Bug#766334: BrowseAllow all gets into cups-browsed.conf by default resulting in no remote printers

2014-10-30 Thread Tim Waugh
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 11:10 +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > The "Browse..." directive implementation was done by Tim Waugh as part > of the legacy CUPS broadcasting/browsing support. I do not know the > exact details, especially not of combinations of various lines. I only >

Bug#181378: grep hanging with -Fw and an empty pattern

2005-09-29 Thread Tim Waugh
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:26:27PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote: > Changing the 'while (1)' loop to a 'while (len)' loop in search.c fix this > issue. However, I don't know if this is correct or optimal (I don't know > what should happen if we enter the loop with len>0 and len is then > decrease

Bug#323169: filterdiff: ability to strip non-diff stuff

2005-08-15 Thread Tim Waugh
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:02:20AM +0200, Michael Fedrowitz wrote: > For now there's a simple workaround: just do filterdiff |filterdiff -x > (or the other way round). Yes, that's how this is meant to work. Tim. */ pgpfwguhgNhVI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#160849: Deprecating mv's --reply={yes,no,query} option

2005-06-30 Thread Tim Waugh
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:37:35AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > > The second option that I recommend is to deprecate this option > > entirely and remove it from the code base. The longer it remains the > > harder it will be to change to better behavior late

Bug#160849: Deprecating mv's --reply={yes,no,query} option

2005-06-30 Thread Tim Waugh
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:16:19AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > [ Presuming you meant `mv -i'. ] > Just use mv's -f option -- it's equivalent to --reply=yes. > > If you really did mean `rm -i', then I admit that rm's > -f option isn't precisely the same as `turn off -i', but > it's pretty close.

Bug#308316: [Fwd: Bug#308316: patchutils: FTBFS on the Hurd]

2005-06-13 Thread Tim Waugh
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 06:51:44PM +0200, Michael Fedrowitz wrote: > Btw. are there any plans for a new release in the foreseeable future? I just released 0.2.31. The code is changed in that area, and I think it should be fine for what you want now. Tim. */ pgpY6YvNiOVEU.pgp Description: PGP

Bug#305828: [Fwd: Bug#305828: patchutils: rediff doesn't like file diff removal in patches]

2005-05-11 Thread Tim Waugh
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:16:05PM +0200, Michael Fedrowitz wrote: > forwarded 305828 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks I've added a testcase for this to CVS, but don't have a fix. Tim. */ pgpSNnayS5hXf.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#306869: [Fwd: Bug#306869: patchutils: splitdiff calls lsdiff with wrong args]

2005-05-11 Thread Tim Waugh
Thanks, applied. Tim. */ pgpnyR40xrdYp.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#264439: [Fwd: Bug#264439: filterdiff could read exclusions or inclusions from a file]

2005-05-11 Thread Tim Waugh
Added to the TODO list, but I don't know when I'll get to it. Patches welcome. :-) Tim. */ pgpfopTUqJVv5.pgp Description: PGP signature