Bug#349287: am-utils: amd segfaulting on amd64 (x86_64)

2006-01-21 Thread John Gruenenfelder
Package: am-utils Version: 6.1.3-2 Severity: important amd has been exhibiting some nasty problems on an amd64 machine running the x86_64 port of Debian/testing. Specifically, it periodically segfaults and must be manually restarted. The usage of amd on this machine is important, but the machin

Bug#349287: am-utils: amd segfaulting on amd64 (x86_64)

2006-01-22 Thread John Gruenenfelder
be >useful, i.e. your amd.conf file, your /etc/default/am-utils file and >any map files referred to by the amd.conf file. > >Thanks, >Tim Can do. I've attached my amd.conf and /etc/default/am-utils files as well as the amd.home map. -- --John GruenenfelderResearch Assistant

Bug#349287: am-utils: amd segfaulting on amd64 (x86_64)

2006-01-23 Thread John Gruenenfelder
machine bach. That way the path doesn't change if accessed from another machine. The other two machines which use amd.home receive it via NIS. -- --John GruenenfelderResearch Assistant, UMass Amherst student Systems Manager, MKS Imaging Technology, LLC. Try W

Bug#314173: libmpich1.0-dev installs incorrect alternative for /usr/lib/libmpi++.so

2005-06-14 Thread John Gruenenfelder
s/libmpi++.a -> /usr/lib/mpich/lib/libpmpich++.a Trying to compile a program with the incorrect link will result in numerous linker errors. --John Gruenenfelder -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture:

Bug#381181: mdadm fix affects root-on-LVM-on-RAID

2006-08-20 Thread John Gruenenfelder
doing correctly. So... what is the best fix for this? Is there some fix I'll need to make to my initrd? Or will removing /etc/udev/mdadm.rules be enough to cause udev to go back to the old behavior? -- --John GruenenfelderResearch Assistant, UMass Amherst st

Bug#381181: mdadm fix affects root-on-LVM-on-RAID

2006-08-21 Thread John Gruenenfelder
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:05:23AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: >also sprach John Gruenenfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.21.0513 +0100]: >> So... what is the best fix for this? Is there some fix I'll need >> to make to my initrd? Or will removing /etc/udev/mdadm.r

Bug#385393: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Please include modesetting branch

2006-08-30 Thread John Gruenenfelder
n the i810 package? The Fedora rawhide package for the i810 driver includes both, naming the modesetting driver "intel" to avoid any conflicts. It would help those of us with hardware not fully supported by the current i810 driver. --John Gruenenfelder -- System Information: Deb

Bug#385393: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Please include modesetting branch

2006-08-30 Thread John Gruenenfelder
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 04:14:01PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: >On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 07:39:30PM -0400, John Gruenenfelder wrote: >> >> Would it be possible to include both of them in the i810 package? The >> Fedora rawhide package for the i810 driver includes both, namin

Bug#365441: xserver-xorg-video-savage: XVideo extension using too much CPU

2006-08-30 Thread John Gruenenfelder
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:40:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: >On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 23:11 -0400, John Gruenenfelder wrote: >> Package: xserver-xorg-video-savage >> Version: 1:2.0.2.3-4 >> Severity: normal >> >> After upgrading to the new modular X packages, I fi

Bug#365441: xserver-xorg-video-savage: XVideo extension using too much CPU

2007-05-06 Thread John Gruenenfelder
When I posted to the Xorg list even though I didn't get any help I did get another user to speak up. I believe we had the same Shuttle box/mobo with the same Savage chipset. He was experiencing similar problems. But, unless he decides to comment on this bug report I don't know how he

Bug#365441: xserver-xorg-video-savage: XVideo extension using too much CPU

2007-05-05 Thread John Gruenenfelder
the upgrade was worth it. -- --John GruenenfelderResearch Assistant, UMass Amherst student Systems Manager, MKS Imaging Technology, LLC. Try Weasel Reader for PalmOS -- http://gutenpalm.sf.net "This is the most fun I've had without being drenched in the blood of my en

Bug#365441: xserver-xorg-video-savage: XVideo extension using too much CPU

2006-04-29 Thread John Gruenenfelder
Package: xserver-xorg-video-savage Version: 1:2.0.2.3-4 Severity: normal After upgrading to the new modular X packages, I find that my X setup now uses an excessive amount of CPU time to play back video when using the XVideo extension. The machine is my MythTV box. It is a small Shuttle box with

Bug#365441: xserver-xorg-video-savage: XVideo extension using too much CPU

2006-04-30 Thread John Gruenenfelder
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:40:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: >On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 23:11 -0400, John Gruenenfelder wrote: >> Package: xserver-xorg-video-savage >> Version: 1:2.0.2.3-4 >> Severity: normal >> >> After upgrading to the new modular X packages, I fi