Bug#1095517: getfem: currently skipping some tests that randomly fail

2025-06-03 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Thanks for this report. The torture unit tests are tests run with random data, so they are not meant to be reproducible. The 3 fails for the torture tests are all because of this bug https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?66384 Cause of the bug is known. Need to find time to implement a proper fix. We

Bug#1068901: re-open

2024-08-07 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
This is actually still present on a fully updated debian trixie/sid. I can also confirm that applying https://github.com/jupyter/notebook/pull/7051/files fixes the issue Maybe one should consider adding this commit as a debian patch until the new upstream version has arrived. Konstantinos

Bug#1049792: upstream fix

2024-02-20 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Should apparently apply this upstream fix: https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/getfem.git/commit/?id=cb207a37436e8bb561c14364e6041bc849798592

Bug#1023788: getfem: fails to build from source on s390x

2022-12-01 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Thanks Drew for the workaround. However in the meantime, I have found a proper fix. Have sent you a merge request for that: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/getfem/-/merge_requests/6 I hope it can be uploaded/tested on all architectures before the freeze deadline. Kostas On Mon, 28 Nov 2

Bug#1016084: transition: petsc

2022-09-22 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
> I see it, thanks for the clarification. > > > > What's the plan regarding getfem++/getfem? It looks like some package > > renaming was started in unstable but it was never finished. > > > Hi Sebastian, Konstantinos Poulios was preparing the getfem package. I

Bug#956950: Acknowledgement (fonts-fantasque-sans: fantasque-sans fonts do not render with newest libpango package)

2020-04-17 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
I can now confirm that removing the woff files of the font: with rm -rf /usr/share/fonts/woff/fantasque-sans fixes the issue. With woff removed, the otf version of the font is picked and rendered correctly.

Bug#956950: fonts-fantasque-sans: fantasque-sans fonts do not render with newest libpango package

2020-04-16 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Package: fonts-fantasque-sans Version: 1.7.2~alpha.3~dfsg-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, After the recent update from libpango-1.0-0 (1.42.4-8) to 1.44.7-3, fantasque- sans fonts fail to render in applications like gedit, gnome-terminal, geany. The attached minimal demonstrator produces the

Bug#783587: Still present in buster

2020-01-03 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
This is an easy fix to a very annoying issue. Attaching (almost) the same fix as proposed in the original report with some screenshots demonstrating it. Easy fix to apply to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nemiver/plugins/dbgperspective/ui/openfiledialog.ui Best regards Kostas openfiledialog_orig.ui

Bug#943943: getfem++ ftbfs

2019-12-19 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
the latest ftbfs on all architectures seems more like a python2to3 transition issue /usr/bin/env: ‘python’: No such file or directory

Bug#722995:

2013-10-28 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Hi, unfortunately I haven't seen this bug report earlier. As upstream developer of pdfshuffler, I am against the proposed patch. It was actually an intentional decision not to include a save button. The reason is that the pypdf library is quite limited so that the pdfs processed with pdfshuffler m

Bug#660937: pdfshuffler: will not run with poppler 0.18

2012-04-28 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Hi Andrea, Great! Your last package works with no memory leaks as expected. Here there is a new pdfshuffler version that can finally close the present bug report: https://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfshuffler/files/pdfshuffler/0.6.0/ Regards Kostas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-

Bug#660937: pdfshuffler: will not run with poppler 0.18

2012-04-03 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
, Konstantinos Poulios wrote [edited]: On 02/24/2012 01:20 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: [..] The cairo rendering methods are in poppler-glib since many release (at least 0.10, if not even earlier); since python-poppler 0.12 maps the poppler-glib 0.12 API, I think any python-poppler 0.12.x version (so what'

Bug#660937: pdfshuffler: will not run with poppler 0.18

2012-02-23 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
On 02/24/2012 01:20 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: Hi Serafeim, Alle venerdì 24 febbraio 2012, Serafeim Zanikolas ha scritto: I've grabbed the commit from upstream and will look into backporting it early next week. Thanks! Please let me know what minimum revision of python-poppler pdfshuffler shou

Bug#628891: pdfshuffler: Errors when trying to save to a file

2011-06-09 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Hi, I am not familiar with the PDF specification but reading the last comment before line 755 in pdf.py it becomes quite clear what is happening here. pypdf according to the PDF spec, expects at that position a line of fixed size 20. It can additionally tolerate malformed files where the line is

Bug#593574: upstream changes

2011-02-08 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
This is one of the problems that have been fixed upstream: https://github.com/mfenniak/pyPdf/commits/trunk Even if there is no official release, I think it would be a nice idea to pull all recent changes from the upstream git repo into debian. I am developing PDF Shuffler and I believe that the

Bug#576837: confirmation

2010-08-16 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
This bug is still present in paraview 3.8.0-1: >>> from paraview import servermanager Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/paraview/servermanager.py", line 43, in import paraview, re, os, new, sys, vtk File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python

Bug#552709: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#552709: More changes required

2009-12-15 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
The following commit should fix the problem: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-scicomp/?op=comp&compare[]=%2fgetfem%2b...@4669&compare[]=%2fgetfem%2b...@4725 @Sylvestre: could you take a look at this changes? @Jan Möblus: thanks for your report, I haven't applied directly your fix but the one from u

Bug#549283: python-getfem++ cannot be installed

2009-10-08 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
it seems that the problem is triggered by the "++" suffix of the python package. To get a comparison I 've built the package twice with changing only the name of the python package. Debhelper + python-support generate the following postint scripts: with the name "python-getfem": > #!/bin/sh > set

Bug#453065: getfem++ 4.0

2009-09-23 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Hi all, I've uploaded my last packaging effort based on the official release of getfem version 4.0.0 here: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=getfem Some remarks: 1. In accordance with the tar.gz-name and the SO-NAME of the last upstream release I've remove

Bug#453065: getfem++ 4.0

2009-08-26 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
Hi, I see that the actual packaging work for getfem++ is being done here: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kde/krap/getfem%2B%2B/trunk/ Unfortunately the current packaging status fails to build the getfem++ code from the upstream svn-repository, mainly because of upstream autotools modifications. H

Bug#513003: #513003 - progress?

2009-05-16 Thread Konstantinos Poulios
hi! I am the developer of pdfshuffler. Thanks Serafeim for the useful patches. I ve included them among with other bug fixes in the version 0.4.2. Maybe you are interested in updating your packages to this version as it will be the last 0.4.x version. I have a notice about your packages. As I see