Bug#529210: calendarserver: dependencies problem

2009-06-18 Thread Ryan Hass
Additional information about this bug can be found in Ubuntu Launchpad bug 349837. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted-calendarserver/+bug/349837 They are reporting the same issue. The issue is appears to be with twisted-calendarserver in which is is attempting to overwrite

Bug#477708: reprepro: option to ignore request to re-add modified already existing package version

2009-03-09 Thread Ryan Hass
* martin f krafft madd...@debian.org [080429 13:56]: also sprach Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org [2008.04.27.1105 +0200]: They are different, because you did something different. In the first case you uploaded a (source) package that was already there, in the second case you uploaded a

Bug#514801: reprepro: Document conf/options

2009-02-10 Thread Ryan Hass
Package: reprepro Version: 3.6.3-1 Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- The conf/options feature is undocumented in the man page or in the manual.html file, however it seems the following command line arguments can be defined in conf/options: local cur prev

Bug#514801: Acknowledgement (reprepro: Document conf/options)

2009-02-10 Thread Ryan Hass
Correction to my previous statement. I found the documentation in the man page, the documentation only appears to be missing from the manual.html file. My apologies. Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. This is an automatically generated reply to

Bug#512586: Package downgrades via copyfilter cause reprepro to barf

2009-01-21 Thread Ryan Hass
Package: reprepro Version: 3.6.3-1 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- When attempting to downgrade a package using copyfilter reprepro barfed. See below: reprepro -b /srv/reprepro --outdir repo copyfilter hardy-raw hardy-lab 'Package (== python-support)'

Bug#501522: reprepro: processingcoming ignores section changes when removing old/unreferenced versions of packages

2008-10-07 Thread Ryan Hass
Package: reprepro Version: 3.6.0-1 Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- In this use case, I uploaded a package with a default debhelper template control file as shown: Source: myexample-dbdump Section: unknown Priority: extra Maintainer: Ryan Hass [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#495302: reprepro: Add hook for post-processing a dist.

2008-08-18 Thread Ryan Hass
Bernhard R. Link wrote: When is all operations on a dist are completed? Before the Release file is generated, so it can add files to it? After the Release file is generated, so it can look at this? After the release file is generated, and more importantly, after all the .new files have been

Bug#495302: reprepro: Add hook for post-processing a dist.

2008-08-15 Thread Ryan Hass
Package: reprepro Version: 3.6.0-1dakim1 Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- This is a feature request to add a post-processing hook which would be executed when all operations on a dist are completed. The desired parameters which would be passed to the

Bug#495303: reprepro: Add support for multiple export hook scripts

2008-08-15 Thread Ryan Hass
Package: reprepro Version: 3.6.0-1 Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Currently the DscIndicies and DebIndicies settings only allow for one export processing hook. For example, the following line is considered valid: DscIndices: Sources Release . .gz tiffany.py

Bug#488858: Acknowledgement (config field to ignore specified Release file checksums )

2008-07-07 Thread Ryan Hass
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will

Bug#488910: Enable identical codenames to be used for multiple suites/dists.

2008-07-07 Thread Ryan Hass
Bernhard R. Link wrote: If you give some more details what you want to achieve, I might give more information. But in its own multiple distributions with the same name do not make much sense in my eyes, so I am considering closing this bug. Please feel free to close this bug, the limitation

Bug#488858: config field to ignore specified Release file checksums

2008-07-01 Thread Ryan Hass
Package: reprepro Version: 3.5.2-1 Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- This is a request to implement a feature which allows a user to instruct reprepro to ignore any specified checksums from upstream Release files. Example use case: Upstream Release file

Bug#488910: Enable identical codenames to be used for multiple suites/dists.

2008-07-01 Thread Ryan Hass
Package: reprepro Version: 3.5.2-1 Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- It would be nice if it was possible to have and mirror from multiple dists/suites which share the same codename. This would allow for far more flexibility with importing and managing