Package: libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx
Version: 340.96
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
I prefere a testing Debian installation for personal convenience but my nvidia card (Quadro FX 580) is not any more
supported by the new driver > 352.79 also I foreseen to install the
(and dependencies) is now
successful :)
On 02/11/2012 09:43 PM, Joel Soete wrote:
Hello φ-coder,
Sorry for so late reaction, but I would like to be sure that I well understand.
# fdisk /dev/sda
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 300.1 GB, 300067970560 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track
Hello φ-coder,
Sorry for so late reaction, but I would like to be sure that I well understand.
# fdisk /dev/sda
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 300.1 GB, 300067970560 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 36481 cylinders, total 586070255 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Hello all,
I use to compile my custom kernel (for my hw) which I build with make-kpkg.
I also have to install nvidia-kernel-dkms (the unstable 280.13-1) and the
latest virtualbox-4.1 4.1.2.
All was working fine until yesterday when I build the latest linux kernel 3.0.3 for mu debian testing
. With dkms 2.2, I still have to find why it doesn't run 'auto installation service' for this kernel?
J.
On 08/21/2011 02:55 PM, Joel Soete wrote:
Hello all,
I use to compile my custom kernel (for my hw) which I build with make-kpkg.
I also have to install nvidia-kernel-dkms (the unstable
Hello Colin,
On 06/13/2011 05:19 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 03:53:41PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote:
I just forgot to mention that after this failure of installation,
when I try to boot from this master disk, grub fall in 'rescue' mode
after error message: error: symbol
Hello Colin,
On 06/13/2011 05:22 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 03:23:42PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote:
But this operation failed on 64bit env:
[snip]
Setting up grub-common (1.99-6) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/grub.d/10_linux ...
Installing new version
Hello all,
I just forgot to mention that after this failure of installation, when I try to boot from this master disk, grub fall in
'rescue' mode after error message: error: symbol not found 'grub_divmod64_full'.
I also figure out that previous operational release was the '1.99~rc1-13' but
Deqr maintainer,
Here is what I have to change in the module src to make it works:
diff -Naur nvidia-kernel.orig/conftest.h nvidia-kernel/conftest.h
--- nvidia-kernel.orig/conftest.h 2010-03-20 16:21:35.0 +
+++ nvidia-kernel/conftest.h2010-03-20 19:12:10.0 +
@@
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 195.36.15-jso0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: sid
Hello,
Just to mentionned that a new release (195.36.15) is available.
Well, it failed to build from the source pkg but nothing difficult to fix (I
just don't know where to put it to build a usable debian pkg?)
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98~20091210-1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello dear grub2 maintainers,
I just buy a week ago a new home PC with help to a kind supplier.
This box is equipped with an quad-core Intel i7:
# cat /proc/cpuinfo | more
processor
Package: arno-iptables-firewall
Version: 1.9.0.b-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hello Michael,
After the update of your new kind iptables firewall, internal network
connections failed :( with following messages:
+ /sbin/iptables -A MAC_FILTER -m mac --mac-source '00:14:22:f9:53:a2
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.14
Severity: wishlist
Hello all,
From time to time /etc/cron.daily/apt failed just because it lakes of free
space in my 'archives' fs.
And most of the time, it's enough to run manually apt-get autoclean to free
enough space to launch again
/etc/cron.daily/apt
Hello Aurelien,
severity 473725 wishlist
thanks
No pb ;)
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 09:46:21AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
May I ask you the favour to compile a new deb package based on this new
upstream release (1.3.14 on http://yaboot.ozlabs.org/)?
Please note that I am currently
Package: yaboot
Version: 1.3.13a-1
Severity: important
Hello all,
May I ask you the favour to compile a new deb package based on this new
upstream release (1.3.14 on http://yaboot.ozlabs.org/)?
According to git Changelog, it's possible that it fixes the install issue of
the debian-4.0r3 I
Hello,
Sorry but release 3.3-pre11-3 doesn't fix this pb to me ;-(
J.
---
Pack Scarlet One, ADSL 6 Mbps + Telephonie, a partir de EUR 29,95...
http://www.scarlet.be/
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#420735: Please include libploticus API (i.e. libploticus.a),
which was filed against the ploticus package.
It has been closed by Colin Tuckley [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#420735: Please include libploticus API (i.e. libploticus.a),
which was filed against the ploticus package.
It has been closed by Colin Tuckley [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
Package: liferea
Version: 1.2.7-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
It seems that your 1.2.7 debian pakage in experimental works fine, why isn't it
not yet push in unstable/testing?
It would be great so that in experimental you could keep the upstream unstable?
Thanks in advance,
Joel
--
Vincent,
too cool ;-)
Thanks a lot,
Joel
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#418190: tioga 1.5 is out,
which was filed against the tioga package.
It has been closed by Vincent Fourmond [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Their explanation is
Package: ploticus
Version: 2.33-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello Colin,
According to ploticus doc:
http://ploticus.sourceforge.net/doc/api.html, it's possible to compile
a 'libploticus API' (i.e. libploticus.a). It would be interesting to
included in a package. (personaly I am interested in because
Hello Daigo,
In ruby's manpages (release 1.8.6-1), I finaly found the right way to work
with debian way gem pkg are installed:
for the rubicus gem:
RUBYLIB=/var/lib/gems/1.8/gems/rubicus-0.1.0/lib
export RUBYLIB
It seems to me hard to manage with severall lib to install.
(isn't there any means
Hi all,
Release 3.35 fixes the pb.
Thanks a lot,
Joel
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received. It is being forwarded to the package
were encountered while processing:
reportbug
I couldn't even remove it to reinstall.
Any idea?
Tia,
Joel
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
INTERFACE=text
** /root/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version 3.17
mode standard
ui text
realname Joel Soete
email [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: tioga
Version: 1.3.0
Severity: normal
Hello Vincent,
I just discover tioga and would like to learn more on my debian distro
(unstable)
but tioga release 1.5 is not yet availbale.
Tia,
Joel
PS: btw can we expect a debian package of ctioga too?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.06-3
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello all,
Some time ago, on my testing debian install, I created a vg named vg00
over a software mirror raid1 as pv for a debootstrap, as well a vg_raid5
over a sw raid5 pv for data.
All seems to
Hello Matthias,
I well read some br like this one and your related advise.
Unfortunately my 'apt-get dist-upgrade' (today 2006-06-17) still failled:
[snip]
(Reading database ... 87452 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace python-central 0.4.7 (using
Laurent Fousse wrote:
Hello,
* Joel Soete [Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 03:00:54PM +0200]:
Package: libmpfr-dev
Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hello Laurent,
As you may be already read in buildd report:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg
Package: libmpfr-dev
Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello Laurent,
As you may be already read in buildd report:
Hello all,
just want to mentioned that new stuff I discovered:
$ d4x
The program 'd4x' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)'.
(Details: serial 1614 error_code 8 request_code 72 minor_code 0)
Hello Matthias,
Personaly I don't care of gcj but well glibc and according to jda's mail
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00815.html this patch
would fix the mentioned pb for all gcc 4.x
This is well comitted upstream, I check with some script like:
svn diff --old
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:02:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
udevd[862]: get_netlink_msg: unable to receive kernel netlink message: No
buffer space available
!-- not sure about this message, but the same is shown for initramfs-tools
--
This is the reason you aren't getting /dev/sd* nodes.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:02:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
udevd[862]: get_netlink_msg: unable to receive kernel netlink message: No
buffer space available
!-- not sure about this message, but the same is shown for
initramfs-tools --
This is the reason you aren't getting /dev/sd*
Frans Pop wrote:
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.12-3
Severity: important
After a new installation on hppa, the system seemed to boot correctly, but
failed to
mount /boot and /home directories. Also the eth0 network interface was not
brought
up automatically.
If I create the initrd using
Hello Marco,
Sorry for delay but have annoying pb to access my mail ;-(
On Feb 12, Joel Soete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would just like to understand with you why this above steps ('umounting
local fs') did also 'umount /dev', as it seems to be the reason of next
trouble.
The udev
Package: udev
Version: 0.084-3
Severity: normal
Hi all,
Desperating that lvm will ever offer the 'encapsulation' of /boot in lvm like
hpux does), i am trying to install a more common lvm+raid1 boot disk with
following scheme:
boot disk will be build on raid1 + lv, i.e:
o the / (aka
Hello Sebastien,
Just to confirm an hypothesis:
fwiw, here at home, I tried exactly the same test (i.e. launch gftp
and gdmsetup from another hppa debian unstable install boxe) without
any pb???
Just a thought:
o here at home my X env is a Xfce runing on a i386 debian unstable
Package: libgtk2.0-0
Version: 2.8.9-2
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello Sebastien,
At my office, I encounter the same bad situation as describe in this br #345313
but also seems related to #321832.
(so fill free to requalify it)
I tried first to
Hello Luigi,
Luigi Gangitano wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
retitle 338783 squid: please add a boot option to clean spool
(somewhere in /etc/default)
thanks
Hi,
zapping the cache every time you reboot is not an effective choiche.
Well, as mentioned in my proposal,
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello,
I frequently noticed that:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/apt/periodic# lrt
total 2
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 1024 Oct 21 18:14 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Oct 24 09:31 .
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Dec 3 06:26 update-stamp
-rw-r--r--
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.42.3
Severity: normal
Hello dear apt maintainer,
I noticed that daily apt update was hanging:
# ps -ef | grep apt
root 15277 15260 0 07:35 ?00:00:00 /bin/sh /etc/cron.daily/apt
root 15287 15277 0 07:35 ?00:00:00 apt-get -qq update
root
Package: squid
Version: 2.5.12-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello all,
Frequently after an upgrade or simply a reboot I encounter some weird pb
to use my squid cache. I didn't analyse further because those pb was always
solved by a stop of squid,
a cleanup of the spool (rm -rf /var/spool/squid/) and a
Hello Luigi,
Sorry I do have made some mistakes with reportbug: the title was:
Couldn't it be possible to add a boot option to clean spool (somewhere in
/etc/default)?
Apologies,
Joel
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
Package: alien
Version: 8.56
Severity: normal
Hello Joey,
I build with success a rpm pkg from it's sources.
As I did with success on i386 (with same srpm), I would like to debianize it
to install it on my unstable debian hppa.
Unfortunately, it failed as follow:
# alien -d
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#338187: alien failed to debianize an rpm for parisc (aka hppa),
which was filed against the alien package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED].
[...]
We believe that the bug you
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#325889: pdsh: Upstream it exists a more recent version 2.7,
which was filed against the pdsh package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Brian Pellin [EMAIL PROTECTED].
[...]
Source: pdsh
Source-Version:
Package: kernel-package
Version: 9.008.4
Severity: wishlist
Hi all,
When I build manualy a kernel 2.6, I abuse of the build option
O=/My_Kernel_Build_dir
It allow me to save a clean src tree and build as much different config as
space disk allow me ;-) _without duplicate src tree_ (I trust that
Hello Yann,
This is fixed since latest gksu upgrade (i.e. 1.3.5-2)
Thanks again for your attention,
Joel
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
Oh yes, BTW, I have seen that glibc does not built anymore on hppa. It
seems the new binutils does not accept some assembly instructions.
Currently I am doing my tests with binutils 2.16.1. It has to be fixed
before uploading a new glibc, but unfortunately I
Package: sysvinit
Version: 2.86.ds1-3
Followup-For: Bug #327865
Just confirming that the mentioned patch solved the pb as well as on my
i386 as on my hppa boxes :^)
Hth,
Joel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),
...
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005, Lo=EFc Minier wrote:
I've requested a requeue at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The package has been built and will enter the archive tonight. I'm
closing this bug.
Cool :^)
Many thanks,
Joel
Package: libvte4
Version: 1:0.11.13-2
Severity: normal
Hi all,
Trying to install xfce4-terminal with apt-get, I encountered the following pb:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
xfce4-terminal: Depends: libvte4 (= 1:0.11.11) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken packages
Package: firestarter
Version: 1.0.3-1.1
Severity: normal
Hello dear maintainer,
My wm being xfce4 (debian unstable install), after the initial configure
wizard, when I try to launch firestarter from a common user desktop menu,
nothing happen:
# ps -ef | grep fire
jso 3358 1304 0 15:54
Package: firestarter
Version: 1.0.3-1.1
Severity: normal
Hello dear maintainer(s),
My i386 (debian unstable install) owns two nic: eth0 eth1.
eth0 is connected to my adsl modem.
eth1 for my local lan (actualy a cross cable for a parisc-linux box also
an unstable debian install).
As am using
Package: pdsh
Severity: wishlist
Hi all,
Just discovering this tools and btw found upstream a more recent release of
this pkg: 2.7.
Hth,
Joel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
The buildd in question is currently running a 2.4.26-64 kernel.
Cool (I didn't thought that there was still systems running 2.4)
In fact while simply rebuilding a kernel (as root, without fakeroot), I also
observe a segfault with 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 (on c110 and d380) but panicing
2.6.12
-- Initial header ---
From : Randolph Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : John David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC :
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
PROTECTED],debian-hppa@lists.debian.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Wed, 10 Aug 2005
Package: gcc-4.0
Severity: normal
Hello Mathias,
Trying to rebuild locally this experimental gcc-4.0 dpkg, it failled early
because:
checking whether the C compiler (gnatgcc ) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot
create executables.
make[1]: ***
Matthias Klose wrote:
Joel Soete writes:
Package: gcc-4.0
Severity: normal
Hello Mathias,
Trying to rebuild locally this experimental gcc-4.0 dpkg, it failled
early because:
thanks, fixed. still waiting for an m68k build to finish, and then
I'll upload a new version.
Cool ;-)
checking whether
Package: gcc-4.0-hppa64
Version: 4.0.0-2
Severity: normal
Hi all,
This experimental gcc-4.0-hppa64 dpkg failled in postinst because:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gcc-4.0-hppa64.postinst: line 3: shell: command not found
update-alternatives: --install needs link name path priority
Debian update-alternatives
Hello Craig,
...
What did I missed? Any idea?
Is it compiling or not? I'm trying to understand what is wrong other
than the top header.
That was finaly a kernel pb.
It's now fixed so you can safely close this report :-)
Thanks again for your attention,
Joel
-- Original Message --
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:44:28 +1100
To: Joel Soete [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small)
Subject: Re: Bug#292927: top doesn't show right info on parisc since
2.6.10-pa7?
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:24:09AM +0100, Joel Soete
Package: procps
Version: 1:2.0
Severity: normal
Hello Craig,
I am running a unstable debian on parisc platform with a development linux
kernel 2.6.11-rc2-pa3 :-)
And I noticed this top pb:
Tasks: 79 total, 2 running, 77 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 1.9% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0%
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.11.4
Severity: normal
Hello Julien,
Here is the promised br ;-)
Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:30:42AM +, paddy wrote:
What you can do as a workaround is use the relevant tool to remove
the ext3 features that parted doesn't like, resize, and then add them
back in.
Bah, this is hacky, i would just use resize2fs directly in this case, and
anyway, i
Package: parted
Version: 1.6.11-9
Severity: normal
Hello all,
I am running a debian unstable' (today updated) with a developement kernel
2.6.11-rc1-pa3 on hppa box (b2000).
This system own 2 Disk: one boot disk of 9gb and a 'data' disk of 36Gb.
the boot disk sda has the following slicing
66 matches
Mail list logo
