On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:00:48PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:26 PM, John David
> Anglin wrote:
> > I don't have more details... The idea is as Carlos outlined. There's
> > code in the binutils elf32-hppa.c and elf64-hppa.c files to implement
> > the above for dynam
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 02:23:09PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Kyle McMartin said:
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:08:54AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > sg...@spontini:~$ sudo /usr/sbin/irqbalance --debug
> > > Package 0: cpu m
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:08:54AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> sg...@spontini:~$ sudo /usr/sbin/irqbalance --debug
> Package 0: cpu mask is 0001 (workload 0)
> Cache domain 0: cpu mask is 0001 (workload 0)
> CPU number 0 (workload 0)
> Package 2: cpu mask is 00
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:07:29PM +0100, Janusz Dziemidowicz wrote:
> 2009/1/1 Kyle McMartin :
> > Hrm, we're carrying a fairly large patch against irqbalance that deals
> > with cpu parsing in Fedora that hasn't made it upstream for some reason.
> > I
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:14:07AM +0100, Janusz Dziemidowicz wrote:
> irqbalance detects incorrect number of processors on kernel 2.6.26. I
> have a single dual core processor (/proc/cpuinfo available below), but
> irqbalance debug shows:
>
Hrm, we're carrying a fairly large patch against irqbal
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 01:07:21AM -0700, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> Sorry to take so long to get back to you.
>
> Kyle McMartin wrote:
>
> > What was the starting kernel version? The latest stable etch kernel?
>
> Yes. I performed a dist-upgrade while it was still on
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:57:00PM -0700, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> Perhaps I should mention a problem I had upgrading Etch to Lenny. I
> made a Debian bug report about it because it seemed like it might be a
> general Debian issue, but now I'm not so sure.
>
> The gist of the issue is that df stops
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:18:33AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > I spent some time trying to fix this a while ago at Jeff Bailey's
> > request, but it required nasty invasive changes that I didn't have
> > time to debug. (It's not really an improvement when /sbin/init fails
> > to exec...)
>
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 03:12:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> + * Non maintainer upload.
> + * irqbalance would segfault on startup when /proc/interrupts contains
> +an interrupt with a number of 256 or larger, since internally it
> +stored data in a fixed-length array. Newer versio
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:30:40PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Note that inn and inn2 have since been fixed AFAIK, so there's something
> like 26 more suspected packages left.
>
Could you please post the list here (to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) There's likely
enough folks here who can follow proper NMU proc
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:54:35PM -0500, Ivan Jager wrote:
> I modified the hotfix so it will also patch compat_sys_vmsplice, which
> would be important on amd64 boxen with x86 compatibility enabled.
>
these "hotfixes" are so completely wrong, it's not even funny.
you're playing russian roulette
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 06:23:35PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> +### BEGIN INIT INFO
> +# Provides: irqbalance
> +# Required-Start:$remote_fs $syslog
> +# Required-Stop: $remote_fs $syslog
> +# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5
> +# Default-Stop: 0 1 6
> +### END INIT INFO
lo
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 01:00:10PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > 00:05 < pusling> lamont: what is "bus error" on hppa ?
> > 00:06 < lamont> pusling: unaligned load/store
> > 00:06 < lamont> pusling: more specically, valid address, permission fault
> > 00:06 < pusling> lamont: is unaligned load
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:59:43AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: irqbalance
> Version: 0.55-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This is the current description of the package in Debian.
> irqbalance - Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems
>
>
> M
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:22:27PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: irqbalance
> Version: 0.55-2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
cool, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:30:07AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> found 426391 2.6.21-5
> thanks
>
> On Monday 28 May 2007 15:06, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel Fault
>
> This kernel panic still happens with 2.6.21-5.
Yeah, I'll get the patch into SVN soon...
Sorry,
Package: 915resolution
Severity: wishlist
Upstream seems to be slow at updating the list of supported chipsets,
if Debian will support -i810 on i965GM and newer.
02-new-chipsets.dpatch is inline:
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 02-new-chipsets.dpatch by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
##
## All
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:34:53PM +0200, Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
> This bug was reported five years ago! I have no IA64 anymore to test
> this, so from me you can safely close this bug with a can't-reproduce
> or similar.
>
Last I tried (about a year ago) it was still the case.
--
To UNSUB
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:33:56PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 28 May 2007 15:06, Frans Pop wrote:
> > The boot failed with the following messages.
>
> Additional info: this was the official package (grabbed from incoming).
>
> It was compiled using (from the build log [1]):
> libc6-dev_2
Bummer, the patch doesn't help. CROSS_COMPILE is still set to an empty
string. Looking through make-kpkg I can't see how the other architectures
which need to build both 64bit and 32bit images the same way handle this...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Package: kernel-package
Somewhere between 2.6.18-7 and 2.6.18-8, something changed which causes
make-kpkg to pass CROSS_COMPILE to make. CROSS_COMPILE is set by
arch/parisc/Makefile in the kernel to the correct value when CONFIG_64BIT
is set in the kernel config (as it is for config.{parisc64,pari
too lazy to make a patch for this crap code but it's pretty easy
to get PAGE_SHIFT via sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE)
and much less ugly...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:24:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Basically it checks for /usr/bin/hppa64-linux-gnu-gcc, which is an
> alternative. My guess is the the build daemon has the alternative broken
> (or the gcc package), as the package linux-2.6 builds correctly on my
> machine here.
>
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:35:44PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > /build/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.18/debian/build/build-hppa-none-parisc64/scripts/gcc-version.sh:
> > line 11: hppa64-linux-gcc-4.1: command not found
> > /build/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.18/debian/build/build-hppa-none-parisc64/scripts/
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:56:40PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> I'm fairly certain we have a bug in handling unaligned fixups
> for doubles in the kernel. This caused a problem for libffi.
> This depends on whether the kernel is 32/64 bits.
>
I'll try to come up with some testcases.
--
T
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> That would be wonderful if you, or another hppa porter, could track down
> where the bug lies. libgcc2 is almost certainly the wrong package, since
> nothing should be *using* libgcc2 in a fresh build of qt-x11-free; it may be
> a b
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:39:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The qt-x11-free package builds fine with a standard Debian setup.
> Building with prctl --unaligned=signal makes the "bug" reproducible.
>
Right. The buildd is set up to deliver SIGBUS on unaligned accesses.
This is configurable, a
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:18:58PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> That's this fix, isn't it?
>
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-rc-fixes-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b2b3c121076961333977f485f0d54c22121df920
>
Yup.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Hello Joshua,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:59:16AM -0600, Joshua Rubin wrote:
> I have confirmed that loading cpqarray first fixes the problem on several
> systems now. I have also realized that when this is the case, the sym53c8xx
> driver is not needed or loaded. I thought this was noteworthy. I
Let's take a quick look in
linux-2.6/drivers/video/nvidia/nv_hw.c:NvLoadStateExt(), shall we?
{...}
if (par->Architecture >= NV_ARCH_40) {
NV_WR32(par->PRAMIN, 0x * 4, 0x8010);
NV_WR32(par->PRAMIN, 0x0001 * 4, 0x00101202);
NV_WR32(par
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: linux32
> Version: 1-3
>
> $ uname -m
> parisc64
>
> $ linux32 uname -m
> parisc64
>
I spent some time trying to fix this a while ago at Jeff Bailey's
request, but it required nasty invasive changes that I didn't have
tim
Package: numactl
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please add support for hppa to numactl. Patch follows.
The only syscall # which needs definition is migrate pages, as the rest
are now in linux-kernel-headers asm/unistd.h.
Cheers,
Kyle
--- numactl/syscall.c~ 2006-04-19 06:44:13.0
I'm also seeing this bug on a dual cpu A500-7X... Will investigate
and hopefully we'll find a solution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:46:09PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
> hihi, as I have to rebuild the pkg is also discover:
> udev_libc_wrapper.h:69:2: warning: #warning "inotify unsupported on this
> architecture!"
>
Good catch, I missed this. Yes, this should also go upstream... not that
I've yet receive
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:02:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> udevd[862]: get_netlink_msg: unable to receive kernel netlink message: No
> buffer space available
>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:06:56AM +0100, Sven Koch wrote:
> (starting by hand, the init-script does not output any errors but deamon is
> just not running afterwards)
>
Ok. I thought I had fixed this, but I clearly need to reopen that bug
> aurora:/etc/default# wpa_supplicant -w -i ath0 -D madw
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 10:24:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> I have cloned the installation report to #350482 and reassigned that to
> the linux-2.6 source package for this issue.
>
> The user confirmed this issue is still there for 2.6.15. I'll leave it to
> kernel maintainers to determine if t
Package: binutils
Version: 2.16.1cvs20051214-1
The Linux kernel's make menuconfig on hppa currently fails because
it tries to do
scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/check-lxdialog.sh:
[..]
echo "main() {}" | $cc -lncurses -xc - -o /dev/null 2> /dev/null
[..]
To check which ncurses library it is ab
> After changing addr to value, compiles fine; prctl -q runs ok now, prctl
> --unaligned=signal doesn't have any effect. You say that it's going to be
> the prctl() function in the kernel that needs further tweaks?
>
I suspect this is the problem:
(linux/prctl.h)
# define PR_UNALIGN_NOPRINT
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:19:55PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> After changing addr to value, compiles fine; prctl -q runs ok now, prctl
> --unaligned=signal doesn't have any effect. You say that it's going to be
> the prctl() function in the kernel that needs further tweaks?
>
I'm not sure, I'
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:23:08AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Should be 'value' instead of 'addr', I guess?
>
Yeah, oops, I just cribbed it from the one I did for parisc for LaMont.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:06:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So please make it work; knowing this exists and should be supported, I'm not
> willing to hack up prctl's source to use __NR_osf_setsysinfo instead. :)
>
Bleh.
Untested, as I don't have an alpha. arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c already
c
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> Anyhow, given how hppa is already among the architectures that did not
> re-qualify for Etch, I propose that, from now on, hppa be ignored for
> deciding whether a package is considered valid for going into Testing.
>
Uhm. You'r
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:45:21PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> 0x4200f534 in __umoddi3 () from /lib/libgcc_s.so.2
>
Could you tell us what the specific illegal instruction was?
You should be able to disassemble that address with "x/i 0x4200f534"
in gdb.
This looks mostly like a GCC bug...
C
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:08:08AM +0100, Yannick Torres wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How about this bug ?
>
> Is there a solution ?
>
I don't have my laptop right now, making it extremely difficult to work
on wpasupplicant. Sorry, patience please.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 05:04:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> To say that this is a compiler bug, you would have to show that gcc-4.0 is
> *wrong* to 32-bit align the fenv_t struct instead of 64-bit aligning it.
> You'd have to check with the compiler folks to be sure, but I don't think
> this
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:55:24PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Looks very similar to 2.6.8 output. So the 2.6.12 output from
> the debian kernel is just wierd. (Maybe compiler/toolchain bug?)
>
I just booted linux-image-2.6.12-1 on my a500:
% cat /proc/ioports
- : PCI00 Ports
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:55:04PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> wpa_supplicant.conf tells you to look in
> /usr/share/doc/wpasupplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf.gz for details. However, the
> path should be:
> /usr/share/doc/wpasupplicant/examples/wpa_supplicant.conf.gz .
>
Oops.
> #network={
> #
close 331033
thanks
Not a bug. Take the hint and edit /etc/default/wpasupplicant. I removed
the patch to put a default config in because it does not agree with having
multiple interfaces. Also, don't forget to pass -D.
> linux:~# rm /var/run/wpa_supplicant/ath0
> linux:~# wpa_supplicant -B -c /et
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Peter Hicks wrote:
> Numerous, and I had the OpenSC libraries installed on my laptop for
> other projects. Certainly, the configuration files referenced some .so
> files.
>
> Sorry I can't be more specific, I was more concerned with fixing
> authenticatio
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Peter Hicks wrote:
> Numerous, and I had the OpenSC libraries installed on my laptop for
> other projects. Certainly, the configuration files referenced some .so
> files.
>
> Sorry I can't be more specific, I was more concerned with fixing
> authenticatio
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Peter Hicks wrote:
> On a laptop where wpasupplicant was working last week, today's upgrade
> breaks and reports problems loading an OpenSC library.
>
> Installing libopensc-openssl works around this problem - should the package
> depend on it?
>
How odd,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:51:18AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Is that non-functionality documented prominently enough?
>
It's in the readme. It would be nice, I suppose, if choosing methods that
don't work yelled in the output a bit more, and I'll add a comment to the
wpa_supplicant.conf.
Cheers,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:37:22PM +0200, H?kan Lindqvist wrote:
> Package: wpasupplicant
> Version: 0.3.8-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
Sorry for taking so long to get back to you. Does this bug still apply
to 0.4.4? Thanks.
Cheers,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
close 299181
thanks
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:57:05AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The kernel is compiled with this extensions of the ioclt, but it seems
> to doesn't read it. Before a dist-upgrade from debian stable to debian
> testing, at least this ioctr error doesn't occur.
>
> I am us
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:38:11PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Package: wpasupplicant
> Version: 0.3.8-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
It most certainly is working now, don't know about then. Can this
bug be closed?
Cheers,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 06:11:43PM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote:
>
Applied in 0.4.4-1. Thanks!
Cheers,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:08:16AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ever since upgrading to 3.8 (from Debian's previous package, version 3.2 I
> think), wpa_supplicant no longer works with WEP. If I don't use
> wpa_supplicant and configure the interface manually with iwconfig, I can set
> t
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:35:16PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Package: wpasupplicant
> Version: 0.3.8-1
> Severity: important
>
Is this still a problem? I'm tempted to close this as fixed-upstream.
Cheers,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Sorry for taking so long to get back to you, finally clearing
out a bunch of the bugs on the package.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:50:22PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> I almost never use the wireless interface in my laptop, but when I do I
> need WPA support, so I have wpa_supplicant configured de
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 06:57:31PM +0300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> tags 317180 +patch
> thanks
>
Thanks!
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a patch for wpasupplicant which adds a configuration item
> CONFIG_LOG_TO_SYSLOG and enables it in the Debian build.
>
Cool!
> 14_log_to_syslog.dpatch
>
> This (opt
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:31:22PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> The config file shipped in
> /usr/share/doc/wpasupplicant/examples/wpa_supplicant.conf.gz does not
> seem to be compatible with the current software, as wpasupplicant
> complains about an unknown EAP method 'FAST' on startup.
>
EAP-FAST
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> /etc/default/wpasupplicant says
> # -i Interface (required, unless specified in config)
> however, the example config file does not say where the interface name
> can be configured.
>
Ah, this was an option I added in a patch
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:36:12PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Package: wpasupplicant
> Severity: wishlist
>
> As the option "interface" is required on the wpa_supplicant command
> line, /etc/default/wpasupplicant should have a dedicated field for
> that setting.
>
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a g
rade your driver.
Cheers,
--
Kyle McMartin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
other
> similar (kernel-related) task, it does not work and system becomes unusable
> and, thus, it must be hard-rebooted.
>
Can you please post the specifications of your computer? Arch, processor,
amount of ram, etc. Additionally, what kernel you are using.
Cheers,
--
Kyle McMartin
--
DB_ENDIAN
-DTERMIO -O1 -march=2.0 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -DBN_DIV2W
gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12)
And the test suite seemed to pass.
I think the bug can safely be closed, since gcc3.3 is the default
compiler in sarge.
--
Kyle McMartin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
t;
Does it still use a "non-free" python extension? I believe it was the
'profile' module.
Cheers,
--
Kyle McMartin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 12:20:48PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Backtrace:
> [<10115720>] dump_stack+0x20/0x38
> [<10121688>] smp_call_function+0xd8/0x4c0
> [<10114320>] flush_data_cache+0x38/0x70
> [<10112eb8>] free_initmem+0x78/0x560
> [<10112304>] i
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 2 drives.
I'm not really sure what to say. None of that code has been modified in
any of the hppa patches.
Are you sure the device labels are correct? mdadm shows /dev/md0 s
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer have sufficient time to maintain this package, watching
for new releases, etc. I believe it would be better off in someone elses
hands.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer have time to maintain this package. Though no work has been
needed on it.
Cheers,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer have time to maintain this package. I think I have fixed
all outstanding bugs on the package, though things crop up from time to
time.
Cheers,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Due to lack of time, I'm orphaning this package. There's currently
a crash bug in the software, that has been waiting on upstream
action for some time, with no response. It is a fairly easy
package to work with, as it is all autoconf.
Cheers,
Kyle
--
To U
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm orphaning this package due to lack of time. There are a few outstanding
bugs on this software, but none of them look particularly critical and
are mostly waiting on upstream action.
Thanks,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer have time to maintain this package. The new upstream version
is out, but is written in Java instead, I am unable to make enough time
to move to the new version.
Regards,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:02:27AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I suggest we close this bug since all issues have been reported in
> other bugs already. OK?
Works for me.
Cheers,
Kyle.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 02:19:43PM +0100, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> As a matter of fact I reported this feature lack as a wishlist bug to
> the debian bug tracking system when migrating from waproamd to
> wpasupplicant. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/287220 for that report.
>
> Unless I'm wron
Debian-installer-version: d-i pre-rc3
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-arm/20050305/images/netwinder/netboot/boot.img
uname -a: Linux barad-dur 2.4.27-netwinder #1 Tue Feb 22 15:24:37 GMT 2005
armv4l GNU/Linux
Date: Sun Mar 13 01:00:51 EST 2005
Method: Netinst booted off a lo
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 05:15:59AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> That's probably a problem with your network, though?
>
Yeah. I wasn't sure if the fact that a component failed would make a
difference in the install process somehow, so I thought I should note
it.
> All of the standard schemes
Package: installation-reports
Possibly a followup to #253789, sorry for the long delay, I had to
fix the board.
Debian-installer-version: Sat, 12 Mar 21:10 EST 2005
http://people.debian.org/~kmuto/d-i/images/daily/netwinder/netboot/boot.img
uname -a: Linux barad-dur 2.4.27-netwinder #1 Tue Feb
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: p.d.o/~jbailey/ from 2005-02-25
uname -a: Linux celebdil 2.6.8-2-32-smp #1 SMP Mon Feb 7 22:19:10 EST 2005
parisc GNU/Linux
Date: Sat Feb 26 00:57:32 EST 2005
Method: Net Install via Daily Build
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:45:11AM -0700, Benj Carson wrote:
> I've compiled the upstream developer release as of 2005-02-24
> (http://hostap.epitest.fi/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/hostap/hostap.tar.gz?tarball=1)
> and associating with WEP-enabled networks now works properly.
>
In correspondance with Jo
I'll look into this. I'm not sure the best way to integrate this yet,
but I'll look at the code and we'll see.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:53:16AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It seems that kernel-patch-2.6.8-hppa doesn't work with
> kernel-source-2.6.8 (ie version 2.6.8-12), so it is simply unuseable:
>
Thanks, I've already fixed this in my working tree, but I've been working
fairly heavily with Bdale a
85 matches
Mail list logo
