merge 357290 357024 357067 357159 357160 356984
thanks
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Setting up openoffice.org-gcj (2.0.2-1) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-gcj.postinst: line 7:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/gcj: No such file or directory
> find: /usr/share/gcj-: No such file or dir
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Already reported as #357024, #357067. #357159, #357160 and #356984.
> > Please check whether a bug already is reported before filing one,
>
> I did, and none were reported at the time as fa
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > > Already reported as #357024, #357067. #357159, #357160 and #356984.
> > > > Plea
Hi,
Felix Homann wrote:
> in order to find out wether the problems I've reported earlier are upstream
> or
> specific to Debian I temporarily installed the packages from
>
> http://ftp.linux.cz/pub/localization/OpenOffice.org/2.0.2/
>
> The wizard is working fine there. So it is not an upstre
Hi.
Felix Homann wrote:
> I've just tried to create a letter in oowriter with the Wizard using gcj. It
> didn't work, the Wizard didn't start either. (Though it did work this
> afternoon, once..) So what's the point building with gcj when the result is
This one *does* work.
> a crippled Open
Am Freitag 17 März 2006 14:12 schrieb Miguel Telleria de Esteban:
> strace shows that when IDLC (idlc.bin) calls idlcpp (the preprocessor), it
> actually calls a nonexistent file "idlcidlcpp".
>
> A simple workaround is creating a simbolic link idlcidlcpp->idlcpp.
>
> The problem seems to be in the
Hi,
Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote:
> > From looking at the source; this might work on 2.0.2 (and the source is
> > indentical with 2.0.1). Can you try the 2.0.1 on bpo and confirm this?
[...]
> Sorry for my low culture level, but I don't see at the moment what "bpo"
> means :).
backports.org
merge 357457 356984 357024 357067 357159 357160 357290
thanks
Hi,
Am Freitag 17 März 2006 15:01 schrieb Max Gilead:
> Post-installation breaks with this error message:
> Setting up openoffice.org-gcj (2.0.2-1) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-gcj.postinst: line 7:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/b
Version: 2.0.1-5
Hi,
Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote:
> ii openoffice.org-dev 2.0.1-4bpo1 OpenOffice.org SDK...
>
> Good news: The concatenation error IDLC->IDLCPP is no longer there. I
> had removed the symlink and it continued working.
Good. So I close this bug as fixed in 2.0.1-5.
> Bad
Felix Homann wrote:
> With openoffice.org-gcj installed none of the following wizards starts with
> whatever JRE:
>
> From Writer: letter, fax, agenda, web page (presentation works!)
> From Base: Create Table, Create Form, Create Report
>
> After removing openoffice.org-gcj so
[ please larn to quote. thanks. ]
Felix Homann wrote:
> On Saturday 18 March 2006 13:20, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Felix Homann wrote:
> > > With openoffice.org-gcj installed none of the following wizards starts
> > > with whatever JRE:
> > >
> > >
Felix Homann wrote:
> On Saturday 18 March 2006 13:46, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > I guess the also installed Blackdown JDK
> > interfered (/usr/bin/java where JAVA_HOOME of "Free Software Foundation"
> > 1.4.2 is /usr...).
> >
>
> Removing the Blackdown J
Hi,
Am Mittwoch 22 März 2006 22:18 schrieb fellow:
> Please close this bugreport. The openoffice.org-help-hu package is
> available, so this "fallabck help" function isn't necessary anymore.
Well, it still is a problem with languages which don't have a -helppackage.
I'd leave it open..
Regards,
Hi,
Martijn Pieters wrote:
> Please update for the new 2.6.16 kernel; ieee8011softmac is now included in
> that kernel; the current version does not compile against this kernel. Of
where do you see it being included in this kernel? I don't.
But I am working on an update, yes...
Regards,
Rene
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.52-0
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
Hi,
I just tried bulding OOo on sparc with Java (and therefore with
java-gcj-compat-dev from experimental).
The configure check for jni.h failed, though because jni.h #include's
jni_md.h for which there is no s
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
please remove the (obsolete) mozilla-openoffice.org package from sid.
Its build is disabled since it's completely buggy and unusable.
[ Can you please do it fast so that it goes into testing directly once
pango1.0 is unblocked and before I plan to upl
reassign 355972 gcj-4.0
retitle 355972 undefined symbol: GC_pthread_create
thanks
csj wrote:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.0-1.4.2.0/jre/lib/i386/pr13212.so: undefined
> symbol: GC_pthread_create
> dmake: Error code 127, while making
> '
[ referring to your commend on Bug 340468 ]
Hi,
sorry for the late answer, I hear from many persons that a symlink would
work... Does a hardlink work? Not that I might be allowed to do one,
but
I don't see either why adding /usr/lib/openoffice/program into the
CLASSPATH would help.
Regards,
Ryan Underwood wrote:
> libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs.
> libGL error: InitDriver failed
> libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering
Is that fglrx or some other binary-only thing by chance?
In that case, this is not supportable and ATIs/ fault.
Regards,
Rene
signa
reassign 356640 java-gcj-compat
retitle 355660 undefined symbol: GC_pthread_create
merge 355972 356640
thanks
Hi,
csj wrote:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.0-1.4.2.0/jre/lib/i386/pr13212.so: undefined
> symbol: GC_pthread_create
> dmake:
Hi,
besides the fact that this bug is assigned to the wrong package; does it
sill fail on sid? (I tried on sid with 2.0.1-5 and it looks OK once you
re-format the text with AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni) but I have no clue about
chinese, so
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
tag 356901 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Stefan Huehner wrote:
> your control file specifies the 'replaces' and 'section' fields multiple
> time for a single package which is illegal. The attached patch merges
> the multiple 'replaces' line into one and for the 'section' duplicate it
> chooses one of the
tag 356984 + pending
thanks
Philipp Weis wrote:
> I just tried to install openoffice.org-gcj, and got the following:
>
> | Setting up openoffice.org-gcj (2.0.2-1) ...
> | /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-gcj.postinst: line 7:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/gcj: No such file or directory
> | find:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
[ X-Debbugs-Cc'ing -soikko and -voikko maintainers for Comments ]
[ RoOOoM = Request of OpenOffice.org Maintainer ;) ]
IMHO openoffice.org-soikko should be removed.
It is non-free, i386-only, unmaintained upstream and will be
"obsolete in the near futur
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] only goes to thei maintainer (in this case the
ftpmasters), not the submitter. Neither did it go to the -voikko
maintainer which I did add to Cc for a reason. ]
Hi,
Jarno Elonoen wrote:
> > It is non-free, i386-only, unmaintained upstream and will be
> > "obsolete in the near
severity 387928 grave
reassign 395880 fontconfig
merge 393909 395880 387928
thanks
Hi,
Mikolaj Menke wrote:
> This is what happens when I install ttf-opensymbol:
>
> menek:~# apt-get install ttf-opensymbol
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> ttf-opensymbol is alr
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Rene Engelhard, le Sat 14 Apr 2007 23:09:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > You do have openoffice.org-gtk and/or openoffice.org-gnome installed, have
> > you?
>
> Ah, sorry, I missed that part, but it's not sufficient either.
>
> > And of
Hi,
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> I would like to help in maintaining such a package, but since I cannot
> estimate how much spare time I'll have, I would like to start browsing all
> bug reports and checking them for reproducibility against the latest
> version.
>
> Is this ok for you? Is there any co
Package: libcurl4-openssl-dev
Severity: grave
Hi,
as you spoke on -release about a curl transition I wanted to do a testbuild
an installed libcurl4-openssl-dev.
The build breaks:
ccache g++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN' -Wl,-zdynsort
-shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--version-script
..
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> i just uploaded 7.16.2-1 to experimental, i also fixed this bug. please,
> cpuld you redo the test with this new version?
I tested again after installing libcurl4-openssl. And this indeed works.
Will try with 7.16.2-1 once its rebuilt for amd64 here.
Gr??e/Regards,
Re
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > i just uploaded 7.16.2-1 to experimental, i also fixed this bug. please,
> > cpuld you redo the test with this new version?
>
> I tested again after installing libcurl4-openssl. And this indeed works.
> Will try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
found 412967 2.17.20070406cvs-2
retitle 412967 fails to assemble climaker.exe (mono) from OOo on ppc
thanks
Hi,
I tried again on up-to-date sid and the problem persists.
I also tried binutils from experimental now and it also fails:
gmcs -debug -u
forwarded 419740 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74814
close 419740 2.2.0-4
thanks
Hi,
Harri Pitkänen wrote:
> I was able to open the file (prova.dbf) attached by the submitter without
> problems using version 2.2.0-4 on amd64. This believe this is the same bug
> as in http://qa.o
severity 348164 wishlist
tag 348164 + wontfix
thanks
[ can you please write your mails sensefully and not write everything
into one long line. Fixed here for quoting. ]
Hi,
> The 'File' menu of oocalc and oowriter show a list of recently used
> documents. Those 2 programs share this list which d
Paolo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:09:11PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >
> > Got remooved upstream.
>
> means that you're going to release a new version without such email settings
> pane? how direct sendmail will be handled then?
That example sucks since sendmail itself ca
Paolo wrote:
> in fluxbox(1) wm (0.9.14-1.2) the options box of OOo appears cropped at
> right/bottom edges.
And what makes you think this is a OOo bug and not a fulxbox bug in the
first place? (especially at it works normal in metacity, kwin etc?)
Just as a data point.
Gr��e/Regards,
Ren�
--
severity 419876 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
Florian Dufour wrote:
> When libtimedate-perl is not installed, muttprint doesn't work when
> using DATE=local in config file.
Which is a custom setting.
> Line 1692: It seems that you don't have installed the module
> "Date::Parse" on your system. Please in
tag 420615 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Philina Pallis wrote:
> as an example the words "Portrait" plural isn't "Portraiten" but "Portraits"
And this relates how to what you reported the bug against?
I tried here:
Portrait used with the Thesaurus properly gives "Bild" etc.
Or did you mean the spellc
Package: openoffice.org-thesaurus-pl
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
According to http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73618
there is a new upstream version available somewhere which thankfully
isn't OPL 2.0 anymore, but dual-licenses LGPL/OSL which makes it movable
main (taking the LGPL option
Hi,
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:19 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > I request assistance with maintaining the openoffice.org package.
> Well, always wanted to be part of the OpenOffice.org team; but I know
welcome :). If you wish, I can add you to the al
Hi,
giuseppe bonacci wrote:
> OOO 2.0 crashed repeatedly when trying to open a relatively simple sxc
> spreadsheet that OOO 1.x had always opened correctly.
What do you define as "relatively simple"?
> after a couple of failed attempts at finding the reason for the SEGV and
> interpreting the el
reassign 445601 openoffice.org-calc
thanks
Jeroen N. Witmond [Bahco] wrote:
leave that nonsense out, please.
> Package: openoffice.org-common
> Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch2
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/ooffice
Don't use that broken feature of rep
Hi,
Harold Toothman wrote:
> Failure to install this package prevents open office from installing! The
there's no "open office" in Debian. Did you mean openoffice.org? Then
please say so.
> first statement is error in package ttf-opensymbol, followed by "E:
> ttf-opensymbol: subprocess post-inst
severity 446014 important
forcemerge 444741 446014
thanks
Hi,
darren wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org-impress
> Version: 2.2.1-9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
No. Wrong.
> it crashes with:
> *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: free():
>
Hi,
reassign 446014 openoffice.org-gtk
forcemerge 444741 446014
thanks
Hi,
darren wrote:
> > The bt looks like the one of 444741. Which theme do you use?
>
>
> I am using Gonxical,which is really old.change theme to default debian's
> clearlooks,it starts with no problem.
Hmm, ok, as guessed
# mark version
close 416711 2.2.0~rc4~oof680m13-1
thanks
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> > Any openoffice program I try to use crashes with this error immediately
> > after
> > startup:
> >
> > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup
> > error: /usr/li
Hi,
Alessio wrote:
> I just isolated the problem (at least it seems so...): everything works
> disabling hardware acceleration in Options.
> Actually, I first deleted .openoffice.org directory in my home and
> everything worked fine; then I enabled hardware acceleration and OpenGL
> drawing and Im
tag 417393 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Pascal A. Dupuis wrote:
> uname({sys="Linux", node="Tatooine", ...}) = 0
> socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 5
> uname({sys="Linux", node="Tatooine", ...}) = 0
> uname({sys="Linux", node="Tatooine", ...}) = 0
> connect(5, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/t
reassign 417694 lp-solve
retitle 417694 should add /usr/lib/lp_solve to ld.so.conf / run ldconfig
severity 417694 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
Didrik Pinte wrote:
> Two arguments for using ldconfig in the liblpsolve55-dev package :
>
> [1] I'm actually using a Matlab MEX file under Debian that is linked
severity 417695 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
Didrik Pinte wrote:
> At the moment, the library files for lp-solve are in /usr/lib/lp_solve/ and
> the
> headers in /usr/include/lpsolve/.
>
> Would it be possible to update it to a coherent naming scheme ?
Maybe. I've choosen /usr/include/lpsolve because t
Hi,
Didrik Pinte wrote:
> That's not a problem for me. I vote for "lpsolve" directory everywhere.
> Do you want me to propose a patch to relocate the shared library from
> /usr/lib/lp_solve to /usr/lib/lpsolve ?
Will think of it.
> If i'm not wrong the shared library is there since version 5.5.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Didrik Pinte wrote:
> > Two arguments for using ldconfig in the liblpsolve55-dev package :
> >
> > [1] I'm actually using a Matlab MEX file under Debian that is linked to the
> > liblps
901 - 952 of 952 matches
Mail list logo
