Hello,
I forwarded this to the scponly mailinglist.
Tom
Vincent Bernat wrote:
Package: scponly
Version: 4.6-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi !
Using rsync with --bwlimit option is rejected by scponly. Here is a
patch that adds support for this option. This patch also includes
patch from b
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Package: scponly
Version: 4.8-1
Severity: grave
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of scponly_4.8-1 on rem by sbuild/mipsel 99.999
Build started at 20090709-0831
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-D
Hi,
I'll be uploading scponly-4.8 shortly, yet rsync
support is still disabled. I have to look into why
the security team disabled it in the first place.
I'm working on it...
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Hello,
yes, this is because setup_chroot.sh is generated by
automake out of setup_chroot.sh.in and this way tries
to be platform independent. It's not a bug, it's a
feature :-)
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi Steffen,
On 07.09.2007, at 15:14, Steffen Moeller wrote:
Package: gsoap
Version: 2.7.9b-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi Thomas, are you aware of version ...k to be out?
Thanks, I'll be packaging the new version soon.
Tom
Kind regards
Steffen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
On 07.09.2007, at 11:01, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 07.09.2007, 10:59 +0200 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Joachim Breitner:
I think mounting the file system no-exec covers that. IIRC,
Subversion directly executes the hook scripts, and this will
fail in
that case.
Then this
On 02.09.2007, at 18:29, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Joachim Breitner:
This is an unfortunate interaction between scponly and
Subversion, but
not a real bug in any of the programs. The same problem arises
when a
scponly-restricted user uploads any form of executable contents.
CGI
scripts
Hi,
On 18.07.2007, at 00:41, Michael Prokop wrote:
Hi,
I just experienced and verified that problem on my own, the 'error
looking up user group' problem is still present and prevents login
and scp actions from clients using WinSCP.
Whereas it worked fine using Debian sarge (version 4.0-1sarge
Hi Joachim,
On 10.08.2007, at 19:54, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Package: scponly
Version: 4.6-1
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi Thomas Wana,
messing around with some friends here, I tried to access his computer
with only a scponly protected account. I
It seems as if upstream fixed the issue:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/commits/98698
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the problem is a bogus detection of Tru64.
>
> Patch:
>
Thanks, I'm going to incorporate this in the next release.
Tom
> --- gsoap-2.7.9b/soapcpp2/stdsoap2.h 2006-12-28 03:28:05.0 +0100
> +++ gsoap-2.7.9b.hacked/soapcpp2/stdsoap2.h 2007-03-11 21:02:38
Hi,
I'm going to upload a new package with updated config.guess
and config.sub files in the next hours; can you check if the
problem persists?
Thanks,
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm sorry, due to the lack of access to an alpha machine I can't sort
this out on my own. I'd just need to know what alpha #defines during
a build (#ifdef ALPHA ...) and if and where (include-file) it has a
struct hostent_data.
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Package: scponly
Version: 4.6-1
scponly should be built with --enable-svnserv-compat (sic) for svnserve
to work with scponly.
Tom
--
Thomas Wana eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX Administrator, DeveloperTel.: (+43 1) 4277-14057
Vienna University Computer Center
Hi!
Dan Christensen wrote:
> Maybe Debian can include the patch?
>
> Dan
I'd like to wait for upstream to include the patch (or release
a new version of scponly). Since scponly 4.6 is already a year
old, I expect a new version to become available soon.
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi!
Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> Package: gsoap
> Version: 2.7.6d-1
> Severity: important
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd very much like if you could upload a new version of gSOAP to the
> archive. Version 2.7.9a is available and stable.
>
> I'v
Hi,
Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Just like to bring bug #350964 back to the limelight. Briefly recapping
>
> Feb 2, I created the bug report
> Feb 6, unstable fixed by Thomas
> Feb 13 DSA 969-1 released
> Feb 15 I questioned if sarge fixed, Thomas, Joey and Steve respond/discuss.
>
> At the moment it
Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:01:51PM +1100, Geoff Crompton wrote:
>
>
>>This bug has been closed for unstable (see bug 350964) with the 4.6
>>upload, but will it be fixed for sarge?
>
>
> Please see DSA-969-1 released two days ago:
>
> http://www.us.debian.org/security/
Hi,
Geoff Crompton wrote:
This bug has been closed for unstable (see bug 350964) with the 4.6
upload, but will it be fixed for sarge?
Joey: I sent you a patch for that, but it seems you didn't
include this in scponly-4.0sarge1. We also had no discussion
about wether to include it or not. Plea
Hi,
I forwarded the bug info to the security team. No word yet.
Your patch for stable seems fine, but in fact there is another
security hole in scponly where there is no backported patch
for 4.0 yet. I wrote the scponly author about this, again,
no reply.
Tom
Max Vozeler wrote:
> This is CVE-200
ls are only one way (from soapC.c/pp to
stdsoap2.c/pp and not back). Users reported these link problems when
libgsoap included dom.c/pp.
I'm not sure why the link error occurs, because soap_ssl_client_context
isn't defined in dom.c
Cheers,
- Robert
On Nov 23, 2005, at 2:51 PM
scponly asks the user upon installation if he/she wants to set
the binary suid root (via debconf). You probably set debconf's
threshold too high or missed the question.
Tom
john duda wrote:
> Package: scponly
> Version: 4.0-1
>
> attempts to log in with scponlyc as the shell will fail with a
> "
TED]>
Resent-Cc: Thomas Wana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#337863: FTBFS (alpha): storage size of 'ht_data' isn't
known
Reply-To: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gsoap
Version: 2.7.6c-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to bui
Ben Rasmussen wrote:
Hi Tom,
I am truly an idiot. After my last message I dug around a little more
and realized that I had my /home partition mounted noexec.
So, this is not a bug at all. I am really sorry for wasting your time
with this.
Thanks,
Ben
OK no problem, thanks for resolving it yoursel
Ben Rasmussen wrote:
> Package: scponly
> Severity: important
>
> When using scponlyc, the connection is closed immediately following
> successful authentication. This is scponly 4.0-1 on a pure-sarge
> machine. setup-chroot.sh was used to create the user & chroot. If
> user's shell is set to /u
Rolf Leggewie wrote:
Package: scponly
Severity: minor
There is a minor spelling mistake in the scponly man page. On line 26 it
says "each of which could could be set up". I think you see the
redundancy.
Thanks, thats indeed a redundancy :)
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[...]
Er, no.
xen 1.2 is already in unstable.
Plus, I've been finishing up the xen 2.0 debs. I *just* got done rebasing my
2.0.3 debs against 2.0.4(which was just released today).
Uh, my excuses for that. Somehow I was checking for "*xen*" on both
packages.deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xen
Version : 2.0.4
Upstream Author : University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/
* License : GPL / BSD license
D
Package: popularity-contest
Version: 1.26
Severity: minor
Hi,
the FAQ states:
Q) What are the privacy consideration for popularity-contest ?
A) Each popularity-contest host is identified by a random 128bit uuid
(MY_HOSTID in /etc/popularity-contest). This uuid is used to track
submission
Tags: patch
The following patch fixes the problem.
Tom
--- debian/libhttpfetcher-dev.files.orig 2005-01-17 21:59:05.0
+0100
+++ debian/libhttpfetcher-dev.files2005-01-17 21:57:25.0 +0100
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
usr/share/doc/*
usr/lib/lib*.a
usr/share/man/man3/*
+usr/lib/lib*.
Hi,
> ERROR: module is read only
quick question, are the permissions correct on the other end?
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31 matches
Mail list logo