tags 315414 confirmed upstream
forwarded 315414 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22165
thanks
The following test case isolates the problem more closely.
-- ARM 15.5.3(7): The component subtypes of the formal and actual
-- array types shall statically match.
generic
package P is
type T is private;
forwarded 315414 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/PR22164
thanks
(correcting the URL above)
I wrote:
package Instance_Of_Q is new P.Q (Formal_Array_Type = Array_Type);
This should be:
package Instance_Of_Q is new Instance_Of_P.Q (Formal_Array_Type = Array_Type);
--
Ludovic Brenta.
Jacob,
What options did you pass to GNAT when compiling?
I tried with your UTF-8 files and with the following command line:
gnatmake -O2 -gnatiw -gnatW8 test_315416.adb
The results are a little surprising.
3.15p-12 and 4.0.0-2 both crash because of #312621 (aka PR19519).
With 3.15p-13, which
Package: gnat
Version: 3.15p-12
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
(From GCC Bugzilla PR ada/19519, reported by Georg Bauhaus
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
The following program triggers the bug box when
encoded as UTF-8.
It runs fine when used with Latin-1
characters. The compiler can test the robustness of
As noted previously, the X server does not crash, it exists
voluntarily. The cause for this is now known to be that gnat-gps
calls kill (-1, SIGINT) which kills the user's session.
See #297980 for more details.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
tags 297980 -help
tags 297980 +pending
thanks
Jan Nordholz writes:
Removing the #ifdef pfa around the return value check should fix
the problem, although that's likely only mending the symptoms, not
the cause: The code in question has no support whatsoever for the
case that the ioctl()ed FD
Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
- Upon the request to begin compilation, gnat-gps claims a legacy
legacy PTY (it should really use the new mechanism and open /dev/ptmx
instead) and forks off...
I don't think that using the legacy mechanism for allocating a pty is
the culprit, but if I have time I will
Yossi Tamari wrote:
I noticed you reported about the GPS problem. I was wondering if you
know what is the staus of this bug and what is the estimated time it
would be fixed. I would hate to install Windows for Ada
programming...
The status of the bug is exactly as described in the report.
Hello. I've read about new uploads solving this problem. Has there
been any progress yet? Thanks,
The problem in the static library was solved in gnat 3.15p-7, but the
problem in the shared library is still there, as well as in AdaCore's
binary. If you use 3.15p-12, you can avoid the problem by
9 matches
Mail list logo
