It seems to have gone away, I haven't had the issue for ages now.
Thanks for the response.
On 1 October 2011 03:03, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Peter Neal wrote:
>
>> That'll be because I forgot to attach it :-) Third time lucky..?
>
> Sorry for t
Here is the screenshot - I did send it to the bug email address but
apparently it never appeared :-(
2009/11/27 Peter Neal
> screenshot of kernel BUG message
>
>
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
Version: 2.6.26+17+lenny1
Severity: important
screenshot of kernel BUG to follow
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LA
This doesn't work in latest relase from ntp.org 4.2.4p7 but is OK in the
most recent dev version dev-4.2.5p237-RC
2009/10/6 Kurt Roeckx
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 05:53:55PM +0100, Peter Neal wrote:
> > It still crashes with -L - I tried emailing the straces, but they haven'
kedev(8, 1), st_ino=17064068,
st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_nlink=1, st_uid=0, st_gid=0, st_blksize=4096,
st_blocks=8, st_size=3661, st_atime=2009/10/06-17:49:23,
st_mtime=2009/10/01-09:44:48, st_ctime=2009/10/01-09:44:48}) = 0
sendto(3, "<30>Oct 6 17:49:24 ntpd[14268]: Listening on interface #1
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.4p4+dfsg-8lenny2
Severity: important
bigrig worker-1:~# wc -l /proc/net/dev
54 /proc/net/dev
when starting ntp, it fails to initialise, syslogs
Oct 6 11:17:11 worker-1 ntpd[26048]: socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, 0) failed on
address 2001:470:921b:7839::17: Too many o
Package: vsftpd
Version: 2.0.5-2
Severity: important
Under heavy load PASV connection setup fails. See tcpflow output below.
http://vsftpd.beasts.org/ says:
"vsftpd-2.0.7 is released [...] A race causing PASV connection drops under
extreme load was fixed"
010.000.000.200.00021-010.000.000.011.5
7 matches
Mail list logo
