Package: src:mpi4py
Version: 4.0.0-9
Severity: minor
Hello.
I've just updated the variable to allow oversubscription
in debian/rules.
This is just to note some pending issues:
* I didn't find a well-documented replacement for several
of the previous OMPI_* environment variables. Maybe they
are
forwarded 1084262 https://github.com/vulcand/oxy/issues/243
tags 1084262 - help
owner 1084262 !
thanks
Ok, I'm going to remove the unneeded depends/build-depends on tzdata-legacy
and will disable the single test which fails.
Thanks.
reopen 1084262
thanks
I'll have to look at this more carefully.
Hello.
One of the reasons tzdata will not migrate to testing is that it has an
artificial bug preventing it from doing so:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1084190
In my opinion (after reporting several tzdata-related bugs
and also fixing some of them), the breakage introduced
retitle 1066758 golang-github-k0swe-wsjtx-go: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
severity 1066758 important
thanks
Hello.
I can build this package quite reliably, but in my setup
(using machines with 1 CPU and 2 CPUs).
I don't have time right now to test in a machine with 8 CPUs, but I
believe this
El 7/11/24 a las 22:37, Aurelien Jarno escribió:
Santiago, would it be possible to do a team upload with this patch as
you just did for reposurgeon?
Done.
Thanks a lot.
Package: dune-common
Version: 2.9.0-7
Severity: important
Affects: src:dune-grid src:dune-grid-glue
Tags: patch
Dear maintainer:
The file /usr/share/dune/dune-debian.mk needs to be updated
for OpenMPI 5.0. Patch attached.
(In some cases I've seen this issue being solved by
adding the new variab
El 6/11/24 a las 15:42, Lee Garrett escribió:
Package: base-files
Version: 12.4+deb12u8
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@rocketjump.eu
Hi,
reproducer for the problem:
$ mkdir tmp
$ sudo debootstrap bookworm tmp/
[...]
$ sudo PATH=not-set-correctly /usr/sbin/chroot tmp/ /bin/bash -l
bash:
Hi.
For the record: I was not the only one to find this problem:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/940636
So, in addition to a bug in a build-depends, this could also be
a bug which happens randomly, in which case it seems I
was so unlucky that it failed for me several times in a row.
Thanks.
El 5/11/24 a las 14:27, Julien Puydt escribió:
I just tried to "sbuild -d unstable traitlets" and it compiled fine...
so I'm wondering if the failure you reported is reproducible on your
side.
Thanks for checking.
It was 100% reproducible on my side, but at the time I reported it,
as I always
El 5/11/24 a las 6:26, Aurelien Jarno escribió:
On 2024-11-05 00:33, Santiago Vila wrote:
please find the debdiff attached
Hi. Can you post the debdiff? (or just say what you did)
Oops sorry about that. Please find it attached.
Thank you. I've made a team upload with those changes.
Hi.
Thanks a lot for the patch. I've converted your NMU
into a team upload (1.2.1-3).
Thanks.
Hi.
Thanks for the patch. I've taken your debdiff and have converted
into a team upload which includes the pending commit from Michael
and your changes.
Thanks.
please find the debdiff attached
Hi. Can you post the debdiff? (or just say what you did)
NMUs are messy for my taste. I could fix the FTBFS problem and let Anthony
(the usual uploader) to decide (for a later upload) if he wants
to use a depends, a recommends, or a suggest for the binary depend
owner 1085691 !
owner 1085692 !
thanks
After forwarding this upstream, I'm going to do this instead:
+# https://github.com/joblib/joblib/issues/1618
+ifeq ($(shell nproc), 1)
+ EXCLUDE_TESTS += and not test_nested_parallelism_limit
+ EXCLUDE_TESTS += and not test_threadpool_limitation_in_child
So, I believe we should just backport that hyphen to bookworm.
Simple and effective. I don't like NMUs but I would be willing
to help with the bureaucrazy if you accept a sponsored upload.
Sure. I am more than happy to accept a sponsored stable-pu.
Thanks a lot!
We'll do that, then (for 12.9,
Revised patch.
(But this would be for 12.9, the window for 12.8 closes today).
Thanks.--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+cpuinfo (0.0~git20220617.082deff-1+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Ignore exit status of dh_auto_test, allowing the pac
Hi.
Sorry, the patch is wrong, as it was against the unstable version,
and I missed there is even an hyphen in debian/rules here:
-LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(shell pwd)/$(shell ls -d obj-*) dh_auto_test
I think that's exactly the spirit of my previous "|| true" suggestion
(which I did before I saw the h
tags 1086649 patch
thanks
I cannot guarantee that anyone can compile it with any cpu they own,
if not disabling hardware-related dh_auto_test completely.
Well, if the tests are going to be ignored when they fail in bookworm,
then (imho) it does not make sense to have the build fail when the te
El 3/11/24 a las 18:12, 陈 晟祺 escribió:
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
2024年11月3日 08:14，Santiago Vila 写道：
[ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below:
[ FAILED ] CORE.known_uarch
This is a failure in dh_auto_test.
I know, but it's still a violation of a must directi
Hi.
The failed build logs contain a line like this:
-- Got valid date: ''
I think the error happens because the package tries to access Internet
during build. When such access fails, the build fails.
You can easily reproduce this
No rule to make target '/<>/src/bankdata/bankdata.de.db
by a
Package: src:nodejs
Version: 18.19.0+dfsg-6~deb12u2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20.17.0+dfsg-2
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm + proposed-updates, your package
failed to build:
--
Package: src:openvpn
Version: 2.6.3-1+deb12u2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.6.12-1
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm + proposed-updates, your package
failed to build:
--
Package: src:python-django-storages
Version: 1.13.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.14.4-1
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm + proposed-updates, your package
failed to build:
--
Package: src:jc
Version: 1.22.5-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.25.3-1
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm + proposed-updates, your package
failed to build:
[
Package: src:delve
Version: 1.20.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.23.1-2
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm + proposed-updates, your package
failed to build:
---
Package: src:cpuinfo
Version: 0.0~git20220617.082deff-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0~git20240830.fa1c679-5
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm + proposed-updates, your package
failed to build:
---
El 2/11/24 a las 15:01, Francesco Ballarin escribió:
Source: hypre
Followup-For: Bug #1086275
X-Debbugs-Cc: francesco.balla...@unicatt.it, sanv...@debian.org
Hi Santiago,
I am puzzled as to how I missed the OMPI_* environment variables in
debian/rules in
superlu-dist while grep-ing through the
El 2/11/24 a las 13:51, Francesco Ballarin escribió:
I have a local fix for the FTBS, similar to the one I recently uploaded for
mumps and superlu dist.
BTW: The superlu-dist fix didn't work for me.
I think debian/rules still needs to be updated.
Can you take care of that too?
Thanks.
t;nr_cpus=1" will work on any computer.
Thanks.commit 92b9d838fa240db919fd177abf487cae0e6ff3d8
Author: Santiago Vila
Date: Sat Nov 2 13:20:00 2024 +0100
debian/rules: Update variables for OpenMPI 5.0. Closes: #1086275.
OpenMPI 5.0 changed the way environment variables h
Hmm, I didn't change debian/tests/test-hypre-common, maybe that was what I
missed.
I still leave it to you, but I'm curious to know if that was the reason for my
build problem
after the debian/rules change.
Thanks.
owner 1086275 !
thanks
El 2/11/24 a las 12:09, Drew Parsons escribió:
Source: hypre
Followup-For: Bug #1086275
Control: tags -1 ftbfs
max available processors nproc=1
Almost certainly an oversubscribe issue.
OpenMPI 5 changed env variables: OMPI_ → PRTE_
Debian scripts will need to be upda
owner 1086386 !
thanks
El 2/11/24 a las 0:57, Drew Parsons escribió:
My guess is that 4 is the number of the processes used for the MPI test,
and the test machine does not have 4 CPUs available.
OpenMPI 5 changed the env variables for allowing oversubscribing.
From OMPI_ to PRTE_. Might be th
El 1/11/24 a las 20:43, Aurelien Jarno escribió:
I haven't spotted any issue on the (official) build daemons.
For the record: Neither have I on my unofficial archive rebuilds.
In fact, the data which I collect by monitoring /proc/meminfo during
the build supports that this package is not part
El 31/10/24 a las 19:51, Colin Turner escribió:
I can confirm the bug, but I would suggest the severity be increased as the
whole package does not work as a result.
In advance of a patch...
It is possible to edit two lines:
Line 113 of /usr/bin/pyzor
Lines 81, 230 and 235 of /usr/lib/python3/
Note: I've updated the BD of libhts-dev like this:
libhts-dev (>= 1.20+ds-2~)
This is to avoid a build failure in the buildds.
The package does not exist yet, but it eventually will,
and then the autobuilders should build it as normal.
(I understand that this is slightly better than retrying
o
owner 1086515 !
thanks
I'll fix this myself, since I can.
Sorry for the fuss again.
Thanks.
Package: src:pbseqlib
Version: 5.3.5+dfsg-7
Hi.
The build-dependency was not really needed.
It was libhts-dev, one of the build-dependencies of pbseqlib,
the one requiring a dependency.
Sorry for the fuss.
Thanks.
Please stop assuming bad faith in what I write. This isn't the case.
No, I was not assuming bad faith.
I just thought the title was suboptimal.
I have just added the information you requested (namely, that a faster
computer probably avoids the problem). I will not change the title again.
Than
retitle 1086276 ironic: FTBFS: tests timeout if the computer is not fast enough
thanks
I hope this is acceptable for you.
I was just trying to be neutral. My computer is not "very slow". It only builds
packages and does not do any other thing. It is therefore not particularly
"busy".
I changed
Package: src:libjung-free-java
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
(Note: Trivial patch attached)
[...]
Package: src:ostree
Version: 2024.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_aut
retitle 1086272 gromacs: FTBFS with OpenMPI 5 on systems with less than 4 CPUs
severity 1086272 important
thanks
Hi. Thanks for finding a fix for this so quickly.
Nicholas Breen wrote:
Looks like OpenMPI 5 has changed the options to allow oversubscription -
but this should only affect running t
retitle 1086276 ironic; FTBFS: tests timeout
thanks
El 30/10/24 a las 15:33, Thomas Goirand escribió:
What you're seeing here is only a fail on slow computers, as the unit test
reaches timeout. I know it because other OpenStack services had the issue, and
as you can see, it stops at 93.49%.
Package: src:sundials
Version: 7.1.1+dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsy
Package: src:libxmlcatalog-java
Version: 1.0.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh
Package: src:stopt
Version: 5.12+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3
Package: src:magic-wormhole
Version: 0.17.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with pyt
Package: src:apache-opennlp
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
dh_updat
Package: src:sdml
Version: 0.3.1+20241014-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_upda
Package: src:todoman
Version: 4.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --buildsystem=pybu
Package: src:scikit-build
Version: 0.18.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with pyt
Package: src:scap-security-guide
Version: 0.1.73-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --b
Package: src:python-pgpy
Version: 0.6.0-1.3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with pyt
Package: src:python-recurring-ical-events
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh bi
Package: src:python-os-win
Version: 5.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make: pyversions: No
Package: src:python-pyghmi
Version: 1.5.70-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make: pyversions: No
Package: src:python-sphinx-feature-classification
Version: 1.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules buil
Package: src:python-fluids
Version: 1.0.26-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with py
Package: src:python-momepy
Version: 0.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make: pyversions: No
Package: src:python-os-service-types
Version: 1.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make: pyver
Package: src:python-icalendar
Version: 5.0.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buil
Package: src:python-gphoto2
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=py
Package: src:python-escript
Version: 5.6-7
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build -v
dh_upd
Package: src:pbbam
Version: 2.4.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem
Package: src:ndcube
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3,sp
Package: src:plastex
Version: 3.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3 --b
Package: src:pbseqlib
Version: 5.3.5+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_upda
Package: src:metabat
Version: 2.15-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_auto
Package: src:nfdump
Version: 1.7.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_auto
Package: src:macromoleculebuilder
Version: 4.0.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binar
Package: src:libjavaewah-java
Version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_u
Package: src:libbio-db-hts-perl
Version: 3.01-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_
Package: src:gscan2pdf
Version: 2.13.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_
Package: src:digikam
Version: 4:8.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with kf6
dh
Package: src:trippy
Version: 0.11.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with shel
tags 1086320 + patch
thanks
Trivial patch attached (but untested).
I wonder how this worked at all before.
Thanks.--- a/swift/include/swift/SILOptimizer/Utils/UpdatingInstructionIterator.h
+++ b/swift/include/swift/SILOptimizer/Utils/UpdatingInstructionIterator.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ public:
}
Package: src:libtwelvemonkeys-java
Version: 3.11.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh bin
Package: src:meson-python
Version: 0.16.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with sph
Package: src:telegram-desktop
Version: 4.14.9+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:zvbi
Version: 0.2.42-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_autot
Package: src:wtforms-components
Version: 0.10.5-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --wi
Package: src:wtforms-alchemy
Version: 0.18.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:wf-recorder
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsyste
Package: src:upstream-ontologist
Version: 0.1.44-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --b
Package: src:tycho
Version: 2.7.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_autot
Package: src:snek
Version: 1.9-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_autotool
Package: src:rust-wasm-bindgen
Version: 0.2.87-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --bui
Package: src:swiftlang
Version: 5.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_a
Package: src:siscone
Version: 3.0.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_aut
Package: src:ruby-timeliness
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --builds
Package: src:silver-platter
Version: 0.5.39-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with p
Package: src:rust-allocator-api2
Version: 0.2.16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --b
Package: src:raincat
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_aut
Package: src:ruby-mojo-magick
Version: 0.6.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --build
Package: src:rmpi
Version: 0.7-2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
RExtraInstallFlags="--no-tes
Package: src:qpid-proton-j-extensions
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:neatvnc
Version: 0.8.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_updat
Package: src:purify
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem=cma
Package: src:pywws
Version: 24.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
1 - 100 of 3844 matches
Mail list logo
