Hello,
I noticed this same problem, and I wrote a patch for keepalived
to implement To-header.
The patch is here:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=keepalived-develmessage_id=20120928122744.GR8912%40reaktio.netcounter=1
And the keepalived-devel mailinglist thread about
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:12:16AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 09:51 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.12 at 10:33, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 19:47 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: src:xen
Version: 4.1.3-4
Severity:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:26:29PM +0100, Erik Hjelmås wrote:
When installing xen-linux-system on a new Dell R810 server, Wheezy,
Squeeze and Ubuntu server 11.10 all boot fine when booted directly into
the standard kernel, but when booting through Xen (after installing the
package
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 01:12:58PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I thought xenconsoled was restartable, the upstream init scripts
certainly do so.
Yes, xenconsoled is restartable.
(And earlier you even had to restart it every now and then,
because it had a bug where it got stuck and thus also
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 12:54:32AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
That means 8704 MB of memory is used.
Over the last couple of days, I've experienced that when creating two
VM's with 512 MB RAM, the oom-killer is invoked. This should not happen
because Dom0 can shrink and because the
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 04:34:04PM +0400, ?? wrote:
By the way seems to me problem independs from kernel.
I've installed 2.6.39 kernel and tried to start domain with xl create
and it is the same problem.
When i try to start domain with xm i get error:
Error: Device 768 (vbd) could
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:40:32AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Thanks. Indeed, there was some possible confusion. Patched accordingly.
Please find the new patch attached to this email.
See below for one more comment..
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--- release-notes/en/upgrading.dbk.orig
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:26:11PM -0400, Keith Russell wrote:
Package: xen-utils-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-1
Severity: normal
Due to license issues this version of Xen does not include the blktap2
backend (tapdisk2) and associated utilities (vhd-util, etc.). The decision
was made to disable
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 06:41:20PM -0300, Daniel Requena wrote:
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64
Version: 4.0.1-1
Hardware specs:
Dell PowerEdge R410
32GB RAM DDR3
1TB RAID-1 HD (Perc H200 RAID controller)
Processor: 2 - Intel XeonE5620 2.4Ghz 12M Cache Turbo HT 1066MHz
SO: Debian
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:30:48PM +0300, Alex Morega wrote:
I get the same error, with versions 4.0.1~rc5-1, 4.0.1~rc6-1 and 4.0.1-1 of
xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64. I'd like to provide a more complete log dump but I
don't know how.
So you need to set up a serial console to get the console
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:31:28AM +0200, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure but I think I suffer under the same problem with a bit
different setup with squeeze testing and xen 4.0rc5.
In fact I'm using bridges in the dom0 and the connections to the domU get
lost
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:18:54PM +0100, Ondrej Kunc wrote:
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64
Version: 3.2.1-2
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
Recently I've experienced some crashes of Xen domU (also debian Lenny,
running same kernel as dom0
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:21:28PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:18:54PM +0100, Ondrej Kunc wrote:
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64
Version: 3.2.1-2
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
Recently I've experienced some
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:14:48AM +0100, Vincent van Adrighem wrote:
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386
Version: 3.2.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #566012
Just had another crash. I got the output from a serial console. The kernel
doesn't say anything though.
You could try two things:
- Update
Hello,
Debian Lenny linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen uses an early snapshot of Novell SLES11
patches,
so I guess someone would have to go through the SLES11 kernel-xen patches
and see what has changed.. I believe SLES11 Xen patches have numerous bugfixes
compared to what is in Lenny.
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 12:39:00AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-3
Severity: normal
I don't seem to have the CPU flags for Intel virtualisation from the processor
to run KVM, Xen and friends. I double-checked the BIOS and virtualisation
is enabled
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:51:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 09:30:05PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
I refuse to maintain the security-hog called qemu for the next stable
release, so it can only come from a different source package.
What's
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:39:42AM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
Romain Francoise wrote:
This happens when there's not enough free memory to compensate the
memory overhead of domain creation, xend balloons down dom0 by 2MB
to work around this, but sometimes it's not enough.
Freeing more
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 12:11:33AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:34:18PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:38:10PM +0200, Csillag Kristof wrote:
We should move this to this thread (#536175),
because the other bug report (#536176) is about
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:28:18AM +0200, Csillag Kristof wrote:
Package: xen-utils-3.4
Version: 3.4.0-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After installing xen-utils-3.4 besides my existing xen-3.2 system,
I could not start xend-3.2 anymore. The message I was
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:42:40PM +0200, Csillag Kristof wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
What do you mean with HVM support is disabled? Xen 3.4.0 definitely supports
HVM guests.
Xen does, but the current debian package does not seem to.
The changelog says so:
xen-3 (3.4.0-1
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:10:31PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:19:39PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Uhm, that's really weird. What was the reason for disabling Xen HVM support?
It's removing half of the Xen functionality in Debian..
Xen upstream decided to move
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:38:10PM +0200, Csillag Kristof wrote:
We should move this to this thread (#536175),
because the other bug report (#536176) is about a different issue.
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:10:31PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:34:18PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:38:10PM +0200, Csillag Kristof wrote:
We should move this to this thread (#536175),
because the other bug report (#536176) is about a different issue.
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:22:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:46:37PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390862
Is there anything that could be done with this, at this (late) point?
If we can't do anything
So.. is there anything to do about this?
-- Pasi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:18:01PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:54:31PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
What about idea not to *add* pae versions of xen kernels, but to *replace*
non-pae versions with pae versions?
Rationale:
- not increase
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:54:31PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
What about idea not to *add* pae versions of xen kernels, but to *replace*
non-pae versions with pae versions?
Rationale:
- not increase in archive size or linux-2.6 package build time,
- this will improve
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: rc3 for i386 from cdimage.debian.org
uname -a: Linux testi 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Mon Jan 24 03:01:58 EST 2005 i686 unknown
Date: Tue 29 Mar 2005 12:30
Method: Booted from rc3/i386 CD, and ran linux26 installer.
Machine: HP Proliant DL380 G4 server
29 matches
Mail list logo
