Package: libnet-ssh-ruby1.8
Version: 1.0.10-1
Severity: wishlist
New upstream version available (1.1.1)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU c
Package: python-fuse
Version: 2.5-5+b2
Severity: wishlist
New upstream version (0.2pre1).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: jruby
Version : 1.0.0rc2
Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
* URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
* License : tri license CPL/GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:40:06PM +0200, erlk ozlr wrote:
> http://fuse4bsd.creo.hu/README.new_fusepy_api.html#old-api , maybe
> only patching the packages that refrain from upgrading to a new
> python-fuse version would be enough
The problem is that there is no new python-fuse version per se, as
tag 422906 + confirmed pending
thanks
Fixed in -3.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 02:13:18PM -0500, Ken Bloom wrote:
> Package: jruby0.9
> Version: 0.9.8-2
> Severity: normal
>
> /usr/lib/jruby0.9/bin/jrubyc has the incorrect shebang. It starts with
> #!/usr/bin/env jruby0.9
> but it's
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cartoreso
Version : 0.1-alpha
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://cartoreso.campus.ecp.fr
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Java
Descr
Package: fglrx-kernel-src
Version: 8.36.5-1
Severity: important
# m-a -t -f build fglrx
FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible module fglrx.ko uses GPL-only symbol
'paravirt_ops'
This happens on 2.6.20:
ii linux-headers-2.6.20-1 2.6.20-2 Common header files for Linux
2.6.20
ii
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:40:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> What package provides jruby0.9 and what's the canonical path to the
> interpretor?
jruby0.9 is the package, /usr/bin/jruby0.9 is a link:
lrwxrwxrwx [...] /usr/bin/jruby0.9 -> ../lib/jruby0.9/bin/jruby
> Also, is there no jruby int
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.28
Severity: wishlist
Can we have jruby0.9 added to the list of known interepreters ?
W: jruby0.9: unusual-interpreter ./usr/lib/jruby0.9/bin/jirb #!jruby0.9
Thanks a lot,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT
sed on the failures we are seeing.
>
> On 3/14/07, Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:16:47AM +1100, Richard Jones wrote:
> >> Follow up on my last email. I can reproduce the problem by making the
> >> change you mention
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: jruby
Version : 0.9.8
Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
* URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
* License : tri license CPL/GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
tag 412986 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Paul,
could you tell me what version of python-libgmail you're using ? In
general, it is good to use reportbug to file bugs, since it will list
all the dependencies for the package you report against.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:38:57PM +0100, paul
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:17:08PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:37:58AM -0800,
> Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 27 lines which said:
>
> > So... do you think the problem is in the zonecheck code, or rather
:55:35PM -0800,
> Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 54 lines which said:
>
> > I am not seeing that on unstable as of today;
>
> I did see the problem on "unstable", too. And I've found a solution:
>
> apt-get remove libx
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:59:43PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> A colleague had it on Fedora Core 5, too. Same mystery.
Is there any way to run zonecheck through the Ruby debugger to try to
figure out this mystery ? :)
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:39:32AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Right, another etch box does not have the problem (both have been
> 'aptitude dist-upgrade' this morning. I'll study both machines in
> details to see where they can be different. Any idea?
I don't have any idea right now; were
tag 407896 + moreinfo
thanks
I am not seeing that on unstable as of today; the only difference with
an etch setup is the version of iputils-ping, which is 20020927-4 in
unstable (although I'd expect the version in etch to be a simple
backport of this one).
Stephane, do you have other etch boxes w
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 05:13:51PM -0800, gary ng wrote:
> Is this in debian unstable ?
It is not: please use packages.debian.org to verify things like this.
> I am running etch and need a package that is in debian which is what
> my patch is against.
I am more than reluctant to package the curr
tag 407695 + patch
thanks
Passing on this "quick" patch to upstream...
--Seb
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:36:50PM +0800, gary ng wrote:
> Package: python-fuse
> Version: 2.5-5
> Followup-For: Bug #407695
>
> Below is a diff of the quick patch I made. It does not interfere with
> existing applicat
severity 405304 important
thanks
It's not grave, but definitely important...
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity normal
tag + upstream
thanks
Setting severity to normal, as this most definitely doesn't render the
package unusable.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:33:45PM +0100, Alexandre Passant wrote:
> Package: python-libgmail
> Version: 0.1.5.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: rend
severity 404889 + normal
tag 404889 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
gmailfs works here (same version of python-fuse, kernel 2.6.18), and
it does call Fuse.main(). I'd say xmp.py is deprecated, which is
indeed a bug (albeit a minor one), but I'd like you to tell me more
about the actual problem you're facin
Heya Mathieu,
any clues on this ? If you need some more info from the submitter,
please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Cc: list !
Cheers,
--Seb
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 04:28:55PM +0300, Dmitry Rutsky wrote:
> Package: fantasdic
> Version: 1.0beta2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> fantasdic occasionally
tag 401909 + upstream confirmed
forwarded 401909 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 401909 normal
merge 401909 341301
thanks
When submitting a bug, please:
- use reportbug so I can see what version of the package (and its
dependencies) you're using.
- check the existing bugs for the package you're repo
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:00:16PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:04:48PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
>
> > * Package name: fantasdic
> > Version : 1.0-beta2
> > Upstream Author : Mathieu Blondel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:50:05AM +0100, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> You probably should add the package-dependency on "libnet-dns-perl",
> since my patch uses this module.
fixed in -6. A working patch, complete with the appropriate "use
Foo::Bar" lines, is always nicer ;)
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fantasdic
Version : 1.0-beta2
Upstream Author : Mathieu Blondel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnome.org/projects/fantasdic/
* License : GPL
severity 400599 wishlist
tag 400599 + patch pending
thanks
This should hit the Debian archive pretty soon now; I'm also copying
Clinton Wong, original author of Net::Socks maintainership, so he can
incorporate this patch if he desires.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 03:34:46PM +0100, Chr
Package: python-sqlobject
Version: 0.7.0-4
Severity: wishlist
http://sqlobject.org/News.html#sqlobject-0-7-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linu
--- Begin Message ---
On 8/20/06, Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We were wondering if somehow the "snippets" setting was triggering
this bug that neither the upload author nor myself can't seem to
reproduce...
BTW the python-libgmail problem you describe be
be
able to get that soon.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:54:58PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 20:08:27 -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> >Hey guys,
> >
> >do you have "snippets" enabled in your gmail config ?
>
> Nope, s
Package: python2.3-id3lib
Version: 0.5.1-6
Severity: normal
Needs to be moved to the new python policy.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.1
Hey guys,
do you have "snippets" enabled in your gmail config ?
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 383052 + confirmed upstream
thanks
Hi dear libgmail maintainers,
I can reproduce this one too, have you heard about it at all ? :)
Sorry for the very short mail, I'm on vacation with only dialup access
right now...
Cheers,
--Seb
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:45:34PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Hi Dan,
could you please split this bug report into a few smaller,
self-contained ones ? That way I can tag/fix/close them the right way.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:34:43PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: wikipediafs
> Version: 0.1-1
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/share/man
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:08:18PM +1000, Richard Jones wrote:
> Actually, a point I should have mentioned before, you should ask these
> guys to check if they have snippets turned on in their gmail
> preferences. The error when this occurred used to be different, but
> I think this is the most l
nice to know what is causing the
> different behaviours.
>
> Regards,
> Richard.
>
>
> On 7/28/06, Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >tag 378312 + upstream
> >thanks
> >
> >Hi Richard,
> >
> >do you have any thoughts on
that I am *not*
experiencing this bug... What do you think ?
Cheers,
--Seb
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:11:39PM -0400, Matthew Cheetah Gabeler-Lee wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
>
> > I still can't reproduce this one... Do you see the same behavior w
I still can't reproduce this one... Do you see the same behavior with
another fsName ?
--Seb
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:57:38PM -0400, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote:
> Package: gmailfs
> Version: 0.7.1-6
> Followup-For: Bug #378312
>
>
> I'm seeing the exact same behavior as the original reporter.
tag 378312 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
I can't seem to reproduce this behavior, even with an old gmail
filesystem. Do you still see this same problem if you create a new
one ?
Cheers,
--Seb
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:42:47AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Package: gmailfs
> Version: 0.7.1
reassign 375126 python-libgmail
thanks
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 10:28:59AM -0500, Tim Kelley wrote:
> Package: gmailfs
> Version: 0.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> gmail and fuse and friends install just finei; fuse modules loads with
> no complaint. However,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wikipediafs
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Mathieu Blondel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://wikipediafs.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.11+cvs20060403-1
Followup-For: Bug #352680
I see the same exact behavior with a remote Courier-IMAP server.
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh l
tag 361047 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 361047 normal
thanks
Works fine here:
~ # python /usr/share/doc/python-libgmail/examples/sendmsg.py [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo bar
Please wait, logging in...
Log in successful.
Message sent `foo` successfully.
Done.
Looking
reassign 361057 graphviz
merge 361057 359622
thanks
See Bug #359622 for graphviz.
--Seb
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:06:21PM +1000, Glenn wrote:
> Package: lanmap
> Version: 0.1+svn20060227-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> as stated in heading, also on installing
reassign 359998 graphviz
merge 359998 359622
thanks
This is actually a bug in the packaging of graphviz >= 2.8.0-2.
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 359622 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 359622 normal
thanks
lanmap works fine here (same version), so how about you run it with -v
or -vv maybe ? In the meantime, I'll ask the upstream author if this
rings any bell for him...
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:11:34PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Maybe commenting on what features you feel "make a difference" on this
> package vs. others will help users decide which one to install.
Right you are, I will rewrite the long description and emphasize how
lanmap is
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:04:32AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:22:57PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> > * Package name: lanmap
> > Version : 0.1
> > Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lanmap
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://parseerror.com/lanmap/
* License : GPL
Description : lanmap
Please install and python-fuse 2.5-1.
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
found 346523 1.0.0-2
thanks
I still can't input accented characters in an aterm with 1.0.0-2. It
works fine in a xterm or in firefox.
ii aterm 1.0.0-2 Afterstep XVT - a VT102 emulator for the X window
system
ii libc6 2.3.5-12GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 03:34:48PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> I apologize for the long delay, but I've been very busy over the last
> couple of months.
no problem...
> I am still getting the same error with current versions in sid
yep, same here... We hope that the next, re-engineered imp
reassign 351602 python-libgmail
tag 351602 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 351602 normal
thanks
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 01:36:43AM +0100, LT-P wrote:
> $ mount.gmailfs none /mnt -o [EMAIL PROTECTED],fsname=zOlRRa -p
> Gmail password:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/moun
tag 351520 + patch
thanks
Here is a patch fixing the option parsing problem.
Cheers,
--Seb
--- work/debian/gmailfs/0.7/gmailfs-0.7/mount.gmailfs 2006-02-04
11:40:59.0 -0800
+++ /usr/bin/mount.gmailfs 2006-02-05 12:17:44.0 -0800
@@ -40,19 +40,20 @@
options, args = pars
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 01:46:38AM +0100, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> Package: python-fuse
> Version: 2.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Importing fuse used to work but broke with my last upgrade. I suspect
> recompiling the package
> would be enough as I think
Package: python-libgmail
Version: 0.1.3.3-1
Severity: important
~ # python /usr/share/doc/python-libgmail/examples/sendmsg.py [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo bar
WARNING:root:Note: Using currently installed `libgmail` version.
Password:
Please wait, logging in...
Log in succe
Hi,
what is the state of the 0.7 package ? Do you still need a sponsor ?
Cheers,
--Seb
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: gmailfs
Version: 0.6-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to mount a gmailfs volume, I get:
12/05/05 15:00:54 ERROR OpenSSLProxy is missing. Can't use HTTPS proxy!
12/05/05 15:00:54 INFO Starting gmailfs in child process (PID 7646)
12/05
retitle 341301 Exception thrown when using EncFS in paranoia-mode, when
size(file) > 8192 bytes
thanks
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:28:57PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> It is indeed correct: only in paranoia mode and files larger that 8192
> bytes.
>
>
> Please let me know if there is any fur
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:14:17PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> I tried with a new FSname but ran into the same problem. However,
> after some more testing, I determined that the problem seems to be
> with the options for the encrypted volume. I had originally set it
> up with the 'pre-confi
tag 341300 + pending patch
thanks
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:49:21AM +1100, Richard Jones wrote:
> Definately take it out. In some sense it doesn't matter if its 600,
> as if you can read that file then you are likely to be able to modify
> the executables and capture the password anyway but the
tag 341301 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:29:11PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> While trying to copy a text file to the gmailfs mount point I got the
> following error:
> # cp abi /mnt
> No messages found
> No messages found
> No messages found
> No messages found
tag 340971 + moreinfo unreproducible
severity 340971 normal
thanks
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 03:10:21PM +0100, Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) wrote:
>/usr/bin/zonecheck uses /usr/bin/ruby but I have /usr/bin/ruby2, so
> it either misses a dependency or needs to update its #! line.
>
> -- System
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 12:26:12AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Hm. The new version of fuse may help you. I will ask you to test again
> when it's packaged.
sure thing. What's interesting is that I don't get the same behavior
when unmounting gmailfs (a FUSE FS as well), so I don't know if it's
rea
Package: encfs
Version: 1.2.4.1-2
Severity: normal
I mount my EncFS volume with:
~ # encfs /home/seb/enc /home/seb/clear
EncFS Password:
~ # mount | grep clear
encfs on /home/seb/clear type fuse
(rw,nosuid,nodev,default_permissions,user=seb)
At unmount time:
~ # fusermount -u /home/
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 06:56:24PM +1000, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> I presume you already know this, but according to
> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1350455&forum_id=388073
> this bug appears to have been fixed upstream. Will this filter through
> to Debian soon?
Yes, pretty s
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:33:42AM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
> Package: python-libgmail
> Version: 0.0.8+cvs20050208-2
> Followup-For: Bug #326708
>
> This bug was tagged "pending" for more than a month now. Current status?
>
> Current package cannot login at all, thus useless. I downloaded 0.1
Package: eyed3
Version: 0.6.8-1
Severity: normal
When I try to list tags for *any* of my mp3s, I systematically get the
following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/eyeD3", line 841, in ?
retval = main();
File "/usr/bin/eyeD3", line 836, in main
re
Package: python-eyed3
Version: 0.6.6-1
Severity: wishlist
Version 0.6.8 is available from http://eyed3.nicfit.net/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_C
reassign 327433 python-libgmail
tag 327433 + confirmed upstream
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: centericq
Version: 4.20.0-9
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Recent protocol changes in AIM broke login with centericq. This is now
fixed in CVS, per
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.network.centericq/3650
Maybe packaging the CVS head could be a good idea ? OTOH, I have no
idea how fa
Here is the backtrace I get with all the debugging symbols:
#0 0xb7d77344 in std::string::c_str () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5
#1 0x082939bd in MSN::decimalFromString ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at util.cpp:130
#2 0x08282e4d in MSN::NotificationServerConnection::handleIncomingData
(this=0x8334e
Package: centericq
Version: 4.20.0-6
Severity: important
centericq keeps segfaulting for me, about 2 or 3 times a day. THe
backtrace I get from the core file is a follows:
#0 0x082ee4c5 in std::basic_string,
std::allocator >::basic_string<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator > ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x082ee4
Package: xmule
Version: 1.10.0b-1
Severity: normal
Steps to reproduce:
Go to Main Prefs -> Connection Settings -> Port Settings
Check the "Enable UDP port" checkbox
Shutdown xmule
Start xmule
Notice the "Enable UDP port" checkbox is unchecked
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT pre
The problem described in bug #309259 actually stems from 2 things:
1) Gmail changed their message encoding. Quoting upstream, "The
fixQuotedPrintable() function fixed this problem".
2) Quoting Richard again "whenever and old file was changed the
old file which was now in the trash was being
; Distribution: unstable
> > Urgency: high
> > Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Changed-By: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Description:
> > python-libgmail - Python bindings to access Gmail accounts
> > Clos
Here is the confirmation that 0.4 only fixes this RC bug...
--Seb
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:29:53PM +1000, Richard Jones wrote:
> > With gmailfs 0.4, everything works fine, so I'm in the process of
> > backporting all your changes to 0.3-9 in Debian. Can you tell me if
> > you fixed *anything* e
Here is what gmailfs upstream author, Richard Jones, has to say about
fixes in 0.4:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:43:52AM +1000, Richard Jones wrote:
> For me, GmailFS appeared to work with just the MI_* fix, but then
> when you unmounted and remounted it had trouble retrieving the files
> previously
Package: gmailfs
Version: 0.3-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
As of May 2005, no new files can be created on gmailfs mounts. Any
attempt to save a file results in the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/gmailfs/gmailfs.py", line 31
Package: python-libgmail
Version: 0.0.8+cvs20050208-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: renders package unusable
The following patch is needed as of May 2005 (increment the constants
from MI_AUTHOREMAIL to MI_PHISHWARNING incremented by 1. So MI_SUBJECT
should become 15 and MI_A
Heya,
thanks for the note and the technical precisions; we'll be anxiously
awaiting your next release ;)
Cheers,
--Seb
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:53:19AM +1000, Richard Jones wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> I've been meaning to drop you an email for a couple of days but hadn't
> got around to it.
>
> Ther
tag 277310 + patch
tag 277310 - help
thanks
Hi Phil,
I believe the patch below should do; please let me know what you
think...
Cheers,
--Seb
--- /usr/share/doc/python-libgmail/examples/gmailpopd.py2005-02-08
12:47:09.0 -0800
+++ /tmp/gmailpopd.py 2005-05-09 19:12:01.64167018
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:39:10PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> > i warn you didn't have the time yet to test boot that,
> > so please have an second known good kernel handy.
> >
> > you can find the image at my work place:
> > http://charm.itp.tuwien.a
Package: eyeD3
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: wishlist
New upstream version (0.6.5) available.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-
Package: superkaramba
Version: 0.35-2
Severity: wishlist
New version 0.36 is available from
http://netdragon.sourceforge.net/ssuperkaramba.html.
Thanks a lot for your time,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i38
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:23:12PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> looks a bit similar to #289770,
> where CONFIG_PNP stole some ressources.
>
> rebuilt a kernel-image against latest source in unstable
> without it and without some ISA sound driver, whose
> compilation broke without it.
>
> i
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:39:54PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> please send in the output for /proc/ioports
> both for working 2.6.9 and non working 2.6.11
I figured I'd also send /proc/ioports for the working 2.6.9 with full
ACPI enabled (no acpi=... specified as a kernel option to my
bootlo
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:39:54PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> strange indeed, you already tried without disabling acpi?
You mean not specifying acpi=ht, and letting the full acpi stuff kick
in ?
Until now I tried all the following combinations:
acpi=ht
acpi=ht noapic
acpi=off noapic
I ju
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:47:06PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> please send in also working dmesg of kernel 2.6.9?
There you go...
### dmesg for kernel-image-2.6.9-686-smp version 2.6.9-3
Linux version 2.6.9-1-686-smp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian
1:3.3.5-2)) #1 SMP
I also need to add that I tried both 'acpi=off' and 'noapic', but got
the same result as before.
Regards,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel
Severity: important
I cannot use hdparm to set DMA on any of my disks; when I try, I get
the following message:
~ # hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
using_dma= 0 (off)
(Here I take /dev/hd
tag 303622 + pending
tag 303339 + pending
thanks
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:43:47PM +1000, Richard Jones wrote:
> So firstly it looks like I've been fairly boneheaded here. that
> value of 1000 in blocks = 1000*1024 should never have been there,
> that should have been calculated from quoteMbTota
Package: python-fuse
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
statfs.bavail is not defined by the python-fuse bindings, so df always
report 0% of disk usage (see bug #303339).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i3
Package: sim
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch, upstream
When the conversation window has focus, new messages from your party
don't show up automatically at the bottom of the window: the scrollbar
stays a little bit too high. This problem is described in the
following bug report:
http
tag 302100 + sarge
thanks
The (lib)?fuse* packages in sarge are already at 2.2.x, while the new
python-fuse and gmailfs packages that are compatible with them cannot
enter sarge yet; the arm autobuilder seems to still be catching up:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=python-fuse
http://bu
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:48:30PM -0800, gary ng wrote:
> While the dependency has changed back to fuse-utils
> 1.3-1, the calling parameter in mount.gmailfs seems to
> be changed to the newer version so it gives a unknown
> option with fuse-util 1.3-1(fusermount).
Works fine for me, with fuse-ut
Package: dvdrtools
Version: 0.1.5-4
Severity: wishlist
New upstream version avaialble (0.2.1) from
http://savannah.nongnu.org/downloads/dvdrtools/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-68
tag 297106 + pending
thanks
>From the description of the gmailfs package, it is pretty clear you
need FUSE support in your kernel:
To use GmailFS, please use fuse-source to compile appropriate modules
for your running kernel.
However, it is true that the manpage refers to the README for more
i
Dear Patrick,
this is fixed in 0.3-6: the patch for this particular issue had been
omitted in 0.3-5.
On a general note, please make sure you always mention the version of
the package you're using (and the version of its dependencies; hint:
reportbug can do that for you) before reporting a bug: "f
401 - 500 of 505 matches
Mail list logo
