Bug#699322: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#699322: Bug#699322: status of liberation fonts 2.00.1 in Debian unstable?

2016-08-17 Thread Pravin Satpute
On Wednesday 17 August 2016 03:57 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >> has value for fonts. Just want to emphasize that properly _developed_ >> fonts with proper sources available has _greater_ value than equally >> shaped commercially promoted but over-the-fence-developed fonts. > I don't agree as gene

Bug#699322: status of liberation fonts 2.00.1 in Debian unstable?

2016-08-16 Thread Pravin Satpute
tter are now packaged in > Debian as part of src:fonts-noto and covered by the SIL Open Font License. > > So, what do you think, does it still make sense to maintain the liberation > fonts in Debian or should we rather transition to the Croscore fonts > instead? Differences are as above, so feel free to take decision :) Thanks, Pravin Satpute