But rule 6 says not to apply rule 5 for failed cards:
If the quality response was lower than 3 then start repetitions for the
item
from the beginning without changing the E-Factor
It doesn't say that. It says that rule 6 applies only to cards with grades 0
and
1. It doesn't and
Done.
Peter
On 3 May 2015 19:32:54 CEST, Astrid S. de Wijn astrid-spamme...@syonax.net
wrote:
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 06:30:03PM +0200, Peter Bienstman wrote:
But if that is ok, because the precise algorithm is not
important for
what you want to do with this data
Hi,
Thanks for looking into this!
However, when I wrote this code many years ago, I had a feeling the original
SM2 algorithm could use a few tweaks, especially when dealing with early / late
review, and the fact that there should be a small difference between grades 0
and 1.
So, I'm afraid
this bug, there is in fact no difference at all between grades 0 and 1.
There is no difference in terms of easiness, but cards with grade 0 show up
more often in the queue.
Worse,
cards that the user reviews precisely on time, but fails to recall (grade 0
or 1)
end up with higher
It is rule 5 of the SM2 algorithm that is not being executed at all for cards
graded 0 or 1
But rule 6 says not to apply rule 5 for failed cards:
If the quality response was lower than 3 then start repetitions for the item
from the beginning without changing the E-Factor
I guess the
5 matches
Mail list logo
