ace
> > ii libjpeg-progs 7-1 Programs for manipulating JPEG
> > fil
> > ii libpango1.0-0 1.24.5-1 Layout and rendering of
> > internatio
> > ii libxml2 2.7.3.dfsg-2.1 GNOME XML library
> > ii xloadimage
ion uploaded. I hope to have the
package completed by the end of the week.
Does this serve as sufficient explanation of my plan? Or would you
still like to see a filed ITA?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
am preparing a new upstream release right now
for upload, so this would be a good time to make the change if people
think it is necessary/desirable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
There is no NEWS
> entry or anything else to warn about this.
>
It was in /usr/share/doc/shorewall-common/releasenotes.txt.gz
However, I am looking into it.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
cript prior to the defaults file being
read?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
wondering if your plan to split the data and the core API is coming
soon, or if you are planning it for further down the road.
I ask because I'd really like to see this make it into Debian Squeeze.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.c
ways much simpler than
IPv4 packet filter (e.g., there is no NAT in IPv6 and IPsec is part
of the spec instead of requiring encapsulation).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 01:15:54PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2009, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Since the sid/squeeze version could be downloaded and directly installed
> > with 'dpkg -i', it is probably not suitable for upload to the official
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:42:37PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> After upgrading my Sarge workstation to Etch today, I decided to start
> messing aroud with sudo-ldap. I was a bit disappointed to find that it
> did not work with ldaps:// schemes. I did some digging and here is what
starting. If it is disabled on your system, then that means
that something is disabling it after Shorewall has already started. I
am inclined to think that this is not a bug in Shorewall.
What happens when you remove or comment out the "net.ipv4.ip_forward=1"
entry from /etc/sysctl.con
et/ipv4/ip_forward=$(cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward)"
3. reboot your computer
4. provide the entire contents of /var/log/shorewall-init.log
immediately following reboot
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:08:14PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> On Saturday 14 February 2009, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:22:37PM +0100, alessandro -oggei- ogier wrote:
> > > Package: shorewall
> > > Version:
ystem. I am
not sure what the problem could be. I'll have to give this some more
thought.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:42:44PM +0100, Jaap Eldering wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:31:18PM -0500, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
> >
> > What is the output of 'ls /etc/rc2.d' ?
>
> # ls /etc/rc2.d/
I'm sorry. I meant 'ls /etc/rcS.d'.
ce 4.2 did not stabilize enough until after
the freeze was well under way, I decided to wait until after the release
of Lenny. I will package 4.2.6 and upload it to Sid and also to my
personal repository, which will host Lenny packages.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.co
gt; No, the only non-comment line was 'startup=1'. I did just merge the
> shorewall.dpkg-dist file, which adds an empty OPTIONS="" declaration,
> but I guess that that is not the problem.
>
What is the output of 'ls /etc/rc2.d' ?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
you have '-f' set in /etc/default/shorewall?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ll-common package
(which owns /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf) is "Yes". If it was set to
"No" on your system, then something or someone else must have changed
it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ttle) I have seen... The Rails i18n API is a huge step
> backwards from using Gettext for application translations :-(
>
> Still, if we want to further Rails' support in Debian, we have to
> support this. So, will you package this under the pkg-ruby-extras
> repository? I'm in
pload of libwx-perl 0.88-1. The upload
will follow shortly.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
es
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr cx8 sep mtrr pge cmov pat mmx fxsr sse
rng rng_en ace ace_en
bogomips: 1200.99
It certainly does not implement the full 686 instruction set. Even for
the Etch kernel, I must use a -486 variant
tion.
>ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -A smurfs -s tcpflags -j DROP" Failed
> Processing /etc/shorewall/stop ...
> Processing /etc/shorewall/stopped ...
> Terminated
>
Please send the contents of your /etc/shorewall/interfaces file.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Ro
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:26:10PM +, Philip Ross wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> 2008/11/6 Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:48:52PM +, Philip Ross wrote:
> >> I've tested this by comparing the output for all timezone
to make two separate releases (one with zone data and one
without), or just one release and have me remove the zone data as part
of the Debian packaging process?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> Also, ruby-tzfile has not been updated in over a year.
>
I figured that they were different, but that it couldn't hurt to
consider it as an option.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
data but continues to ship the zone data
(in both cases that would be for platforms that perhaps don't include
it), then do I need to be repacking the upstream tarball to remove those
zone data files?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-ruby or libactivesupport-ruby will
need to be modified.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/503591
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/index.html
>
Great! Thanks for the info.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
perator error when merging the fix
from the trunk to the 4.0 branch and then in the creation of the point
release.
I am preparing a fix right now.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:27:11PM -0500, Harry Coin wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >>
> >What is the output of 'shorewall show capabilities' on the problem host?
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >-Roberto
> >
> >
>
> Debain t
> be aware it is running over ipsec over l2tp? What does that module do?
> AS far as I know, the kernel module handles decapsulation of l2tp data
> packets, and passes control packets back to userland for xl2tpd.
>
/me <- not a kernel hacker :-/
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C
-restore v1.4.1.1: host/network `!' not found
>
What is the output of 'shorewall show capabilities' on the problem host?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
moved the kernel support code from init_network() to
> start_pppd() and
> add modification of the above initialization code. The bug disappeared.
> However, this is not whole story. When kernel support is on, pppd uses plugin
> pppol2tp.so,
> which is not present in Debian
moved the kernel support code from init_network() to
> start_pppd() and
> add modification of the above initialization code. The bug disappeared.
> However, this is not whole story. When kernel support is on, pppd uses plugin
> pppol2tp.so,
> which is not present in Debian re
e to maintain
libactivesupport-ruby and libactiverecord-ruby, among other packages for
them) and they were in agreement. Hence I filed an ITP and packaged
libtzinfo-ruby.
All that said, should I hold off uploading libactivesupport-ruby since
it will depend on libtzinfo-ruby?
I do intend to work with upstream as suggested.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
grate to Lenny.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
moved the kernel support code from init_network() to
> start_pppd() and
> add modification of the above initialization code. The bug disappeared.
> However, this is not whole story. When kernel support is on, pppd uses plugin
> pppol2tp.so,
> which is not present in Debian
n mysql_real_connect(mysql, host, user, password, database,
> port ? strtoul(port, NULL, 10) : 0, NULL,
> 0);
>
> Then SSL connections work OK for me.
>
> So, the variable sql_usessl is completely unusable. It should probably
> replaced
neral
> Public License, version 2."
>
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
pen to me on various systems and it always manifests
itself in some different way. I move that we close the bug report as
there is no evidence that it is anything else.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
r it
is) afterward?
Are you on IRC or IM? I am el_cubano on OFTC and Freenode and I am on
Jabber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you could maybe help me try
and figure this out, I would appreciate it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 04:07:42AM +0200, Martin Bagge wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> >Is there a way you could fix it and send me a new one? I'd like to get
> >this ASAP as there was new upstream reelase today and I'd like to try
> &
d fix it and send me a new one? I'd like to get
this ASAP as there was new upstream reelase today and I'd like to try
and get it uploaded in time for Lenny.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t
release (I think I asked in IRC, which is why I cannot find a mailing
list message about it). Essentially, I was told that sort of thing
would have to be handled by an update to volatile or by using a
backports.org package.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
to patch toshset, then that might possible and I could
help with incorporating the patch and uploading if you can test.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ain text. Commands are given such that these issues
> can
> be added, edited and listed easily.
>
I'm curious about something. I use ditrack and I am wondering what
differences/advantages cil has over ditrack. Are you aware of any?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánch
pository keyrings? Will those be allowed or disallowed?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
will look into it and see
what I can come up with, but it may not be much. If you can create and
test a patch (or have someone else do so), I would gladly performa QA
upload of the package.
Another possibility might be to contact upstream.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.
The qa.debian.org/developer.php page is
already quite wide for "busy" packages or developers. If an additional
column were added, it should default to off and only be switched on for
those specifically opting in.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
orewall isn't actually
> enabled since it is likely that it isn't even supposed to be configured.
>
My mistake. I have uploaded a new version to fix another bug and also
fixed this along the way.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I have maintained vncsnapshot in svn the whole time I have been
maintainer. If someone interested in adopting would like the entire svn
history, please let me know and I would be glad to provide it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
I have maintained releaseforge in svn the whole time I have been
maintainer. If someone interested in adopting would like the entire svn
history, please let me know and I would be glad to provide it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
line-ruby1.8 (<< 0.7.10-10)
>
> should solve this finally.
>
Is a replaces really the right relationship? In reality, libopen4-ruby
does not completely supersed libcommandline-ruby. Perhaps a conflicts
would be more appropriate?
Conflicts: libcommandline-ruby1.8 (<< 0.7.10-10)
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
uby.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 02:12:34PM +0200, Aurélien Le Provost - Ribaltchenko
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le jeudi 27 décembre 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
>
> > A while ago you reported bug #413548 against shorewall. In order
> > to help track down this bug, I need some m
like language libraries, especially
when they originate from some sort of common language repository like
CPAN or CRAN or whatever if OCaml has something similar, it is probably
good to have some sort of common naming scheme.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~r
An error I made in my changelog inadvertently closed #426032. I meant
to close #462032. I have reopened #426032. I apologize for the
confusion.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
es it as a real
shell. For the time being, I have patched offending files to use
/bin/dash. A couple of months ago I committed a change to the upstream
repository which makes the change to the local declarations to make them
POSIX-compliant.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://peo
lines. That is a huge diff for something
that is a stable release. In the next upload of the packages, I intend
to simply replace /bin/sh with /bin/dash and then depend upon dash.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.a
The described behavior in the inital report is documented as being the
default behavior in Debian. As a result, I am closing this bug.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 07:28:19PM +0200, Darshaka Pathirana wrote:
> On 07.04.2008 23:00, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Darshaka Pathirana wrote:
> >> JFTR: I've sent you the logs I have directly to you...
> >>
> >
the Debian package, IP_FORWARD defaults to "Keep", instead of "On".
This is so that values set manually or via /etc/sysctl.conf are not
disrupted by Shorewall. In your case, you would want Shorewall to
enable it unconditionally since you are not enabling it elsewhere.
Please con
x27;s the difference to Devel::DProf, bundled with the Perl core?
> The fact that the output file is human-readable?
>
That and that it works with XS modules, which DProf does not.
Incidentally, Joey Hess already packaged this and it is in NEW, so I
have closed the ITP.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
along sudo.
>
> Note that I am about to upload the package to debian mentors
> and start looking for a sponsor.
>
If it us "just a ruby script", is it sensible to use an entire package
for it? What about trying to get it included in another package that
ha
problem I had with one of my packages (xl2tpd) in
#447990. Perhaps the discussion there might be applicable in solving
this one.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 06:37:30PM +0100, Darshaka Pathirana wrote:
> Hi Roberto!
>
> On 14.03.2008 12:11, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > The best thing would be if you could send a compressed shorewall dump
> > from each of the following times:
> >
> > - just af
o-interfaces" I think there
> should be some kind of "README.Debian" too where this issue should
> be mentioned!
>
> HTH && HAND
> - Darsha
I will certainly look into this.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the pkg-nx group on
Alioth.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:44:00PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Thanks for keeping this in mind in the future!
>
Sure will. Thanks for the quick reply.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description
/debian/pool/main/p/python-wxglade_0.6.3-1_all.deb
>
> Please José Luis, can you sponsor this new version if possible?
>
Great. Just so you know, I can also sponsor your uploads in the future
if necessary.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
id> yeah, I agree
10:32 < ifvoid> ah ok
10:32 < ifvoid> particularly the arch all/any, and the perl modules outside
usr/lib/perl and /usr/share/perl5
10:32 < el_cubano> OK. I will refer the package back to the maintainer for
some rework.
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://
ll-perl directly. Or, if you
are upgrading from Etch, then you can upgrad shorewall, which install
shorewall-shell. Then you can install shorewall-perl simultaneously.
Once you have your config working satisfactorily in shorewall-perl, then
you remove shorewall and shorewall-perl packages.
as made by the previous maintainer. I will take a
look at the bog log a little later in detail and see if I can do
something about it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:35:06PM +, sam wrote:
> Package: shorewall
> Version: 3.2.6-2
> Severity: minor
>
> file /usr/share/doc/shorewall/default-config/rules, incorrect comment
>
This does not make sense to me. Please elaborate.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Rober
but I must have overlooked
it. It will be in the next upload.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
lintian at all.
>
OK. That seems fair. Please feel free to close the report.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ship only one
version (which caused complaints about the lack of a Heimdal version).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mes.
>
> [1]http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gambas.html
>
I had the same problem with an older version of ddccontrol. This was
actually a bug in dpkg-dev that was fixed months ago.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
newer libldap-2.4-2 to
> solve #405495 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405495)
> I guess.
>
Thanks for the reminder. I had forgotten about that bug.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
olved checking for current/previous WNPP bugs about them and then
checking for packages already in Debian with similar names. Let's just
say that I am still in the "getting started" phase with Ruby.
However, I will contact them before I do anything else. Thanks for the
info.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ses it enters Debian.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:22:12PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 06:41:17AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >
> > Please notify me of your intents with regards to this.
> >
>
> I will review the .tar.gz, but my intent is to accept all
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 06:41:17AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Please notify me of your intents with regards to this.
>
I will review the .tar.gz, but my intent is to accept all changes.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~rob
Don't worry. I don't feel like my toes were stepped on. I just did not
want for you to have to unnecessarily pass the same headaches I did.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
term ITP
with the old one so that the information in the old bug log is not lost.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/311597
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/366285
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/435219
[3] http://packages.debian.org/ajaxterm
[4] http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rote.html
--
Ro
r 4.4->4.6,
>too. You need to adapt the package version number in the patch.
>
This might ease things somewhat. I will try and look into it. However,
I would feel better if one of the group members who is more familiar
with DB could chime in.
> Thanks for considering,
>
- noshadow [EMAIL PROTECTED] has quit [Quit: ...]
15:01 < adamm> I guess there are bugs with build and install scripts, but I
have no idea where to report bugs against
that software. For example, the debian archive installer thingy
will not allow bz2 compressed deb
archives into Sid without predent on pre-Woody dpkg version.
15:01 < el_cubano> vorlon: So, email lamont about Packages-arch-specific ?
15:01 < vorlon> yeah
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 11:03:59PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Sam,
>
> I was looking into this and I cannot reproduce it. Here is what I see
> on a freshly booted machine running Shorewall 4.0.6 with
> DISABLE_IPV6=yes:
>
> ip6tables --list
> Chain INPUT (policy
roblems need correction. Additionally, the dtc package
includes some lintian overrides. Please add some comments to the
overrides file explaining why the overrides are necessary.
Beyond that, you should also make sure that both source packages can
pass piuparts.
If you can correct these pro
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:03:26AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> I would also need sponsoring for our control panel dtc (same location on
> our FTP). Could you as well sponsor it?
>
I will look at both packages this coming week.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C.
>
> What do you think?
>
I agree that the data should not be reaching the PTS in that form to
begin with.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thomas,
You mentioned in bug #444212 that you were in need of a sponsor. Is
this still the case? I have some time in the coming days where I could
sponsor your upload.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
ful for comparison.
If you could provide the requested information, I would appreciate it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nothing is going to get through.
The kicker is that a 'shorewall restart' does not change anything.
Any thoughts you have on this would be appreciated.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is the case, then I am not maintaining my packages
properly.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reopen 457443
tags 457443 pending
thanks
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 02:51:34AM +0100, Luca Brivio wrote:
> sat 22 dicembre 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > It should just be "debugging symbols" instead of "debugging sybmols" in
> > > the short descri
f "examples files" in the short
> description. - reporting this so it's easier to remember!
>
Yes, thank you for the report.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gt; this was my first bug report.
>
So, should the bug be closed? If so, then send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (where nn is the bug number that was
assigned).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Descr
ll investigate and report back.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
301 - 400 of 519 matches
Mail list logo
