Bug#1108214: old git branches in the repository

package: release-notes severity: minor The release-notes repository has accumulated some old branches that could be deleted: These are merged into the main history, but the branch was not deleted: supported-archs-no-i386 -- an ancestor of current master ( trixie ) issues-ping-reword -- ancestor

Bug#1050881: borgbackup: Mention required documentation for upgrading repositories for fixes for CVE-2023-36811

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:22:07 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > borgbackup/1.2.5-1 contained a fix for CVE-2023-36811. But > additionally to the package upgrades, users need to follow the upgrade > procedure as documented. > > After an update of the package one is not really aware of it, so I >

Bug#1105130: release-notes: uprading a minimal system with gnupg to trixie pulls in an MTA

> If a minimal system with gnupg is upgraded to trixie it is likely to pull in > an > unwanted MTA because of changed dependencies. Such users may find it helpful > for a hint in the release notes to remove gpg-wks-server on upgrade, such as > with: > > apt full-upgrade gpg-wks-server- I was

Bug#1099613: marked as done (release-notes: have users install linux-sysctl-defaults)

> > the package linux-sysctl-defaults got introduced in trixie and is > > Priority: important. Most users should install it, to avoid being > > surprised by behaviour changes when not having it. > https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/232 > was merged. > Closing. Is thi

Bug#1104427: release-notes: Removal of policykit-1-gnome

On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 23:10, Peter Blackman wrote: > > On 21/06/2025 17:49, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 15:02, Peter Blackman > > wrote: > >> On 15/06/2025 20:13, Richard Lewis wrote: > >>> or does it mean XFCE is broken in trixie

Bug#1104427: release-notes: Removal of policykit-1-gnome

On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 15:02, Peter Blackman wrote: > On 15/06/2025 20:13, Richard Lewis wrote: > > or does it mean XFCE is broken in trixie? > Looks that way to me. it doesnt seem that anyone has reported this as a bug against xfce? (without that the chances of it being fixed see

Bug#1074223: trixie: please document samba package changes

On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:21:29 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: > Tags: patch hi Michael - you tagged this bug against release-notes as having patch but i dont see on (did i miss it?), assuming not: the NEWS things look well written and complete to me - im not a samba user, but i feel i would underst

Bug#1092176: release-notes: systemd v257 has new rules for network interface names

On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 13:38:49 + Justin B Rye wrote: > we probably ought to stop thinking of it as an item to go > under "Possible issues during upgrade" and start advertising it under > "Preparing for the upgrade" as a chronic bug that sysadmins always > need to beware of any time they upgrade

Bug#1091766: release-notes: trixie deprecating LXD in favor of Incus

On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:07:14 + Mathias Gibbens wrote: > TL;DR -- It is expected that trixie will be the last release of > Debian to include LXD, and users are encouraged to migrate to Incus > after upgrading. > See here for some suggested wording for the release-notes - https://salsa.deb

Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped

On Mon, 16 Jun 2025, 07:43 Andrew Ruthven, wrote: > On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven > > > request-tracker4 and extensions targetting RT4 won't be in trixie. They > > > are > >

Bug#1107933: release-notes: document deborphan removal and replacement options

On Tue, 17 Jun 2025, 18:21 Andres Salomon, wrote: > Package: release-notes > X-Debbugs-Cc: dilin...@queued.net > > As mentioned in > , > we removed references to deborphan in the release notes; however, we > should mention that

Bug#1107587: chkrootkit: Missing 'strings' executable

On Mon, 16 Jun 2025, 20:49 Stephan Helma, wrote: > From the packages mentioned, the following are marked essential > (checked with `aptitude search '?priority(required)'`): > awk, coreutils, findutils, grep, login, sed > > The remaining packages packages are: > > binutils, ipro

Bug#1104427: release-notes: Removal of policykit-1-gnome

> Please mention in the release-notes the removal of policykit-1-gnome > AIUI This will leave XFCE desktop environment with no authentication agent. > On 30/04/2025 06:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> thunar Recommends: policykit-1-gnome | polkit-1-auth-agent > > The latter is a virtual package, wh

Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped

On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven wrote: > request-tracker4 and extensions targetting RT4 won't be in trixie. They are > replaced by request-tracker5. Can we please include words like the below in > the > "Noteworthy obsolete packages" section: > > request-tracker4 has been r

Bug#1107587: chkrootkit: Missing 'strings' executable

On Sun, 15 Jun 2025, 14:27 Stephan Helma, wrote: > There might be even more. The `chkrootkit` skript mentions these > commands (on the right side the respective debian package is mentioned): > > Section below: > ## workaround for some Bourne shell implementations > unalias login > /dev/null 2>&1

Bug#1107573: release-notes: Document dropped cronjobs for trixie

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 01:56:27 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Several packages have dropped cronjobs in favour of systemd timers if someone provides a list of which packages did this, i can help write the text. I assume this should exclude packages that added a timer and made the cron-jo

Bug#1107587: chkrootkit: Missing 'strings' executable

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 at 11:33, Stephan Helma wrote: > I did a default installation of 'chkrootkit' without installing the > recommended packages. > >* What was the outcome of this action? > I received an email with: > Today's run produced the following output: > --- [ BEGIN: cat /var/

Bug#1107331: logcheck-database: Many incorrect regular expressions

On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 at 05:51, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, Richard Lewis wrote: > It seems grep regards differently the command line pattern and the > -f patternfile. this looks like a bug in grep. perhaps you could report it to grep -- i suppose they never teste

Bug#1107331: logcheck-database: Many incorrect regular expressions

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 18:49 Gabor Kiss, wrote: > > > for f in * > do > echo $f > while read line > do > grep -E "$line" /dev/null 2>&1 > [[ "$?" = 2 ]] && echo $line > done < $f > done > IMHO it would be useful to exa

Bug#1106121: removal would affect other packages

On Tue, 27 May 2025 19:58:04 +0200 Thomas Lange wrote: > Hi, > > this bug also affects more packages that are not in the reverse dependency. > - chkrootkit_0.58b-4/debian/tests/control this is only used for autopkgtesting, any other dhcp server could be used (i wont bore you with the details) --

Bug#1106816: allow commands to be broken over multiple lines with a \

On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 09:09, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:06:00AM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > could you make the bts support a \ as a continuation character so > > commands can be split over lines? > Could you send an email from gmail to this bu

Bug#1106574: release-notes FTBFS with gbp buildpackage

> > Is there a file "debian/compat"? > > > > This file is obsolete. Please use debhelper-compat (=13) in debian/control. Found some other issues -- - most of debian/rules can replaced with a simple call to dh - missing build-dep on git (Makefile uses it to set the last-modified date) - the build o

Bug#1105792: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Mathias Gibbens ) (Bug#1105792: fixed in logcheck 1.4.5)

On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, 07:05 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello, > I just installed it and will report if anything happens. > > Just to let you know, when installing the following was printed: > > logcheck.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting > it. > i think that's expecte

Bug#1106667: logcheck: apparently uses systemd rather than cron, but it is undocumented

On Tue, 27 May 2025, 16:01 Francesco Potortì, wrote: > Package: logcheck > Version: 1.4.4 > Severity: normal > > After the latest upgrade, I receive reports every hour rather than every > day as usual. I changed the /etc/cron.d/logcheck crontab to revert to the > previous behaviour, but nothing

Bug#1106816: allow commands to be broken over multiple lines with a \

Package: debbugs Version: 2.6.2 Severity: wishlist Hi, could you make the bts support a \ as a continuation character so commands can be split over lines? some software wrap long lines at spaces, which makes it impossible to use commands like "subject" or "forwarded" with long arguments eg from

Bug#1030041: release-notes: offer deb22 format for apt sources

On Sat, 24 May 2025, 15:49 Justin B Rye, wrote: > "sudo apt modernize-sources" > > > The Release Notes still need at least a mention of this issue and the > modernize-sources solution; example deb822 sources are annoyingly > longwinded, but I suppose we can get away with just pointing at >

Bug#1106574: release-notes FTBFS with gbp buildpackage

package: release-notes severity: minor trying to build with "gbp buildpackage", i get a failure due to a missing build-dependency on git and debian/compat specifies debhelper level 5, but debian/control is asking for 13 The Makefile uses git on line 8 to set the DATE: I think the Makefile should

Bug#1106405: release-notes: 4.2.1. title states 'to' instead of 'from'

On Sat, 24 May 2025 at 15:01, Justin B Rye wrote: > > Richard Lewis wrote: > > Sistemas Jaguar, wrote: > >> The title of section 4.2.1 is inconsistent with section 4.2. > >> > >>4.2 Upgrades from Debian 12 (bookworm) > >>4.2.1. Upgr

Bug#1106405: release-notes: 4.2.1. title states 'to' instead of 'from'

On Sat, 24 May 2025, 14:15 Sistemas Jaguar, wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: minor > > The title of section 4.2.1 is inconsistent with section 4.2. > >4.2 Upgrades from Debian 12 (bookworm) >4.2.1. Upgrade to Debian 12 (bookworm) > > The use of 'to' here is inconsistent an

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 20:19, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Richard, > Am Wed, May 21, 2025 at 05:48:43PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > cant hurt - you can also do this locally: > > > > systemctl edit logcheck > > # in the editor add: > > [Servic

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Tue, 20 May 2025, 17:29 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:41:15AM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 20:04, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > > > > > control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible > > >

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 20:04, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible > > Having reviewed the messages so far in this bug report, it's clear > that something different is happening when logcheck runs under the > systemd timer/service, but not cron. However, we don't

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 16:36, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 10:18:59PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 21:35, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > I would suggest to install a machine with local exim (per debcon

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 12:29, Marc Haber wrote: > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 06:58:56PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > >There is a known 'incompatibility' between systemd and exim that both > >upstreams have explicitly declined to address - but it's > >not c

Bug#1106030: logcheck: mails from the systemd timer are delayed by up to 30 mins

package: logcheck version: 1.4.4 (following investigation of #1105792 , which i could not reproduce - but maybe this is relevant) This assumes exim, but i believe applies to postfix as well. The systemd timer works "fine", but the mail is actually being delayed. If you do # tail -n0 -f /var/log

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 21:35, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 07:01:34PM + schrieb Helge Kreutzmann: > > Hello Richard, > > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 07:12:15PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > > i think what i need to know i

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 18:02 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 05:41:49PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 17:22 Helge Kreutzmann, > wrote: > > > Yes, now the subject is Reboot: > > > > > > I dont

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 17:22 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 02:40:04PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 14:28 Richard Lewis, < > > richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 May 2025,

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 14:28 Richard Lewis, < richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 14:14 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > >> Hello Richard, >> Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 01:18:57PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: >> > On Sun, 18 May 2025,

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 14:14 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 01:18:57PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 12:37 Helge Kreutzmann, > wrote: > > > > > > > > root@twentytwo:~# cat /etc/cron.d/logchec

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 12:37 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > > root@twentytwo:~# cat /etc/cron.d/logcheck > # /etc/cron.d/logcheck: crontab entries for the logcheck package > # These do nothing under systemd because the systemd timer will take > precedence > > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/

Bug#1105920: chkrootkit: please use dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) mv_conffile, instead of issuing a warning

On Sat, 17 May 2025, 11:09 Martin-Éric Racine, wrote: > Package: chkrootkit > Version: 0.57-2+b5 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi > > Setting up chkrootkit (0.57-2+b5) ... > WARNING: /etc/chkrootkit.conf is deprecated. Please put your settings in > /etc/chkrootkit/chkr

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sat, 17 May 2025 at 17:14, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Am Sat, May 17, 2025 at 05:44:03PM +0200 schrieb Marc Haber: > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 01:44:57PM +, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > In /etc/exim4 three files mention procmail: > > > > > > exim4-config: /etc/exim4/conf.d/transport/30_exim

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sat, 17 May 2025, 11:18 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Sat, May 17, 2025 at 11:12:05AM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sat, 17 May 2025, 09:30 Helge Kreutzmann, > wrote: > > > Am Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:35:14PM + schrieb Helge Kreutzmann: >

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sat, 17 May 2025, 09:30 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:35:14PM + schrieb Helge Kreutzmann: > > Am Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:58:44PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/logcheck/-/blob/debian/s

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Fri, 16 May 2025, 18:40 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:02:55PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Fri, 16 May 2025, 17:29 Helge Kreutzmann, > wrote: > > > > > Hello Richard, > > > first of all, to test other

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Fri, 16 May 2025, 17:29 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > first of all, to test other configuration, I downgraded logcheck to > the previous version - now everything is back to normal. So this is not > an exim issue or so, but is clearly caused by the updated package. > (Logcheck > i

Bug#1097920: splint: ftbfs with GCC-15

On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:54:42 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:splint > Version: 1:3.1.2+dfsg-5 > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-15/g++-15, but succeeds to build with gcc-14/g++-14. The > severity of this report will be raised before the forky

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 19:58, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Richard, > Am Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:55:48PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:36, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > > > Since todays update of logcheck I get every message tw

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:36, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Since todays update of logcheck I get every message twice, does message mean every email, email from logcheck, or line in the logceck report? is this perhaps because logcheck is reporting messages that are in the journal and rsyslog? (it s

Bug#1105709: tiger: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: install: cannot create regular file 'debian/tiger//usr/share/man/man8': No such file or directory

control: tags -1 patch On Tue, 13 May 2025, 20:23 Lucas Nussbaum, wrote: > > This package fails to build with make --shuffle=reverse. confirmed: in Makefile.in the install target depends on installdirs installbinaries installconfig installmanpages but each install should depend on installdirs as

Bug#1097997: tiger: ftbfs with GCC-15

control: tags -1 + patch thanks On Mon, 17 Feb 2025, 18:00 Matthias Klose, wrote: > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-15 The attached patch should fix this The failure is because in c/md5.c the PROTO_LIST macro removes the arguments unless PROTOTYPES is

Bug#1105103: ifpromisc: output is incomplete

package: chkrootkit version: 0.58b-4 severity: normal tags: upstream ifpromisc (the 'sniffer' test) does not report all 'packet sniffers' that it detected A standard desktop with network manager and wifi has 4 processes with sockets listening on network interfaces, 2 from NetworkManager and 2 fro

Bug#1104798: git-buildpackage: s/sets both/both sets/ in git-pbuilder(1)

On Tue, 6 May 2025, 18:09 Andrew Sayers, < 2025-bugs.debian@pileofstuff.org> wrote: > > > `man git-pbuilder` contains the following sentence: > > For a cowbuilder builder, this sets both the base path and is passed as the > --architecture option. > > That would be more readable as "... this bo

Bug#1099871: chkrootkit: some issues with ifpromisc

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 20:38, Peter Marschall wrote: > On Donnerstag, 13. März 2025 20:36:21 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Richard > Lewis wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025, 07:51 Peter Marschall, wrote: > > it would be good if the output of `ifpromisc` > > > would be so

Bug#1102259: cppcheck: fails to find libraries

On Fri, 18 Apr 2025, 10:30 Joachim Reichel, wrote: > > i think the message could be improved! > > > > > > It should be more like "Ignoring #include at line xxx" that would be a > lot > > more understandable > > Possibly. You could suggest that on the cppcheck mailinglist (maybe check > their >

Bug#1102259: cppcheck: fails to find libraries

On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, 20:37 Joachim Reichel, wrote: > Hi Richard, > > yes, that's expected as explained in the message from the second > invocation. hi - thanks for replying. > There is no default include path in cppcheck. You can add it explicitly, > but > typically you don't want to check th

Bug#1102259: cppcheck: fails to find libraries

Package: cppcheck Version: 2.10-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, Is it expected that cppcheck fails to find any standard include files? $ cat foo.c #include void main(void){} $ cppcheck --enable=all foo.c nofile:0:0: information: Cppcheck ca

Bug#1100699: screen: hardcopy and screen-exchange are insecure by default

On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:59:50 -0400 =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= wrote: > On 2025-03-17 15:48:56, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > + possible data loss via a symlink attack > > The screen-exchange feature (">" in copy mode) is also insecure: > Is it worth keeping screen in Debian at all? i switche

Bug#1102018: utmp in trixie

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.general as well. Holger Levsen writes: > package: releasenotes > x-debbugs-cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 03:27:05PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote > Message-ID: <7

Bug#1102005: webext-ublock-origin-chromium: No longer supported by latest chromium :(

Package: webext-ublock-origin-chromium Version: 1.46.0+dfsg-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The latest upgrade of chromium considers the ublock plugin unsupported. I was able to re-enable following the instructions in a comment here: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues

Bug#1101186: editorconfig-core: Fails to build

you can fix this FTBFS by changing the version of cmake in the 3 files in test/cmake/*.cmake -cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5) +cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.25) works for me -- 3.5 is apparently no longer supported by cmake. bookworm has cmake version 3.25

Bug#1099871: chkrootkit: some issues with ifpromisc

On Sun, 9 Mar 2025, 07:51 Peter Marschall, wrote: > > when running chkrootkit using `chkrootkit-daily` in diff mode, ifpromisc > sometimes raised an alert because of its output appears in a different > order. > this is why we have the diff mode and the filtering mechanism, to avoid this kind of

Bug#1096108: docs look ancient on first view

On Sun, 16 Feb 2025, 14:51 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, < jo...@debian.org> wrote: > I intend to do a major rewrite of the first part of the man > page for Trixie. I think the man-page for sbuild is no worse than other docs in debian (which doesnt say much, but i dont think you should worr

Bug#1085646:

I also just hit something like this -- /dev/shm had somehow been unmounted (not due to sbuild) and so the chroot could not be unpacked --- the build fails but there was no info about why, not even "could not unpack the chroot", so something is throwing away the error message

Bug#355549: checksecurity: Checking for incorrect md5sums

On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:07:50 +0100 =?utf-8?B?0L3QsNCx?= < nabijaczlew...@nabijaczleweli.xyz> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:55:00PM +0200, Panu Kalliokoski wrote: > > Here is a simple script (in shell) to list files that have conflicting > > md5sums from those in the package: > Or, you know >

Bug#1087512: ITS: checksecurity

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 13:14, Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:41:37AM + schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 10:39, Richard Lewis > > wrote: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/checksecurity/-/merge_requests/1 > >

Bug#1092611: checksecurity: piuparts testing shows a regression (blocks testing migration)

On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 21:06:14 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote: > Package: checksecurity > Version: 2.0.17 > Severity: serious > Tags: security > X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net,ti...@debian.org > > Hi > > The 2.0.17 upload cannot migrate to testing, since piuparts reports a > regression for it. The (hopef

Bug#1093596: chkrootkit autopkgtest failure when not running dhclient

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 20:54, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 04:07:31PM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > This is not really about debusine. It is about autopkgtest in general. > > > If you happen to set up an autopkgtest image that happens to not use &g

Bug#1093596: chkrootkit autopkgtest failure when not running dhclient

On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, 20:34 Helmut Grohne, wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Thanks for picking up my report and implementing a more robust solution. > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:35:24AM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > Does the version at > > https://salsa.debian.org/rpil2/chk

Bug#1095132: tracker.debian.org: patch to forward upstream should not appear if patch has Applied-Upstream

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025, 11:21 Raphael Hertzog, wrote: > On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I tend to agree with you but this is under control of UDD and AFAIK UDD > > is just applying what's documented in DEP-3. There have been suggestions > > to update DEP-3 regarding this but nothing h

Bug#1073927: autopkgtest: --shell and --shell-fail are broken

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:34:57 +0200 Paride Legovini wrote: > On 2024-06-20 13:12, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Some time ago, I already experienced on my own laptop that --shell and > > --shell-fail didn't work anymore I see this with lxc, she shell starts, but it seems to hang wiating for input once y

Bug#1093596: chkrootkit autopkgtest failure when not running dhclient

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:04:53 +0100 Helmut Grohne wrote: > chkrootkit fails its autopkgtest when the containment environment is not > running dhclient. > If instead running systemd-networkd, the output looks like this: > > https://debusine.debian.net/debusine/System/artifact/1204564/raw/1774387/t

Bug#1094414: sbuild: The --purge-build=never option doesnt work with schroot

Package: sbuild Version: 0.88.1~bpo12+1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, This may be a local issue as im running the sbuild from git, commit 39120d92, but on stable: If i run sbuild with --chroot-mode=schroot --purge-build=never then /var/lib/sb

Bug#1094175: ITP: linux-os-updater -- Linux OS Updater. This is a package updating system designed to ease the update process for most Linux distributions efficiently.

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.general as well. Crypticverse writes: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Crypticverse > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, crypticvers...@gmail.com > > * Package name

Bug#1093896: isc-dhcp: autopkgtests fail with autopkgtest-virt-unshare

Source: isc-dhcp Version: 4.4.3-P1-5 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, The client-server autopkgtest for isc-dhcp fails when run in an 'unshare' 'container' as it can't create a netns: Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ... autopkgtest [20:39:58

Bug#1093596: chkrootkit autopkgtest failure when not running dhclient

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:04:53 +0100 Helmut Grohne wrote: >l > chkrootkit fails its autopkgtest when the containment environment is not > running dhclient. The ci.debian.net infrastructure is running dhclient > and there the test output looks like this: > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/uns

Bug#1093377: mailutils: git repository on salsa seems to be corrupt

Package: mailutils Version: 1:3.15-4 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, there seems to be some issue with the git repository on salsa: git clone --config transfer.fsckobjects=true https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mailutils.git mailutils Cloni

Bug#1083102: trixie: last and lastlog are gone

On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 00:38:38 +0200 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 07:57:04PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > I think the advice for most users would be that they dont need to do > > anything else > > Yes. My idea was that actually caring sites probabl

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 21:15:34 + Richard Lewis wrote: > On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 22:40:51 + Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:43:18PM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > [...] > > > I think all it needs is > > > /etc/systemd/system/chk

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 22:40:51 + Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:43:18PM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > [...] > > I think all it needs is > > /etc/systemd/system/chkrootkit.service.d/override.conf with > > > > [Service] > > ProtectSyste

Bug#1091170: [SPAM] Bug#1091170: sbuild: unsbale to update unshare chroots, or use them if $apt_update=0

On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 at 07:21, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > > >If i set $apt_update=0 ... then --run-autopkgtest doesnt work, > > > >If i add --skip=cleanup/apt/lists to mmdebstrap it all works again > > > This seems to all work as expected, can you describe how you think it > > >

Bug#1035401: Fwd: release-notes | upgrading.rst: Mention tmux in preference to screen (!213)

Hi Romain, Is a tmux client from bookworm able to connect to a server from trixie? In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035401 it was requested that the release notes suggest doing the upgrade in tmux ( in preference/as an alternagive to screen, which has been suggested for many

Bug#1089105: [SPAM] Bug#1089105: Broken chroot after an upgrade

On Fri, 06 Dec 2024 08:57:03 +0100 Julien Puydt wrote: > Le jeudi 05 décembre 2024 à 19:09 +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit : > > * Julien Puydt [2024-12-05 18:52]: > Solution A. > (1) changing the first paragraph to explain that's how it has to be > done (not just "recommends") ; > (2) and

Bug#1091170: [SPAM] Bug#1091170: sbuild: unsbale to update unshare chroots, or use them if $apt_update=0

On Tue, 24 Dec 2024, 13:21 Jochen Sprickerhof, wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Hi Richard, > > * Richard Lewis [2024-12-22 20:43]: > >I make a chroot with > >mmdebstrap --variant=buildd bookworm > --include=eatmydata,debhelper,fakeroot,apt-utils > ~

Bug#987017: release-notes: Giving many ways to do something *is* useful

On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 08:29:25 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > On 27-04-2024 11:48 p.m., Manny wrote: > > As an aptitude user, I was bothered by the lack of aptitude ways of > > doing things in the upgrade guide. > > I anything, I prefer the Release Notes to move to using one tool in the > instructions,

Bug#1041072: trixie: Explicitly flag that /usr-merge changes will break skip-upgrades

On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 12:34:31 +0100 Justin B Rye wrote: > Matthew Vernon wrote: > > We don't support skip-upgrades, but in practice they can often be made > > to work by an experienced administrator. > > > > For trixie, though, packages are going to be allowed to assume > > merged-/usr, and the ong

Bug#1035401: tmux as an alternative to screen

On Wed, 3 May 2023 22:09:44 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 02-05-2023 22:52, Marc Haber wrote: > > the release notes in the "preparing a safe environment" chapter > > recommend running in screen. Since tmux has reached some matureness in > > the mean time, it might be a good idea to mention

Bug#977358: release-notes: document how to make the rescue mode usable if no root password is set (buster)

On Sat, 03 Jun 2023 13:10:09 +0100 > Although this was documented for bullseye, the underlying cause > remains, and I think that it could be valuable for users to continue > to have this documentation available. > I've tested that the previously-added guidance from the bullseye > release notes re

Bug#1054019: broken sample rate passthrough

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:04:18 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?RHlsYW4gQcOvc3Np?= wrote: > Le mar. 17 oct. 2023 à 19:59, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit : > > 0.3.82-1~bpo12+1 solves the bug :) > > Great! :-) > > > Rather than close this bug as fixed right away, do you think it would be > > worthwhile to keep it open

Bug#930318: Suggestion for i386/amd64 "PC"

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:29:34 +0900 hox...@noramail.jp wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:01:25PM +0900, hox...@noramail.jp wrote: > > > en/whats-new.dbk: "Supported architectures" section > > > 1. 32-bit PC (i386) and 64-bit PC (amd64) > > > 2. 64-bit ARM (arm64) > > > > "arm64" is not Debian ar

Bug#708982: release-notes: l is difficult to distinguish from I or | (at least in the html version)

On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 23:58:03 +0200 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 02 dec 14, 08:25:07, Niels Thykier wrote: > > On Mon, 20 May 2013 02:18:35 +0300 Andrei POPESCU > > wrote: > > > In the paragraph describing how to find big packages with aptitude there > > > is an occurrence of 'l' which is very ha

Bug#1043043: UDD patches: marks Forwarded as invalid if not 'no', 'not-needed', 'yes' or URL

On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 22:32:54 +0100 Richard Lewis wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:19:38 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote: > > > On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 23:35:27 -0300, David da Silva Polverari wrote: > > > > When using https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi, I notice that whenever &

Bug#1091170: sbuild: unsbale to update unshare chroots, or use them if $apt_update=0

Package: sbuild Version: 0.86.3~bpo12+2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, I make a chroot with mmdebstrap --variant=buildd bookworm --include=eatmydata,debhelper,fakeroot,apt-utils ~/.cache/sbuild/bookworm-amd64.tar \ http://deb.debian.org/deb

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 15:53, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, 09:10 Julian Gilbey, wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 10:45:40PM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > On Mon

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, 09:10 Julian Gilbey, wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 10:45:40PM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2024, 12:42 Julian Gilbey, wrote: > > chkrootkit updates the > > access times of all the files in /tmp > > it to that time a

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024, 12:42 Julian Gilbey, wrote: > Package: chkrootkit > Version: 0.58b-3 > Severity: normal > > I was wondering why my /tmp is never cleared by systemd-tmpfiles, and > tried playing around with the settings in /etc/tmpfiles.d, but it > didn't help. > > I then discovered the source

Bug#1031086: piupart: fails in many packages for /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/e2scrub_reap.service not owned that is not related to package tested

On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 16:12:57 -0700 Manphiz wrote: > I've been dealing with similar spurious error of piuparts when testing > some packages that it reports that package purging left files on system: > > , > | 0m45.6s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system: > | /etc/default/locale -

Bug#482020: Fwd: avahi riles fo logcheck (Re: Wish for logcheck whitelists)

On Tue, 20 May 2008 18:19:15 +1000 "Trent W. Buck" wrote: > Currently, avahi-daemon provides no > /etc/logcheck/*.d.ignore/avahi-daemon files I believe this is not in debian, but if https://salsa.debian.org/debian/logcheck/-/merge_requests/23 gets merged logcheck will include avahi rules equival

Bug#1084672: git-buildpackage: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13

On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:31:22 -0800 =?UTF-8?B?T3R0byBLZWvDpGzDpGluZW4=?= < o...@debian.org> wrote: > From https://peps.python.org/pep-0594/#pipes > > > The pipes module provides helpers to pipe the input of one command into the output of another > > command. The module is built on top of os.popen. U

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >