ur elders please too, they use, like,
would like to continue to use system V init, and
not be goaded into being corralled into your
new cattle pen.
-Original Message-
From: James Rhodes
To: Thilos Rich ; 727708 <727...@bugs.debian.org>
Sent: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 2:00 am
Subject
>Plus sysvinit support isn't
>forever, since eventually it will be deprecated as more and more parts
>of the system drop support for it.
Why? There is nothing wrong with sysv init for most of us.
Why is there insistance (or seemingly triumphal predictions)
that those of us who are happy with the s
Init should be simple, secure, and get out of the way. It should not take over
the system. We should not be forced to use an init that does.
This man said it best:
wizardofbits.tumblr.com/post/45232318557/systemd-more-like-shit-stemd
"
Init has one other job, which is to keep the process tables
3 matches
Mail list logo
