process_msg(), the return code for overlong messages
> will be non-zero even if -Mmutt is pas
Hi,
On 15 Oct 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le dim 15 octobre 2006 21:25, Jochen Striepe a écrit :
> > Releasing the hold of course instantly solved the problem. I'm under
> > the strong impression that apt-listchanges should require an apt
> > version where libap
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.70
Severity: important
Hi,
having had apt (partly accidential) on hold since apt version 0.5.14, for
quite some time apt-listchanges could not load libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.11
on my system and thus failed on program start.
Releasing the hold of course insta
Hi,
On 21 Jun 2006, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> P.S.: Please ignore Jochen on this, he's "just" upstream and doesn't
>need to share the point of view I have on using it within Debian.
*nods*
It's just that the performance issue is not mentioned explicitely in the
documentation, and thus perh
Hi,
On 20 Jun 2006, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> currently the global activation of t-prot in /etc/Muttrc.t-prot uses the
> examples/footers directory,
Oops.
> however that is not apropriate for
> configuration files. t-prot should install all or some of these example
> footers into /etc/t-prot
Hi,
On 21 May 2006, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> I think t-prot shouldn't stop processing after finding the last
> signature of a mail. On debian-lists you often get 2 signatures, one
> from the OP and the list-signature, however t-prot only hides the
> list-signature.
Sorry, but trying several m
Hello,
On 20 May 2006, Glyn Kennington wrote:
> I think the problem is the following, at /usr/bin/t-prot line 715 after
> the t-prot-r1.243-mutt157.diff patch has been applied:
>
> $$lines[$x] !~
> /^(?:\e[^\a]+\a)?(?:\Q$mutt_ssloutstart\E)/o)) {
>
> This equates to true if the given
close 301653
thanks
On 05 Apr 2005, gregor herrmann wrote:
> IMO including the patch in sarge would be great because the fix for
> the flickering screen is a real improvement in usability.
The patch is included in the freshly uploaded t-prot Debian package,
version 1.99.1+2.0-rc2-0.sarge.1 (sorry
Hello,
On 27 Mar 2005, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Some suggestions for improving t-prot.sl:
>
> * Assigning ESC-1 and ESC-0 (for de/activating t-prot filtering in slrn) is
> IMO no good idea because slrn often uses these shortcuts as prefix
> arguments. I use ESC-6 und ESC-7 because the see
16 matches
Mail list logo
