Source: libpng
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Please use the mechanism of DEB_*FLAGS_MAINT_APPEND instead of overriding
CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, etc -- with the current way it is a problem for compiling
special versions, it overrides some of the flags that I want to pass.
Perhaps this needs dh compat v9
commited now, marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
he package info screen of the curses interface.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
relevant message of this (cloned)
bug report.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
biguity.
Note to maintainers: the requests in the other messages have been cloned
to other bug reports.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
was cloned, this one is only about this
particular request.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ould be already possible if there was a %escape listing all
tags for a package, the same that this bug is about.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
up more than 10% of the free space on my
hard disk.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
en if one plays with HOME when becoming
root.
So basically, this is implemented now and was commited to VCS, so
marking as +pending. Hopefully it will not be pulled out again before
release.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
e never because I
have already configured aptitude to my liking.
This has been fixed now, it will be present in the next release, marking
as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
though all that has changed is the order/layout of the options in
the file.
Would it be possible for aptitude to rewrite the config only when
options have been changed?
Thanks for the report. This has been fixed now, marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.mon
A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
~/.aptitude/config when it is empty and
remove ~/.aptitude/ when there is no config file there and no other
files there.
Thanks, fix commited and marked as +pending.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
later using aptitude as a normal user again, it might not be able to
read its package cache etc.
This has been fixed now and will be present in the next release, marking
as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
is
zero
I guess that original problem is not locking /var/lib/dpkg/lock during
add/remove user tags or not checking status of lock/unlock
Thanks for the report, this has been addressed now and will be present
in the next release. Marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
, will be present in the next release, so marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
the problem is easier to pinpoint.
I suppose that this does not happen very often now with the pdiffs.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
from installing pacman on my server and samba on my desktop :-)
It could be done already, as explained in a previous message, but now it
will be there by default from the next release, so marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
. in the case of package
conflicts, e.g. between ftp.de.debian.org and a 3rd-party repository.
This is implemented now, will be released soon, so marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2015-11-13 11:31 GMT+00:00 Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net>:
> On 2015-11-13 10:59:01 +0000, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>>
>> So when you put packages on hold in testing, say "v1", and "v2"
>> appears in unstable or testing, the packa
the version from unstable rather than the version
from his repository.)
This is implemented now, will be released soon, so marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Did you find this problem in more instances, especially with kfreebsd?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
at the same time. It would be very helpful if a field showing the
repository is added to the package display list.
This is implemented now, will be released soon, so marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Thanks for the report.
I am tagging it as +help in the case that somebody feels generous and
wants to handle this bug.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ear
future.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
TED but will NOT be installed: ...
1 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
Need to get 4,123 kB of archives. After unpacking 2,084 kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
Implemented now, with verbose>0, marking as +pending.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Mon
.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
what you are doing!
To continue, type the phrase "I am aware that this is a very bad idea":
This is implemented now, marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Dan,
2008-08-30 05:20 jida...@jidanni.org:
Maybe it should say "Continue [in simulation mode]?"...
Implemented now, marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ess
fine because it uses only the minimum width or justifies to the right,
but "search" and "versions" don't work well.
So, in short, I agree that it doesn't make much sense when
redirecting/piping, and it's a problem, but it's the way in which all of
aptitude command line works and it will take a very significant effort
to change.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
it's fairly clear to conclude that this is
not going to be addressed in the near future, so leaving open but
marking as +wontfix for the time being.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
rhaps just say no when asked to confirm installation, if that is in
fact how to do it.
Yes, that's the only way to do it at the moment.
Merging with another duplicate bug report of yours.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2015-11-13 2:10 GMT+00:00 Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net>:
> On 2015-11-12 21:57:33 +0000, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> In your example above, using hold also would not install v2 from
>> testing, and when v4 appears, you notice and unhold, and all is well.
&
in VCS, marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
.aptitude/config and set:
aptitude::UI::Default-Grouping ""
it works as expected.
Thanks for the report. Implemented now, will be present in the next
release, so marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ration file reference_ do neither directly or indirectly
mention that the ‘maximum’ and ‘minimum’ values can be used.
The latter is my main point here, yes.
Being mentioned partway through a list any cross-reference would be
unclear, so perhaps just mention the two values everywhere in the
s
+pending.
Thanks for your report.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2015-11-12 15:49 GMT+00:00 Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net>:
> On 2015-11-12 14:24:10 +0000, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> In the general case, if one is using v9-1 from unstable, v9-2 appears
>> in unstable and v8-2 appears in testing and aptitude allows to
upgrading.
I am merging it with one of the bugs open related to this.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
I am not sure when this was added or removed, it doesn't seem to be in
the history of the file where it's more logical to contain it.
Anyway, I implemented this now, it will be present in the next release,
marking as +pending.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
severity 642030 wishlist
tags 642030 + wontfix
stop
2015-11-12 13:37 GMT+00:00 Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net>:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On 2015-11-12 11:59:15 +0000, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Even if this worked for multiple versions, if you are unsur
Control: tags -1 + pending
2015-09-30 00:59 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson:
"MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> writes:
MAFM> So yes, I guess that it was some kind of action pending in
MAFM> aptitude/apt/dpkg (or that they thought that it was pending
be solvable in general. Unless we only
capture the reporting user's config, I don't know if we can do much
better.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
o happened with other / all packages?
The code was not changed lately, I never experienced it and there are no
other reports, and it's a moderately popular feature... so it's a bit
odd if it only fails in your system or with a particular package.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
, which in principle should be a valid solution. Was it
not so?
In any case, the resolver changed a lot in the years after this bug
report, and after so many years, I do not think that we can do much
about this bug report.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
From: Markus Koschany <a...@gambaru.de>
> To: 804793-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc:
> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:11:22 +0100
> Subject: Re: Bug#804793: games-minesweeper: Please do not recommend
> 'aptitude' as minesweeper game
> Am 11.11.2015 um 19:42 schrieb Manuel A. Ferna
Package: games-minesweeper
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The purpose of the aptitude package is completely different from being a game.
The reason why it includes a game it is a historical curiosity.
And basically, it is a bit dangerous that people launch aptitude thinking that
it's a minesweeper
Another little oddity caused by this feature, it is recommended by the
meta-package games-minesweeper:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804793
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
your way in.
The little support for this project is going to be disabled soon due to
being obsolete and unmaintained, see:
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/aptitude-devel/2015-November/005903.html
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2015-11-09 0:41 GMT+00:00 Paul Wise <p...@debian.org>:
> On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 22:13 +0000, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
>> If you have systems with testing (or unstable, but still didn't upgrade the
>> package), could you perhaps try to see if this is still happ
s just by excluding some paths, git-buildpackage does the rest:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-sdl/packages/libsdl2.git/tree/debian/gbp.conf
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo help
2015-11-11 0:56 GMT+00:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jida...@jidanni.org>:
> Your mail has no bug number at all.
Thanks for noticing.
> I don't know. I haven't used that hardware in many years.
All right, no idea either.
>>>>>> "MA
is
use-case, I am not sure that implementing the other solution is a good
idea, there ar lots of details that are needed to get it right.
Since this has been unattended for years I am marking it as +wontfix, it
doesn't look likely that nobody takes a stab in the near future.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernande
ere, but I think that this is printed now with
"recommended but not installed packages".
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
I don't think that it's a very good idea to
implement this.
Some people who like to tweak under the hood, simply disable recommends
and install recommends on demand (as in your case with GCC below), and
they seem to have their systems working fine, so you might try this if
you are not doing it already.
en?
Again, as with my comment to the first report, I don't think that not
being suspended in these circumstances is a problem with aptitude,
because if the process to be suspended is aptitude, the signal is not
even supposed to reach aptitude.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
d").
If you have systems with testing (or unstable, but still didn't upgrade
the package), could you perhaps try to see if this is still happening
when you upgrade in the next few days, and report back the results in
this bug report?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
that this is going to be addressed soon.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
e is much more clear
d) there have been no seconds in 6 years, and no reactions after more
than 3 other than the one above
So I think that it's simply better to close this request, now that the
issue that triggered the main complaint is gone -- doing it now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
t problems in aptitude to solve and hundreds of bugs open, I
don't think that it's useful to keep this one open as well).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
) and I will
probably profit from this Feature.
This can be changed with the option about default grouping ('G' in
curses, in preferences, or saving it to the config file).
http://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s05s01.html
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
, and I don't imagine that having the extra
depends will hurt, unless apt changes dramatically in the future.
And very few people will want apt removed from the system even if
aptitude would not require it.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
cheduled actions into account unconditionally, if
possible at all, rather than adding yet more config options. But I am
leaning more towards +wontfix.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ee the real why...
Again, the report is quite diffuse about the options used and what is
confusing, and the exact commands used.
Also, perhaps reading apt's documentation on that option would help to
clear things up, or even aptitude's:
http://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s05s05.html
Chee
s is still happening in recent
machines/systems?
Also, the problem with screen happened also with a Mac, or with any kind
of hardware?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
qt is dead upstream, or rather, merged with LXDE-Qt (merged
project being called LXQt). Some packages are starting to pop up in
the repositories already.
The current Razor-qt packages use Qt4, which is going to be retired
from Debian before the next stable, I think, at which point Razor-qt
will cease to compile.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2015-11-01 8:36 GMT+00:00 RjY <r...@users.sourceforge.net>:
> Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>So now we try to be more cautious and to avoid cherry-picking fixes
>>(unless they are critical fixes), unless they were going to be released
>>im
on the
command line. Here is the result:
Thanks for the report.
This looks like the problem described in #800017, so merging them.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
he machine which had weird issues, like
intermittent compilation failures?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ging 2.0.3 at this point (19 months after) doesn't
look like a very good option to me. I don't know why upstream people
are so reluctant to release 2.0.4 :-/
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2015-10-31 20:10 GMT+00:00 Sebastian Dröge <sl...@coaxion.net>:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> On October 31, 2015 10:03:51 PM EET, "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo"
> <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>(Sorry for the duplicate Sebastian, I forgot to include the bug re
at is not.
We already tried to encourage upstream in different ways to try to get
regular bugfix releases, but we failed so far. If you think that you
can influence them, please go ahead :)
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
e go ahead :)
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
tions inside a freshly started aptitude in a
157x21 terminal.
I can reproduce it all the time, also in 0.6.11 from stable (Jessie).
I think that it's partly due to the incremental search feature
(according to the backtrace), feature about which there are more
complaints in the BTS (but I haven't checked if they are related or
not).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2015-10-26 12:25 Axel Beckert:
Control: notfound -1 aptitude/0.6.11
Control: found -1 aptitude/0.6.11-1
Hi,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
I think that it's partly due to the incremental search feature
(according to the backtrace), feature about which there are more
complaints
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: minor
>From bug #799918 (opening a new one to avoid all of the noise in that bug
report):
jidanni:
OK now full-upgrade prints "- libgdal1i, but 1.11.3+dfsg-1~exp1 is to be
installed." twice! On the same line too.
(Note I always use the CLI
er.
But in any case, it is strange that this survived lurking for so many
years (7+) since the feature was added, without more bug reports
alerting about the problem.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
em before,
and there are not many bugs about the issue, so I guess that there is
something specific about this dependency that makes it fail.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 + pending
2015-10-25 12:51 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: minor
From bug #799918 (opening a new one to avoid all of the noise in that bug
report):
jidanni:
OK now full-upgrade prints "- libgdal1i, but 1.11.3+dfsg-1
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: serious
0.7.4 will migrate to testing soon, so this is a way to hold the migration. It
is not very elegant and it would be nice to have another way to achieve this
other than with changes in BTS, but I don't think that there are any.
The reason for
2015-10-24 0:15 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jida...@jidanni.org>:
>>>>>> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> writes:
>
> MAFM> The idea is that you install libgdal1i from testing first
>
2015-10-25 1:11 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jida...@jidanni.org>:
>>>>>> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> writes:
>
> MAFM> stable and testing are supposed to be free of that (althought
2015-10-25 1:52 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jida...@jidanni.org>:
>>>>>> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> writes:
>
> MAFM> sid is subject to massive changes and in-place library update
sg-2, which of course cannot stay in the system as
the same time as libgdal1i=1.11.2+dfsg-3.
So the packages will not be able to be installed/upgraded until all of
the chain of dependencies decide move on to depend on
libgdal.so.1-1.11.3 (provided by libgdal1i=1.11.3+dfsg-2), or in other
words, until the tra
ge to fix it or change the behaviour, please ask them to
also do a new release, so we can refer to a clear point in time rather
than picking random patches or VCS at random dates.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Hello,
2015-09-21 11:18 GMT+01:00 Prof. Dr. Gundolf Kiefer
<gundolf.kie...@hs-augsburg.de>:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:49:21 +0100
> "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>>
>>
>>
2015-10-20 18:44 GMT+01:00 Nick Black <nick.bl...@sprezzatech.com>:
> I can confirm that 0.7.4 fixes the issue I reported. Good work.
Good, thanks for the confirmation!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
1i, you can try
"apt-get install libgdal1i" to see if there are further explanations
why that package cannot be installed in your system.
We do no add the dependency of libgdal.so.1-1.11.2 directly, it was
added by depending on libgdal-dev. I think that if there are any
problems with this is due to changes in that package or knock-on
effects.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
rom the stable and testing
>> repositories, but I'm not convinced this is the problem because my
>> sources.list only has testing (not stable), and I did an 'apt-get update &&
>> apt-get dist-upgrade' before reporting either bug.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
would remain, and
> MAFM> that is that the packages in their current state are not
> MAFM> installable anyway, and there is nothing that we can do from
> MAFM> aptitude's side to get it installed in your system.
>
> Then there is indeed a bug that should be reported to the
2015-10-17 4:21 GMT+01:00 Harald Dunkel <ha...@afaics.de>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 09/30/15 14:13, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>>
>> Even if we add support in aptitude to hold uninstalled packages (another bug
>> rep
me, and wonder if
there is some fine detail that they are missing).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ate the information everywhere
in manpage and guide (and in some cases on-line quick help and in-source
messages) -- it takes at least twice the work and can easily lead to
being out of sync (I've been fixing many such cases lately), so marking
as +wontfix and closing.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fern
State: installed
Forbidden version: 2.02~beta2-29
Automatically installed: no
Multi-Arch: foreign
Version: 2.02~beta2-28
...
Maybe this has been fixed in the 5.5 years in between, otherwise this is
not the condition that triggers the problem.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
indeed heard what I said.
One needs to start the visual interface to confirm what happened
indeed happened.
Will do this with -v now, marking as +pending.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
1101 - 1200 of 2047 matches
Mail list logo
