Bug#435214: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#435214: Bug#435214: Clarification of licensing terms of semidef-oct

2007-08-07 Thread Lieven Vandenberghe
has a different policy. Thanks. Lieven Stephen Boyd wrote: whatever is easiest. i am happy with semidef_prog having either license. Rafael Laboissiere wrote: * Lieven Vandenberghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 09:13]: I can see why our license is ambiguous. When we wrote it in 1994,

Bug#435214: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#435214: Clarification of licensing terms of semidef-oct

2007-08-06 Thread Lieven Vandenberghe
Rafael, I can see why our license is ambiguous. When we wrote it in 1994, we intended it to mean that the program is entirely free, for any purpose (including commercial) and without any restriction. If it is easier if we switch to a standard free license, I would choose the LGPL. Best