Hi Hans,
On 13.09.23 23:38, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
Hi Radoslav,
Thanks for your report...
Hi Juergen, Boris and xen-devel,
At Debian, we got the report below. (Also at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051862)
This hardware, with only Xen and Dom0 running is hitting the
On 12/03/2019 17:41, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 3/12/19 5:04 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 11/03/2019 20:50, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>>> On 3/11/19 7:34 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure. Patch 3 of this series i
On 11/03/2019 20:50, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 3/11/19 7:34 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure. Patch 3 of this series is basically already there (see
>> commit c6d4381220a0087ce19dbf6984d92c451bd6b364). So maybe all we need
>> is patch 4, which
ly 32-bit DMA addresses in hardware structures. This results in
unnecessary use of the SWIOTLB if DMA addresses are more than 32-bits,
impacting performance significantly.
We could base the DMA mask on the maximum MFN but:
a) The hypercall op to get the maximum MFN (XENMEM_maximum_ram_page)
will trunc
On 10/03/2019 23:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 10/03/2019 21:35, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> found -1 4.19.20-1
>> thanks
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Reviving a thing from Jan 2017 here. I don't have this thread in my
>> mailbox, so no inline quotes.
>>
>> I just installed some HP z820 workstation and
This bug is now older than one month without any activity from gcc
maintainers.
Up to now this bug has been observed on debian only. It has been
observed in multiple gcc versions.
This bug is blocking Linux kernel patches to go in!
Juergen
Package: gcc-6
Version: 6.3.0-18+deb9u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
when trying to compile the Linux kernel for arch=i386 some configurations
of the kernel result in an error. See:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.lrh.2.21.1808262340040.22...@math.ut.ee/
7 matches
Mail list logo
