On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:33:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Loic Minier wrote:
> > Anyway, your preferred option seems saner, and quite doable given the
> > limited amount of API / ABI changes as listed by mdz.
>
> Other symbols removed since 2.1.7
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:45:14PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> FTC_SBit_Cache_Lookup -> FTC_SBit_Cache_Lookup
This should be:
FTC_SBit_Cache_Lookup -> FTC_SBitCache_Lookup
of course.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
A quick scan of the diff reveals at least the following API and ABI changes:
Functions:
FTC_Image_Cache_New -> FTC_ImageCache_New
FTC_Image_Cache_Lookup -> FTC_ImageCache_Lookup
FTC_SBit_Cache_New -> FTC_SBitCache_New
FTC_SBit_Cache_Lookup -> FTC_SBit_Cache_Lookup
FTC_Manager_Lookup_Face -> FTC_Ma
Package: adduser
Version: 3.78ubuntu1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Many chroot environments don't use shadow passwords, and adduser seems to
fail in those enviroments now. The code in adduser attempts to cope with
this, but it's defeated by the check within the systemcall function.
Patch atta
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:41:39AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not sure when this problem occured first. I know it was fine months
> ago. i just stared debugging why some graph didn't work and then noticed
> this fault.
Can you test with a pre-1.2 rrdtool?
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:10:14PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Package: rrdtool
> Version: 1.0.49-1
> Severity: important
>
> rrdtool graph command gives a floating point exception on my alpha.
> None of my rrd files appear to work.
>
> $ rrdtool graph /tmp/blah DEF:ntest=/tmp/interface-6-1.rrd:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:20:21PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> So what's the current status of hercules? There was some discussion
> about the new upstream version in February but no further activity since
> then. Currently hercules is removed from testing because of it's
> FTBFS bug related
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.6.2.1
> Severity: normal
>
> Policy 9.2.1 says:
> Packages other than base-passwd must not modify /etc/passwd,
> /etc/shadow, /etc/group or /etc/gshadow.
>
> This makes, for example, the passwd packa
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 07:14:09PM +0200, Antonio Biasio wrote:
> Package: reportbug
> Version: 3.17
> Severity: normal
>
>
> In ubuntu packages reportbug crash when send bug.
Please don't report Ubuntu bugs to the Debian bug tracking system. Ubuntu
has its own bug tracking system at http://bug
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:50:59PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.41
> Severity: important
>
>
> We are running Sid within a chroot environment and from time to time I
> update the packages there. Since about apt-0.6.40 the 'apt-get update
> command' causes problems. I
NMUs are welcome on these bugs (and other such transitional bugs in any of
my packages).
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:24:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 02:21:22PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This is necessary in order to maintain compatibility, since Release has
> > traditionally been optional.
>
> Does that preclude even a
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:09:40PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.41
> Severity: normal
>
> I spent half an hour trying to figure out why Apt complained that a bunch of
> packages would be updated but were unauthenticated. It turns out that the
> Release.gpg on the
retitle 329156 [CAN-2005-0023] /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper: writes arbitrary
utmp records
thanks
Use CAN-2005-0023 for this issue.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:25:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:48:20AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 06:51:23PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > > Package: installation-reports
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > &g
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 06:51:23PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I'm reporting this feature request based on the review of "Mad Penguin."
> I'm aware that Ubuntu has nothing to do wit Debian, but Ubuntu uses
> same installer, so the remarks apply
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: vmnet
> Version: 0.4-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
> decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
> long time could co
retitle 325299 [doc] Documentation for --names-only could be clearer
thanks
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 09:42:01AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.40.1
> Severity: normal
>
> The man page says:
>
> and if --names-only is given then the long description is not searched,
>
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:55:29AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> - Ryan said it may break commercial apps. I'm really not too worried
>about that. First, if an app uses the socket directly instead of
>using libesd, it is broken by design. Second, most commercial apps
>I know use OSS and
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:13:46AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > It should be removed from unstable if no one steps up to maintain it; it
> > needs to be repackaged more or less from scratch in order to migrate t
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 04:29:23PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 04:02:37PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Yes, as I said:
> > >
> > > > > What might be better for the default Debian permissions setup is to
> > > > > ma
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:55:27PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:32:34PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > With modern GNOME, it's quite convenient to have multiple users logged in at
> > the console and switch between them, as in Windows XP, and that
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:13:41PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:23:19PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > I patched esound to work with several parallel instances, so that
> > several logged in users can get sound:
>
> This breaks third party commercial applications. I have
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:22:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:23:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > This will break a lot packages depending on one of those, including but
> > > not limited to things like linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6, pwc,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:05:28PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:44:35PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Rationale:
> > > Security team automatically gets all bugs which are tagged security,
> >
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:44:35PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Rationale:
> Security team automatically gets all bugs which are tagged security,
> this ensures this is not missed.
This is not true. If a bug should be brought to the attention of the
security team, it needs to be sent to [EM
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:30:30AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Matt Zimmerman]
> > They are all doing different things. The only common part is
> > calling dpkg-reconfigure, and I don't mind one line of duplicate
> > code in favor of adding a new init script to
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:07:57AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Matt Zimmerman]
> > As discussed with Petter previously, I don't think this is the right
> > approach, and intend to maintain the existing mechanism where the
> > LTSP init script configures X. I s
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:24:21PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Package: xserver-common
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> When booting live CDs and thin clients, there is a need to
> (re)configure X automatically at boot time. To make this easier and
> mor
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 03:27:59PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> I see the problem is reported to ubuntu as well
> http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11821. I couldn't find an easy way
> to link the ubuntu& debian bugs which is annoying :-(
We do this by setting an alias of "deb".
--
-
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:17:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I can see their point, but damn if this isn't an ugly way to do it. I'd
> much rather see movement toward a BSD auth solution, where the entire
> pam_unix module is behind an exec barrier, but I don't exactly have time to
> refactor
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:09:29AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.03.0103 +0200]:
> > There is no way for apt to tell which one is "the" release file that you are
> > regenerating.
>
> For one,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:08:38AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.02.2217 +0200]:
> > The Release file and the Packages file have the same high-level format, and
> > so use the same parser. The error message is mislead
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 09:59:59PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> needs an extra versioned dependency on apt, but I don't know which
> version will have Michael's progress code yet.
0.6.40
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 05:09:08PM +0300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: apt-utils
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/apt-ftparchive
>
> If the Release file already exists and is to be overwritten with
> apt-ftparchive like so:
>
> apt-ftparchive release . >| Release
>
merge 318207 207431
thanks
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:50:14AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.38
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello
>
> Please implement a Post-Update hook for /etc/apt/apt.conf.d scripts.
> It should not be that hard but would give admins a lot to play
severity 317432 normal
tags 317432 unreproducible
thanks
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:13:17PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I have the following line in sources.list:
>
> deb http://debian.madduck.net ~madduck/packages/internal/
>
> This causes
>
> http://debian.madduck.net/~madduck/packages/
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > Currently, apt 0.6 uses a single binary file as its keyring in /etc/apt.
> > This has the disadvantage that modifying it requires special tools like
> > apt-key, and so key manageme
retitle 316915 [libapt-pkg] Suggests running apt-get update as a solution to
any error
thanks
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 09:04:01PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.38
>
> Recently there was a problem with the signatures for amd64:
>
>
> # apt-get update
> :
> :
> Get:4 h
severity 317101 wishlist
retitle 317101 Record the reasons for authentication failures for later use?
thanks
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:43:14PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> when installing packages without having gpg present on the s
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 11:55:15PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:24:51PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > I put some code into apt that should make it possible to get usefull
> > install progress reports. It's in
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/apt--progress-reporting--0 [1]
> >
> >
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:36:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU that sets -fno-inline-functions on m68k to work around
> the compiler bug there (-finline-functions is being set in the upstream
> configure script). In the process, I found a couple of other issues in
> debian/
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:16:09PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:47:27PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > could you maybe take a look at my patch in the BTS to allow using
> > [TRUSTED] as vendor tag in sources.list for implizitly tursted
> > repositories?
>
> Sorry
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 08:43:47AM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Package: checksecurity
> Version: 2.0.7-6
> Severity: important
> Tags: security patch sarge
What's the security issue here?
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:06:53PM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.38
> Tags: patch
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> I profiled aptitude a bit and found out that most of its slowness(*)
> is due to apt (which shouldn't be that much of a surprise, aptitude
> being mostly on
severity 319142 wishlist
merge 319142 250305
thanks
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:44:02AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ md5sum
> /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-scalable_6.8.2.dfsg.1-3_all.deb
> a525d80fb0df950f4e9b0e3141c63d0c
> /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-scalable_6.8.2.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:37:24PM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.38
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this has been discussed before in depth, but anyway I
> believe that the libapt-pkg .so should be split in its own package.
> This would have the benefit
Package: apt
Severity: normal
Simple test case, assuming 'hello' is not installed:
# apt-get --trivial-only install hello hello
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
hello
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 50 no
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:13:47PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>
> > Either way, I don't think having acpid installed is enough, as long it
> > starts so late in bootup process. A long fsck run or a similar problem
> > before entering runlevel 2, an
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 12:25:52PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Subject: gnucash-common: .desktop file misplaced
> > Package: gnucash-common
> > Version: 1.8.9-4ubuntu2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > *** Please type your report below this line
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 06:34:05PM +0100, Colin S. Miller wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> apt-get displays progress bars when its downloading files.
> However, when it is exctacting and configuring the .debs,
> there is no indication of how long this is likely
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:44:38PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I've been trying to look into the viability of running User Mode Linux
> on a Debian/sarge system, but it doesn't seem to be possible to do so in
> the Debian "native" way with these serious bugs open and preventing the
>
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:30:03PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 11:34:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I found 3(!) problems causing it! In my case I had to fix all 3 of the
> > problems before it finally worked.
> >
> > 1) An important cause of this is that the netw
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 03:10:17PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Something I found on the Ubuntu site suggested to solve this problem
> > by setting apt up to install a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d to set
> > APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated to 1. I think this would be better
> > than either using
reassign 316344 debian-keyring
severity 316344 wishlist
retitle 316344 Please provide Debian archive keyring
thanks
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 06:14:07AM +0200, Christian von Kietzell wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.38
> Followup-For: Bug #316344
>
>
> I did an strace on apt and it tries to re
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 06:39:30AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hoary-security universe
> > > deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hoary-security universe'
> > > --preserve-buildplace
> > >
> > > and it fails on `apt-get update'. Please
severity 316337 normal
thanks
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 10:03:50AM +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.6.38
> Severity: important
>
> When running apt-get update on the sources below, I get the following problem:
>
> Failed to fetch
> ftp://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/../pro
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 06:06:31PM +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> On Thursday 30 June 2005 17:56, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:47:37PM +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> > > On Thursday 30 June 2005 16:42, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > That's odd
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:47:37PM +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> On Thursday 30 June 2005 16:42, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > That's odd...it may be that the error message is misleading, though. Did
> > you try downloading the .bz2 file and testing it?
>
> Well, fact is, t
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Package: pbuilder
> Version: 0.127
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I'm trying to make
>
> # pbuilder create --distribution hoary --mirror
> 'http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu' --nonusmirror '' --othermirror 'deb
> http://us.archive.
severity 316119 wishlist
thanks
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:53:04PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Severity: important
I beg your pardon?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt/archives$ dpkg --contents
> apt_0.6.38_i386.deb | grep ubuntu
> -rw-r--r-- root/root 1724 2005-06-25 21:45:20
> ./usr
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:10:50AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Lun 27 Juin 2005 04:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Package: kdelibs-bin
> > Version: 4:3.4.0-0ubuntu3.2
> > Severity: normal
> > File: /usr/bin/kcmshell
>
> I suppose you are kidding us ?
>
> please make bug reports on ubu
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:04:30PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> The following held packages will be changed:
> fuse-source
> [...]
> E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes
>
> So which problems? Tell me!
You placed the on hold. Try removing the hold and trying again.
--
I agree with Manoj's suggestion. The best way to go about it would be to
draft a complete proposal (including standardizing the output format), start
patching packages in unstable, and go from there.
FWIW, I think it would be appropriate to add an option to start-stop-daemon
to support this use c
severity 314332 minor
merge 211075 314332
thanks
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:56:52PM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> I have a problem to install this two packages in one step.
Please check the list of open bugs before reporting a new one.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
severity 314334 wishlist
thanks
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:14:13PM -0600, Matthew S. Wood wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> APT doesn't work on filesystems which don't support shared writable mmap.
> This is significant for hand-held devices which u
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 04:50:18PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Package: apt
> Severity: wishlist
>
> By adding APT::Get::Show-Upgraded to apt.conf, each apt-get run reports the
> packages that it wants to upgrade in addition to the packages installed and
> removed. However, there does ot seem t
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 05:40:11PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: esound
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi Ryan!
>
> esound is not capable of reconnecting to the sound device. Whenever
> the sound configuration changes (e. g. change of the default device in
> ~/.asoundrc), esd has t
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:51:58AM +0100, Eamonn Hamilton wrote:
> Package: evms
> Version: 2.5.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> on using ebmsn or evmsgui, on exit after deciding not to save the
> following error is delivered :
>
> ** glibc detected *** corrupted double-linked list: 0x080ea500 ***
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:31:25PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> severity 315152 wishlist
> thanks
>
> * Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Package: bzr
> > Version: 0.0.5-1
> > Severity: important
> > Justification: fails to build from source
> >
>
Package: bzr
Version: 0.0.5-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
> python2.3 setup.py clean --all
> make: python2.3: Command not found
Full log available at:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~lamont/buildLogs/b/bzr/0.0.5-1/bzr_0.0.5-1_20050616-2010-i386-failed.gz
-- System In
(I didn't see this until now because I'm not subscribed to debian-boot;
please respect my mail-followup-to)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:57:28AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > ipconfig in klibc has worked well for me so far; I believe it's based on t
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:07:44AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 10:22:13AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 03:17:57PM +0100, Christoph Heine wrote:
> >
> > > new_auth_behavior is not critical enough for a "high&quo
reassign 315001 python2.3
close 315001
merge 315001 314849
thanks
Already reported and fixed (this is a python2.3 bug, not an apt-listchanges
bug).
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 01:52:38PM -0400, A. Costa wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:48:13 -0700
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
>
> > > File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 218, in ?
> > > main()
>
> > This is a bug in apt-listchanges which is even reported
reassign 314962 python2.3
severity 314962 normal
close 314962
merge 314962 314849
thanks
> Backing python2.3 to 2.3.5-4 makes this package usable again.
>
> Please reassign this bug to python2.3, if that's a better place.
Doing so (the bug has already been fixed there).
--
- mdz
--
To UNSU
tags 313402 pending
thanks
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 03:28:48PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: normal
>
> According to #294954, bug scripts need to use bash if they are using
> the yesno function. However, /usr/share/bug/apt/script starts with
>
> #!
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 02:26:27PM +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman schrieb:
>
> >severity 307942 normal
> >thanks
> >
> >
> Oh, well, I'd say the random deletion of files that I expect to keep is
> a /serious/ issue, at least for the band
severity 309993 wishlist
retitle 309993 Incorporate partial packages in download total?
thanks
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:52:13PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: normal
>
> cane:/home/pryzbyj# apt-get install bbappconf
> Reading Package Lists... Done
>
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:43:39AM -0400, Luis Mondesi wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Followup-For: Bug #152217
>
> apt-get download should simply be a call to (alias?):
>
> apt-get -o 'Dir::State::status "./"' \
> -o 'Dir::Cache "./"
> --download-only --reinstall install
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:34:10AM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Followup-For: Bug #178854
>
>
> I understand how you could view this as a wishlist item, but the fact
> is that when a repository returns a 302, the resulting set of
> downloaded data files is su
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 01:27:48AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: initramfs
> > Version : 0.7
> > Upstream Author : Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECT
Allow dpkg-reconfigure -fnoninteractive to work again by testing for
+forced_frontend
+
+ -- Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:02:57 -0700
+
debconf (1.4.50ubuntu1) breezy; urgency=low
* Resynchronise with Debian. Drop dummy progress passthrough patches,
diff -Nru
reassign 312534 aptitude
severity 312534 minor
thanks
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:25:12AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I meant to say I did aptitude update. Should that matter?
Yep. Also, these are only warnings, and not errors (I expect they are
harmless).
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:02:25AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:41:31AM -0400, EspeonEefi wrote:
> > I have run into the same problem (I'm on a ThinkPad T42). An interesting
> > thing I noticed was that sound was only disturbed when sound was being
> > output by ESD (GN
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 09:10:13AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: normal
>
> When adding a new entry to sources.list I've noticed I often (always?)
> get an error the first time I do an update.
>
> E.g., I changed my entry for security from woody to sarg
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:28:29PM +1000, Ben Stewart wrote:
> Reading through the earlier entries in this bug report, it appears that
> a change from depending on libgd2-xpm was changed to libgd2-noxpm.
>
> This causes problems with having php4-gd installed on the same machine,
> as follows:
>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:25:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: usbutils
> Version: 0.71-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The Ubuntu patch to usbutils defines the device 03f0:3a11 (vendor
> Hewlett-Packard) as "OfficeJet 5510". Matt Zimmerman added this with no
>
This is the same as:
https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 308744 pending
thanks
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:32:11PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Package: apt-listchanges
> Version: 2.59-0.2
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> The Vietnamese translation for debconf: apt-listchanges
Committed to my CVS, thanks.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
retitle 309513 Comment in /etc/cron.d/cricket contains incorrect path to config
tree
thanks
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:51:10PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: cricket
> Severity: normal
>
> The /etc/cron.d/cricket reads:
>
> # Note: if you change the collection interval here, you MUST ed
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:48:23PM -0300, Adriano Nagelschmidt Rodrigues wrote:
> Package: apt-listchanges
> Version: 2.59-0.2
>
> I'm running a script to upgrade my system, via cron, with stdout
> sent to /dev/null. I would like to receive the changelogs extracted by
> apt-listchanges via email.
tags 302548 pending
thanks
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 04:16:11PM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
> tags 302548 +patch
> thanks
>
> Followup-For: Bug #302548
> Package: apt-listchanges
> Version: 2.59-0.2
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is a small patch to fix this internationalization issue:
Applied in my CV
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Package: apt-listchanges
> Version: 2.59-0.2
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n
>
>
> The french translation prints doesn't "Terminé" correctly on Unicode
> consoles. Looks like the translation was incorrectly made in Latin1.
Can
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Package: gzip
> Version: 1.3.5-9
> Tags: patch
>
> While looking at the ubuntu patches for gzip, I found some changes
> which are missing in the debian package. These are the ubuntu
> changelog entries related to the fixes:
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:24:23PM +0400, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
> tags 308766 + security
> thanks
> Thursday, 12 May 2005 12:32 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Package: jabber-irc
> > Version: 0.1cvs20050311-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi Alexey,
> >
> > I was preparing to sponsor your upload of j
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:36:22PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Diab Jerius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I haven't had a chance to downgrade libusb/sane further, but I just
> > happened to have a laptop running Ubuntu Hoary at home this morning,
> > and tried that out. I have no idea if this i
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:10:39PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> There is one functional change; the Ubuntu version adds a couple of
> additional USB IDs to the hotplug usermap (patch attached).
Really attached now.
--
- mdz
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpat
severity 307942 normal
thanks
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:32:06PM +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.1
> Severity: important
>
> apt-get autoclean removes valid cache members
>
> Hi, this is actually a replay of archived bug #180395.
>
> I have just run apt-get autoclea
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:47:21PM +0300, Pasi Savolainen wrote:
> On 5/2/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:22:49AM +0300, Pasi Savolainen wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.10-5-k7-smp
> > > Version: 2.6.10-34
> > > Severity: important
> >
> > This appe
101 - 200 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
