Hi Yadd,
On 22-08-2022 22:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 22-08-2022 17:26, Yadd wrote:
could you remove node-request from testing ? Following #956423, it
shouldn't be part of next stable release. All its reverse dependencies
are already removed from testing (yarnpkg, node-matrix-sdk).
node
Source: tryton-sao
Severity: serious
tryton-sao build depends on node-uglify which is deprecated and will be
removed from bookworm very shortly (#958117), please update your (build)
dependency in favor of uglifyjs or uglifyjs.terser.
https://bugs.debian.org/958117
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:53:54 -0500 =?UTF-8?Q?Charles_Fl=C3=A8che?=
wrote:
> We've been able to install the package using the attached patch that
> doesn't hack around the migration to timidity-daemon. Does this
> approach looks OK ?
Although I'm not the
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-sg3-utils.html
Hi Jonathan,
On 02-03-2023 10:30, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
This is a prerequest, before uploading to unstable. The package has
already passed through NEW and is available in
Hi,
Sorry for the delayed answer, also to Sam's original question.
On 25-02-2023 17:52, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 09:47:59 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
Ah, was wondering the same few days before the toolchain freeze, as I
was unsure whether to update some of the packages I
reassign 917528 releases.debian.org
retitle 917528 britney should add packages from debug archive too
user release.debian@package.debian.org
usertag 917528 britney
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 20:21:21 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
On 28-12-2018 10:16, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> In test
Package: debci-worker
Version: 3.5.2+nmu1
When the debci workers are stopped by calling:
$ systemctl stop debci-worker # or
$ systemctl stop debci-worker@1
I would expect the testbed to be cleaned up if it was created by the
worker. E.g. on ci.d.n we run with the lxc backend, but the container
Control: fixed -1 5.10.162-1 6.1.8-1
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 21:35:58 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 07:42:10PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> It seems like there was a regression with the latest stable update
> that affects the autopkgtest for liburing. Reassigning.
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
[Now with submitter in To:]
Hi Ryutaroh,
On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:50:38 +0900 Ryutaroh Matsumoto
wrote:
debci setup -a arm64 -b qemu fails as below.
This is caused by
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973038
That bug has been fixed quite 1.5 years
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Ryutaroh,
On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:50:38 +0900 Ryutaroh Matsumoto
wrote:
debci setup -a arm64 -b qemu fails as below.
This is caused by
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973038
That bug has been fixed quite 1.5 years ago. Does this issue still
Hi Jussi,
On 01-03-2023 00:17, Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 23:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
With your last upload of meson, we're seeing issues on
ci.debian.net. It turns out that the autopkgtest of meson is using so
much disk space that the most of our hosts runs out of it when
Source: meson
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear Jussi,
With your last upload of meson, we're seeing issues on
ci.debian.net. It turns out that the autopkgtest of meson is using so
much disk space that the most of our hosts runs out of it when meson
is tested.
See e.g. the history (look
Hi Ana,
On 28-02-2023 21:57, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
Please, keep debian-timeline out of bookworm, the installed HTML doesn't
show the timeline like it should so the package is useless.
The recommended way to achieve that is by filing an RC bug against the
package and let autoremoval take
Hi Wouter,
On 27-02-2023 23:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
To be clear: this would require a pass through NEW, for the RDM tester
package ("ola-rdm-tester"). That's okay then? If so, can you add the
unblock? If not, I'll leave the rdm-tester for after the release.
No, adding new binaries is not
Control: tags 994758 - bookworm-ignore
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for caring.
On 25-02-2023 14:30, Adrian Bunk wrote:
With the bookworm-ignore for #994758,
I'll admit that I misjudged that bug; with this message I'll clear the
bookworm-ignore tag.
bullseye and bookworm
will ship libsgutils2-2
Dear David,
On 08-02-2023 13:53, David Prévot wrote:
[ Tests ]
I didn’t test it thoroughly (I doubt to have much time for at least
another week), but it passes
There are issues with the installability of src:symfony packages as can
be seen from the autopkgtests [1]:
Hi all,
On 23-02-2023 02:21, Chris Knadle wrote:
I'd like to know the status of mumble-server on armhf and arm64 and
whether it can be restored for those architectures, because mumble
server is commonly run on that hardware and is one one of the base
expected programs for the FreedomBox
Hi,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:21:06 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
net-http-persistent (~> 3.0, >= 3.0.0) was resolved to 3.1.0,
which depends on
Ruby (~> 2.1)
This doesn't seem to be an issue on reproducible builds [1] when
building ruby-faraday. Does that make sense?
Paul
[1]
Hi Otto,
On 23-02-2023 17:08, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
What does apt upgrade -o Debug::pkgDepCache::Marker=1 -o
Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall=1 -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=1
yield?
In this situation we need to debug what versions apt is seeing and how
it is resolving them [1].
paul@mulciber
Hi Otto,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 08:00:00 -0800 =?UTF-8?B?T3R0byBLZWvDpGzDpGluZW4=?=
wrote:
This severity 'serious' bug should prevent the migration
automatically. Close this bug when migration is free to proceed.
I believe this has happened now. Do you think it should solve that issue
I was
Hi Otto,
On 22-02-2023 08:25, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
A fresh run today passed, proving the Debian autopkgtest host
hardware/kernel/overload theory is likely the cause.
I don't think a pass proves anything in that respect. I've seen so many
tests being flaky because they assume things that
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 20-02-2023 13:09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
If the release team would be willing to grant an exception to the policy
to get this done, we can get this wrapped up inside a week I expect.
Can you please confirm that everything is ready to do this? I.e. there
Hi,
Not a removal in my case, but a "kept back"
paul@mulciber ~ $ sudo apt -oDebug::pkgDepCache::Marker=yes full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
MarkInstall breeze:amd64 < 4:5.26.90-1 @ii mK NPb IPb > FU=0
MarkInstall
Hi Otto,
On my daily updated system, I today saw this:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libdbd-mariadb-perl
The following packages have been kept back:
mariadb-server
The following packages will be upgraded:
chromium chromium-common chromium-driver chromium-sandbox
Dear Ted,
On 16-02-2023 23:24, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
But, if the Debian Release team would like to override my position, my
suggestion would be to just change the default for /etc/mke2fs.conf
for *everyone* running Debian bookworm, and with the understanding
that this will be reverted in Debian
Control: tags -1 pending
On 20-02-2023 16:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have the attached debdiff ready to handle with the stable release
managers.
I have uploaded the attached debdiff, I took the liberty to also fix the
autopkgtest (cherry-pick from unstable).
Paul
diff --git a/debian
: add new non-free-firmware component (Closes: #1029803)
+ * debian/tests: Add adduser dependency, fix test to not assume vim-tiny
+matches for vim. (from bookworm branch)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:09:19 +0100
+
command-not-found (20.10.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Trim
Hi Abou,
On 18-02-2023 12:17, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
On Thu, 2021-12-30 at 22:30 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
Maybe we should move
the fp-units-$bar packages to the library section too and embed the ABI
version into the package name.
I like that idea. Let's go that way.
...
I don't
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On 19-02-2023 21:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:51:39 +0100 Lee Garrett
wrote:
This is already fixed in unstable, but in it's current form this will
break the
upgrade path from bullseye to bookworm. The fix is trivial, adding
`'non-free-firmware
Package: libtycho-java
Version: 1.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fais to install
Dear maintainer,
You package depends on libeclipse-osgi-util-java but that no longer
exists in unstable.
Paul
Hi Julian,
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:51:39 +0100 Lee Garrett wrote:
This is already fixed in unstable, but in it's current form this will break the
upgrade path from bullseye to bookworm. The fix is trivial, adding
`'non-free-firmware': 60,` to CommandNotFound/db/creator.py is enough. I propose
Source: multiplex
Version: 0.5.1-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.6.0-1
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1027462
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: elementpath
Version: 2.5.3-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.2-1
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1027439
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 freedom-make 0.32
Control: clone -1 -3
Control: reassign -3 debos 1.1.1-2
On 2023-02-15 21:04:36 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -2 vmdb2 0.26-2
>
> On 2023-02-14 01:01:38 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Hi
Hi Mechtilde,
On 17-02-2023 22:32, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
If it is better for the release, please remove my try to fix it.
That won't fix the FTBFS. I think your upload just uncovered a latent
issue, bug #026204.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 16-02-2023 23:34, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
@elbrus: Why does britney try to migrate clinfo together with pocl?
Honestly, I don't know. The logic that does that *is* rather greedy as
often it helps (but not always).
IMO clinfo should be able to migrate on its own without causing new
Source: clinfo, libgpuarray
Control: found -1 clinfo/3.0.23.01.25-1
Control: found -1 libgpuarray/0.7.6-13
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of clinfo the autopkgtest of libgpuarray fails
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Dear Otto,
On 12-02-2023 08:14, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
MariaDB 10.11 is the latest stable and long-term supported (until
2028) version of a popular database software. Having it included in
Debian Bookworm would serve users best, both immediately and in the
long run
Hi Helge,
On 16-02-2023 15:54, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
There is one small issue left, so I probably will issue another
backport upload this weekend, but otherwise - this is (hopefully)
completely resolved.
This bug is currently marked RC and hence it showed up on my radar. If
you fix RC
Hi Steve,
On 16-02-2023 11:56, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Thanks, that did! But I wasn't paying enough attention and forgot to
also ask for the related:
unblock grub-efi-amd64-signed/1+2.06+8
unblock grub-efi-arm64-signed/1+2.06+8
unblock grub-efi-ia32-signed/1+2.06+8
Could you also add those
Hi Helge,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 07:36:33 +0100 Helge Kreutzmann
wrote:
I expect upstream to release "this weekend" - but this might be
actually next monday/tuesday.
Then I might take a day or two to package this for unstable.
I think this happened in version 4.17.0-1 and 2. The latter
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 13-02-2023 20:45, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
src:nvidia-graphics-drivers recently moved from non-free to
non-free-firmware since the firmware-nvidia-gsp binary package was moved
to that section, too.
Ack.
Tracker reports
autopkgtest for
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi Daniel,
On 16-02-2023 01:11, Daniel Leidert wrote:
I ask you to
find a reasonable approach to deal with this for the Bookworm release.
That's not how we normally work. Please come with concrete proposals and
we can evaluate them.
Hi Adrian,
On 14-02-2023 14:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This will require a hint from the release team I have not yet requested,
since installability of binary-all packages is tested on amd64 and arm64
but there is no requirement that a binary-all package is installable on
arm64 and several are
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jonas,
On 12-02-2023 09:19, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
^
Please don't do this with bugs against release.debian.org. It makes our
flow worse instead of helping.
The
Hi Otto,
On 12-02-2023 01:29, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Did cacti perhaps change how it uses systemd/systemctl?
cacti doesn't use systemd nor systemctl
Probably not, the same version of cacti has been in Debian for a long
time. Latest upload of dbconfig-common was on Feb 2nd, and after that
Hi,
On 11-02-2023 22:41, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
On 11/02/2023 20:17, Paul Gevers wrote:
Well, the buildd's don't run bookworm, but they run stable (which
currently is bullseye).
Sorry, I was told this was Bookworm blocker when this was emailed to me,
not a Bullseye one.
That is true
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 20:18:57 + James Addison wrote:
Source: qemu
Followup-For: Bug #1030545
For anyone else looking into this bug: it seemed to me that 'qcow2.c' is a
likely candidate for this infinite looping[1] behaviour to originate from.
The fact that metadata preallocation is
Hi,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:42:10 + Andrew Hutchings
wrote:
Are we 100% sure that Bookworm's kernel on S390x is good?
Well, the buildd's don't run bookworm, but they run stable (which
currently is bullseye).
I am seeing something weird on ci.debian.net too, which also runs
stable. I
Hi,
Disclaimer, I may be misunderstanding how things work, because I only
judge it on observations and some comments in threads here and there.
On 11-02-2023 00:43, Adrian Bunk wrote:
I would be curious whether there is any technical reason why most
Go libraries are binary-all but most Rust
Hi Jonas,
On 09-02-2023 23:59, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I can only interpret that as the test environment on thos arches being
broken. Please don't punish the package for that :-(
I think your interpretation it wrong. librust-rustls-dev Depends on
librust-ring-0.16+default-dev which is only
Control: reassign -1 debci-collector
Control: retitle -1 missing filename sanitizing
Hi Jonas,
On 08-02-2023 21:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
So it's either the timing was extremely unfortunate and your package hit
something unknown on our infrastructure, or it's actually the package
that's causing
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: firefox-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:firefox-esr
Hi,
The latest version of src:firefox-esr isn't building on s390x anymore
because the Build-Depends on lld isn't
Hi,
On 09-02-2023 13:08, Joe Nahmias wrote:
Have I understood the situation correctly?
Yes.
How does this relate to the impending soft freeze? My understanding is
that we only have until 2023-02-12 to fix dask.distributed and have it
migrated -- a very tight deadline.
Unfortunately, yes.
Source: satpy
Version: 0.39.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:spyder-kernels 2.4.2-1
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build
Source: ipyparallel
Version: 7.1.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Hi Jonas,
On 08-02-2023 19:31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
omething seems wrong in autopkgtests for rust-ureq: status is listed as
"Test in progress" on all arches, except ppc64el and s390x that had
failed, seemingly due to choking on the src:rust-rustls package recently
switching from arch-any to
Source: wf-config
Version: 0.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.7.1-3
Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60
Control: tags -1 bullseye
Hi Mike,
On 07-02-2023 12:14, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-rem...@lists.debian.org
nmu x11vnc_0.9.16-7 . ANY . bullseye . -m "Rebuild against
Source: mariadb, mariadb-10.6
Control: found -1 mariadb/1:10.11.1-2
Control: found -1 mariadb-10.6/1:10.6.11-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of mariadb the autopkgtest of mariadb-10.6
Source: scapy
Version: 2.5.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of scapy the autopkgtest of scapy fails in testing
when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of scapy from
unstable. It passes when
Source: findent
Version: 4.2.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of findent the autopkgtest of findent fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of findent
from unstable. It passes
Source: redis, python-fakeredis
Control: found -1 redis/5:7.0.8-2
Control: found -1 python-fakeredis/1.9.0-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of redis the autopkgtest of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi Adam,
As discussed in bug #1027825, #1014503 and #1004729 (and probably
more), bind-dyndb-ldap is currently broken in bullseye and because of
its use of unstable internal
Source: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen
Version: 21
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s) and mips* porter(s),
Please consider this an official warning for the mipsel and mips64el
ports. Several key packages that
Source: stockfish
Version: 14.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 15.1-1
Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60
Hi,
As a Release Team member, I'm leave a small note here.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:12:17 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
I would like to propose a release goal:
It has been a while since we did release goals in the formal way. I
recommend instead to discuss this in a bigger audience and get
Hi Adrian,
On 02-02-2023 21:32, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 08:31:53PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package because it was
showing up on our "slow" page [1]. I noticed that there were several runs
that took 2:47 (our ti
Hi Kunal,
On 02-02-2023 20:23, Kunal Mehta wrote:
I'm lowering the severity because it no longer blocks the 8.2 transition
(please revert me if I'm wrong on that).
In my opinion flaky builds and flaky tests are bad because they cost
quite some time of people that are not involved in the
Hi,
On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 11:11:35 +0100 Bastian Venthur
wrote:
Package: fwupd-amd64-signed
Version: 1.5.7+5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: vent...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
fwupd-amd64-signed is uninstallable as it depends on fwupd < 1.5.7-6, however
Hi Justin,
Thanks for bringing this up.
On 30-01-2023 17:05, Justin B Rye wrote:
a) Doing a combined dist-upgrade and usrmerge is so reliable that
everybody should simply do it this way (thus using the latest
usrmerge).
That's what I think has to be the case. So unless we
Hi,
Sorry it took so long.
On 02-01-2022 01:43, Iain Lane wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 10:05:21PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Raphael,
On 01-01-2022 21:37, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, Paul Gevers wrote:
Otherwise I would like to suggest to create two entries, one
Control: retitle -1 www.debian.org/Bugs should get tags from BTS
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 12:13:41 + Simon McVittie wrote:
To reproduce:
- look at the list of valid tags in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/
- see that trixie, trixie-ignore, forky and forky-ignore are in the list
- try to tag a
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm going over the Release Team checklist [1] and I noticed that the
BTS doesn't know `forky` yet. Can you please add `forky` to `@gTags`
in /srv/bugs.debian.org/etc/config on bugs-master.debian.org?
Thanks
Paul
[1]
Source: dh-octave
Version: 1.2.6
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just noticed that src:dh-octave is the only key package that
Build-Depends on shunit2 without a annotation. shunit2
currently has an RC bug (which we'll probably ignore for bookworm),
but the Release Team has requested to annotate test
control: reopen -1
control: found -1 3+c2
Hi,
The version chosen in version 3+c2 is lower than what's in the archive.
Version 12.2.0-14cross2 is still available in unstable while this upload
only built version 12.2.0-14cross1.
Paul
elbrus@coccia:~$ cat
Source: python-catalogue
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
You recently added an autopkgtest to your package python-catalogue,
great. However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the
migration to testing
Source: feh
Version: 3.9.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
You recently added an autopkgtest to your package feh, great. However,
it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the migration to testing
[1]. Can you please
Source: ceilometer
Version: 1:19.0.0-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails. What's worse, particularly on i386 but also on
other architectures, it
Hi Adrian,
On 27-01-2023 15:36, Adrian Bunk wrote:
There are no more test failures on the buildds and in autopkgtest with
all tests skipped on ppc64el, but that's not a fix for the actual problem.
Agreed, but the trigger for the severity is gone. Are these problems
avoided during build and
Hi,
On Sun, 01 Nov 2015 10:42:49 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
If run in a loop, live-2012-05-09 will eventually fail with:
AssertionError: NUNINST OUT OF SYNC
The problem is with hurd-i386 (fucked/break arch in this test) and I've
seen problems such as:
E: [Sun Nov 1 10:31:41 2015]
[Copy to the bug, I typo-ed the address]
Hi Nilesh,
On 26-01-2023 10:06, Nilesh Patra wrote:
I guess something that changed since then is that upstream is aware
about it and can help a bit with backporting. However the onus to
maintain it in stable is still on the maintainer and security@ (to
Source: python-pytray
Version: 0.3.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of python-pytray the autopkgtest of python-pytray
fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
of python-pytray
Source: singularity-container
Severity: serious
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?
Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 19:25:56 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:14:41 +0100
From: Moritz
Hi Guillem,
On 25-01-2023 22:17, Guillem Jover wrote:
BTW, I had in mind doing a call for
translations and a final upload including _only_ those, but reading
the above, I'm wondering whether that would be welcome/acceptable? If
not, then no problem, and I'll not bother translators now, and
Source: shunit2
Version: 2.1.6-1.2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.1.8-3
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60 days
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 23-01-2023 20:02, Sven Joachim wrote:
[ Reason ]
1. Pasting in vim is broken on some terminal emulators[1]
Remedy: Declare versioned Breaks against vim-common in ncurses-{base,term}
2. Stack buffer overflow in "tic -I" on crafted input[2]
Remedy:
Hi Victor,
On 22-01-2023 16:08, Victor Westerhuis wrote:
This is bug #971739, I think, but I cannot find online what steps to
take next. Should I switch the dependency to python3-sphinx:native? Or
is this something that can be overridden someway?
I think for now (if you want progress) it's
Source: r-cran-bayesplot
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.10.0-2
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: camv-rnd
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.1.0-2
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1024559
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: tar
Version: 1.34+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.34+dfsg-1.1
X-Debbugs-CC: mechti...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1026204
Dear Mechtilde, maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi,
On 19-01-2023 10:22, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 4:55 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
On 11-01-2023 09:32, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
This is a point release for golang 1.19 which happens today.
Where can I find the upstream policy on point release updates
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi Fabian,
On 14-01-2023 22:39, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
This request is for pre-approval of a not-yet-uploaded fixed version of
rustc.
Please go ahead with uploading 1.63.0+dfsg1-2.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Shengjing,
On 11-01-2023 09:32, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
This is a point release for golang 1.19 which happens today.
Where can I find the upstream policy on point release updates? Or, if
not documented in one place, can you describe it? Is 1.19 a bug-fix only
branch already, or are new
Hi,
On 19-01-2023 03:17, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
Sorry not to make it clear. It's a pre-approval request.
Sorry from my side too, I forgot the context and only looked at the
subject and my first reply... (There was an other unblock request that
didn't require any action and I thought it was
Hi Ondřej,
On 08-01-2023 22:41, Ondřej Surý wrote:
The Breaks have been added there since the last transition - there was a
tendency for the apt dependency solver to pick one package (say php-imagick)
from old PHP version and other one from new PHP version (say php-mysql). The
Breaks was the
Source: linux-apfs-rw
Version: 0+git20221028+ds-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
You recently added an autopkgtest to your package linux-apfs-rw, great.
However, it fails on armel, armhf and i386. Currently this failure is
Source: cimg
Version: 3.1.6+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertag: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting issues with your packages. Normally your build
dependencies shouldn't be removed from testing without removal all
reverse build
Hi,
On 17-01-2023 07:14, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I will bite the bullet (taking full responsibility for it if
necessary, don't blame the other kernel team members) and ask here now
the release team: Can we let linux 6.1.4-1 despite the RC bug
reported, migrate to testing, so we can move on
Hi Axel,
On 15-01-2023 23:07, Axel Beckert wrote:
TL;DR:
[...]
You're awesome. And indeed, what a shame of your time.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1301 - 1400 of 8222 matches
Mail list logo
