On 06/05/2013 09:24 PM, tony mancill wrote:
Hello Sam,
Would you be opposed to an NMU of proguard to update it to a newer
version and to address the FTBFS error? Or perhaps to the packaging
being moved to collaborative maintenance under the Debian Java team?
The current version is
On 05/10/2012 08:43 AM, Jari Aalto wrote:
I'm planning to NMU with changes listed in previous mail's patch to help
migrate away from deprecated dpatch.
Please let me know if an update is alredy being worked on, or if the
previous patch needs adjustments, or if there is anything that should
--
sam clegg
:: s...@superduper.net :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-8
Severity: important
Running the following code with gcc-4.4 will print A even though the
value of bar in is actually 64 at runtime.
The correct behaviour is surely to print invalid bar?
As you can see from the code, adding a default case changes the
behaviour
...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mad-maintainers
--
sam clegg
:: s...@superduper.net :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I really hope this patch gets applied sooner rather than later.
I use tree a lot and have had problems with utf8 filenames.
--
sam clegg
:: s...@superduper.net :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 22:02 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi Sam Clegg
Any news or ETA on this one? It is almost a month ago you said you would
apply the patch from Onkar Shinde (which will also fix #548810).
Thanks for the nudge Niels. My laptop was destroyed recently but with
my new one
Thanks Onkar. All changes look great. will apply and upload.
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 10:55 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
Please find attached the patch that fixes this bug and improves the
packaging in general.
Cheers,
Onkar
--
sam clegg
:: s...@superduper.net :: http://superduper.net
Are you planning on uploading this (at least to non-free?).
I'm using it and would love a packaged version. Do you have preview of
your package on the net somewhere?
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24
Are you planning on uploading this (at least to non-free?).
I'm using it and would love a packaged version. Do you have preview of
your package on the net somewhere?
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24
Are you planning on uploading this (at least to non-free?).
I'm using it and would love a packaged version. Do you have preview of
your package on the net somewhere?
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24
package.
Hope thats ok.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
diff -Nurb antlr-2.7.7/debian/antlr-cil-2.7.pc antlr-2.7.7.new/debian/antlr-cil-2.7.pc
--- antlr-2.7.7/debian/antlr-cil-2.7.pc 1970-01-01 01
will re-upload boo
from the boo1 sources and create boo2 packages with seperate libbooX-cil
and booX packages.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
sense. I'll do this with my next
upload. Is the process more complicated than simply updating the
maintainer field? I'll read up the website and hopefully get this done
next week.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 19:39 +0100, arno renevier wrote:
Package: boo
Severity: minor
Hi,
Long description of boo package tells:
The boo compiler and the programs it produces are 100% CIL and can be run on
any compliant CLI virtual machine
I suppose it's a typo, and CIL should be
Ok, my ITP was a dup of this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448756
I'm still happy to package this if nobody else has come forward.
My packages are good to go already.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: dmucs
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Victor Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://dmucs.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 05:41 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
for Debian, what is the point of adding another? Especially when
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 14:42 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me that this depends on Perforce. D'oh.
(I don't know anything about Perforce. Perhaps it's really dangerous
software. But perhaps it's just non-free.)
Perforce is an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: perforce
Version : 2007.2-2
Upstream Author : Perforce Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.perforce.com/
* License : proprietary
Programming Lang: binary only
This is really quite annoying.
I just needed to install unixodbc-dev on a build machine. This machine
only does compilation, nothing else.
Why does this package then force me to install and extra 8 megs for
libqt3-mt? I really don't see why this can't be split out into
unixodbc-admin or some
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 21:31 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:07:51PM +0100, Sam Clegg wrote:
Looks to me like this is an opaque data type. Its only ever referenced
as a pointer type so the user of the API never needs to know what the
layout of the type really is.
So
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 15:07 +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
Package: libid3tag0-dev
Version: 0.15.1b-10
Severity: normal
See subject
libid3tag0-dev: header file /usr/include/id3tag.h does not contain
definition for struct id3_file altough it references it
[EMAIL
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:25 +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
Package: proguard
Version: 3.7-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
While using the proguard 3.7 source package to build a deb of proguard 4.0
beta5 I discovered the proguard.jar and ant-proguard.jar files contain
an incorrect
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 14:09 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
Hi,
In my case it works, without any problems!
Indeed, works for my just fine on sid. Will try etch just to be sure.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I think this is a dup of #425458. Seems that insmod upstream has a
segfault.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 10:15 +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
Package: madplay
Version: 0.15.2b-4
Severity: important
madplay somevalid.mp3 just plays noise on my
indigo2. mpg321 gets it right.
$ uname -a
Linux mips 2.6.20-1-r4k-ip22 #1 Tue Apr 24 23:33:09 UTC 2007 mips64
GNU/Linux
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 14:18 +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
Package: proguard
Version: 3.7-1
Severity: wishlist
As Ant is a required for the build-deps why wouldn't you add the support
for the Ant Task for proguard (patch attached):
--- proguard-orig/proguard-3.7/debian/rules
Package: python-cherrypy3
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: wishlist
It seems to me that the tutorial code should live in
/usr/share/doc
rather than
/usr/share/python-support/python-cherrypy3/cherrypy/tutorial/
I could be wrong but thats where I expected to find it.
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: apt-cross
Version: 0.0.5
Severity: important
Line 380 of apt-cross seems to contain an incorrect invokation of
apt-get. Seems to be passing -update rather than update.
On my system (if I remove the 21) I get the following error:
E: Command line option ‘p’ [from -update] is not known.
reported
since it looks like all the mono packages being install are CLR1,
eg:
Unpacking mono-jit (from .../mono-jit_1.1.17.1-5_amd64.deb) ...
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
why it shouldn't be an easy
port.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to see what he thinks about the later.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
monodevelop before
uploading.
I'll certainly look into the dh_clideps problem, too.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:01:35AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
tag 380132 patch
thanks
I have prepared a patch which solves the FTBFS. The patch is attached.
Greetings Arjan
Thanks Arjan, but I already uploaded a fix for this bug (Looks
like its in unstable as I write).
cheers,
--
sam
. Will fix ASAP.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: sqliteodbc
Version : 0.69
Upstream Author : Christian Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.ch-werner.de/sqliteodbc/
* License : BSD-style
Programming Lang: C
I'm afraid I have to agree here that there should be a GUI-free
dev package available.
I'm building DB applications against unixodbc on several headless
servers and have no need of GUI tools to end the .ini files.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
Sorry for the delay removing boo.lang. I'm about to upload a new
7.6 package that fixes this bug.
cheers,
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Package: proguard
Severity: normal
This package does not seem to contain any architecture-specific components
and should therefore be Architecture: all (not any).
Hmm.. thanks for spotting that. How on earth did that happen!
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED
]:~/prog/boo$
Just because the boo package doesn't bring in a package which installs the mono
binary. Shouldn't do it?
I think you're right. I can't see much use for boo without mono.
Adding mono to Depends now.
Thanks
sam.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP
since the problem still
exists.
I'll try and reproduce this today and see if I can suggest a reasonable
fix.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
I saw the same issue.
Seems to be related to avahi-daemon. I stopped it and banshee started
just fine. Strangly, once I started it again banshee was still able
to start, so perhaps this is a workaround. Shame I can no longer
reproduce it though :(
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I also have a bug showing as outstanding that isn't: #338355
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
.
cheers,
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any progress on getting this package into debian? I use it on several
machines and it would be really useful.
Also the unofficial package that I was using seems to have disappeared
from http://debian.usefulinc.com/
If I can help then please let me know.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED
. Foo/Street
Number35/Number
/Address
Address
StreetAl.Bar/Street
Number14/Number
/Address
/Addresses
/Person
Simpson, Homer
35, Al. Foo
14, Al.Bar
What is the output you get from running this?
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net
/ant1.6 as ANT_HOME.
Michael
Thanks for the heads up michael. Combined this with the new upstream
release I just uploaded.
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Mirco Bauer wrote:
Package: boo
Severity: serious
The included boo.pc in 0.5.6.1701-1 has an invalid prefix, it's set
to /usr/local which should be /usr.
This breaks compiling programs against boo (like MonoDevelop).
Thanks. Will fix ASAP.
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED
everything in debian/install.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
that fastjar provided the 'jar'
command. Looks like i'll still need anther upload that uses the
fastjar command explicitly.
cheers,
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
': No such file or directory
dh_install: command returned error code 256
make: *** [binary-install/proguard] Error 1
I think this was fixed in an upload I made this morning.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19
Package: python-tunepimp
Version: 0.3.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Clearly this is a wishlist bug. I would like to use
python-tunepimp with python2.4. Would it be difficult
to add support for this?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1,
fixed in sarge?
Kurt
Sorry kurt, i've been away for a few days in Paris (should have
notified debian, i know). Will do the upload today.
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp
Package: libevent-dev
Version: 1.0b-1.1
Severity: minor
The README.Debian is misleading:
Currently, libevent supports kqueue(2) and select(2). Support for
poll(2) and /dev/poll is planned.
Also,
libevent - an asynchronous event notification library
Is libevent asynchronous? the website
Package: python-eyed3
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: wishlist
Any chance of supporting multiple python versions.
I would like a 2.4 package, for example.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: proguard
Version : 3.2
Upstream Author : Eric Lafortune [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://proguard.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : java class file shrinker
Package: rar
Version: 3.30-2
Severity: wishlist
When rar e fails to write to or create an output file it
does not give the reason. It simply outputs Cannot create
or Error writing without telling you, for example, if you
have no disk space or a permissions issue.
I had to run it through
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: boo
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Rodrigo B. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://boo.codehaus.org/
* License : Custom. DFSG Compatible.
Description : a python
Looks like I just missed this one. I would also like to adopt this
package. I use it a lot and already maintain xmms-mad, the xmms
plugin based on libmad.
Kurt, since you got here first, you get the take the package I guess.
I'd be happy to sponsor you. Are you in the NM queue?
sam
--
sam
Package: python-pymad
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Any chance we could get package build for python2.4/2.2?
I personally need a 2.4 version.
cheers,
sam
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture:
Package: libmysqlclient10
Version: 3.23.56-2
Severity: normal
I found this problem while using the python bindings which set
autocommit off by default.
When not in autocommit mode (SET AUTOCOMMIT=0) the client will fail on
reconnect and the nature of the error is not reported to the user.
In
Steve Langasek wrote:
Sam,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:55:32PM +, Sam Clegg wrote:
I found this problem while using the python bindings which set
autocommit off by default.
When not in autocommit mode (SET AUTOCOMMIT=0) the client will fail on
reconnect and the nature of the error
I've had the same problem. Seems the patch is breaking the way the
library is supposed to work (i.e. v2 tags take precidence over v1 tags).
I have quite a few apps that use the feature and the are broken right
now (i.e. xmms-mad).
Can we get this patch removed for sarge?
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL
64 matches
Mail list logo
