Bug#911548: lirc: unowned broken symlinks after purge: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/lirc* -> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/python3.6/site-packages/lirc*

2018-10-25 Thread Michael Kolmodin
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:51:07 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello Alec, > can you please have a look at this debian/postinst issue? > thanks Confirmed. I missed to remove the links created in postinst in postrm. Fix under way. --alec

Bug#887126: RFS: ddupdate/0.2.0-1 #886546

2018-02-04 Thread Michael Kolmodin
Hi Juhani! Thanks for your reply, and sorry that I missed it! It was probably lost in the noise, was not really prepared for a reply from the bugĀ  so to speak. Listening to high-volume lists is not always easy :( For better or worse, both upstream and the packaging has evolved since your review.

Bug#860551: [Pkg-lirc-maint] Bug#860551: lircd-0.9.4c[845]: Error: Cannot glob /sys/class/rc/rc0/input[0-9]*/event[0-9]*

2017-05-15 Thread Michael Kolmodin
Actually, there is yet another way to cope with this: adding the immediate-init option to lircd (e. g., in lirc_options.conf). This will make lircd exit if the hardware cannot be initialized. Which means there will be no socket for clients to connect to. Making this the default setup is a possi

Bug#858144: lirc: Missing dependency: lirc-setup requires python3-yaml

2017-03-19 Thread Michael Kolmodin
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 22:35:29 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > I cannot judge whether Depends is appropriate or would pull in too much, > but a Recommends or at least a Suggests on all required packages is > required. Indeed, thanks for reporting. Will fix using a Recommends: , stay tuned. In the lo

Bug#851618: lirc: adequate reports multiple obsolete-conffiles for lirc Package: lirc

2017-01-16 Thread Michael Kolmodin
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:12:49 +0530 =?UTF-8?B?c2hpcmlzaCDgpLbgpL/gpLDgpYDgpLc=?= wrote: > Adequate reported multiple obsolete-conffiles for lirc - > > [$] adequate lirc > > lirc: obsolete-conffile /etc/lirc/irexec.lircrc > lirc: obsolete-conffile /etc/lirc/lircmd.conf > lirc: obsolete-conffile /

Bug#810445: lirc: please switch to libusb 1.0

2017-01-12 Thread Michael Kolmodin
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:52:12 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > > That is, is it really, really impossible to use the compatibility > > package which actually works on Fedora to resolve this? > > can you please add more information on that? > how does it work? > > G. See #731424 --alec

Bug#790969: We need to do something...

2016-10-23 Thread Michael Kolmodin
... with this bug. Given that it surfaces around kernel version 4.0, my first bet would be that this is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260862. It's not hard to check, just look for the consecutive spaces described in the bug. This bug is fixed (really, worked around) in the la