On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Dmitry Smirnov writes:
>
> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:18:50 Sage Weil wrote:
> >> Also,
> >>
> >> +LimitNOFILE=32768
> >>
> >> is still going to be problematic as large c
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I had a look at the different proposed systemd service files today.
> While this topic was brought up again by a Debian bug report, I don't
> think this is distribution specific. I would very much prefer a unified
> solution across all distribu
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:36:40 Clint Adams wrote:
> > Control: severity 760538 serious
>
> Clint, are you trying to get Ceph removed from Jessie?
> I'll set severity back to "important" for now -- feel free to upgrade afrer
> freeze.
>
>
> > It is seri
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> >> if test x"$cpu" = x"x86_64" || test x"$cpu" = x"i386"; then
> >> cat >conftest.c <<-'EOF'
> >>
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Sage Weil dixit:
>
> >I'll apply the original patch (and backport) to start. But making the
> >build properly detect amd64 would be even better. Right now we are
> >testing whether `arch` = 'x86_64'. What sho
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Daniel Schepler dixit:
>
> >> Attached patch fixes this by installing yasm on amd64 only.
>
> >Would this really work without also adding Build-Conflicts: yasm [!amd64]?
> >I
>
> Only if we build in clean chroots. Which we do, always.
> B-C is inde
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2014 11:14:51 John David Anglin wrote:
> > The attached patch resolves the issue with the undeclared atomic functions.
>
> Thanks, John. I passed this patch to upstream through
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1844
I merged thi
This fixes it for me. I think it just the position of the rule relative
to
# probe filesystem metadata of disks
KERNEL!="sr*", IMPORT{program}="/sbin/blkid -o udev -p $tempnode"
Is this something we can fix for wheezy, or should Ceph ship a seprate set
of rules to make by-partuuid work?
Thank
Hey Laszlo,
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 22:02 -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
> [ about OpenSSL license exception for ceph ]
> > I removed all the openssl references in the ceph code and replaced it
> > with crypto++, so hopefully all this discussion i
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 10:15 -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Can you take a look at the 'testing' branch in git commit 5bdae2af?
> > That's how I've been doing releases, more or less. Assuming pack
Hi Laszlo,
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 10:21 -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Great! There are a handful of bug fixes I'd like to roll into v0.23.2
> > first, if it isn't too much trouble. I can do that today.
&g
Hey Laszlo,
These changes are great! I incorporated all of your changes into
ceph.git, and also fixed up the ceph.spec.in to include the missed gui
files.
> I've changed the way debug parts of the packages are handled. It may
> sound harsh and so I'm open to revert that back to your way.
Yay,
Hi Clint,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Yes we'd much rather have a single package that works in both Debian and
> Ubuntu.
>
> If you know exactly what package is being looked at for upload into
> Debian, I can at least start with that so that the merge when it finally
> does get uplo
Hi Clint,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm about to start working on merging 0.23 into Ubuntu, and I'm just
> wondering if there has been any progress on adding CEPH to debian before
> I do so.
Whoops, I thought it was uploaded a month or so ago, but checking now it
lo
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
>
> > Hi Clint,
> >
> > Sorry about the testing confusion.. I was queueing up the little fixes (in
> > the software and the packaging) and just rolled a 0.21.1. The .dsc is at
>
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
>
> > Hi Clint,
> >
> > Sorry about the testing confusion.. I was queueing up the little fixes (in
> > the software and the packaging) and just rolled a 0.21.1. The .dsc is at
> >
> > http://ceph.newdream.n
Hi Clint,
Sorry about the testing confusion.. I was queueing up the little fixes (in
the software and the packaging) and just rolled a 0.21.1. The .dsc is at
http://ceph.newdream.net/debian/pool/ceph-stable/c/ceph/ceph_0.21.1-1.dsc
Asheesh, can this one get uploaded to debian, too?
Let me kn
Okay, v0.21 is out. The .dsc is at
http://ceph.newdream.net/debian/pool/ceph-stable/c/ceph/ceph_0.21-1.dsc
Thanks guys!
sage
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
n Jul 27, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>
> > Hi Clint, Asheesh,
> >
> > I am about to finalize a v0.21 release. Do you mind looking at the .dsc
> > below and checking that everything is to your liking? I'd like to fix any
> > packaging iss
Is (>= 4) sufficient?
Thanks!
sage
>
> On Jul 27, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>
> > Hi Clint, Asheesh,
> >
> > I am about to finalize a v0.21 release. Do you mind looking at the .dsc
> > below and checking that everything is to your liki
Hi Clint, Asheesh,
I am about to finalize a v0.21 release. Do you mind looking at the .dsc
below and checking that everything is to your liking? I'd like to fix any
packaging issues before tagging the release if possible.
http://ceph.newdream.net/testing/0.21/ceph_0.21-1.dsc
Thanks!
c has this header:
>
> /*
> * Ceph - scalable distributed file system * * Copyright (C) 2004-2006
> Sage Weil * * This is free software; you can
> redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser
> General Public * License version 2.1, as published b
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 11:01 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Package: ceph-dkms
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Sage Weil
> >
> >
> > * Package name: ceph-dkms
> > * URL : http://ce
Package: ceph-dkms
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sage Weil
* Package name: ceph-dkms
* URL : http://ceph.newdream.net/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description : Ceph client kernel module [DKMS driver source]
The Ceph client Linux kernel module allows hosts
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Sage, first off, thanks for producing debian source packages and
> maintaining your own apt repository.
>
>
> I'm curious if you're involved at all with this debian Intent To Package
> bug
>
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506040 f
:00 2001
From: Sage Weil
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 15:04:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] sysvinit: include 'ceph' in list of network file systems
Ceph is a distributed network file system (package 'ceph') that needs to
be mounted with other netowrk file system, after the network
26 matches
Mail list logo
