On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:24:53AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Heya,
>
> is anybody out there taking care of this bug? Would be very appreciated.
Yes, I'm on it. No ETA for a fix promised yed.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :&#
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.2
Severity: important
devscripts 2.10.3 contains the file /usr/bin/licensecheck. The package
kdesdk-scripts contains /usr/bin/licensecheck too. devscripts should
either rename the script or conflict with kdesdk-scripts.
Cheers,
Michael
-- System Information:
D
Version: 1.2.21-1
This bug was fixed by the upload or 1.2.21.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483
ould be upgraded to include this fix.
I can confirm this bug. Version 1.2.22 will soon be released. I will
fix this bug when the new version is released.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
Hello,
I close this bug as libswt3.1-gtk-jni doesn't exist anymore and we got
no reports that libswt3.2-gtk-jni is still broken.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `'
Version: 3.2.1
I just close this bug as the the issue is fixed.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Closing this bug as libswt3.1-gtk-jni doesn't exist anymore and
libswt3.2-gtk-jni doesnt have this problem anymore.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 3.2.1-6
I just close this bug as the the issue is fixed.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think we'll need different versions of asm. I think Michael Koch is
> working on it.
>
> If somebody works on asm, please, change the lib version in API
> incompatibilities. I think there are incompatibilities between 1.x,
> 2.x and 3.x series.
Package for ASM ver
your efforts
already.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 02:32:22PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Le lundi 2 avril 2007 09:59, Michael Koch a écrit :
> > Currently jbidwatcher depends directly on sun-java6-jre. Please add
> > support for other Java runtimes by depending on
> >
> &
k7 flavor). Strangely it dont affected all machines.
All affected machines had wrong links in / as the original submitter
says.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Koch
Senior Developer
Enough Software
Sögestr. 70
28195 Bremen
Germany
Web: http://www.enough.de
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +49-(0)421-9889 131
Package: jbidwatcher
Version: 1.0.dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
Currently jbidwatcher depends directly on sun-java6-jre. Please add
support for other Java runtimes by depending on
java1-runtime | java2-runtime | sun-java6-jre
If its possible to run jbidwatcher to run with java-gcj-compat, it should
Package: jbidwatcher
Version: 1.0.dfsg-1
Severity: minor
There is a type in the long desctiption of the package. Its called
JBidWatcher, not JBidWatecher.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (999, 'testing'), (199, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
ted
in all Java envirtonments. I can act as a co-maintainer for the package
too, if you like.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:29:35PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
> >> The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file,
> >> wagon-http-shared etc). What would be t
sync? If yes I would prefer
one big source package which includes the tarballs of all releases and
builds either seven binary packages or one binary package with 7 jars.
I think I would prefer the later one.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:47:14AM +0100, Nicolas François wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:35:59AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> >
> > Well I consider "jamvm -cp Test.jar Test" and "jamvm -jar Test.jar" not
> > working a maj
apache.org/connectors-doc/news/20070301.html#20070301.1
>
> >From JK 1.2.20, the performance and stability are increased, our product
> >use it for long.
Thanks for your report. We will update the package, when the etch
release is out the door.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael K
ue. If I wouldn't, we wouldn't need a fix for this.
These two are the main usecases for every Java runtime and should just
work.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
ink thats okay.
I will upload a fixed package to unstable soon.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
--
To
ython-central.
> >
>
> I didn't think about an extra package, just a Provides:
> ${python:Provides} line in debian/control.
Thanks for this info. I will do this.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Develope
thon-support or python-central.
Thanks for your report.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:05:23AM +0100, Nicolas François wrote:
> reassign 413116 classpath 0.91-3
> # I tested it with 0.92-4, but 0.92-1 was probably fixed too.
> notfound 413116 0.92-4
> tags 413116 patch
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks Michel and Matthew for your answers.
>
> I'm reassignin
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.27
Severity: normal
When building new classpath package for testing-proposed-updates I tried
to use the version number 2:0.91-3.etch.1 and lintian gave this warning:
W: classpath source: maintainer-upload-has-incorrect-version-number
2:0.91-3.etch.1
W: classpath so
with this
> message. I have also re-attached his patch, so that it's clearly visible in
> the bug log.
>
> Maintainers, do you agree that this patch is a correct fix for the problem?
> Since the new upstream version of classpath in unstable doesn't look
> suitable for
Version: 2.8.5-1.1
This bug was fixed in version 2.8.5-1.1 by an NMU. Thanks for this.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 B
h the CDs/DVDs but thats a problem of
the CD/DVD creator when they include packages not installable on the
arch.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B
The eclipse-gcj package is
architeture independant and therefore available on all architectures.
I downgrade this bug to wishlist as eclipse needs serious work to make
everything work on sparc. When you install the eclipse package the
installation will still fail because the libswt3.2-gtk-jni pac
7-01-22/share/classpath/glibj.zip "$@"
>
> )
>
> Please let me know if you can't reproduce the bug. I'm happy to
> provide more info.
Can you please test with classpath from experimental? Experimental
contains 0.93.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael
h and the best way to support installations without compiler which
are unusual but possible.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0
cy.
The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together
with this one in all but unusual installations.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
e
> maintaining software?
There is at least one bug filed for this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=232730
The only workaround is uploading with a new orig.tar.gz.
I will do this for jta later today.
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :&#x
ing a new
> version of afnix, or marking this bug as blocked by 389163?
Add this to afnix:
Conflicts: aleph
Replaces: aleph
This should make it possible to have always one of them installed and
make afnix replace aleph on dist-upgrades.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <
bugs if appropriate for the bug to help the
maintainers. I agree that the tags were inappropriate for this bug.
> Ant seems to need some attention also with respect to bug triaging...
Right. I looked into ant 1.7 already and will probably package it soon.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:25:33PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Koch said:
> > Recommends are installed by default. People explicitely dont installing
> > the recommends and then wondering about broken stuff are on their own.
> How do you mean th
s.
Kaffe is outdated and needs some serious updates. Its better not to use
it in current state. The other runtimes are more uptodate.
Sablevm is even more outdated and I dont see anyone working on it at
all in Debian.
Recommending those two currently is like moving the user into a really
a custom kernel, you are responsible for loading required
> modules. Just add it to "/etc/modules". (Or compile it in, which seems to
> make more sense.)
Its not even a good idea to compile this as module. If you want this
functioniality, put it directly into the kernel.
Cheers,
Mi
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Wolfram Gloger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:44:00 +0100
> > From: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply. Unfortunately, it was apparently delayed
> by more than a month som
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:48:23PM +0100, Wolfram Gloger wrote:
> Package: libapache2-mod-jk
> Version: 1.2.18-2
> Severity: important
>
> When doing some benchmarks on amd64, we noticed easily reproducible
> apache2 crashes when mod_jk was used:
>
> [Thu Jan 11 17:49:31 2007] [notice] Apache/2.2
.
I have uploaded a new package to fix this issue. Please talk to the
release managers to get this into etch.
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 09:54:22AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> * License : LGPL, GPL, BSD
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Mi
-4.
Please close this bug when the explanation is okay for you.
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
k separately from eclipse.
Eclipse will go into etch when the 10 days will be over (tomorrow). We
have already the exception ok from the release managers [1].
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/01/msg00591.html
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTEC
Package: libspin-java-doc
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: minor
The summary and description of the libspin-java-doc should reflect what
SPIN is for. It should look like this for users who for a solution to a
problem this library solves:
Description: transparent threading solution for non-freezing Swing
Package: linda
Version: 0.3.24
Severity: normal
When building classpath package I get the folling message from linda:
Now running linda...
Check FilesCheck failed. Exception KeyError thrown
('/usr/share/classpath/javax/swing/plaf/basic/BasicScrollPaneUI0.class').
Finished running linda.
That is
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:34:22PM +0200, Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) wrote:
> Package: wftk
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
>The font wftk-0.7.1/demos/wf_opal.ttf is "Opulent Regular" and has
> the string "Copyright Rubicon Computer Labs Inc., 1993-96.". It comes
> with
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The WFTK package has currently one RC bug [1]. No other package depends
on it. The package WFTK was needed for (uclient) never landed in the
Debian archive. WFTK and uclient are abandoned upstream a long time ago.
Therefor I request the removal of the pac
reassign 391751 libflash-mozplugin
thanks
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 09:51:19PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Definitively yesterday wasn't my better day, sorry. trying the correct
> command
> this time, firefox -g --sync, I've realized that this is a libflash-mozplugin
> bug. The fact
tag 380170 confirmed pending
thanks
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:42:14AM -0300, Gleidson Echeli Leopoldo wrote:
> Package: eclipse-platform-common
> Version: 3.1.2-2
>
> Hi, today i installed the Eclipse and i desired to install without GNU
> Java (GCJ) because the software what i compile uses the
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 11:54:49AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Michael Koch 2006-06-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > developer.php doesn't support grouping of packages maintained by the
> > user. For example when you look at
> > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECT
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:50:55AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 10:25:47AM +0000, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Package: libxul-dev
> > Version: 1.8.0.4-2
> > Severity: important
> >
> > nsEmbedAPI.h declares NS_Em
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:13:52PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gsf-sharp
> Version : 0.7.0
> Upstream Author : Martin Willemoes Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
Package: libxul-dev
Version: 1.8.0.4-2
Severity: important
nsEmbedAPI.h declares NS_Embedding but no lib in xulrunner implements this
function.
Or I'm at least unable to find it. The problem with this is that
Eclipse (SWT) needs this method to embed a gecko engine embedded.
This method should ei
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 09:04:16PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:42:49AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > block 376107 by 362292
> > thanks
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:46:12AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > Package
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 07:48:34AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Version: 3.1.1-1
>
> This is an experiment to see if my theory about BTS' version tracking bugs is
> correct or not; if I'm right, the bug should now be marked as fixed in
> "3.1.1-1" (mapping to source package "eclipse/
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 03:47:46AM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: kaffe
> Version: 2:1.1.7-3
> Severity: grave
>
> On my i386 system:
>
> frobnitz:/tmp# cat Test.java
> public class Test {
> public static void main (String args[]) {
> System.exit(0);
> }
> }
> frobnitz:/tmp# /usr/lib/ka
block 376107 by 362292
thanks
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:46:12AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: libbsf-java
> Version: 1:2.3.0+cvs20050308-6
> Severity: serious
>
> When trying to build 'libbsf-java' in a clean unstable chroot,
> I get the following error:
>
> aj:/# apt-get source libb
severity 376296 important
merge 376296 336405 373705
thanks
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:01:03AM +0400, babl wrote:
> Package: libswt3.1-gtk-java
> Version: 3.1
>
> Debian testing
>
> Azureus and Eclipse cannot be installed in my system simultaneously.
> Azureus depends on libswt-gtk-3.1-java, bu
Version: 3.8.1.1-7
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 02:53:16PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: junit
> Version: 3.8.1.1-6
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> (cd src;/usr/lib/kaffe/bin/javac -target 1.3 -classpath . -d ../classes
> junit/*/*.java)
> Internal error: cau
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:25:06AM +0100, Anthony Callegaro wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.1.2-2
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (800, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Shell: /bin/sh
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:56:48AM +0200, Daniel Hofstetter wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:44:19AM +0200, Daniel Hofstetter wrote:
> >> Package: eclipse
> >> Version: 3.1.2-1
> >> Severity: normal
> >>
> >> If I
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:44:19AM +0200, Daniel Hofstetter wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.1.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> If I select a file and choose "Compare with HEAD", Eclipse tries to open the
> compare view, but in the
> middle of this process, the system freezes: it is no longer pos
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:41:08PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:20:30PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:47:46AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 07:58:06PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > &
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:51:16PM +0100, Stephen Kell wrote:
> Is there any reason why Jan's suggested changes haven't been made? I too
> would be very happy to see them applied.
Lameness of the maintainer. (Oops, that's me)
I'm currently testing this.
Cheers,
Michael
--
http://www.worldforge
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:47:46AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 07:58:06PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:41:40PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:50:56AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > >
tag 374133 confirmed pending
thanks
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 12:45:51PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> Package: classpath
> Version: 2:0.91-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The package currently depends on two GUI libraries: GTK+ and QT.
> Is this really necessary? It would be nice to either drop the
> depe
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
developer.php doesn't support grouping of packages maintained by the
user. For example when you look at
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you see
several packages in the "main" group. I wanted to group the packages
"eris", "wftk", "mercator" and some ot
tag 266906 fixed-in-experimental pending
thanks
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 09:15:33PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> the startup of the plugin is fixed now more of less. It still does not
> take the java settings into account as it does not use OJI interface
> yet.
The current gcjwebplugin
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:41:40PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:50:56AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:24:25AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, kaffe still FTBFS
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:24:25AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 08:11:20PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Is 3.1.2-6 the latest release of ecj-bootstrap-gcj ? In that case it
> > > still cause kaffe to FTBFS and was built with gcj-4.1 4.1.0-2j1, so
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:34:42PM +0200, Daniel Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:20:02PM +0200, Daniel R. wrote:
> >> Package: eclipse
> >> Severity: important
> >>
> >>
> >> I have had eclipse
tag 373791 confirmed pending
thanks
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:57:18PM +0200, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> Package: classpath
> Version: 2:0.91+cvs20060611-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
>
> There was an error building your package:
>
> i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../..
tag 336405 - wontfix
severity 336405 important
merge 336405 373705
thanks
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:03:41AM +0200, André Wendt wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Severity: important
>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> From: =?iso-
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:35:04PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.1.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I have problem running eclipse in Etch (it was also the case with
> Sid). When launching /usr/bin/eclise, I have th
tag 372851 pending
thanks
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:51:47AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Package: classpath
> Severity: important
> Version: 2:0.91-3
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
>
> Please find attached patch to fix that.
> It excludes linux s
reassign 313299 jamvm
thanks
This seems to be a jamvm problem as cacao does this okay with the same
classpath version.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:20:32PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:08:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 04:14:17PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > &
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:08:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 04:14:17PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 04:03:16PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:27:26PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:20:02PM +0200, Daniel R. wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Severity: important
>
>
> I have had eclipse (downloaded from www.eclipse.org, directly) installed
> on my /opt/eclipse directory for some time, along with Sun's java 5
> (update 6) sdk (debian-packaged with java-pa
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 04:03:16PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:27:26PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> >
> > The bug was in GCJ (See
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26483).
> >
> > I patch for this was uploaded in gcj-4.
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:16:38PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > IMO its now the best time to get rid of this package totally.
>
> FWIW, I'd forgotten that java-gcj-compat-dev even existed until your
> mailout to d-d-announce last month ("GCJ 4.1 transition"). In this
> mailout you ask maintain
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 03:36:56PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > No, its enough to rebuild the package with the new gcc package pointing
> > to gcc-4.1 installed.
>
> Sure, but relying on (build-essential + libgcj-dev) assumes that the gcc
> and gcj versions will always be the same. Past experi
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:48:01AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Probably a solution would be including libgcj7-dev.
>
> It does. It build-depends on libgcj-dev (>= 4:4.1.0), which brings in
> libgcj7-dev.
>
> >From the amd64 build log (which failed in this way):
>
> Unpacking libg
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:25:44PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:06:06AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: kaffe
> > Version: 2:1.1.7-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hello Kaffe maintainers,
> >
> > kaffe FTBFS on ia64:
> >
> > make[4]: Leaving directory
>
severity 36995 wishlist
merge 369950 368583 369194
thanks
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:29:18PM +0200, Emil Nowak wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.1.2-2
> Severity: minor
>
> So now we have sun jdk in debian, but eclipse is not trying to use it.
> I know I can set JAVA_HOME and it everytinh ma
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:24:55PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Marcin Owsiany a écrit :
> > What I meant is that maybe you could just add " | java2-runtime" after
> > "java1-runtime" to the Depends line for the time being? (That is, until
> >
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 06:03:47PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Package: eclipse-platform-common
> Version: 3.1.2-2
>
> Isn't a java2-runtime enough to fulfil this package's dependancy on a
> java runtime? The current Depends: means I need to install another
> runtime apart from the already inst
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 07:45:43PM -0400, Chris Howie wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > Unfortunately that is not that easy to do. The latest stable release has
> > broken C# support. It tries to create a Makefile during configure that
> > cannot exist. I'm trying
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:36:08PM -0400, Barry Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:44:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Package: ow-util-ant-tasks
> > Version: 1.3-4
> > Severity: important
> >
> > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> >
> > > Automatic build of
severity 369194 wishlist
merge 368583 369194
thanks
--
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
serverity 369194 wishlist
merge 368583 369194
thanks
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 07:28:26AM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.1.2-2
> Severity: normal
>
> As far as I can see, eclipse now tries to locate where java is located by
> scanning through the directories in /etc/ecl
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:53:59PM -0400, Chris Howie wrote:
> Package: antlr
> Version: 2.7.6-5
> Severity: wishlist
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Please enable support for generating C# classes from ANTLR grammar files.
Unfortunately that is not that easy to do. The l
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:09:20AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As said here and in the BTS several times before: On Debian SWT only
> >works with Mozilla. We tried it with Firefox and other browsers and
> >faile
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:12:51PM -0500, Tom Marble wrote:
> All:
>
> In reviewing the proposed changes to Debian Java Policy [1] [2]
> please allow me to make the following suggestions:
>
> 1. With respect to virtual packages [3] I understand that
>Debian Policy does not allow packages in "
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:26:26PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> On 5/26/06, Matt Philmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Thanks Shaun. On Ubuntu (Dapper), azureus requires the package
> >libswt3.1-gtk-java (listed as one of the Eclipse libraries), which
> >requires mozilla-browser. It appears that t
Package: openvrml
Severity: normal
While looking into the gcj 4.1 transition for openvrml I found out that
the package was not buildable at all for me. It FTBFSed for me with the
following error message:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../lib/antlr -I../../java
-I../../src/libopenvrml
Hello,
I'm NMUing this to get rid of gcj-4.0 in Debian.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:03:19PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
> > > Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
> > > I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
> >
> > A function that is used to
501 - 600 of 828 matches
Mail list logo
