On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:53:01AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.94
>
> I'm not sure, whether this is a real problem, but I just got the
> following message during upgrade:
>
> Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
> update-initramfs: Generating /bo
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:55:13PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-9
> Severity: serious
>
> Kernel Panic - no init found.
> Tried init=/sbin/init. No help.
please post output of
update-initramfs -u -k 2.6.32-3-686
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:34:12AM +0200, Cord Beermann wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.94
> Severity: important
>
>
> Reading changelogs... Done
> (Reading database ... 106585 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace initramfs-tools 0.93.4 (using
> .../i
reassign 576641 mdadm
severity 576641 serious
tags 576641 patch
stop
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:14:29AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Setting up initramfs-tools (0.94) ...
> W: mdadm: /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf defines no arrays.
> W: mdadm: no arrays defined in configuration file.
> .: 4: Can't op
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, Bruce Ward wrote:
> Hello Max.
>
> Did you get the initramfs? I sent it 17 February.
>
> Bruce
didn't see any trouble relevant modules are inside.
only thing that I remakred was splashy,
could you please purge that to have it out of the game?
and then update-initramfs of c
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010, bugrep...@public-files.de wrote:
> I don't have hotkey-setup installed
good.
> output of lscpi -vvv attached
>
> Thanks for caring so much. I am still not entirely convinced that this
> is a genuine bug (which is why I waited so long reporting it), because
> the graphics
tags 501359 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 01:01 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > well also according to the /sys tree you posted [1] this seems
> > to be an error of xen-blkfront declaring itself as vbd module
> > in sys?
&
tags 548148 moreinfo
stop
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> please consider adding the following obvious patch to
> initramfs-tools/scripts/functions:
sorry for the late reply, but had a pile to review and
0.94 is out now, so.
> --- functions.orig 2009-09-24 10:42:11.0 +0
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> > #547365: "initramfs-tools -d -k foo" is not idempotent
> >
> > It has been closed by maximilian attems .
>
> Thanks.
sorry for the taken time, will try to be more
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.94
Severity: serious
breaks cryptsetup for now thus should stay in sid,
until fixed cryptestup available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:00:49PM +0300, Rami Autiomäki wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-9
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
outdated,
can you please test 2.6.32-10 from unstable.
also 2.6.32-11, which we will upload soonest,
contains severals alsa fixes please report back on that
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:12:48PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: linux-base
> Version: 2.6.32-10
> Severity: normal
>
> The conversion on my Thinkpad X31 seems to have generated incorrect
> labels, which lead to the home partition not being mounted automatically:
>
> This is the /et
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.1.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
initramfs-tools 0.94 will break cryptsetup cryptroot boot script.
The Ubuntu feature of pre-cached order got merged,
will add a versioned breaks on cryptsetup
their is a patch in Ubuntu cryptsetup for the situation,
including
> Sry, missed that part.
do you have hotkey-setup installed?
dpkg -l hotkey-setup
and following output please
lspci -vvv
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010, Bert Schulze wrote:
>
> hello maximilian,
>
> fixed the commandline argument to select the compressor. also your test
> with "command" needed to be negated otherwise the fallback to gzip would
> take place everytime. patch attached
>
> --
> frohe ostern
> Bert Schulze
grea
reassign 559710 btrfs-tools
retitle 559710 btrfs-tools: add initramfs boot and hook scripts
stop
> eventhough it's possible to do that, it's the wrong place, it needs to
> be handled by initramfs-tools at system start already, thus reassigning.
it is not up to initramfs-tools to support cats an
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> What do you think about adding such a feature? It would be useful
> for creating custom initramfs images for other machines in conjunction
> with the -d option.
don't think both features mix equaly well.
first of all the ignore mechanism should be mo
tags 576274 moreinfo
stop
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 12:23:00PM +0200, bugrep...@public-files.de wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> with some help from one of the maintainers I found the latest package from
> sid and installed it:
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-2.6.32-4-686
where is the requeste
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, bert schulze wrote:
> Hello Maximilian,
>
> this version uses /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf to determine
> the compression method, checks kernel and userspace support with
> fallback to gzip. Since LZO didnt work for me at all with 2.6.33
> I left that out for now.
>
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> the configure_networking function relies on DEVICE being set, and
> conf/initramfs.conf hard-codes this to eth0. though some scripts may call this
> from /scripts/local-top, and DEVICE may not be set. even when it is set, it
> hard-coding it to eth0
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 09:59:02PM +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
>
> I just submitted a patch upstream :
> http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2010-April/002596.html
> Don't hesitate to test it and report any result.
>
why do you think that bug was marked pending ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
if you care to get an answer, Cc the bugreport,
private requests may easily be ignored, thanks.
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 03:19:32PM +0200, bugrep...@public-files.de wrote:
> I am not sure, but it looks like Squeeze and Sid have the same packages. I
> have the package installed from Squeeze.
> http
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 03:15:21PM +0200, bugrep...@public-files.de wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
> Version: 2.6.32-9
outdated, please test against newer in unstable.
> This bug also applies to linux-source and linux-image packages going back to
> at least 2.6.30
>
> I have not re
reassign 570321 module-init-tools
stop
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 04:01:23AM -0700, Jayen Ashar wrote:
> output from pstree:
> `-aptitude,6493,root
> |-{aptitude},30685
> `-dpkg,30843 --status-fd 48 --configure linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686
> `-frontend,30844 -w /usr/share/debconf/frontend
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 07:53:48AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-686
> Severity: important
>
> Migrating from new kernel to old kernel do not work.
>
> malakit:~# vzmigrate -r no --keep-dst --online tigereye 1
> -e OPT:-r
> -e OPT:--keep-dst
> -e OPT:--online
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:23:38PM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Not sure what kind of answer you expect from me here.
>
> > post your grub2 /boot/grub/grub.cfg
>
> Attached to this mail.
that one :)
anyway grub2 looks fine, so we need more info can you please check
http://wiki.debian.org/Ini
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 04:21:14PM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.4
> Severity: grave
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: renders package unusable
not at most important, as only local breakage, works fine for thousand
others and we need more i
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:34:21PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> Thanks. I just had a look at these templates. Would you mind if we
> launch some review on debian-l10n-english? Not that I pretend that my
> knowledge of your language is better than yoours, Benbut more to
> guarantee some
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:38:22AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
>
> I did check this out, but I didn't find any PO file in there. Is there
> some special mechanism in place to allow for localization of the
> kernel packages templates?
debian/templates/temp.image.plain/templates
is the file
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Loïc Grenié wrote:
> It has probably been corrected (or I made a mistake the first time)...
> Changing $@ in "$@" is still probably a good idea, though.
>
> Thanks,
indeed, can't harm done:
http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=summary
bug not reo
reasign firmware-nonfree
stop
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:51:14AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-03-24 19:38 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > The general conditions for the bug are:
> > 1. Module is manually loaded using /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
> > 2. Module needs to load firmware
thi
severity 575498 wishlist
tags 575498 wontfix
stop
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:09:15PM +0100, Ingo Rauschenberg wrote:
>
> I'm using in my grub configuration Labels to point out, where my Rootfs
> is located.
> This looks like # kopt=root=LABEL=ROOT ro
> When the vlm2 initramfs-tools script runs th
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Jason White wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > aboves error message shows that there is no initramfs passed by the
> > bootloader. which grub or lilo do you use?
>
> Grub 2. Regenerating the initramfs is what I tried first, but it didn't help.
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Jason White wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > aboves error message shows that there is no initramfs passed by the
> > bootloader. which grub or lilo do you use?
>
> Grub 2. Regenerating the initramfs is what I tried first, but it didn't help.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:08:19AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.4
> Followup-For: Bug #571980
please report upstream on bugzilla.kernel.org with oops dmesg there
and let us know bug nr so that it can be tracked.
thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:12:24PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> Note that the next upload will go through NEW. If you don???t want a delay
> when you actually want to refer to a new version, you should consider
> uploading version 26 before the next kernel version bump.
>
we are used to go
hello!
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 07:18:46PM +0100, deb...@x.ray.net wrote:
> well actually i checked man initramfs-tools. i think if the
> explanation "/etc/initramfs-tools -> local admin config overriding
> package defaults, /usr/share/initramfs-tools -> package defaults" were
> in this manpage, to
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:46:35PM +0100, deb...@x.ray.net wrote:
>
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > egrep UMASK /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
> > UMASK=0077
> >
> > this was not yet documented in initramfs.conf.5,
> > will be in next upload.
>
> a
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:29:38PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> clone 516294 -1
> reassign -1 linux-libc-dev
> found -1 linux-libc-dev/2.6.32-10
> tags -1 = patch
> retitle -1 linux-libc-dev: getrusage() prototype should be
> protected from user space
> severity -1 normal
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:54:06AM +0100, Guido Bozzetto wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.4
> Severity: normal
sid initramfs-tools was trying to second guess your lilo / grub usage.
it stop doing this in latest git.
> ~# LANG=C dpkg --configure initramfs-tools
> update-initramfs
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 04:44:52PM +1100, Jason White wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.4
> Severity: normal
>
>
> linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64 is fine, but linux-image-2.6.33-2-amd64 from
> experimental won't boot.
>
> As I can't see the screen, I'm relying on others to
retitle 536195 document UMASK initramfs.conf usage
stop
ls -l /boot/initrd.img-2.6.33-2-amd64
-rw--- 1 root root 9589266 Mar 25 03:03 /boot/initrd.img-2.6.33-2-amd64
egrep UMASK /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
UMASK=0077
this was not yet documented in initramfs.conf.5,
will be in next u
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:04:04AM +0100, Jesús Ángel del Pozo Domínguez wrote:
> Any fix for this bug?
>
> I can't install anything due to this update-initramfs error.
the easy fix for your issue on your box is to not have multiple
bootloader installed. do you still use lilo?
if not deinstall i
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 07:07:16PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.4
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs
>
> Hi,
>
> update-initramfs considers linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 to be newer
> than linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64 causing the init
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 06:22:17PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:23:39PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > mkvimlinuz or the used tool may provide the relevant check for running
> > box.
>
> Okay, so the bug should probably
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:50:37PM +0100, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
> Version: 2.6.32+25
> Severity: normal
>
> linux-image-2.6-amd64 currently depends on linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64,
> but it should in theory depend on linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64, which is
> the
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:27:55PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.4
>
> I decided to give nouveau a try and built a vanilla 2.6.33.1 kernel with
> it. This works okay if the nouveau module is not in the initramfs, it
> then gets loaded by udev in runlevel S.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:19:20AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:30:37AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > > It would be good if mkinitramfs would fail on systems that have the
> > > string "platform: CHRP&quo
reopen 454665
stop
thanks for quick feedback.
the ubuntu entry was only added to kepp diff with them small,
didn't workout in initramfs-tools, we hope to cure that.
indeed can easily add that busybox-static entry once known
to be good, thanks for testing it out.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
oh ok got patch now. :)
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> When searching for the root block device, there may be multiple device
> mapper indirections.
>
thanks applied to latest git,
will be in next upload of initramfs-tools expected to happen around eastern.
thanks again for quic
Dear Steve,
keeping that story short. I'm in the middle of a big initramfs-tools
backlog, the last message to that bug was
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:36:48 +0200
and was unresponded see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454665#32
your email also doesn't enlightem me if busybox-sta
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> While there are multiple calls to usplash in initramfs functions there
> is no support for splashy. On systems that spend substantial part of
> boot in the initramfs this is inadequate.
had many screen corruptions (temporary nature, but still) while u
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:36:10AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
>
> OK, patch follows. Take it with a big disclaimer: I just learned about
> the sysfs interface in question, I don't know how raid would fit in
> here, so raid may still be broken with lvm snapshots, and I tested it
> only on two b
reassign 573741 tuxonice-userui
stop
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Takeshi Hamasaki wrote:
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> lvm2 script doesn't recognize resume=swap:/dev/XX in kernel command line
> option, and also resume script doesn't know how to trigger resume sequence
> for
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.4
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> You cannot boot from MMC with MODULES=dep because mmc_block is missing
> in the initramfs. Here's a patch:
thanks applied.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Piotr Lewandowski wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the problem for me (udev no longer ships
> vol_id since 146-1).
>
thanks applied:
http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=summary
will be in next release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:58:47AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> retitle 573761 initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs fails with MODULES=dep if
> crypto-root fs has snapshot
> thanks
>
> I really don't think that the - indeed not very helpful - error message
> is the problem, but the fact that mkinitram
reassign rootskel
stop
[ adding debian-boot to cc ]
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009, Simon Richter wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.4
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> some OpenFirmware implementations, such as the one in the PegasosII,
> have a 12 MB size limit on kernel images, and no i
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Peng Tao wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Peng Tao wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:36 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
> >> thanks, please add
> >>
> >> ldd /bin/busybox
> > $ldd initrd/bin/busybox
> >
tags 575154 pending
stop
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:41:58PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> If the running kernel has had module support removed, you'll get a bunch
> of errors of:
> grep: /proc/modules: No such file or directory
>
> The one place I found was in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hoo
tags 561287 moreinfo
stop
can you still reproduce that eror?
if yes please follow up with reportbug to add relevant info:
reportbug -N 561287
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Alex wrote:
> I've seen this message often at boot, it appear randomically from zero to
> more
> times (seen up to four).
> Take a look to scripts/init-bottom/udev, to me looks like some udevd die
> between test -x and readlink (as correctly reported in the comment followin
dude if you are using k-p you have to bite it's bullet.
I repeat:
*none* of their loud crying crowd has been able to come forward
with a correct patch.
I am currently polishing klibc, once this is done.
initramfs-tools has my attention and yes an upload is overdue.
happy if someone would triage
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> -
>
> I made patch to fix this problem. Could you apply this patch?
thanks applied to my patch queue.
once applied and released upstream, will upload to Debian.
kind regards
maks
ps added pending tag as hpa usually pulls at some point
my pa
tags 556265 moreinfo
stop
hello
> ipconfig always send DHCPREQUEST twice.
> Because its misses DHCPACK and thats makes very long time to get done.
this should be fixed upstream in 1.5.17, with the changeset:
[klibc] ipconfig may discard useful packets
please test against 1.5.17, should be avail
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 04:38:08PM -0400, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-9
> Severity: normal
please try the 2.6.33 experimental images,
they have newer stuff of that staging driver,
thanks for feedback.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.
Package: src:klibc
Version: 1.5.17-2
Severity: serious
KLIBCLD usr/klibc/libc.so
ld: s390:31-bit architecture of input file
`/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.4.3/libgcc.a(_clzdi2.o)' is incompatible with
s390:64-bit output
ld: s390:31-bit architecture of input file
`/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.
Package: klibc
Version: 1.5.17-1
Severity: serious
make all INSTALLROOT=debian/tmp KBUILD_VERBOSE=1
make[2]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-klibc_1.5.17-1-s390-2QwYDl/klibc-1.5.17'
make -f
/build/buildd-klibc_1.5.17-1-s390-2QwYDl/klibc-1.5.17/scripts/Kbuild.klibc
obj=klcc
GEN klcc/klibc.
forcemerge 573926 574699
stop
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:04:57PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
known, fixed upstream and about to upload fixes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> I found the config change which breaks the kernel. A kernel which
> differs from the official one only in this does boot, the official
> one does not. I am quite sure there are no messages to see, this
> only affects very early stages of boot as the
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:14:26PM -0400, Justin Azoff wrote:
> I'm very glad to see that this bug is resolved and that there has been a huge
> ammount of progress made on xen in debian :-)
well i wouldn't bet on that.
it is more that nobody cared about the Lenny xen bugs.
> How should one go ab
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:06:21PM +0300, un...@debian.org wrote:
>
> I tested in my _desktop_ system: i have to have headers package to use
> nvidia drivers :(
you can test the bug on single user, no need to use xorg afais.
> also:
>
> # LANG=C dpkg -i
> tmp/linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-a
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:24:18PM +0300, un...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64
> Severity: important
> Version: 2.6.32-10
>
> I installed on my desktop new version of vz-kernel to test.
> But it works very unstable. Begining from booting it spams dmesg
> messages:
>
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, dann frazier wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: normal
>
> As mentioned in [1], the "vserver" featureset is planned to be removed
> from the Debian linux kernel after the squeeze release. Debian suggests that
> users consider migrating vserver systems to either the L
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:41:41AM +0100, Jesús Ángel del Pozo Domínguez wrote:
> + mbr_check
> + '[' -r /boot/grub/grub.cfg ']'
> ++ awk '/^set root=/{print substr($2, 7, 3); exit}' /boot/grub/grub.cfg
> + groot='(md'
> + '[' -r /boot/grub/menu.lst ']'
> + '[' -e /boot/grub/device.map ']'
> + '['
severity 574553 important
tags 574553 moreinfo unreproducible
stop
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:07:39PM +0100, Jes???gel wrote:
>
> r...@gollum:~# dpkg --configure -a
> Configurando initramfs-tools (0.93.4) ...
> update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
> Procesando disparadores para
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: important
getting tons of disconnects on x61s with
[20396.771335] iwlagn :03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:25:84:02:e3:39
tid = 0
both with 2.6.31-4 and 2.6.32-10
saw this message already previously but not at this rate,
like 200x during
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:40:46PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> As long as there is a package in experimental with aufs support it's
> quite easy to get testing live CDs.
you have all the interest in cooperating with upstream for a real
unionfs instead of whining about aufs.
concerning 2.
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: important
see in git ubuntu lucid
git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git
git shortlog 5f78f17a5b5518120eaa28021e76a267a3ad27d0.. -- drivers/net/igb
depends also on followup fix 97a21d3ae6477ef00e39f21e47ce767a8ca1a22a
x86: Avoid race conditi
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:25:07PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686
> Version: 2.6.32-9
old version, please install 2.6.32-10, aka linux-image-2.6.32-4-686
and report back on it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 05:33:42PM +0100, Per Foreby wrote:
> One simple(?) questions before you close the bug:
>
> - Which kernel should be upgraded to avoid this bug? dom0, domU or both?
2.6.33-10 images in linux unstable are assumed fixed.
primarly dom0, if you can still reproduce bug please
issue got fixed in 2.6.32.9.
is stable affected?
Ben wanted to review it before stable upload as rh/fedora fix went
throug several iterations. although they seem to have settled now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
severity 574031 normal
tags 574031 moreinfo unreproducible
stop
you mocking with postinst doesn't help anyone.
please post failure, as until now you haven't shown us the
failure that affects you.
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Version: 2.6.32-10
failure seeems quite similar:
CC kernel/trace/trace_clock.o
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-10-alpha-POBShR/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_alpha_none/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c:
In function 'trace_clock_local':
/build/buildd-linux-2
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:35:44PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>
> 2010/3/3 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
> >> This patch is now merged in linux-2.6.git. Since you are also the author
> >> of the patch, could you please submit it to sta...@kernel.org ?
> >>
> >
> > Sure. I sent request to sta...@kernel.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:50:42PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> According to the changelog of 2.6.33.1 there have been some off-by-one
> errors fixed that may have caused this behaviour:
well this is a regression fix, so not applyable to 2.6.32.
btw 2.6.33.0 (will upload newer today) is in ex
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi Maximilain,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 16.03.2010, 15:47 +0100 schrieb maximilian attems:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:41:16PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > I???d like to amend this wishlist bug report. I???d find it v
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:41:16PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I???d like to amend this wishlist bug report. I???d find it very useful to
> have a linux-doc-2.6 meta package automatically pulling in the latest
> -doc package, corresponding to the installed kernel. Same thing with a
>
tags 573908 pending
stop
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
>
> Well, it doesn't look as good as I hoped it would but it seems to
> (almost) generate the same binaries now. I did two more or less
> unrelated changes, though: switch to Source Format 3.0 (quilt), and
> symlink the /ush/sha
hello
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:17:01AM -0500, Frank Loeffler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to [1], squeeze will ship with the linux kernel 2.6.32.
> According to this bug report, this bug is only fixed in 2.6.33. Is there
> any possibility to get this fixed for squeeze?
reading aboves paragraph i
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:55:15PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > you once worked on klibc packaging but gave up due to cdbs
> > usage, would you consider trying to switch latest klibc to dh?
> > (away from cdbs) latest is
Package: klibc
Version: 1.5.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
latest klibc failed on sparc and i386.
issue is on the way to be investigated, thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experime
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:56:19PM -0500, Tony Mantler wrote:
>
> On 14-Mar-10, at 6:17 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> >On Mar 04, Tony Mantler wrote:
> >>It seems that a few minutes after waking my laptop from sleep I'll
> >>often
> >>notice a sudden jump in system activity. I've traced this ba
you once worked on klibc packaging but gave up due to cdbs
usage, would you consider trying to switch latest klibc to dh?
(away from cdbs) latest is on
git clone git://git.debian.org/kernel/klibc.git
improved packaging should help also #478589 to shipp README.ipconfig.
I'd really appreciate this
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.3
Severity: normal
klibc per definio beeing a differnt libc can't link against glibc-linked zlib,
thus this check doesn't make so much of a sense in this context.
at least please don't warn in udebs,
as there you can't and shouldn't put overrides:
libklibc-udeb ude
Package: klibc
Version: 1.5.16-1
Severity: normal
having dh used in debian/rules would it make simple for example
to shipp README.klibc.arch in libklibc and README.ipconfig in
klibc-utils.
dh is said to burn less cycles, happy to accept patches against:
git clone git://git.debian.org/kernel/klib
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 07:38:25PM +1100, David Marshall wrote:
> Package: drbd8-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-686
> Version: 2.6.26+8.0.14-6+lenny1
>
> After upgrading xen-utils, linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686 and
> linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-686 drbd fails to start.
>
> I see the following errors in sysl
reassign 573624 linux-2.6
stop
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 01:14:04AM +0100, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 3
> Severity: normal
> On my Acer Aspire 1810TZ, Using linux-image-2.6 wlan0 is not
> created. I tried with Debian/Unstable Live, created with LiveHelper
severity 573604 wishlist
tags 573604 moreinfo
stop
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:43:02PM +, John Talbut wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.32
> Version: 2.6.32-9
> Severity: important
>
> I have compiled and installed a kernel from this package on an otherwise Lenny
> system. I did this in orde
601 - 700 of 3756 matches
Mail list logo
