Bug#687057: ITP: androidsdk-tools -- A subset of the android sdk tools

2012-10-01 Thread Stefan Handschuh
There you go: pkg-java/androidsdk-tools.git Best regards, Stefan Am Freitag, den 28.09.2012, 20:30 +0200 schrieb Jakub Adam: > Hi Stefan, > > I looked at your package and see that the java libraries you create will be > required by ADT Eclipse plugin once it is packaged. To make those J

Bug#687057: ITP: androidsdk-tools -- A subset of the android sdk tools

2012-10-04 Thread Stefan Handschuh
> On 1.10.2012 21:13, Stefan Handschuh wrote: > > There you go: > > > > pkg-java/androidsdk-tools.git > > I set up generation of OSGi metadata for all JARs we are currently building > (also packaged one new required by ADT). > > Package now uses ja

Bug#459219: Short update

2012-10-15 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Here is a short update: Jakub Adam has started to package the adt plugin for eclipse (see #687057 for reference). In the meantime, I packaged* dalvik, libandroidutils and libandroidcutils which are needed for zipalign and aapt. Aidl should be easy to package as it does not seem to have any extern

Bug#687057: ITP: androidsdk-tools -- A subset of the android sdk tools

2012-09-28 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Hi Jakub, thanks for the interest in this package. I do have a local git repository for the packaging and have just requested access to alioth to upload it directly to the debian packaging repository (pkg-java). As soon as I get access, I will upload the packaging repository such that others can e

Bug#459219: Additional tools

2012-09-04 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Hi, thanks for everyone's effort on this. AFAIK there are only a few more things to add in order to be able to create android packages in debian (please correct me, if I am wrong on that): - aapt (c++, "resource file compiler") - dx.jar (java, creates dalvik bytecode) - sdklib.jar (java, creates

Bug#459219: Additional tools

2012-09-06 Thread Stefan Handschuh
, 02:01 +0200 schrieb Stefan Handschuh: > Hi, > > thanks for everyone's effort on this. > > AFAIK there are only a few more things to add in order to be able to > create android packages in debian (please correct me, if I am wrong on > that): > - aapt (c++, "r

Bug#687057: ITP: androidsdk-tools -- A subset of the android sdk tools

2012-09-08 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefan Handschuh * Package name: androidsdk-tools Version : 14 Upstream Author : The Android Open Source Project * URL : https://android.googlesource.com/platform/sdk * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Java

Bug#687057: ITP: androidsdk-tools -- A subset of the android sdk tools

2012-09-09 Thread Stefan Handschuh
re missing. Of course, one does not have to keep the project structure that google intended. Am Sonntag, den 09.09.2012, 09:21 +0400 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > On Sep 9, 2012, at 3:34 AM, Stefan Handschuh > wrote: > > > The sdk tools are containing *some* o

Bug#687057: ITP: androidsdk-tools -- A subset of the android sdk tools

2012-09-11 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Here is the initial package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/androidsdk-tools -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#459219: Additional tools

2012-09-11 Thread Stefan Handschuh
For the sdklib, the ITP bug is #687057. A package (which is referenced there) has been uploaded to mentors, too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#672549: ITP: libballoontip-java -- Balloon Tips for Java

2012-05-11 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefan Handschuh * Package name: libballoontip-java Version : 1.2.1 Upstream Author : Bernhard Pauler , Tim Molderez * URL : http://java.net/projects/balloontip * License : BSD Programming Lang: Java Description

Bug#672549: ITP: libballoontip-java -- Balloon Tips for Java

2012-05-13 Thread Stefan Handschuh
An initial package has been updated to mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libballoontip-java Am Samstag, den 12.05.2012, 00:28 +0200 schrieb Stefan Handschuh: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Stefan Handschuh > > * Package name: lib

Bug#672817: RFS: libballoontip-java/1.2.1-1 [ITP #672549] -- Balloon Tips for Java

2012-05-13 Thread Stefan Handschuh
lowing URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libballoontip-java Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libb/libballoontip-java/libballoontip-java_1.2.1-1.dsc Best regards, Stefan Handschuh sig

Bug#636868: lxpanel: Battery monitor plugin always display 100% of capacity

2012-03-05 Thread Stefan Handschuh
The patch works for me as well (applied to 0.5.8-2). Thanks a lot. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#586352: lxpanel: battery monitor gives battery low warning no matter

2012-03-05 Thread Stefan Handschuh
As I had the same issue (on different hardware) and it seems as the value at /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/current_now contains a negative values which is interpreted as 0. The attached simple patch worked fine for me. --- lxpanel-0.5.8.orig/src/plugins/batt/batt_sys.c +++ lxpanel-0.5.8/src/plugins

Bug#829267: xul-ext-adblock-plus: no ui in jessie firefox-esr

2016-07-01 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Package: xul-ext-adblock-plus Version: 2.6.6+dfsg-1 With the introduction of firefox-esr in debian jessie, the adblock-plus plugin provided in the debian repositories seems to have lost its user interface. The plugin itself however seems to be working properly. The firefox-menu entries are missing

Bug#687057: androidsdk-tools progress

2013-04-09 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Hi Jakub, > The chown did not work (no permissions), so I will try to contact the debian > staff. Its just a small thing, but as you are basically doing all the work, I > think its more appropriate this way. the message has been sent but no response so far. > > >There are some issues w.r.t. the

Bug#687057: androidsdk-tools progress

2013-03-31 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Hi Jakub, thanks for your work and numerous uploads to the git repository. As you are doing the main work with this package, I wanted to ask if its ok for you if the git repository is "owned" by you (i.e. change the owner that is visible in gitweb). > The package in its current state builds succ

Bug#687057: androidsdk-tools progress

2013-04-01 Thread Stefan Handschuh
Hi Jakub, On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:57:24PM +0200, Jakub Adam wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On 1.4.2013 00:40, Stefan Handschuh wrote: > >I wanted to ask if its ok for you if the > >git repository is "owned" by you (i.e. change the owner that is visible in > >

Bug#687057: androidsdk-tools progress

2013-06-02 Thread Stefan Handschuh
t; finally I've had time to make some progress with androidsdk-tools > > On 9.4.2013 23:23, Stefan Handschuh wrote: > >The one thing that has to be changed is the copyright year statement for the > >files in > > swtmenubar > >"2011" to "2011-2012&