Bug#329354: CAN-2005-0204 and 2.4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there. On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 11:30:25AM +0900, Horms wrote: The problem that you see is a patch that was included in 2.4.27-11 (the current version in sid), though it isn't built for amd64. Could you see if the following patch works for

Bug#329354: kernel-source-2.4.27: Patch 143_outs.diff.bz2 breaks compilation on x86_64.

Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 Version: 2.4.27-11.hls.2005082200 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source Patch 143_outs.diff.bz2 breaks the kernel compilation on x86_64. The problem is that it uses the IO_BITMAP_BYTES macro which is defined for i386 (in

Bug#329355: Kernels compiled from kernel-source-2.4.27 can't boot on x86_64.

Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 Version: 2.4.27-11.hls.2005082200 Severity: important Kernels compiled from kernel-source-2.4.27 fail to boot on x86_64, with a 'FATAL: Kernel too old' error. This is on a 3.1r0a/x86_64 system, with security and standard updates as of yesterday. The error is probably

Bug#329355: Kernels compiled from kernel-source-2.4.27 can't boot on x86_64.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote: why can't you use the 2.6 kernel image? I've been having problems with a SiI3112 card in a server I'm trying to setup. I've filed a bug with the kernel's bugzilla (bug id: 5279),

Bug#329355: Kernels compiled from kernel-source-2.4.27 can't boot on x86_64.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi again. On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: the amd64 port does not support 2.4 kernels, and there are no plans top change this. ACK. I guess I missed that part in the release notes... I re-read the whole thing