mainly use dump/restore these days!)
Regards/Mark
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 09:19 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> tags 243141 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 20:29:24 +1000, Mark Hannon
> wrote:
> > Tar complains with a warning re implausibly old time stamp whe
Looking at the text of #377330 I concur. In the cases where my restoration loses files I also see the messages "Deleting ".
Regards/Mark
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 12:08 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 07:38:34PM +1000, Mark Hannon wrote:
> Package:
Package: tar
Version: 1.15.91-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I have used some simple scripts to make incremental backups with tar for
many years. I have attempted to restore a couple of backup series
recently and found that tar has deleted many directories in the ba
Package: yelp
Version: 2.10.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
yelp no longer displays any help topics in the browser window.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (750, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable'), (600, 'stable'),
Package: gsoap
Version: 2.7.0d-1
Severity: important
The default behaviour of wsdl2h is to create header files requiring the
stl*.h headers to be installed in the working directory. These headers
are not part of the binary package. They should be included in the deb
as well as a note in README.D
A dist-upgrade today with new kernel and modutils 3.2-pre1-1 worked
fine.
/mark
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 22:05 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I wonder if you can still reproduce this old bug with 3.2-pre1-2.
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
6 matches
Mail list logo
