Bug#1082109: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1082109: inchi: support for .sdf (v3000 dialect) is not functional

Dear Andrius, In the more general case of a .mol/.sdf file about models with multiple atoms and at least one explicit bond, the reference executable of InChI 1.07.1 is able to process data in the v3000 dialect. Their executable published by August 21st, 2024 on

Bug#1082109: inchi: support for .sdf (v3000 dialect) is not functional

text Full Aux. info Timeout per structure: 6 msec Up to 1024 atoms per structure Error 171 (no INChI; Molfile V3000 input is not supported) inp structure #1. Structure 2 could not be read: Detected end of file. Processed 1 structure, 1 error. @debian:~/Desktop/issue_debian$ cat style_3000

Bug#1076519: libinchi1: new version 1.07 of InChI (now MIT license scheme)

e MIT license scheme. Norwid Behrnd [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/inchi/mailman/message/37365947/ [2] https://github.com/IUPAC-InChI/InChI -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Arch

Bug#1069249: lintian: Debian Policy (version 4.7.0, published April 2024) appears to be unknown to lintian

Package: lintian Version: 2.117.0 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: nbeh...@yahoo.com Dear Maintainers, in preparation of an update of ruby-mdl to adhere the recently published Debian Policy (version 4.7.0), while checking my local `ruby- mdl_0.13.0-5_amd64.changes` file prior to the subsequent uplo

Bug#1069248: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-5 -- Markdown lint tool - transitional dummy package

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl": * Package name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.13.0-5 Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"] * URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint * License

Bug#1062070: RFP: naps2 -- not another pdf scanner

Package: naps2 Version: N/A; reported 2024-01-31 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: nbeh...@yahoo.com * Package name: naps2 * Version : 7.3.0 * Upstream Author : Ben Olden-Cooligan * URL : https://github.com/cyanfish/naps2 * License : a blend of GPLv2 and MIT * Progra

Bug#1061483: tipp10: lesson 18 unexpectedly trains with English and German corpora

Package: tipp10 Version: 3.3.0-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: nbeh...@yahoo.com Dear Maintainer, I gradually advanced to exercise with lesson 18 / all characters in a setup with "USA | QWERTY | Windows" as keyboard layout, and "English | QWERTY" about the language. In contrast to the previous

Bug#1056362: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-4 -- Markdown lint tool - transitional dummy package

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl": * Package name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.13.0-4 Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"] * URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint * License

Bug#1055886: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-3 -- Markdown lint tool - transitional dummy package

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl": * Package name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.13.0-3 Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"] * URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint * License

Bug#1055430: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool - transitional dummy package

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl": * Package name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.13.0-2 Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"] * URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint * License

Bug#1053575: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-1 -- Markdown lint tool

On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 19:02:02 +0100 Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 11:55:29PM +0100 schrieb Norwid Behrnd: > > Your transitional package needs to Depends: on the new package. > Thank you for spotting my omission. The current upload to https://mentors.debian.net/pack

Bug#1053575: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-4 -- Markdown lint tool

> What is wrong with just adding mdl as a new binary package in the existing > source package? By the conventions of the Ruby team,[1] the name `ruby-mdl` conveys the idea the binary provides only a library. For them, the binary however provides an application conventionally named without the pr

Bug#1054258: RFS: mdl/0.13.0-1 -- Markdown lint tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mdl": * Package name : mdl Version : 0.13.0-1 Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"] * URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint * License

Bug#1054238: ruby-mdl: the package provides an application, not a library

Package: ruby-mdl Version: 0.12.0-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: nbeh...@yahoo.com Dear Maintainer, by convention, a package should carry the prefix `ruby-` only if it is a library.[1] As a syntax checker, the binary however provides an application. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Pack

Bug#1053575: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.13.0-1 -- Markdown lint tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl": * Package name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.13.0-1 Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"] * URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint * License

Bug#1051716: mopac-makpol apparently not yet packaged

as a non mandatory extra.[4] With best regards, Norwid Behrnd [1] https://github.com/openmopac/mopac/issues/173#issuecomment-1713917483 [2] http://openmopac.net/manual/makpol.html [3] http://openmopac.net/manual/makpol.zip [4] https://github.com/openmopac/mopac/releases -- System Information: D

Bug#1030265: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-3 -- Markdown lint tool

> Oif, the man page itself shouldn't be renamed. As the executable in $PATH > is "mdl", the man page should be named so. There was the attempt to resolve the name issue by renaming the package. Given the freeze a couple of days ahead, the suggest received however was to defer this *for now*,[1] o

Bug#1029186: reply: RFS: libcommons-validator-java/1:1.7-1 [Team] -- ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules

Postscript: If you already edit `debian/changelog` (`UNRELEASED` -> `unstable`), the trailing spaces in this file equally can be removed in the same session, too.

Bug#1029186: reply: RFS: libcommons-validator-java/1:1.7-1 [Team] -- ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules

Hello Min Sun, is there a particular reason why you opt for / stick to distribution `UNRELEASED` for a package already monitored by the tracker?[1] It is the entry e.g., `dch -i` puts into file `/debian/changelog` when you start to work on a new version (increment) of a package. After all other

Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt

> So long for a library, change the name. It might be better to rename the package after bookworm became stable. My intent is to rename `ruby-mdl` into `markdownlint`; like `posixsignalmanager`, it is a package accepted into `testing` a couple of days ago. The recommendation I received was to st

Bug#1030265: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-3 -- Markdown lint tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl": * Package name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.12.0-3 Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"] * URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint * License

Bug#1029033: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool

Sorry, this was a misunderstanding on my side. In upload #3, with reference to the documentation, the adjustment of the changelog and provision of the new tag now are the only two intentional changes to the data.

Bug#1029361: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool

. * Source only upload for migration to testing Regards, Norwid Behrnd

Bug#1029033: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-2 -- Markdown lint tool

. * Source only upload for migration to testing Regards, -- Norwid Behrnd

Bug#1026114: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-1 [ITP] -- Markdown lint tool

y (even though it was sent to the submit@ address). > Thank you for pointing out this significant detail. Based on the public archive of the mailing list, I assume /this time/ the message reached the intended audience. -- Norwid Behrnd

Bug#1027904: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-1 [ITP] -- Markdown lint tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-mdl": * Package name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.12.0-1 Upstream contact : ["p...@ipom.com"] * URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint * License

Bug#1026114: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-1 [ITP] -- Markdown lint tool

medium . * Initial release (Closes: #1026114) Regards, -- Norwid Behrnd

Bug#989710: RFP: markdownlint -- A tool to check markdown files and flag style issues.

@Jerome Charaoui I would like to let you know about ticket 1026114 with an ITP. Based on the current version 0.12.0 of markdownlint, the work advanced to the stage requesting a sponsorship. Regards, -- Norwid Behrnd

Bug#1026114: RFS: ruby-mdl/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Markdown lint tool

ium . * Initial release of ruby-mdl for Debian. (Closes: #1026114) Regards, -- Norwid Behrnd

Bug#1026114: ITP: ruby-mdl -- A gem that offers a syntax check for markdown files

package: ruby-mdl Severity: wishlist Owner: 'Norwid Behrnd' *Package Name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.12.0 Upstream Author : Phil Dibowitz (Author name/s of the Gem, p...@ipom.com). *URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint (Link to the git repo of the Gem) *License : MIT *D

Bug#1026095: ITP: ruby-mdl -- A gem that offers a syntax check for markdown files

package: ruby-mdl Severity: wishlist Owner: 'Mark Harrison' *Package Name : ruby-mdl Version : 0.12.0 Upstream Author : Phil Dibowitz (Author name/s of the Gem, p...@ipom.com). *URL : https://github.com/markdownlint/markdownlint (Link to the git repo of the Gem) *License : MIT *Description :

Bug#1025320: suggestion: include of markdownlint as .deb

Package: markdown Version: 1.0.1-11 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: nbeh...@yahoo.com Dear Maintainer, while using markdown more often for taking notes, I noticed markdownlint[1] as a handy tool to reveal inconsistencies in the formatting. On the project page, a few Linuxes are listed which pro