Package: screenruler
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: normal
( Well I don't know where to report...
https://salsa.debian.org/georgesk/screenruler does not have
"reporting bugs", only accepting merge request.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/screenruler/ does not seem to be
the current upstream, so
Well, I don't know well about deb packaging, but:
Versions of packages xscreensaver suggests:
ii firefox [www-browser]109.0-1
pn fortune
pn gdm3 | kdm-gdmcompat
ii lynx [www-browser] 2.9.0dev.12-1
ii palemoon [www-browser] 32.0.0-1.gtk2
pn qcam |
CVE-2020-26159 is now recognized as false positive.
ref: https://github.com/kkos/oniguruma/issues/221
This is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231693
http://icculus.org/pipermail/openbox/2015-June/008872.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
This issue is fixed in 5.27 (in a different way than message #5).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi, Martin:
You mean that xscreensaver displays only some part of a image to the full
screen, right?
(or, only some part of the screen is covered by glslideshow saver and some part
of screen
is uncovered?)
In either case, would you show which size of image (picture) you try to use for
Well,
xscreensaver: 15:39:39: 0: xscreensaver-gl-helper: GL visual is 0x21 (default).
xscreensaver: 15:39:39: 0: visual 0x5e (TrueColor, depth: 32, cmap: 256)
I have no idea why different visual was selected here (i.e. visual returned by
xscreensaver-gl-helper was not selected)
Martin, would
Hello, Martin:
Thank you for logs.
I have not investigated the logs you provided in detail, however:
martin f krafft wrote, at 11/21/2012 11:47 PM +9:00:
also sprach TASAKA Mamoru mtas...@fedoraproject.org [2012.10.19.1427 +0200]:
I cannot reproduce this, either, so to debug this issue your
Hello, all:
I cannot reproduce this (on Fedora with xscreensaver 5.19), however just
from judging the error you posted, *maybe* the attached patch will fix this
issue ?? (can be cleanly applied also for xscreensaver 5.15)
This patch got applied in xscreensaver 5.20 (thank you, Jamie).
--
:/mtasaka/Debian_6.0/amd64/
? I just tried openSUSE open build service, however I could choose squeeze
target, so I am not sure if the built deb can correctly be installed on your
sid
system... Again I am using Fedora)
Regads,
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org
--- xscreensaver-5.19/driver
Well, xscreensaver has the option ignoreUninstalledPrograms option
(in ~/.xscreensaver and some system-default xscreensaver config file:
on Fedora it is /usr/share/X11/app-defaults/XScreenSaver which is the symlink
to /etc/xscreensaver/XScreenSaver.ad. The settings on ~/.xscreensaver
are given
Doesn't it work to uncheck Grab Desktop Images option in Image Manipulation
on
the Advanced tab in xscreensaver-demo?
By the way the default behavior of this (i.e. whether to use the desktop image)
can
be configured by the option grabDesktopImages of XScreenSaver.ad (per-user
setting is written
My patch got applied in xscreensaver 5.16.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi!
I am the maintainer of manedit on Fedora. I received the same bug report
on Fedora. The following patch seems to fix this problem. This is to revert
the related part from 0.8.1 to 0.7.1. I would appreciate it if you try this.
Regards.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356171
---
Still happens on 0.13.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo
