Bug#1072599: node-globby: FTBFS: Property 'parentPath' is missing in type 'DirentFromStats' but required in type 'Dirent'.

found 1072599 13.1.3+~cs16.25.40-1 thanks Hi. This is also happening in bookworm, so I'm adjusting the metadata accordingly. After this is fixed in unstable, please consider an upload for bookworm-proposed-updates, as packages in stable must build in stable. Thanks.

Bug#1078843: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#1078843: symfony: FTBFS: PHP Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required '/usr/share/php/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/../HttpClient/autoload.php' (include_path

tags 1078843 - bookworm fixed 1078843 5.4.23+dfsg-1+deb12u2 thanks Hi. According to your previous email, let's consider this to be the FTBFS problem in bullseye only. (I will report the FTBFS in bookworm in short, since I have a bunch of bookworm bugs pending to be reported). Thanks.

Bug#1078843: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#1078843: symfony: FTBFS: PHP Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required '/usr/share/php/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/../HttpClient/autoload.php' (include_path

El 17/8/24 a las 8:22, David Prévot escribió: Furthermore, you tagged it “bookworm”, but the issue you spotted is not present in Bookworm (well, I just reproduced an FTBFS in bookworm, but it’s unrelated to this specific issue), can you please expand (unless it’s just a typo)? You are right.

Bug#1078845: uvloop: FTBFS: failing tests

Package: src:uvloop Version: 0.14.0+ds1-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.19.0+ds1-2.1 Tags: ftbfs bullseye bookworm Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build: (Note: The build failure also happens in bookworm) ---

Bug#1078844: trapperkeeper-status-clojure: FTBFS: java.security.cert.CertificateExpiredException: NotAfter: Sat Jun 08 21:21:40 UTC 2024

Package: src:trapperkeeper-status-clojure Version: 1.1.1-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.1.1-5 Tags: ftbfs bullseye bookworm Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build: (Note: The build failure also happens in bookworm) -

Bug#1078843: symfony: FTBFS: PHP Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required '/usr/share/php/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/../HttpClient/autoload.php' (include_path='build:.:/usr/share/php') i

Package: src:symfony Version: 4.4.19+dfsg-2+deb11u5 Severity: serious Control: close -1 6.4.7+dfsg-1 Tags: ftbfs bullseye bookworm Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build: (Note: The build failure also happens in bookworm) ---

Bug#1078842: strace: FTBFS: failing tests

Package: src:strace Version: 5.10-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bullseye bookworm trixie Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build: (Note: The build failure also happens in bookworm and trixie)

Bug#1078841: puppetlabs-ring-middleware-clojure: FTBFS: java.security.cert.CertificateExpiredException: NotAfter: Sat Jun 08 20:56:16 UTC 2024

Package: src:puppetlabs-ring-middleware-clojure Version: 1.3.0-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.3.1-4 Tags: ftbfs bullseye bookworm Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build: (Note: The build failure also happens in bookworm) ---

Bug#1078840: libflickr-api-perl: FTBFS: Failed test 'checking the error code for "method not found"'

Package: src:libflickr-api-perl Version: 1.28-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.29-1 Tags: ftbfs bullseye bookworm Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build: (Note: The build failure also happens in bookworm) -

Bug#1078838: php-twig: FTBFS: PHP Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required '/usr/share/php/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/../HttpClient/autoload.php' (include_path='.:/usr/share/php') in /us

Package: src:php-twig Version: 2.14.3-1+deb11u2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 3.5.1-1 Tags: ftbfs bullseye Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in *bullseye*, your package failed to build: [...]

Bug#1078839: user-mode-linux: FTBFS: Patch /<>/debian/patches/07-remove-rpath.patch does not apply

Package: src:user-mode-linux Version: 5.10um3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 6.1um4 Tags: ftbfs bullseye Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in *bullseye*, your package failed to build: [...] de

Bug#1078837: php-laravel-lumen-framework: FTBFS: PHP Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required '/usr/share/php/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/../HttpClient/autoload.php' (include_path='src:.:

Package: src:php-laravel-lumen-framework Version: 6.3.5-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 8.3.4-1 Tags: ftbfs bullseye Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in *bullseye*, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078836: php-doctrine-bundle: FTBFS: PHP Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required '/usr/share/php/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/../HttpClient/autoload.php' (include_path='.:/usr/share/p

Package: src:php-doctrine-bundle Version: 2.2.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bullseye Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in *bullseye*, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh

Bug#1076883: gnuradio: FTBFS: TeX capacity exceeded

close 1076883 3.10.11.0-2 thanks * pdf-documentation patch: set larger pool_size Hi. After trying several times in my autobuilders, I can verify that this change fixed the problem, so I'm closing the bug myself. Thanks.

Bug#1002789: python-pycdlib: FTBFS during tests if /tmp is not a tmpfs

tags 1002789 - moreinfo unreproducible tags 1002789 + patch severity 1002789 serious thanks El 5/3/24 a las 13:51, Lucas Nussbaum escribió: Right, it looks like it only builds fine if /tmp is a tmpfs. Which looks like a valid bug, isn't it? (I can reproduce the failure on my laptop with /tmp on

Bug#1078813: python-aioshelly: FTBFS: ERROR: aioshelly.ble (unittest.loader._FailedTest.aioshelly.ble)

Package: src:python-aioshelly Version: 11.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules build make: pyversions:

Bug#1078812: keystone: FTBFS: Failed to import test module: keystone.tests.unit

Package: src:keystone Version: 2:25.0.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules build make: pyversions: No su

Bug#1078810: audit: FTBFS: Test suite does not allow the package to be built

Package: src:audit Version: 1:4.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules build py3versions: no X-Python3-V

Bug#1078811: gitaly: FTBFS: cannot find package "github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto"

Package: src:gitaly Version: 16.8.2+ds3-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules build dh build --buildsystem

Bug#1076901: opencv: diff for NMU version 4.6.0+dfsg-13.2

El 16/8/24 a las 1:12, p...@debian.org escribió: I'm sorry I had your message too late. The delayed upload was accepted already. No problem. You uploaded -13.2 to delayed, I uploaded -14 this afternoon. Your upload was accepted by the upload queue, but not by dinstall, who will probably reject

Bug#1078772: pmake: “bmake: no system rules (sys.mk).”

El 15/8/24 a las 22:49, Thorsten Glaser escribió: a package that Build-Depends on pmake and uses it in its debian/rules build targets in a clean bullseye chroot Did you really mean bmake (not pmake) here? If yes: Can you provide an example of package in the described set? I ask because I rebu

Bug#1076901: opencv: diff for NMU version 4.6.0+dfsg-13.2

Hi. I'm going to make a team upload including your changes. I hope the usual uploaders do not mind. Otherwise, this would be the second NMU which is not synced to salsa, and this is becoming a little bit messy, imo. I guess you may cancel your NMU (or just let it fail). Thanks.

Bug#1078737: marked as done (base-files: the installation of the newest version of package breaks due to incorrect pre-install script)

reopen 1078737 close 1078737 thanks (Thanks a lot Helmut for caring about this, I'm just going to fix a minor glitch here) Hello Alastair. You have closed this bug in base-files, but apparently you meant to close #1078738 instead. The metadata for 1078737 now looks like this: Found in version

Bug#1078622: [Debian-pan-maintainers] Bug#1078622: jupyterlab: will FTBFS during trixie support period

retitle 1078622 jupyterlab: Tries to access Internet during build thanks El 14/8/24 a las 1:15, Yadd escribió: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: Duplicate of #1060772 Oops, sorry, I actually do not want to report such kind of duplic

Bug#1078645: stunnel4: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:stunnel4 Version: 3:5.72-3 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: --

Bug#1078646: ruby-atlassian-jwt: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:ruby-atlassian-jwt Version: 0.2.1-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078643: rubygems: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:rubygems Version: 3.4.20-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: --

Bug#1078644: ssl-utils-clojure: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:ssl-utils-clojure Version: 3.5.3-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: --

Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:puma Version: 6.4.2-5 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: ---

Bug#1078641: pyvo: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:pyvo Version: 1.5.2-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: ---

Bug#1078642: ruby3.1: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:ruby3.1 Version: 3.1.2-8.3 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: --

Bug#1078639: python-pskc: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:python-pskc Version: 1.2-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: --

Bug#1078638: python-dateutil: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:python-dateutil Version: 2.9.0-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build:

Bug#1078635: puppetserver: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:puppetserver Version: 8.4.0-4 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: ---

Bug#1078637: python-crontab: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:python-crontab Version: 3.1.0-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078636: python-calendra: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:python-calendra Version: 7.9.0-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build:

Bug#1078634: prometheus-alertmanager: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:prometheus-alertmanager Version: 0.27.0+ds-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build:

Bug#1078633: prometheus: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:prometheus Version: 2.45.6+ds-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078632: notary: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:notary Version: 0.7.0+git20240416.9d2b3b3+ds1-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078628: lxd: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:lxd Version: 5.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-5 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build:

Bug#1078629: mysql-8.0: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:mysql-8.0 Version: 8.0.39-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078631: node-tough-cookie: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:node-tough-cookie Version: 4.1.3+~4.0.2-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: ---

Bug#1078627: libinfinity: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:libinfinity Version: 0.7.2-2.1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: --

Bug#1078626: libbio-procedural-perl: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:libbio-procedural-perl Version: 1.7.4-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078622: jupyterlab: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:jupyterlab Version: 4.0.11+ds1-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build:

Bug#1078625: knot: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:knot Version: 3.3.8-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: ---

Bug#1078624: khal: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:khal Version: 1:0.11.3-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build:

Bug#1078623: keystone: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:keystone Version: 2:25.0.0-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build:

Bug#1078621: golang-refraction-networking-utls: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:golang-refraction-networking-utls Version: 1.2.1-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: --

Bug#1078619: golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto Version: 1.0.0-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078620: golang-github-russellhaering-goxmldsig: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:golang-github-russellhaering-goxmldsig Version: 1.2.0-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078617: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient Version: 1.11.0-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: --

Bug#1078618: golang-github-micromdm-scep: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:golang-github-micromdm-scep Version: 2.1.0-3 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build:

Bug#1078616: golang-1.22: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:golang-1.22 Version: 1.22.6-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: ---

Bug#1078613: dput-ng: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:dput-ng Version: 1.40 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: ---

Bug#1078615: golang-1.21: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:golang-1.21 Version: 1.21.13-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: --

Bug#1078612: biojava6-live: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:biojava6-live Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-4 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078614: extrepo-data: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:extrepo-data Version: 1.0.4 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build: -

Bug#1078611: astropy: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Package: src:astropy Version: 6.1.2-1 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-during-trixie-support-period Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable in the year 2028, your package failed to build:

Bug#1076924: metadata

El 13/8/24 a las 16:30, Guillem Jover escribió: I'm now closing it, because only with the fixed marking is not enough for the BTS, and it was being kept open. :) Yes, I was aware that "fixed" did not close the bug. To clarify: I was keeping the bug open (but not in the list of bugs affecting

Bug#1078591: linux-image-6.10.3-amd64, regression, fails boot while fsck (undefined symbol: ext2fs_list_backups)

reassign 1078591 e2fsprogs thanks El 13/8/24 a las 9:11, Giuseppe Sacco escribió: Package: src:linux Version: 6.10.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, this is a debian testing machine. After today upgrade and reboot, the machine does not start anymore.

Bug#1077951: newsboat: FTBFS: failing tests

El 12/8/24 a las 23:07, Adrian Bunk escribió: This bug was that librust-unicode-width-dev 0.1.13 and < 0.1.13 return different results for utils::strwidth_stfl("\07"), and with librust-unicode-width-dev 0.1.13 now in unstable this is fixed. There are now different test failures on armel/armhf.

Bug#1076827: python-scrapy: FTBFS: Tries to access Internet during build

El 9/8/24 a las 21:58, Andrey Rakhmatullin escribió: I wonder why this failure doesn't happen in plain sbuild builds. Good question. Because those builds allow Internet access during build, but the unshare sbuild backend I'm using for my tests does not. Currently, official autobuilders come in

Bug#1078320: sddm: FTBFS: Could not find login.defs at /etc/login.defs. Try -DLOGIN_DEFS_PATH.

El 9/8/24 a las 15:29, Chris Hofstaedtler escribió: On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 02:46:50PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Build-Depends: cmake (>= 3.4~), libxcb-xkb-dev, libxcb1-

Bug#1078320: sddm: FTBFS: Could not find login.defs at /etc/login.defs. Try -DLOGIN_DEFS_PATH.

tags 1078320 + patch thanks Hi. The attached patch would be enough to fix the problem (login is not build-essential anymore in trixie, so packages using it during build should add it to build-depends). However, I believe it would be better to honor the suggestion in the build log and pass -DLOGI

Bug#1078324: tpm2-pkcs11: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

Package: src:tpm2-pkcs11 Version: 1.9.0-0.2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --exclude=

Bug#1078323: vip-manager2: FTBFS: imports github.com/coreos/etcd/client: no Go files in /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/github.com/coreos/etcd/client

Package: src:vip-manager2 Version: 2.5.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsyst

Bug#1078321: staticsite: FTBFS: FAIL: test_site_path (tests.test_theme.TestUrlFor.test_site_path)

Package: src:staticsite Version: 2.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --with python3

Bug#1078320: sddm: FTBFS: Could not find login.defs at /etc/login.defs. Try -DLOGIN_DEFS_PATH.

Package: src:sddm Version: 0.21.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary dh_update_autot

Bug#1078322: vip-manager: FTBFS: src/github.com/cybertec-postgresql/vip-manager/checker/etcd_leader_checker.go:15:2: cannot find package "go.etcd.io/etcd/clientv3"

Package: src:vip-manager Version: 1.0.2-8 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsyste

Bug#1078317: rust-wasmtime: FTBFS: failing tests

Package: src:rust-wasmtime Version: 19.0.0+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --so

Bug#1078319: screengrab: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:screengrab Version: 2.7.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsystem

Bug#1078314: qtorganizer-eds: FTBFS: The following tests FAILED: 5 - recurrence-test (Failed)

Package: src:qtorganizer-eds Version: 0.2.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary dh_up

Bug#1078316: ruby-terser: FTBFS: 5 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file terser.js.rej

Package: src:ruby-terser Version: 1.1.12+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buil

Bug#1078315: rdflib: FTBFS: raise ValueError from exc

Package: src:rdflib Version: 7.0.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --with sphinxdoc

Bug#1078313: qtermwidget: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:qtermwidget Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsyste

Bug#1078312: qterminal: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:qterminal Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsystem

Bug#1078308: python-aiosqlite: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'docutils.nodes' has no attribute 'reprunicode'

Package: src:python-aiosqlite Version: 0.17.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --with

Bug#1078311: pyvkfft: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'docutils.nodes' has no attribute 'reprunicode'

Package: src:pyvkfft Version: 2024.1.2+ds1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsy

Bug#1078309: python-m2r: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'docutils.nodes' has no attribute 'reprunicode'

Package: src:python-m2r Version: 0.3.1-0.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --with pyth

Bug#1078310: python-matrix-nio: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'docutils.nodes' has no attribute 'reprunicode'

Package: src:python-matrix-nio Version: 0.24.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --bui

Bug#1078306: pcmanfm-qt: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:pcmanfm-qt Version: 1.4.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsystem

Bug#1078307: prometheus-postfix-exporter: FTBFS: src/github.com/kumina/postfix_exporter/logsource_docker.go:29:47: undefined: types.ContainerLogsOptions

Package: src:prometheus-postfix-exporter Version: 0.3.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh bin

Bug#1078305: pavucontrol-qt: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:pavucontrol-qt Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsy

Bug#1078302: lxqt-runner: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-runner Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsyste

Bug#1078304: obconf-qt: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:obconf-qt Version: 0.16.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsystem

Bug#1078303: lxqt-sudo: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-sudo Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsystem

Bug#1078301: lxqt-qtplugin: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-qtplugin Version: 1.4.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsys

Bug#1078299: lxqt-policykit: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-policykit Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsy

Bug#1078300: lxqt-powermanagement: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-powermanagement Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --b

Bug#1078298: lxqt-panel: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-panel Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsystem

Bug#1078297: lxqt-openssh-askpass: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-openssh-askpass Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --b

Bug#1078296: lxqt-notificationd: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-notificationd Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --bui

Bug#1078295: lxqt-menu-data: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "lxqt2-build-tools"

Package: src:lxqt-menu-data Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary dh_upd

Bug#1078294: lxqt-globalkeys: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-globalkeys Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --builds

Bug#1078293: lxqt-config: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-config Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsyste

Bug#1078292: lxqt-archiver: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-archiver Version: 0.9.1-0.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --builds

Bug#1078291: lxqt-admin: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-admin Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsystem

Bug#1078290: lxqt-about: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lxqt-about Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsystem

Bug#1078289: lximage-qt: FTBFS: Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5LinguistTools"

Package: src:lximage-qt Version: 1.4.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules binary dh binary --buildsystem

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >