On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 2:55 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> Control: tag -1 upstream
>
> On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 00:22 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version: 5.4.8-1~bpo10+1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using singularity on kvm Debian machines. After the
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:35 AM Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>
> Phillip,
>
Hi Theodore (Ted),
Thank-you for your kind and well intentioned email. It has
de-escalated tensions on my side.
It is very late here, and so I can only be brief, but, I want this
said as soon as possible.
> Peace.
Yes, I w
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:41 PM László Böszörményi (GCS)
wrote:
> Let me add Chris Lamb then the previous Debian Project Leader (also
> British just like you [as I know] and you may sit down and talk about
> this in person) who asked for the reproducibility patch / build in the
> first place.
>
's code-base and my maintenance.
I have absolutely had enough.
I have CC'd this to the Debian project leader and the Debian technical
commitee, and also to linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel and linux-embedded
for wider attention.
What else do I have to do to make you stop bad-mouthing Squa
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:01 AM Phillip Lougher
wrote:
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> The reason why the hacked Debian version of Mksquashfs performs badly
> is because the Debian "maintainer" has applied a so called
> reproducibility patch that *completely* breaks the parallelism
and
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931965#34
Yours
Dr Phillip Lougher
Squashfs author and maintainer
a .tar.gz file may be used), and in constrained block
device/memory systems (e.g. embedded systems) where low overhead is needed."
Dr Phillip Lougher
Squashfs author and maintainer
ked squashfs-tools-ng to remove their libel from their package:
https://github.com/AgentD/squashfs-tools-ng/issues/10
I am posting here to clarify the issue and prevent this falsehood from
spreading.
Dr Phillip Lougher
Squashfs Author and Mainatainer
>However, a newer package "squas
On 02/12/2011 04:57 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
> I tried version 4.1 from Sid and did exactly the same.
> This time it worked as expected. The image could be mounted WITHOUT problems.
This is a known bug in squashfs-tools 4.0, it was fixed in the following
commit (plus a couple of commits, but this
Phillip Lougher wrote:
Michael Prokop wrote:
JFYI: We (the grml team) have working squashfs 4 + lzma patches for
kernel 2.6.31 and an according squashfs-tools package providing
lzma support. Please let me know if we can assist in any way.
I believe these patches are based on the OpenWRT
Michael Prokop wrote:
JFYI: We (the grml team) have working squashfs 4 + lzma patches for
kernel 2.6.31 and an according squashfs-tools package providing
lzma support. Please let me know if we can assist in any way.
I believe these patches are based on the OpenWRT Squashfs patches.
In that ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Your release-tarball contains "only" the patches against specific
>kernel-versions, but we need the files in 'plain format'. In the first
>attempt[1] to build the debian package for that, I had to rebuild your
>release-tarball. We want to avoid that if possible, so.. wha
12 matches
Mail list logo
