Bug#760873: [vim-gtk] Incorrect display of ascii glyps (ie. displays 'm' in place of 'g').

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:31:07PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 04:27:21PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > Hi James, > > yes, it's totally related to the font face used: > > > > $ gvim -u NONE -c 'set guifont=PragmataPro\ 12' > >

Bug#917839: cpufrequtils: diff for NMU version 008-1.1

On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 10:30:36PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Package: cpufrequtils > Version: 008-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch pending > Control: tags 793913 pending > Control: tags 889895 pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for cpufrequtils (versioned as 008-1.1)

Bug#912596: cpufrequtils: cpufreq-info only shows 31 CPUs

On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:09:26PM +, Witold Baryluk wrote: > Package: cpufrequtils > Version: 008-1+b1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > it appears cpufreq-info has issues with a lot of CPUs? cpufrequtils is unmaintained upstream and is in the archive essentially only because

Bug#899318: virtualbox: FTBFS: vboxssdt-standard.hex:16:23: error: expected initializer before '-' token

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 07:07:53AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: [...] > Gianfranco, > if you need a work-around, changing the file prefix to something that is > a legal C identifier might help. Gianfranco, so are you going to patch virtualbox? In terms of severity, I think this bug again

Bug#899318: virtualbox: FTBFS: vboxssdt-standard.hex:16:23: error: expected initializer before '-' token

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:33:45AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:56:55PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > control: reassign -1 src:acpica-unix > > control: found -1 20180508-1 > > control: affects -1 virtualbox > > > > On Tue,

Bug#899318: virtualbox: FTBFS: vboxssdt-standard.hex:16:23: error: expected initializer before '-' token

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:56:55PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: reassign -1 src:acpica-unix > control: found -1 20180508-1 > control: affects -1 virtualbox > > On Tue, 22 May 2018 19:12:32 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: > > Package: virtualbox > >

Bug#877016: Time to drop cpufrequtils?

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:31:37AM -0400, Phil Susi wrote: > On 9/28/2017 9:51 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote: > >> Package: cpufrequtils > >> Version: 008-1 > > ... > >> is the case, should cpu

Bug#877016: Time to drop cpufrequtils?

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote: > Package: cpufrequtils > Version: 008-1 ... > is the case, should cpufrequtils not be removed now? Yes, indeed it should. Thanks for nagging. There's a little more work required to smooth the transition. $ apt-cache rdepends

Bug#857126: cpufrequtils: Fails to install/upgrade (syntax error in init script)

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 05:06:39PM +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote: > Hi Hi, it looks like we almost overlapped in our replies. > Andreas Henriksson schrieb am 08.03.2017, 21:55 +0100: > >On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote: ... > >> Mar 08 10:54:47 kraftkrust

Bug#857126: cpufrequtils: Fails to install/upgrade (syntax error in init script)

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:55:02PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Hello Sebastian Humenda, > > Thanks for your bug report > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote: > > Package: cpufrequtils > > Version: 008-1+b1 > > Severity:

Bug#849672: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#849672: uml-utilities: boot up delay

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:57:42PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: ... > 3.289s uml-utilities.service ... > The following code snippet has an explicit sleep, which has to retry for > a max of 5 secs. > > WAIT=5 > while ! test -e $UML_SWITCH_CTL; do > sleep 1

Bug#843071: linux-cpupower: cpupower does not change the governor

severity 843071 important forwarded 843071 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135391 thanks On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:54:36PM +0100, Julien RIVAUD (_FrnchFrgg_) wrote: > Followup-For: Bug #843071 > Package: linux-cpupower > Version: 4.8.5-1 > > I forgot to include the url of the

Bug#842704: cpufrequtils doesn't create cpufreq directory

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:10:16PM +0100, Diego Herchhoren wrote: > Package: cpufrequtils > Version: 008-1 > > When installing the package, the process doesn't generate the directory > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq > > In the console appear this: > > "Seleccionando el paquete

Bug#841238: acpidump: "turbostat" binary silently dropped?

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:20:25PM +0300, Андрей Василишин wrote: > Package: acpica-tools > Version: 20140926-1 > > Hello! > Iam sorry,but there are no turbostat binary in acpica-tools package Hi, not so siliently actually, from changelog: * Closes: #731761 -- add changelog info on turbostat:

Bug#840852: please make libcpupower-dev depend on libcpupower1 (= ${binary:Version})

's one that is build tested and working. Regards -- mattia :wq! commit 8cee65c3229f5f692ad97df9bca117ef194c9ac7 Author: Mattia Dongili <malat...@linux.it> Date: Sun Oct 16 18:08:41 2016 -0700 libcpufreq-dev depends on its corresponding binary package Closes: #840852 Signed-of

Bug#837920: user-mode-linux should be built directly by src:linux

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:14:13PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 06:20:34AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote: > >... > > Let's see where I get to in integrating the UML build with src:linux, > >... > > If you need help let me know. > > This l

Bug#837920: user-mode-linux should be built directly by src:linux

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:20:18PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 20:55 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > On Thu, September 15, 2016 7:16 pm, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > ... > > > > > > > > > I'm open to the possibility

Bug#837920: user-mode-linux should be built directly by src:linux

On Thu, September 15, 2016 7:16 pm, Ben Hutchings wrote: ... > > I'm open to the possibility of folding this into src:linux, if someone > in (or joining) the kernel team can take responsibility for maintaining > it.  Now that all the userland tools are built from src:linux, it might > not be that

Bug#837920: user-mode-linux should be built directly by src:linux

Thanks for opening this bug. Building UML as part of the regular kernel release has been on my todo list for years now (including making a real attempt with patch long ago - didn't get much attention then). My employer will soon sponsor some work in this area, I hope I can get a step closer at

Bug#834458: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#834458: uml-utilities: Location of tunctl changed from /usr/sbin to /usr/bin

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:42:42PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Control: tag -1 +pending > > On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 18:22 -0400, Allen Chan wrote: > > > > The location of tunctl has changed from /usr/sbin/tunctl to /usr/bin/tunctl. > >

Bug#805990: acpica-unix: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory)

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:14:13PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Greetings. > > I have the ok from the Release Managers to consider this issue as RC > for stretch. I'm going to wait at least one week before raising > this to "serious". > > There is a patch available for this bug. If you need

Bug#811544: cpufrequtils: Disable init scripts by default (not needed anymore)

severity 811544 normal thanks On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:36:17PM +0100, Christian Pernegger wrote: ... > So the init scripts are just expensive noops. Maybe they're still > needed in some cases but I think the default should be off (with a > working low prio debconf question to enable). Thanks

Bug#805851: linux: 4.2.6 panics on dreamplug (kirkwood)

Source: linux Version: 4.2.6-1 Severity: normal Hello, To be fair, this is probably the tip of the iceberg since my unbootable dreamplug went through an upgrade from wheezy to stretch and an u-boot upgrade too. In any case, u-boot seems functional at the moment and I will only be able to check

Bug#805649: pius: Not compatible with latest GNUPG

Package: pius Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: important Hi, gpg introduced new messages that pius trips on thinking they are unknown errors. Upstream has a pull request dealing with this, it'd be good to have the patches applied in Debian until a new release is available, since current pius is

Bug#537219: cpufreqd still complaints about missing files in /sys/class/power_supply

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:25:42PM +0100, Jan Spurny wrote: > Hi, > > I have the same (probably) problem on freshly installed Debian 8 - in syslog, > cpufreq writes: > > cpufreqd: get_class_device_attribute: couldn't open >

Bug#783807: cpufreqd: Missing option to run daemon with given verbosity

Hi Alessandro. On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52:24PM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote: Package: cpufreqd Version: 2.4.2-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch System gets log flooded with these messages: Apr 30 12:36:41 luminol cpufreqd: get_class_device_attribute: couldn't open

Bug#783807: cpufreqd: Missing option to run daemon with given verbosity

On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 06:28:36AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: Hi Alessandro. On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52:24PM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote: Package: cpufreqd Version: 2.4.2-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch System gets log flooded with these messages: Apr 30 12:36:41 luminol

Bug#760873: [vim-gtk] Incorrect display of ascii glyps (ie. displays 'm' in place of 'g').

Package: vim-gtk Version: 2:7.4.488-5 Followup-For: Bug #760873 Hi James, yes, it's totally related to the font face used: $ gvim -u NONE -c 'set guifont=PragmataPro\ 12' $ ** (gvim:26280): CRITICAL **: ascii_glyph_table_init: assertion 'gui.ascii_glyphs-num_glyphs == sizeof(ascii_chars)'

Bug#764582: cpufrequtils: -r flag for related CPUs broke on transition from 3.14 to 3.16 kernel

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:08:56AM +0100, Tim Small wrote: Package: cpufrequtils Version: 008-1 Severity: normal Hi, On 3.14 with Jessie this worked: cpufreq-set -g ondemand --max 2.1GHz -r since upgrading to 3.16 (it's possible that another upgrade installed at the same time

Bug#764582: cpufrequtils: -r flag for related CPUs broke on transition from 3.14 to 3.16 kernel

Package: cpufrequtils Version: 008-1 Followup-For: Bug #764582 Tim, the sysfs file that cpufreq-set uses to find related CPU is incorrect in my previous email. This is what is actually used: grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/related_cpus Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#762162: geeqie: segfault on startup

Package: geeqie Version: 1:1.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #762162 Hi Klaus, thanks a lot and feel free to ask if you need me to test the fix related to this bug. Regards, Mattia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#762162: geeqie: segfault on startup

Package: geeqie Version: 1:1.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #762162 I just updated the system and I can still (actually I just opened geeqie after a long time so I don't really know when it started) reproduce the SIGSEGV. I'll rebuild from source later, but just in case this is useful: - the stack trace

Bug#762162: geeqie: segfault on startup

Package: geeqie Version: 1:1.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #762162 Just for a comparison on package versions, this is from a system where the bug doesn't show. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (1001, 'unstable'), (1001, 'testing'), (1001, 'stable'),

Bug#742016: user-mode-linux: build-depends on linux-source-3.12 which is no longer in the archive

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 07:44:08PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2014-04-15, 15:39: The package builds successfully and seems to work on i386. I'll test on amd64 later. It works on amd64 works, too. :) Would it be okay if I NMUed the package? sure, without any

Bug#742016: user-mode-linux: build-depends on linux-source-3.12 which is no longer in the archive

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:48:01PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org, 2014-03-18, 12:04: user-mode-linux build-depends on linux-source-3.12 which is no longer in the archive. The current version is linux-source-3.13. Any news on this? Do you need help? Yes, at

Bug#741075: user-mode-linux: Occasional memory corruption on startup under high load

On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 07:04:56AM +, Anton Ivanov wrote: Package: user-mode-linux Version: 3.2-2um-1+deb7u2+b1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: causes non-serious data loss Dear Maintainer, This bug is perennial. If we go through old bugs with cannot reproduce tag 50% of

Bug#733545: Fails to set profiles

reassign 733545 linux title 733545 cannot set max cpufreq frequency thanks On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:13:01AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote: Package: cpufreqd Version: 2.4.2-2 Severity: important For weeks now, I've not been able to get cpufreqd to work. The log (and -V7) shows only the

Bug#733545: Fails to set profiles

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:15:45AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: ... Note that this is most likely upstream since I'm using my self rolled 3.13-rc5. forgot to mention: Linux hilbert 3.13.0-rc5+ #25 SMP PREEMPT Mon Dec 23 12:18:40 JST 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux acpipdump: http://www.taihen.jp/vaio

Bug#733545: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#733545: Fails to set profiles

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 04:30:33AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Which scaling driver is being used? acpi-cpufreq Which scaling governor are you using? ondemand What was the last kernel version where this worked? I don't know, I usually just leave ondemand do it's work without interfering. I

Bug#733545: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#733545: Fails to set profiles

reassing 733545 cpufreqd retitle 733545 cpufreqd should honour bios_limit when setting max/min freq thanks On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:55:00PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 04:30:33AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Which scaling driver is being used? acpi-cpufreq

Bug#728704: sonata: missing crossfade in status breaks sonata (mpd =0.18)

Package: sonata Version: 1.6.2.1-5 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, using MPD from unstable (=0.18) broke sonata. Sonata sadly displays a No Read Permissions instead of any more appropriate error or even logging the actual exception causing it to think it doesn't have permissions. The patch

Bug#712234: user-mode-linux: build-depends on linux-source-3.2

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:15:59PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes: Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes: user-mode-linux build-depends on linux-source-3.2 which is no longer available in unstable. That's still the case. And user-mode-linux

Bug#722325: ibus-daemon from 1.5.3-5 segfaults

Package: ibus Followup-For: Bug #722325 Hi Osamu, I have the same problem, on amd64. To get working versions: sudo apt-get install ibus:amd64=1.5.1.is.1.4.2-3 ibus-gtk:amd64=1.5.1.is.1.4.2-3 ibus-gtk3:amd64=1.5.1.is.1.4.2-3 To break again: sudo apt-get install ibus:amd64 ibus-gtk:amd64

Bug#722325: ibus-daemon from 1.5.3-5 segfaults

Package: ibus Version: 1.5.3-7 Followup-For: Bug #722325 just to add the package versions where the problem actually happens. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64

Bug#722325: ibus-daemon from 1.5.3-5 segfaults

rebuilding against new ibus? Another confirmation. see below for all the other questions. On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 04:10:49PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: ibus-daemon barks with the warning/errors below when changing input method: (ibus-daemon:9156): GLib-CRITICAL

Bug#700169: non-free license: requires to obey US export regulation even, when not in the US

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:17:18PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: ... Can we just ignore this bug for wheezy? To me, the licensing intention seems very clear. Can it be closed even? I don't think this bug applies at all. -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#700169: non-free license: requires to obey US export regulation even, when not in the US

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:47:33AM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: Hi Ansgar, Mattia, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes: I also checked the initial Debian package on snapshot.debian.org (version 20050930-1). It also has only the non-free license in the individual files, but

Bug#700169: non-free license: requires to obey US export regulation even, when not in the US

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:06:35PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 27.03.2013 13:44, Michael Stapelberg wrote: Mattia Dongili malat...@debian.org writes: yes it is, that's what Al did already: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/acpica-unix_20130214-0.3.html I see. release-team: What’s your

Bug#704017: unblock: cpufreqd/2.4.2-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package cpufreqd Message-ID: 1364160589.24071.38.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 11:29 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: cpufreqd is in a relatively

Bug#619913: Pre-approval for cpufreqd upload [was Re: Bug#619913: Info received (cpufreqd glibc crash detected)]

:28.0 +0900 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +cpufreqd (2.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Fix reading the correct battery attribute +(Closes: #619913 and Closes: #644567). + + -- Mattia Dongili malat...@debian.org Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:42:31 +0900 + cpufreqd (2.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New

Bug#702527: installation-reports: No CpuFrequencyScaling with Wheezy RC1

On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:36:15AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Topol Morgul (topolm5...@mail.ru): Dear Mr. Perrier ... 1.) installed cpufrequtils via apt-get install cpufrequtils 2.) touch /etc/default/cpufrequtils and echoed GOVERNOR=ondemand 3.) rebooted my

Bug#692552: CPU speed control lost

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:39:18AM +, forthurst wrote: I am currently running 6.0.5 with kernel 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 this sounds unrelated to the problem reported originally. It also sounds like a kernel issue rather than cpufreqd's, please report a bug against the linux-image you're using.

Bug#653227: acpica-unix: New upstream release 20121114 whit full

On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:06:41AM -0700, Al Stone wrote: Just an FYI: did a little re-thinking and made the package closer to pure upstream. New versions are available here: $ dget http://downloads.ahs3.net/packages/acpica-tools/acpica-unix_20130117-2.dsc If there's anything I can

Bug#697300: src:user-mode-linux: missing Built-Using on linux (for linux-source-*)

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:12:07AM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, I looked at your changes and found one error: +BUILT_USING := $(shell dpkg-query -f '$${binary:Package} (= $${source:Version}), ' -W linux-source-$(kernel_version)) It needs to be $${source:Package} here as the

Bug#697418: unblock: user-mode-linux/3.2-2um-1

: + SECURITY_APPARMOR_COMPAT_24=y + NET_SCH_CODEL=m + FQ_CODEL=m + * Bump version number to upload as a proper foreign package. + + -- Mattia Dongili malat...@debian.org Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:11:32 +0900 + user-mode-linux (3.2-1um-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Mattia Dongili ] diff -Nru user-mode

Bug#697300: src:user-mode-linux: missing Built-Using on linux (for linux-source-*)

tags 697300 + pending thanks On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:21:19PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Package: src:user-mode-linux Version: 3.2-1um-1 Severity: serious Thanks, I made the necessary changes to the package, I will upload a fixed version later today. -- mattia :wq! -- To

Bug#696570: nvidia-kernel-dkms: linux/version.h not used anymore

Package: nvidia-kernel-dkms Version: 310.19-0+exp1 Severity: normal Hi, /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/source/include/linux/version.h is not updated on recent kernels. The top level makefile in linux sources define version_h := include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h

Bug#653227: acpica-unix: New upstream release 20121114 whit full support for the ACPI 5.0 specification

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:26:16PM +0100, mdt wrote: ... acpica-unix: New upstream release 20121114 whit full support for the ACPI 5.0 specification Yup, I should be able to get there. Fedora has also adopted the bigendian patches and ported them to a recent release so it should be simple to

Bug#692552: cpufreqd: has all CPU cores run at full speed upon installation

tags 692552 + moreinfo thanks On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:08:57PM +0100, Andreas Glaeser wrote: ... Looking at your configuration you're telling cpufreqd that as long as you're on mains power you want full high speed CPU. WHen configuring cpufreqd, running the deamon using a very verbose

Bug#692552: cpufreqd: has all CPU cores run at full speed upon installation

On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:52:07PM +0100, Andreas Glaeser wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: cpufreqd Version: 2.4.2-1 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Installing cpufreqd shows paradox results. Without cpufreqd

Bug#622277: cpufrequtils: CPUs always run on lowest speed

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:51:02AM +0200, tk wrote: Package: cpufrequtils Version: 008-1 Followup-For: Bug #622277 I do have the sampe problem. I have an E8400 with 2x 3.0Ghz running with 2.0GHz. It's not possible to get it to 3.0Ghz. ... It seems like the full power is only used when the

Bug#677600: cpufrequtils: Please ship systemd service file

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:59:44AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: ... it would be great if you could enable systemd support for cpufrequtils by packaging the service file [1][2]. ... [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd/Services#cpufreq [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54252

Bug#639454: cpufrequtils: New upstream release (008)

On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:47:21PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: Cpufrequtils homepage link (under kernel.org) doesn't seem to work anymore. I found https://github.com/emagii/cpufrequtils It says: Clone of kernel.org cpufrequtils, until it is back in business Can it considered new home of

Bug#663437: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#663437: user-mode-linux: support kernel 3.2

-init-tools, libvdeplug2-dev, libpcap-dev Uploaders: Mattia Dongili malat...@debian.org Standards-Version: 3.8.3 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-uml/user-mode-linux.git diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index d08495c..fc918a3 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -6,7

Bug#657819: cpufrequtils upgrade fails due to conflicting drivers

found 657819 thanks On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:10:50AM -0500, Graham wrote: Package: cpufrequtils Version: 007-1+squeeze1 Hi Graham! I have Debian running on an Atom N270. It's mostly Squeeze, but I've had to upgrade the kernel and a few other bits to Testing. I received this error message

Bug#639454: cpufrequtils: New upstream release (008)

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:46:49PM +0200, Mirosław Zalewski wrote: Package: cpufrequtils Version: 007-2 Severity: wishlist The current upstream version of cpufrequtils is 008. What bugs me, is that it seems to be around since 5 July 2010, so it is over a year now. In the meantime (3

Bug#636194: cpufrequtils: loadcpufreq should not try to load every driver

forcemerge 636141 636194 On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:51:33AM +0200, Martin Fiedler wrote: Package: cpufrequtils Version: 007-1 Severity: important ... My suggestion would be to move the auto-loading code to a point *after* FREQDRIVER is evaluated or load_detected_cpufreq_modules() is called,

Bug#636141: cpufrequtils: with kernel 3.0.0, loadcpufreq loads all freq drivers

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:13:59PM -0400, Matt Behrens wrote: Package: cpufrequtils Version: 007-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch I discovered that my system was loading p4-clockmod instead of acpi-userfreq and it seems the reason is that kernel 3.0.0 rearranged the modules a bit: Hi,

Bug#635348: Error inserting ... (/lib/modules/3.0.0-1-486/kernel/drivers/...

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:05:50PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Package: cpufrequtils Version: 007-1 Followup-For: Bug #635348 I'm having the same problem. loadcpufreq tries to load the wrong kernel modules (it should be acpi-cpufreq in my case). Not entirely sure if it's related to the

Bug#635348: FATAL: Error inserting ... (/lib/modules/3.0.0-1-486/kernel/drivers/...

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 09:02:29PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-1 Seen at boot: Loading cpufreq kernel modules...FATAL: Error inserting powernow_k7 (/lib/modules/3.0.0-1-486/kernel/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k7.ko): No such device Hi all, I'm a bit

Bug#628833: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: Scrolling broken since 1.4.x

On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:35:19PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics Version: 1.4.0-1+b1 Severity: normal Hi, Since this version i can't use the vertical/horizontal scrolling areas from my laptop (Sony Vaio Z1 series) your xorg.conf is broken Section

Bug#627811: cpufrequtils: loadcpufreq does not support AMD E-350 cpus

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 07:50:03PM +0200, Ulrich Dangel wrote: Package: cpufrequtils Version: 007-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch The init script /etc/init.d/loadcpufreq does not support AMD E-350 cpus or to be more precise AMD cpu family 20. As the cpu is already supported by powernow-k8

Bug#597489: Further information

On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 09:13:20AM +0200, Giuseppe Lavagetto wrote: I was able to reproduce the problem: if I copy several GBs of small files over nfs to the machine it eventually hangs kswapd eating up all CPU of one core. This machine is not under any kind of heavy workload, it is just

Bug#614256: Add workaround for slow transitioning CPUs

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:49:42AM +0100, Fabien C. wrote: No, I meant that those numbers were really a power saving failure :) Why? because the ondemand governor not keeping up with demand doesn't sound like a big success to me. cheers -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#533450: GMA500 driver submitted on LKML

And here comes another one: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/22/183 Let's see how it goes. -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#614256: Add workaround for slow transitioning CPUs

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 06:35:53PM +0100, Fabien C. wrote: Package: cpufrequtils Version: 007-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hello, Some CPUs (particularly from AMD) have a very high latency for frequency changes. This is visible at the user level and can lead the user to change

Bug#614256: Add workaround for slow transitioning CPUs

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:06:35PM +0100, Fabien C. wrote: ... Here are my results in GB/s (several averages) for the AMD CPU: ... but this looks really awful in terms of powersaving. Why? Because sampling often is power consuming? No, I meant that those numbers were really a power saving

Bug#533450: just have seen this...

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:12:44PM +0100, Patrick Heinen wrote: http://wiki.debian.org/IntelEmbeddedMediaGraphicsDriver i'm going to try it now those ubuntu packages you pointed at first work for me (using sid Xorg). Actually I modified them a bit as they have some fundamental issues, I'll post

Bug#585352: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#585352: rootstrap: Python string exceptions no more allowed in Python 2.6

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:02:56PM +0100, Riccardo Murri wrote: As of rootstrap 0.3.24-5, any failure in a rootstrap module triggers throwing a string exception in builder. With Python 2.6, this gets particularly annoying since the interpreter throws a TypeError (exceptions must be old-style

Bug#611447: please unblock rootstrap 0.3.24-6

=== --- trunk/src/rootstrap/debian/changelog(revision 331) +++ trunk/src/rootstrap/debian/changelog(revision 334) @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +rootstrap (0.3.24-6) unstable; urgency=high + + * use the stable release in the default rootstrap.conf + + -- Mattia Dongili malat...@debian.org Sat, 29 Jan

Bug#611308: please unblock user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4

unblock. Thanks! Full diff is: commit d3fc4a3f04f67bae4d1fc4f904f35b26554f54b1 Author: Mattia Dongili malat...@linux.it Date: Thu Jan 27 07:10:27 2011 +0900 Update to latest kernel config available for squeeze Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili malat...@linux.it diff --git a/config.amd64 b

Bug#533450: GMA 500 Drivers in Debian and Deprecated Symbols in Xorg

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:25:17PM -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote: ... an orig.tar.gz from the gma500 PPA on Launchpad, as I have yet to find upstream development for this stuff). After I patch it to build against I doubt there is any upstream development at all. Those git repositories I have

Bug#610203: [xserver-xorg-input-synaptics] synclient -l fails with Couldn't find synaptics properties. No synaptics driver loaded?

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:37:33AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: On 2011-01-16 00:18, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Filipus Klutierochea...@gmail.com (15/01/2011): ... Section Module Load synaptics EndSection […] You probably want to remove that part. If you have both evdev and synaptics

Bug#610204: smplayer: ffodivxvdpau should not be enabled on all vdpau chipsets

Package: smplayer Version: 0.6.9-1 Severity: normal Hi, adding the patch at #609815 on 0.6.9-2 broke playing videos with mplayer on one of my computers. You can see other people having problems with ffodivxvdpau here: http://smplayer.berlios.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=285 and here a statement

Bug#603455: [PATCH release-notes] Add notes about X changes

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:19:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Bug#603455 Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org --- en/issues.dbk| 91 ++ en/whats-new.dbk | 22 + 2 files

Bug#591222: grub-pc: grub seems not to detect disks

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:23:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 08:00:41PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: I spent a couple of days trying to figure what was wrong but I don't seem to make any bit progress. I have a number of symptoms that seem to point to grub

Bug#591222: grub-pc: grub seems not to detect disks

Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/04/2011 11:43 PM, Colin Watson wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:16:06AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:23:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote: Vladimir suggested that this might be a PCI

Bug#607329: cpufrequtils should use /etc/default

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:34:57AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 12/19/2010 06:01 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote: Yes, no questions on install v/s questions on install. i find it very sad that you didn't even bother to look at tftpd-hpa. users only get questions if they have debconf priority set

Bug#607329: cpufrequtils should use /etc/default

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 06:32:33AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: reopen 607329 retitle 607329 please ship sample in /etc/default/cpufrequtils thanks Mattia Dongili malat...@linux.it wrote: The fact that the package doesn't provide a default configuration file is to ease upgrades (at least

Bug#607329: cpufrequtils should use /etc/default

tags 607329 + wontfix thanks On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:55:10PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 12/18/2010 11:55 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote: why again and again? The user does it once and that's it. And only if the default behaviour is not appropriate (which I doubt happens that often

Bug#537219: cpufreqd still complaints about missing files in /sys/class/power_supply

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:02:34PM +0100, Daniel Suchy wrote: Hello, I had similar problem with cpufreqd running on 2.6.36 kernel. I found patch on Gentoo website addressing my issue on http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=255083action=view I successfully patched cpufreqd 2.4.2-1 source

Bug#605643: make cpufreqd-get show also active rule

On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:38:00AM +0100, Witold Baryluk wrote: Package: cpufreqd Version: 2.4.2-1 Severity: wishlist cpufreqd-get shows as all profiles, and active one. It would be also usefull to know active rule which triggered this profile. I often do not know why my cpu freq is very

Bug#601946: Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-2

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:22:30PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: retitle 601946 Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-3 thanks On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57:54 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: madt was also removed from

Bug#601946: Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-2

retitle 601946 Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-3 thanks On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57:54 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: madt was also removed from upstream's toplevel makefile since the current squeeze version. I

Bug#601946: Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-2

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:51:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 20:27:06 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ia64) + BINARIES = acpixtract acpidump madt + MANPAGES = acpixtract madt +else + BINARIES = acpixtract acpidump turbostat madt

Bug#601946: Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-2

Package: release.debian.org Hi Release Managers, Actually I have to blame myself for not checking the status of acpidump build logs. Anyway, long story short, I fixed a FTBFS on ia64 that prevented acpidump_20100513 to migrate to squeeze since April and the version currently in the next release

Bug#601946: Freeze exception for acpidump 20100513-2

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:46:38PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: Package: release.debian.org Hi Release Managers, Actually I have to blame myself for not checking the status of acpidump build logs. Anyway, long story short, I fixed a FTBFS on ia64 that prevented acpidump_20100513 to migrate

Bug#602032: cpufreqd: WTF is my machine burning up? AMD 64 bit Turion.

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:07:36PM -0600, s. keeling wrote: Package: cpufreqd Version: 2.3.3-4 Severity: important Yo. This is an HP Pavilion dv4. I'm running fluxbox, CPU's barely ticking over at 0-1%, yet this (it's presently at C 80):

Bug#602032: cpufreqd: WTF is my machine burning up? AMD 64 bit Turion.

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:02:10PM -0600, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Mattia Dongili: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:07:36PM -0600, s. keeling wrote: Package: cpufreqd Version: 2.3.3-4 Severity: important Yo. This is an HP Pavilion dv4. I'm running fluxbox, CPU's barely

Bug#602032: cpufreqd: WTF is my machine burning up? AMD 64 bit Turion.

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 07:15:21PM -0600, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Mattia Dongili: ... One thing you may want to check is if the configuration is preventing higher freq/voltages when the cpu temperature is too high. That's what I wonder. It never steps to higher freq. on high load

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >