- Chris Lamb la...@debian.org wrote:
tags 539373 + patch
thanks
Patch attached.
Problem arises from incorrect use of AC_PROG_LEX and --acdir instead
of
AM_PROG_LEX and -I.
Thanks. I don't really understand your analysis though, and this seems
to introduce some warnings when
- Nathan Scott nsc...@aconex.com wrote:
I also have another package which uses AC_PROG_LEX without issues, so
I'm keen to understand further what you mean above - can you give more
details please?
Ah, I understand the problem now. It seems the latest versions of
autoconf/make evaluate
- Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
Package: pcp
Version: 2.7.4-20080306
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: incorrect-dependency incorrect-runlevels
...
This patch implement the proposed change. Without it,
- Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
Looking at the source, the problem seem to be that the struct stat
member st_mtime is not the same type as time_t.
I've flagged the problematic lines with **:
...
last_mtime can't be converted to int, compared to statbuf.st_mtime or
get an
- Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
[Nathan Scott]
It pulls in sys/types.h and unistd.h via impl.h. But perhaps the
order is important... we really need to run a build on an alpha but
I have not been able to get access to one.
I would not rule out that the ordering
Hi Cyril,
- Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
...
maintainers: I intend to NMU attr in the next days since it is
becoming
a blocker on the buildd side for both kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} ports. If
you don't have any objection (or if I get an explicit ACK), it will
probably happen in
- Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au wrote:
unfortunately, i didn't think to run xfs_db on the fs just before
unmounting it. that would have been useful. next time i see the
segfault
(probably tonight/tomorrow morning), i'll unmount it then run xfs_db
again to see if it goes away when
- Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au wrote:
/dev/sdc4 xfs248G 216G 32G 88% /export/myth2
/dev/sda4 xfs248G 215G 34G 87% /export/myth3
/dev/sdd1 xfs466G 384G 83G 83% /export/myth6
/dev/sdb1 xfs466G 386G 81G 83% /export/myth7
segfaulting
Thanks Petr, I've fwd'd it upstream - your patch looks good
to me I think it should be merged. Once thats done, I'll
update the Debian packages.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
- Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
=== debian ===
make[2]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-pcp_2.8.4-hppa-foVPoK/pcp-2.8.4/debian'
../install-sh -o root -g root -m 755 -d /usr/share/doc/pcp-2.8.4
../install-sh -o root -g root -m 644 changelog
- Gerfried Fuchs rho...@debian.at wrote:
Package: pcp-gui
Version: 1.3.5
Severity: minor
Hi!
It would be nice if the long description of your package could
consist
of full sentences[1], preferably more than just one - currently it
looks
a bit poor and pretty short.
- Markus Steinborn gnugv_maintai...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi Nathan,
I've not heard, but agr...@suse.de might be able to shed
some more light for you.
I'm sorry to tell you, bat Andreas Grienbacher (that's obviously one
of
his email addresses) has not responded since a year or so. So
- Markus Steinborn gnugv_maintai...@yahoo.de wrote:
Nathan Scott wrote:
I've informed upstream, will wait to get their thoughts
Are there any news from upstream?
I've not heard, but agr...@suse.de might be able to shed
some more light for you.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
- Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote:
To remedy this, please add bison to Build-Depends.
Thanks Aaron, I've fixed it in my tree - I'll upload a new package in the next
few days.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 16:11 +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Package: pcp
Version: 2.7.8-20090217
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Thanks for reporting it Peter, I think I can see the cause - I'll
upload a fixed version in the next few days.
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 23:43 +0900, TANIGUCHI Takaki wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.10.2-1
Severity: important
xfs_growfs does not work. But when I use i686 kernel, xfs_growfs work fine.
This is a kernel issue, fixed in more recent kernels, not an xfsprogs
problem. From the XFS
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 17:45 +0300, Samium Gromoff wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.10.2-1
Severity: normal
r...@auriga:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=betelheise.io.new bs=1048576 count=16384
What filesystem does ~root reside on?
r...@auriga:~# mkfs.xfs betelheise.io.new
...
r...@auriga:~#
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 20:49 -0800, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
Package: attr
Version: 1:2.4.43-1
Severity: normal
According to the man page
getfattr -d filename
should list all the attributes of filename, but it is not working:
cavedon-pc:~# setfacl -m 1000:r f
cavedon-pc:~# getfattr -d f
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 21:48 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: pcp
Version: 2.7.8-20081201
Severity: serious
Heya,
Building your package failed on my buildd:
Thanks Marc,
Ah, I can see what that is - works for me cos I have those
headers installed in my root. I'll upload a
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 16:53 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: pcp
Version: 2.7.4-20080507
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.4
Tags: patch
Thanks Martin! Turns out this has been fixed by proxy in
the latest version of pcp - other changes in this file have
removed the
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 19:06 +0200, Markus Steinborn wrote:
tags: patch
severity: important
I've informed upstream, will wait to get their thoughts.
The developers are English speaking though, so I guess they
will only have the patch mail to work from (and not the
discussion link you kindly
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 16:56 -0300, Peter Cordes wrote:
tags 500593 patch
thanks
I fixed this by re-adding the imflag ? imaxpct : defaut logic.
I also re-arranged the -N printing logic to use the values stored in sbp,
instead of duplicating code when it's easy to avoid. see attached patch.
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 08:51 +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Monday 08 September 2008 02:30:21 Nathan Scott wrote:
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 10:55 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
No, since this is not targeted for lenny, we are not plannign
currently upload
it to unstable.
Hmmm... but its
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 10:55 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
No, since this is not targeted for lenny, we are not plannign
currently upload
it to unstable.
Hmmm... but its a bugfix release isnt it? Moving from
4.3 to 4.4 introduced several regressions in just my
one app, I'd expect others have
Package: qt4-x11
Version: 4.4.1-1
Severity: serious
I'm trying to install the 4.4.1 packages from experimental, to see if
483790 is really resolved for my app, and I'm struggling - it kinda,
sorta, maybe looks like a packaging botch in libqtcore4 vs libqtgui4?
Below is what I see from dpkg...
Hi guys,
Any idea when 4.4.1 is planned? This seems to be taking a looong time.
Any way we could get a patch for this issue included in the meantime,
if it looks like it will be still awhile?
thanks!
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 09:15 +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
Hi,
how is the upstream inclusion of this patch progressing ?
AFAICT, not at all (zero discussion for many months / years now).
The acl package userspace patches on the citi webpage are for acl
2.2.42, which was released December 06.
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 08:19 -0700, Daniel Bakken wrote:
Yes, I am. Here is the output:
/usr/sbin/xfs_fsr: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, PowerPC or cisco 4500,
version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses shared
libs), stripped
Ah, OK - this is a kernel problem then. You may
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 11:20 -0700, Daniel Bakken wrote:
Package: xfsdump
Version: 2.2.48-1
Attempting to defragment an xfs filesystem fails:
xfs_fsr /dev/power/data
/san start inode=0
unable to get handle: /san: Invalid argument
# uname -a
Linux power 2.6.22-3-powerpc64 #1 SMP Wed
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 08:24 +0200, Arno van Amersfoort wrote:
And I guess most people expect mkfs.xfs to properly detect the sector
Indeed. I'll let the XFS developers know (CCd) - if devices say they
support only 512 byte sectors, mkfs.xfs should silently switch to the
minimum sector size
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:48 +0200, Arno van Amersfoort wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.8.11-1
Platform: 32bit x86
You should be able to use -ssize=4k on the mkfs command line to work
around this. In more recent versions of xfsprogs, mkfs.xfs does a
better job of handling this
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 21:21 +0200, Rickard Gustavsson wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Severity: normal
Hi
When trying to grow an xfs filesystem running an amd64 kernel,
xfs_growfs returns with the following error message.
Can you confirm whether you were using a 32 or 64 bit
userspace for me
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 02:22 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Package: kmchart
Version: 1.2.6
Severity: serious
Kmchart fails to build on mips/mipsel, and I believe it will also fail
on any other architecture. The reason is a missing build dependency on
libqt4-opengl-dev. This used to be
Hi Piotr,
Thanks for the bug report.
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 08:14 +0200, Piotr Szydełko wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.8.11-1
Severity: minor
Second paragraph in section DIRECTORY TREE QUOTA incorrectly states that -c
option setups project quota. In fact it is -s.
EXAMPLES:
there
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 22:08 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Riki,
curve.cpp: In static member function 'static double Curve::NaN()':
curve.cpp:35: error: 'numeric_limits' is not a member of 'std'
curve.cpp:35: error: expected primary-expression before 'double'
curve.cpp:35:
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 08:27 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Package: kmchart
Version: 1.2.4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kmchart-1.2.4'
src/include/builddefs:22: /etc/pcp.conf: No such file or
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 10:33 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Package: kmchart
Version: 1.1.5
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Thanks Martin, I'll get this fixed up today.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Subject: libqt4: QTreeView dumps core
Package: libqt4-gui
Version: 4.4.0~rc1-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've started to see problems in my QT4 app using the QTreeView
widget, since recently upgrading (I believe I upgraded from an
earlier 4.4 to the current unstable version - 4.4.0-rc1-4).
This
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 03:03 +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Hi!
THanks for your report. It would be nice if you had a minimal test
case we
could use to reproduce the problem (and forward upstream)
Unfortunately this area of my app code is fairly convoluted
and not a great test case.
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 12:35 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
Hi Nathan,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:53:36PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
Let me know if you want a Conflicts: line in the pcp
package... or some other strategy for sorting this out.
Thanks for your offer! I've actually already fixed
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 01:50 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote:
Hi,
The problem is probably with librapi2-tools (my package).
I'll sort this and upload it ASAP.
Hi Jonny,
Let me know if you want a Conflicts: line in the pcp
package... or some other strategy for sorting this out.
cheers.
--
Nathan
Any answer to my earlier question here? Is this reproducible?
I'm wondering why it only fails on s390 (and also whether its
a bug in whatever dh_install version you have there).
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 13:50 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: pcp
Version: 2.7.4-20080317
Severity: serious
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 01:22 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:11:01 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
Any answer to my earlier question here? Is this reproducible?
I'm wondering why it only fails on s390 (and also whether its
a bug in whatever dh_install version you have
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 13:50 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of pcp_2.7.4-20080317 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
[...]
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
dh_install --sourcedir=debian/pcp
cp: cannot stat
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 17:53 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: pcp
Version: 2.7.4-20080306
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080308 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:32 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 28 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
After downgrading to version 2.9.4-1, a newly created partition could be
mounted again.
2.9.5-1 works correctly as well.
Hi all,
Been discussing this with the SGI guys. The problem is most
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 02:28 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply.
On Thursday 28 February 2008, Nathan Scott wrote:
Been discussing this with the SGI guys. The problem is most likely
to be that current mkfs.xfs enables the lazy superblock accounting
feature, which
Hi Barry!
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:21 +1100, Barry Naujok wrote:
Yes, xfs_repair 2.8.11 has an nlink counting bug. Must get xfsprogs
2.9.6
(unstable or testing?), run xfs_metadump to capture an image which can
be
sent to me to fix the SEGV bug is xfs_check and then run xfs_repair to
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 22:42 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.8.11-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Heh, er, just a tad extreme? (its not clear how an xfs_check SEGV
can break the whole system...?)
I have a filesystem which causes a SEGV
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 16:07 +0100, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
...
The attached to line patch fixes this.
Thanks Peter - looks good to me - I've forwarded to upstream and will
upload once they're merged it (should be soon, as theres another more
critical change pending too).
cheers.
--
Nathan
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:51 +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
adding to the end of the paragraph:
_list_ is a caller-allocated buffer of size _size_.
Fwd'd to upstream, thanks Reuben.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 21:02 +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
Package: libattr1-dev
Version: 1:2.4.39-1
Severity: minor
In the word OR'ed, a diagonal tick \' is used, when a normal
apostrophe, produced with ', should have been used. This affects line
42 of attr_set.3.gz and line 44 of
Hi there,
attr(1) is intended only for XFS - it is an IRIX-compatibility
command, and there are parts of the tool that only work on the
XFS filesystem (in particular, those options that deal with the
ROOT namespace are XFS-specific).
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 12:07 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
All sounds good to me - please send a patch with those changes.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Wayne,
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:38 -0700, Wayne Tucker wrote:
fsck.xfs doesn't check to see if the device it is asked to check
exists. This can result in a system booting with an incomplete set of
filesystem mounts. The included patch works for me, although I only
have a limited
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 17:23 -0700, Wayne Tucker wrote:
In my case, the missing devices are being caused by intermittent
XENBUS
timeouts. The the VM boots but doesn't realize that /var/log isn't
mounted. There's an underlying issue that needs to be resolved
there,
but the same problem
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 23:42 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
Any news on this?
Ugh, I'd forgotten all about it - sorry. Thanks for the reminder, I'll
try find the time to get this resolved soon.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 23:49 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Nathan Scott wrote:
Thanks Paul, I've initiated a discussion with upstream, will get
back to you soon. Sorry about the delay, been away over Easter.
What's the outcome?
My timing sucks; I'd just left for 2 weeks vacation
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 19:32 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
Package: attr
Version: 2.4.32
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Arm eabi[1] has different syscall base than oldabi arm. Please
include attached patch.
Hi Riku,
I had this atch merged upstream a little while back, but haven't had
a
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 17:01 +0200, Benjamin Leipold wrote:
...
Running xfs_repair gives me following message: disconnected dir inode ,
moving to lost+found.
If i then try to delete this directory in lost+found, the filesystem is no
longer accessible.
This is a known problem to
Thanks Paul, I've initiated a discussion with upstream, will get
back to you soon. Sorry about the delay, been away over Easter.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 01:55 +, Wookey wrote:
...
Thanks Wookey. I've started a conversation with upstream, see how
they want to fix it - they would prefer to work for all versions of
autoconf, I think. They have some other type checks already, done
differently working for all autoconf
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 17:44 +0100, Fabien SEISEN wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.8.11-1
Severity: normal
...
and 20 lines further:
===
# echo logfiles:42 /etc/projid
===
This one is the correct variant.
so, what is the correct syntax of /etc/projid (name:id or id:name) ?
Hi Andi,
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 08:55 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Nathan, it is really not the right moment to exchange core libraries.
Understood. I certainly didn't want to be uploading anything at this
time. :|
There is already a fixed version uploaded, and I would propose that you
just
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 09:22 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:57:00PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
Hmm, my upload got rejected for some version ... I've sent off some
mail to try figure out why.
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 03:02 +, Debian Installer wrote:
Rejected
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed version will be
uploaded later today, as soon as I'm able.
cheers.
--
Nathan
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 09:36 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed version will be
uploaded later today, as soon as I'm able.
Hmm
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 16:11 +, Martin Guy wrote:
Package: attr
Version: 2.4.32-1
This bug, of attr using system calls directly, presents itself again
in attr 2.4.32-1.
In this case it is with the switch to ARM EABI that triggers the bug because
the
system call base number changes.
John,
Take a deep breath. Please start a discussion with the maintainer
before attempting an NMU, its generally considered courteous to
give more than 45 mins notice (which was the time between this
bug and your NMU problem report).
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 11:23 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Hi John,
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 18:11 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
It appears there was some misinformation about debian-devel about your
level of activity wrt this package.
Yes, I don't know why that stuff was said; I'm still actively
using XFS and plan to keep xfsprogs and friends uptodate in
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:30:08AM +0200, Ferenc W?gner wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.8.11-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I guess my problem is rooted in the 'well known' 2.6.17 error, or maybe
not. Anyway, my experience under a current Sid system is that
xfs_repair does not fix my
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:45:49AM +0200, Reinhardt A.W. Maier wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.8.4-1
Hello Nathan,
in the man-page for xfs_quota(8) in line 333 is written:
# xfs_quota -c report /home
and because 'report' is an admin command - it should be:
# xfs_quota -x -c
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 05:05:50PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.8.11-1
Followup-For: Bug #382935
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
- scan
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:57:32AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
I don't know POSIX, please answer the following.
File system file's block map may *not* be the same as actual data blocks
after truncate() ? If so, i'm going to check ls/dd size and du size of
all files.
The block map does show the
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:13:10PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
Thank you very much !
I'm still wonder if all this 5Gi truncate() stuff matters to d-i
developers as bug...
It may do, I'm not sure... it does seem quite odd behaviour, if it
can be reproduced by them that'd help I guess.
cheers.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
Hallo,
On 8/22/06, Nathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:57:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
...
in prev. email, result is nothing from xfs_check and xfs_repair.
repair and check wont be reporting
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:39:31AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
On 8/23/06, Nathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So. What one must do ? I know XFS warrants _file system_ integrity
(not data), but
this is some kind of nasty thing 4K=5G.
Hmm, no, this is some kind of POSIX thing. Most
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:57:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
After reboot onto another rootfs i've checked XFS with that wrong
files i mentioned
in prev. email, result is nothing from xfs_check and xfs_repair.
repair and check wont be reporting a problem because the size is
valid... it looks
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:40:53AM +, Oleg Verych wrote:
Whould you like to make 'xfs_repair' static in main distribution ?
That doesn't seem like a good idea to me...
Thus it will be easy to have a safemode boot device in case of XFS
Its pretty easy to do that anyway... you'll note that
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:37:00PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 19:57, Frans Pop wrote:
libpthread is available in the installer, but librt currently is not
and we'd prefer not having to add it. Is it possible for you to link in
librt statically for the udeb?
Please
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:25:06PM +0200, Adrian Dziubek wrote:
I would add, that the same message is also issued, when the user tries
to change non-user attribute. e.g.:
setfattr -n something -v something
setfattr -n user.something -v something
The first won't work on user_xattr enabled
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:17:09AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
So, can you explain for me why the POT file needs a header to be
imported properly? Imported into what?
Rosetta so far, but it is basically the same if you start a new
translation manually: a .po file needs a correct header
Hello Martin,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:00:51AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Package: acl
Version: 2.2.39-1
Tags: patch
The POT file created by the acl package is broken since it does not
have a proper header.
Well, that doesn't strictly make it broken, but no matter.
We fixed this by
Hello again Martin,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:00:51AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
The POT file created by the acl package is broken since it does not
have a proper header.
OK, I had a closer look, and now I'm even more confused. ;)
First some i18n refresher notes -
- the acl.pot file is
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 06:35:44PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
just wanted to note that the fix solved my problem. Thanks!
Great - thanks for all your help too Bastian.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:22:45PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
Nathan Scott wrote:
Can you send me the command line you're running here, and also
your /proc/mounts file please?
The command I ran was xfs_growfs -n /dev/hda1. My /proc/mounts is
attached. Note that /dev/hda1 is my root
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:59:22PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
here are some more infos about this bug.
First thing I noted that xfs_growfs read /proc/self/mounts as default,
not /etc/mtab as the man page suggests. So I used -t /etc/mtab, but
with the
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 06:46:07PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
When I run xfs_growfs as a normal user, the program crashes.
/dev/hda1 is my root XFS partition, the uid and gid is 1000.
...
(gdb) run -n /dev/hda1
Starting program: /usr/sbin/xfs_growfs -n /dev/hda1
*** glibc detected ***
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:42:41PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
the download URL in debian/copyright is
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/
However, I cannot find any xfsprogs 2.7.16 package there, the only thing
I can find is this:
Pretty certain that last patch fixes it. I'll merge it and upload a
new version - let me know if any problems remain.
thanks.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:51:58PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
This package still has debmake in its build-depends, but debmake will
be removed from the archive sometime after the release of etch.
...
Please switch to debhelper (recommended) or use some other means of
building your package.
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:35:50PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
when getfacl is run on a non-existant file, it segfaults because it
passes a NULL string to ftw().
Thanks Daniel, I've got this merged into CVS now - I'll do an
update to the acl package in unstable in the next few days.
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:40:15PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
I am trying to set an extended attribute value of the form 0x20
(literally ASCII letters zero, x, two, zero) but setfattr presumes that
I want a literal space (ASCII 0x20 or 32 decimal) instead. setfattr
seemingly has no option to
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:45:24PM -0700, Matt R Hall wrote:
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.7.16-1
Severity: minor
xfs_fsr responds to its command-line arguments inconsistently:
Executing the following command fails:
$ sudo xfs_fsr -v /mnt/
/fileshare/: Directory defragmentation not
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:25AM -0700, Matt R Hall wrote:
Mr. Scott,
Thank you for your rapid reply! I greatly appreciate your dedication
to your work.
No problem.
On 5/21/06, Nathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a filesystem mounted at /mnt? (can you include your
/etc/mtab
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Daniel Webb wrote:
I'll see if I can dig into nftw() tomorrow if someone else who knows what
they're doing hasn't already figured this out by then.
Any progress?
Hi Joey,
Daniel and I have been talking to Andreas
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:01:00PM +0200, Rainer Zocholl wrote:
...
When trying to update i get:
~# aptitude install libacl1 libacl1
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
E: Unable to correct
Hmm, somehow I don't remember even seeing the original bug report
for this one. Shame on me I guess, but I'd have at least passed
the report on upstream to Andreas if I'd seen it... not sure what
happened there.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 03:15:34AM -0600, Daniel Webb wrote:
...
If this is due to
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:55:52AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
If you're about to do an upload (say next couple of weeks), then just
Upload of xfsprogs 2.7.16 has now been done..
cheers.
--
Nathan
pgpvdNZOXAw1I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:55:52AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
If you're about to do an upload (say next couple of weeks), then just
let me know when you do so I can grab the buildd. If you're not
planning on doing it anytime soon, then I'll build it when I have free
OK -
101 - 200 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
