Source: borgbackup2
Version: 2.0.0b8-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the
Source: crmsh
Version: 4.6.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it started to fail in
testing several days ago. Can you please investigate the situation and
fix it? I copied some of the
Source: zfs-linux
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the
Source: strongswan
Version: 5.9.13-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the list
Source: squashfuse
Version: 0.5.0-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the list
Source: snapd
Version: 2.61.2-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the list to
Source: securefs
Version: 0.13.1+ds-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the list
Source: tgt
Version: 1:1.0.85-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the list to
Hi,
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 18:51:52 -0700 Russ Allbery wrote:
"""
+``systemd`` uses dependency and ordering information contained within the
++enabled unit files to decide which services to run and in which order.
"""
^ is that "+" before "enabled" really intended? It looks weird to me.
Paul
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 autopkgtest-virt-docker --podman --init unsure
Hi,
On 30-12-2023 8:26 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I recently added support for isolation-machine testing on ci.d.n and
when I ran the autopkgtest of src:autopkgtest, it failed. It failed the
podman
Source: xdp-tools
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the list to
Source: vagrant-libvirt
Version: 0.12.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the
Source: vagrant-lxc
Version: 1.4.3-3
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: isolation-machine
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for
isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your
package to the list
The mystery continues.
On 04-04-2024 10:08 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I forgot that on amd64, autopkgtest's autopkgtest now runs in qemu which
doesn't benefit yet as much from tmpfs as lxc does, so it's not a good
comparison.
On ci-worker13:
"""
root@elbrus:/tmp/autopkgte
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Samuel,
On 02-04-2024 2:50 p.m., Samuel Thibault wrote:
Should we perhaps make autopkgtest really try this last attempt?
We have been and still are working on several merge requests that should
improve the situation in these weird times:
Package: liferea
Version: 1.15.6-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertag: s390x
Hi,
Today I was debugging the failing autopkgtest of liferea, a graphical
rss reader, on s390x [1]. Previously I already worked around another
crash
Hi William,
I noticed you "binNMU"-ed siridb-server in Ubuntu where it built
successfully on all arches. In Debian I got the bug below reported. Any
idea what the difference could be between the state of Debian and the
state of Ubuntu that causes this?
reproducible-builds [1] confirms that
Control: retitle -1 autopkgtest: test_copy_timeout fails on tmpfs
Hi,
On 04-04-2024 10:08 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Overall, I
expect the host to be *faster* than the old hosts, but ironically the
tests that seems to fail is: __main__.SchrootRunner.test_copy_timeout.
Yes, it's too fast
control: notfound -1 1.15.4-1
On 04-04-2024 5:42 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I've scheduled retries on the reproducible build infrastructure.
amd64 and i386 both build fine (while on amd64 there was the same
failure in the past as in this bug report).
So, marking the bug as not affecting
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:42:34 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
The problem is somewhere in liblzma.
In hind-sight, this is all to likely that it's caused by CVE-2024-3094,
the xz backdoor.
I've scheduled retries on the reproducible build infrastructure. As the
version in unstable is stuck
Source: pytest-testinfra
Version: 10.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: ruby-asana
Version: 0.10.13-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: ruby-graphlient
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: translate-toolkit
Version: 3.12.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: pcp
Version: 6.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:48:24 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI wrote:
tilix fails to build on armhf, s390x.
But on armhf, there currently are no binaries in any suite and on s390x
it never build. So, this is no regression and hence not serious (this
bug is blocking
Hi Andres,
On 04-04-2024 9:56 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I have $(reschedule --days=0)-ed your upload to DELAYED. I'll do a final
check when that lands before unblocking.
The upload seems to be not a pure changelog only change. The tpu upload
has a debian/patches/system/ffmpeg.patch that's
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 5.34
Severity: normal
I tried to run with the new --lxcpath option but it fails:
"""
admin@ci-worker01:~$ /usr/bin/autopkgtest debputy -- lxc --sudo
autopkgtest-testing-i386 --lxcpath=/tmp -ddd
autopkgtest [10:00:08]: starting date and time: 2024-04-04
Source: autopkgtest
Version: 5.33
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it recently started to fail a lot on ppc64el. The failures seem
related to the host that runs the
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
On 03-04-2024 10:31 p.m., Andres Salomon wrote:
I'd like to go ahead and upload
123.0.6312.105-1~deb13u1 to trixie.
I have $(reschedule --days=0)-ed your upload to DELAYED. I'll do a final
check when that lands before unblocking.
Thanks for you patience.
user release.debian.org
usertag 1064533 time-t-downgrade
severity 1064533 important
Hi
On 04-04-2024 4:25 a.m., handsome_feng wrote:
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
The excuses shows
Source: siridb-server
Version: 2.0.51-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails. From a distance, this looks like a race
condition. Should the test
Source: altree
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on armel,
armhf and ppc64el. What's worse, it fails because it seems to hang and
eventually times out due to
Source: libcdk5
Version: 5.0.20230201-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails. Can you
please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some of the output
at the bottom of this
Hi all,
[s390x porters in CC, maybe they can help?]
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 22:22:54 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: gnome-keyring
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in
testing [1]. Your
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 5.33
Severity: normal
Control: block -1 by 933064
Hi,
Some time ago the lxc configuration did some renaming of options,
notably lxc.network to lxc.net. In commit 413f15d we adapted partially
for that, but the conversion of the local proxy to the testbed proxy
Source: r-cran-blme
Version: 1.0-5-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on i386 since
November 2022. What's worse, it fails because it seems to hang and
eventually times out due
Source: r-cran-bayestestr
Version: 0.13.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on i386.
What's worse, it fails because it seems to hang and eventually times out
due to
Source: supysonic
Version: 0.7.6+ds-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails. What's worse, sometimes that failure is due to
it timing out
Hi,
Disclaimer: I only now saw your e-mail. By default the Debian bug
tracking system doesn't CC replies to the submitter of bugs.
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 13:07:04 -0800 David Caldwell wrote:
> Your package is only blocked because the arch:all binary package(s)
> aren't built on a buildd.
Hi Niko, gregor,
On 14-03-2024 8:16 p.m., Niko Tyni wrote:
[Paul: copying you for eyeballs as this seems to have been your pet
package at some point :)]
I'm receiving the bugs of this package, but thanks. It is (or I fear
was) a dependency of a package I still have the ambition to package
Hi,
On 12-03-2024 10:18 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 06/03/2024 06.20, Paul Gevers wrote:
Unfortunately the test still takes upto 33 GB at least (see below).
Did you have time to test the -12 version, yet?
I just did. The biggest rise I saw (and I didn't even stop parallel
runners
Source: rocm-compilersupport
Version: 5.2.3-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 6.0+git20231212.4510c28+dfsg-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: magic-wormhole
Version: 0.12.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: expat
Version: 2.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.6.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: beaker
Version: 1.12.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.12.1-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1052336
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Hi,
On 06-03-2024 10:30 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Do you have the log from running that autopkgtest?
I have no idea what's happening here. At least the buildd build only
used 500 MB.
Attached.
Paul
debug.log.xz
Description: application/xz
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Source: node-dompurify
Version: 2.4.1+dfsg+~2.4.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm the package maintainer of liferea and my upstream has embedded
purify.js in his latest release (at version 3.0.6). Could you please
update the package to avoid too much risk of unexpected behavior?
Paul
-- System
Hi Julien,
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:40:13 +0100 julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
A case of eigenbug where you compile three times and it only fails one?
If it's one in three that would be too much. For ci.d.n I'm having my
"flaky" bug filing threshold between 1/5 and 1/8, but I think it should
Hi Andreas,
On 05-03-2024 10:16 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
But first I'd like to see the s390x build happen and your confirmation
that this unbreaks the CI infrastructure. But at least ppc64 and sparc64
built with 500MB instead of 40GB now ;-)
Feel free to block 15-17 temporarily, too.
Hi
On 05-03-2024 10:16 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Feel free to block 15-17 temporarily, too.
I already did that ;).
I'll try when I see 14 in the archive on s390x.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the upload.
On 04-03-2024 12:26 p.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM-Translator/issues/2397
On 03/03/2024 20.52, Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: spirv-llvm-translator-14
Version: 14.0.0-10
In the upstream report
Source: pytables
Version: 3.7.0-10
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.9.2-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1061661
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: spirv-llvm-translator-14
Version: 14.0.0-10
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: issue
Dear maintainers,
Since a couple of days, our workers on s390x are dying because some test
is filling up all disk space. Several days
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 20:48:06 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Since a couple of days, our workers on s390x are dying because some test
is filling up all disk space. It *appears* that fenics-dolfinx is always
involved, so I suspect it doing something inappropriate.
Yesterday we were in the same
Source: openstructure
Version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Control: block -1 by 1060745
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build
Source: guidata
Version: 3.0.4+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Control: block -1 by 1060742
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build
Source: r-cran-rstanarm
Version: 2.26.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.32.1-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: r-cran-rpact
Version: 3.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.5.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: r-cran-igraph
Version: 1.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.0.1.1-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: glslang
Version: 13.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 14.0.0-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
/me is drinking coffee now *and* looking at test bug-709460
On 29-02-2024 8:43 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
but I exposed it in the bug-709460 test
case while trying to enable britney to check architecture-independent
packages. Currently the behavior is masked in that case because britney
skips
grr, sent too soon (do I need coffee?)
On 29-02-2024 8:33 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 21-02-2024 10:53 p.m., Dalton Durst wrote:
This condition only occurs when both source packages are considerable
for migration. If both source packages provide both binaries, pkgb is
found to supersede
Hi,
On 21-02-2024 10:53 p.m., Dalton Durst wrote:
This condition only occurs when both source packages are considerable
for migration. If both source packages provide both binaries, pkgb is
found to supersede pkga, so pkga is not considered for migration. If
pkgb passes all policy, it will
Source: gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel
Version: 56-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 60-1~exp1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: racket-mode
Version: 20231222git0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20240129git0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: uncrustify
Version: 0.72.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.78.1+dfsg1-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for
Source: commit-patch
Version: 2.6-2.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.6.2-1
X-Debbugs-CC: dko...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
Hi,
On 29-02-2024 4:47 a.m., Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
@d-d:
- How can it happen that purge *t64 packages and at the same time install
the previous package, and then the so file is missing?
I mean it's clear that they use the same name, but shouldn't DPKG handle
the cleanly?
Source: fenics-dolfinx
Version: 1:0.7.3-5
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: issue
Dear maintainer(s),
Since a couple of days, our workers on s390x are dying because some test
is filling up all disk space. It *appears* that fenics-dolfinx is
Hi all,
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 10:52:38 +0100 Antonio Valentino
wrote:
Package: python3-tables-lib
This bug would need to be reassigned to the ftp.debian.org pseudo
package to actually do anything.
Version: 3.9.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: antonio.valent...@tiscali.it
Source: r-cran-gbm
Version: 2.1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.1.9-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: r-cran-estimatr
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.0.2-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Hi Cacin,
On 25-02-2024 10:47 p.m., ca...@allfreemail.net wrote:
your package installs the filename brltty to both bin and sbin as opposed to
just one of those locations.
I haven't checked yet, but are these two versions of file:brltty
actually the same?
This causes a problem on a
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:31:37 +0100 Chris Hofstaedtler
wrote:
Paul Gevers noted that src:pdns's autopkgtests fail every so often
on a large amd64 debci worker and on s390x workers. Apparently a
similar problem can be seen in src:pdns-recursor's debci runs.
The issue (or at least some
Source: nut
Version: 2.8.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails, e.g about half the time on armel. It seems that
the solution for bug #1023530
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 FTBFS on mips64el, ppc64el and s390x
Control: reopen -2
Hi,
On 25-02-2024 5:25 p.m., Bastian Germann wrote:
As I have already written in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063799#16 this is not
true.
The failing architectures also fail
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jerome,
On 25-02-2024 11:39, Jerome Benoit wrote:
the upload of e-antic 2.0.2+ds-1 came with a shift of its SONAME from 1 to 3,
This is a normal library transition. Why didn't you coordinate it with
the Release Team as usual before the upload?
and autopkgtest
Hi Bastian, Bo,
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:07:10 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
Maintainer: Ayatana Packagers
Changed-By: Bo YU
Closes: 1052429
Changes:
snapd-glib (1.63-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Update libsnapd-qt-2-1.symbols to support riscv64.
Package: python3-pyment
Version: 0.3.4+ds-4
Severity: minor
Hi,
I just installed python3-pyment and apt informed me that it suggests
python3-pyment-doc (see below in the "System Information" section).
After a quick play, I decided I wanted to see the docs, but installing
python3-pyment-doc
Source: aflplusplus
Version: 4.08c-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.09c-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: adios
Version: 1.13.1-34
Severity: normal
While looking into infrastructure issues on ci.debian.net I noticed that
we have both src:adios and src:adios2 in the archive. Should we migrate
the only reverse dependency of adios to adios2 and remove it from the
archive?
Paul
Source: peony
Version: 3.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: dt-schema
Version: 2022.08.2-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2023.11-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: amberol
Version: 0.10.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Hi Dalton,
Good to have this discussion. I'll add a few remarks on behavior in
Debian in this e-mail.
On 21-02-2024 23:50, Dalton Durst wrote:
test-src migrated after its amd64 and i386 binaries appeared. It also
has architecture-independent binaries that miraculously only showed up
after
Source: breezy
Version: 3.3.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.3.5-5
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: castxml
Version: 0.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.6.3-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: gnome-keyring
Version: 42.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 46.1-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: ohai
Version: 17.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 18.1.3-2
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: ruby-omniauth-alicloud
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.0-2
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for
Hi Bastian,
On 21-02-2024 13:21, Bastian Germann wrote:
I am uploading a NMU to DELAYED/10 in order to fix this.
The debdiff is included.
Maybe you care to explain *why*?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: endless-sky
Version: 0.10.2-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.4-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1061241
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: python-pamqp
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.3.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: expeyes
Version: 5.3.1+repack-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.3.1+repack-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: rust-async-task
Version: 4.5.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.7.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:37:22 + Michael Fladischer
wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
src:python-watchgod has been superseded by src: python-watchfiles.
And should reverse
Source: btm
Version: 0.9.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from
Source: r-cran-bigmemory
Version: 4.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.6.4-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Control: found -1 1.5.0-1
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:47:50 -0500 =?UTF-8?Q?Jeremy_B=C3=ADcha?=
wrote:
numpydoc's autopkgtest is failing. Matthias added a path to Ubuntu to
mark it as expected fail, but without further explanation. I am
attaching a version of his patch.
The version in
301 - 400 of 8299 matches
Mail list logo
