Bug#652972: grub-pc: Grep complains input file `/boot/grub/grub.cfg.new' is also the output

2012-01-21 Thread Ralph Ulrich
This bug is very confusing for advanced users, because normally there is a very bad bug with such an error message. But it is more like a security flaw, see later: Turns out in /usr/sbin/grub-mkconfig: if [ x${grub_cfg} != x ] ! grep -q ^password ${grub_cfg}.new grep internally recognizes

Bug#649457: systemd-37 : /lib/udev/udevd not there

2011-11-20 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: systemd Version: 37 Package: udev Version: 175 Severity: simple Justification: udev target will not work? In /lib/systemd/system/udev.service there is a reference to /lib/udev/udevd For this is to activate the udev daemon I did ln -s /sbin/udevd /lib/udev/udevd Just to mention: I have

Bug#353248: resolved by new kernel comandline option

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Resolved by new kernel boot option forcefsck? See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=529498#15 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#589561: init.d/Scripts are not considered conffiles

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: sysv-rc Version: 2.88dsf-11 Severity: minor Although #grep '^/etc/init.d/' /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.conffiles shows all packages do consider init.d/scripts as conffiles. This might be non-intuitive for Debian users! In fact it will provide, and has, endless new bug reportings for packages

Bug#589577: Provide a trigger update-init-system for Maintainers

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: sysv-rc Version: 2.88dsf-11 Severity: minor Provide an update-init-system trigger for Maintainers. Every now and then there are bugs the kind of a maintainer not understanding the Debian init system. Or it is debootstrap when something should be started but not yet installed. I think

Bug#589561: init.d/Scripts are not considered conffiles

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Am 18.07.2010 20:19, schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: [Ralph Ulrich] Although #grep '^/etc/init.d/' /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.conffiles shows all packages do consider init.d/scripts as conffiles. This might be non-intuitive for Debian users! In fact it will provide, and has, endless new bug reportings

Bug#589577: Provide a trigger update-init-system for Maintainers

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Am 18.07.2010 22:25, schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: [Ralph Ulrich] A trigger (like update-initramfs) could have alternative implementations for all different init systems also. This way poor Debian maintainers soul should be bothered less to handle init scripts: only need to provide a valid LSB

Bug#530395: closed

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
reopen 530395 = --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#589591: reopen 530395

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: dbus reopen 530395 --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#589591: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#530395: closed

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Am 19.07.2010 00:28, schrieb Michael Biebl: On 19.07.2010 00:18, Ralph Ulrich wrote: reopen 530395 = wtf? Care to explain what you are trying to do here? Nothing was changed. Why did you close in the first place. OK, this reimplementation of an init system is not uses any more when

Bug#589577: Provide a trigger update-init-system for Maintainers

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Am 19.07.2010 00:20, schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: [Ralph Ulrich] Is update-rc.d really usable as a trigger like kernel related update-initramfs is used: - deferrable - all of the previous configuration obsoleted and removed I considered using triggers to update the boot sequence, but decided

Bug#589594: close 530395

2010-07-18 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: dbus --- I did look at Version: 1.2.24-1 not Version: 1.2.24-2 Excuse me, never will happen again -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#572789: what about network.dns.disablePrefetch

2010-03-08 Thread Ralph Ulrich
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 [2] http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.prefetch-next Thank you for the links. Regarding: network.prefetch-next is only in use when APP_TYPE_MAIL is NOT being set If network.prefetch-next is not used, why not setting it to false? Waht

Bug#572789: icedove leaks information to spam servers per dns prefetch

2010-03-06 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: icedove Version: 3.0.2 Severity: wishlist Pre thunderbird-3.0.3 builds have an advanced configuration entry: network.prefetch-next TRUE This seemingly is also an icedove issue too! This means: Every spammer can send a special hacked email to you, where he gets info from dns-queries if

Bug#563204: (no subject)

2010-03-06 Thread Ralph Ulrich
I had purged os-prober some time ago but forgotten about. Now I wanted to reenable os-probing. I saw the file /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober despite having purged os-prober (it is a grub-common config file). 1. Now I searched for a package grub-os-prober. Nothing found. 2. Searched for all names grub .

Bug#569998: parted should be useful for extended parallel Win7 installations

2010-02-15 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: parted Architecture: i386 Version: 1.8.8.git.2009.07.19-5 Severity: severe Situation: Since Vista there is no more a compatible way to partition your harddisk. Win7 needs 1MB free space before first primary partition and 1 MB free space before every first logical disk. And it needs

Bug#553596: linux-image-2.6.31-1-amd64

2009-11-05 Thread Ralph Ulrich
I saw a bug related on launchpad.net about karmic kernels don't like noapic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#543375: considering an kernel configuring issue

2009-10-02 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Does play this kernel .config a role: CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS as only some homebrew kernel systems affected by this bug But: if you : CONFIG_RTC_LIB=m you won't: CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS I saw this mentioned in some other bug report about hwclockfirst - fsck -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#540866: insserv might not remove all

2009-08-10 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: insserv Version: 1.12.0-10 Severity: medium if placed a /etc/insserv/overrides/kdm to disable start in runlevel3 and then making: insserv -d kdm or making a: insserv -r kdm startscipts of runlevel3 are not removed. ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: kdm # Required-Start:

Bug#540866: insserv might not remove all

2009-08-10 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Am 10.08.2009 20:55, schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: Hm. I am trying to reproduce this in a test case, but am unable to replicate your problem. This is the test case I wrote. Any idea where I fail to understand the problem you are experiencing? test_override_remove() { ... Excuse me, I do

Bug#540866: insserv might not remove all

2009-08-10 Thread Ralph Ulrich
If upstream development is openSUSE: openSUSE does a stopLink in whatever runlevel a script is started, doesn't matter what Default-stop says there. So perhaps an upstream developer from openSUSE thinks to only search for startscripts to remove where the is a stopscript. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#530395: dbus: startscript does what insserv should do

2009-05-24 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: dbus Version: 1.2.14-2 Severity: minor This is ugly: Every start of /etc/init.d/dbus does: --- services=$(grep -s -l ^# Required-Start:.*dbus /etc/rc${r}.d/S??* . . . for i in $services ; do service=$(basename $i) service=${service#S??} invoke-rc.d $service $action ||

Bug#529753: insserv: at shutdown critics about invoke-rc.d stop

2009-05-22 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Kel Modderman wrote: # warning: # warning: stop script call of invoke-rc.d # warning: this is not supported by insserv # warning: I am not aware of any message generated by the insserv program which is similar to it. I made a photo of the shutdown messages scrolling away: --- Listening

Bug#529753: insserv: at shutdown critics about invoke-rc.d stop

2009-05-22 Thread Ralph Ulrich
I meant: /etc/init.d/DBUS it is NOT the cause -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#529753: insserv: at shutdown critics about invoke-rc.d stop

2009-05-21 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: insserv Version: 1.12.0-4 Severity: minor At shutdown the scripts /etc/init.d/dbus makes a call invoke-rc.d service stop which insserv does not seem to like: There comes a warning message. Why? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#529753: insserv: at shutdown critics about invoke-rc.d stop

2009-05-21 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Kel Modderman wrote: which insserv does not seem to like: There comes a warning message. Why? What warning message? What does insserv have to do with it? I see this on every shutdown, something like it (it is scrolling fast): # warning: # warning: stop script call of invoke-rc.d # warning:

Bug#529498: flexible fsck the conservative approach

2009-05-20 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Here is a patch to flexible fsck in a conservative manner in the sense of doing fsck at boot time as ever. - You will see free mounts until automatic fsck. - You can force fsck at boot time in which case Mountcount is reseted. Edit the root entries of resulting /boot/grub/menu.lst to your

Bug#529498: initscripts: respond to forcefsck on kernel cmdline

2009-05-19 Thread Ralph Ulrich
Package: initscripts Version: 2.86.ds1-61 Severity: wishlist File: /etc/init.d/checkrootfs.sh When starting openSUSE with a parameter FORCEFSCK it behaves like it was touched a file /forcefsck. Debian ignores such a parameter. Why? This would make me flexible with fsck. Ralph -- To