Bug#553514: node js sponsor

2010-02-08 Thread Todd Troxell
Hello Jérémy -- did you ever get a sponsor for this? If not I'd be glad to help here-- quite interested in seeing this in Debian. Cheers, -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#553514: node js sponsor

2010-02-08 Thread Todd Troxell
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 04:31:06AM +, Todd Troxell wrote: > Hello Jérémy -- did you ever get a sponsor for this? If not I'd be glad to > help here-- quite interested in seeing this in Debian. Nevermind, glad to see this in NEW :) -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat si

Bug#578958: flvtool2: flv/stream.rb: wrong test for audio flags

2010-04-25 Thread Todd Troxell
the following program, with > input.flv a valid FLV file containing audio tags: Thanks for your recent patches, Nicolas. I have integrated them and also asked upstream author to include these. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#552062: webgui depends on libcss-minifier-xs-perl

2009-10-22 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: webgui Version: 7.7.22-1 Severity: important When I run wg-testEnvironment it tells me that I need to install libcss-minifier-xs-perl. This is on clean sid install with current packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unsta

Bug#552063: webgui: include libjavascript-minifier-xs-perl in depends

2009-10-22 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: webgui Version: 7.7.22-1 Severity: important I also found that webgui depends on libjavascript-minifier-xs-perl and this should be listed in the package deps. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i3

Bug#668480: [PATCH] yamdi: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0

2012-04-12 Thread Todd Troxell
it a/debian/compat b/debian/compat > index 7ed6ff8..ec63514 100644 > --- a/debian/compat > +++ b/debian/compat > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -5 > +9 > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index c05bf0d..6d65928 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -2,

Bug#442194: RFP: thinkfinger -- SGS Thompson Microelectronics fingerprint reader utilities

2007-09-13 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: thinkfinger Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Timo Hoenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://thinkfinger.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : S

Bug#442763: wmxres: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-09-18 Thread Todd Troxell
make: *** [install] Error 2 > > ** > Build finished at 20070905-2157 > END OF BUILD NO 2 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] I am having trouble reproducing this bug. When I run "fake

Bug#442763: wmxres: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-09-20 Thread Todd Troxell
lling the bugs. The best thing would be > to ask lucas how he builds the packages. > > But I guess two calls of "debuild" should do the job. The clean, build, > install, clean, build, install. ;-) > (the important thing is here the second clean.. we want to ensure with this > procedure that the clean target of the debs is okay Do you know how I can reproduce this bug? I tried so far: -fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage (2x) -debuild (2x) -fakeroot debian/rules binary, clean, binary ,clean Thanks, -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#442763: wmxres: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-09-25 Thread Todd Troxell
Hi Lucas, On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:32:06AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 20/09/07 at 13:44 -0500, Todd Troxell wrote: > > Hi Lucas, > > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:09:21AM +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 08:00:12 sch

Bug#373771: m-a aptitude preference

2007-11-19 Thread Todd Troxell
thing like -q=100 should make it work like apt. Cheers, -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#432113: wmxres: not a leaf section in menu entry.

2007-07-08 Thread Todd Troxell
ardware > System/Monitoring > etc. > > I would suggest System/Hardware, but I am not entirely sure wmxres does. Wmxres is just a tiny applet for switching screen resolution. I've moved it to Applications/System/Hardware for now. Thanks :) -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#446727: RFP: mysql-proxy -- a mysql proxy for high availability, load balancing and query modification

2007-10-15 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mysql-proxy Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Author : Jan Kneschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/MySQL_Proxy * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : a mysql proxy for high avai

Bug#439332: ITP: flvtool2 -- a manipulation tool for flash video files

2007-08-24 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Todd Troxell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: flvtool2 Version : 1.0.6 Upstream Author : Norman Timmler * URL : http://www.inlet-media.de/flvtool2 * License : GPL Programming Lang: Ruby Description

Bug#439332: Acknowledgement (ITP: flvtool2 -- a manipulation tool for flash video files)

2007-08-24 Thread Todd Troxell
One correction: This software is BSD license, not GPL. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#465986: wmxres: missing build-dependency: libxext-devr

2008-02-15 Thread Todd Troxell
Hi Stefan, On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:59:24PM +0100, Stefan Ebner wrote: > Package: wmxres > Version: 1.2-9 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch > > It needs libxext-dev to build correctly. Thanks, appl

Bug#442763: wmxres: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-09-29 Thread Todd Troxell
hanks for looking at this. I have uploaded a patched version. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#288862: logtail: Logtail (not logcheck) needs perl 5.8

2009-08-22 Thread Todd Troxell
ning logtail on PDAs?) IMO it's ok to ditch this :) -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#919163: O: wmxres -- dock application to select your display mode among those possible

2019-01-13 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am orphaning the wmxres package as I switch to retirement status. The package description is: wmxres is a tiny dockable application that comes in handy when you want a specific X mode. Modes can be scrolled through until the desired one is active.

Bug#919164: O: yamdi -- a utility for adding metadata to flash video files

2019-01-13 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am orphaning the yamdi package as I switch to retirement status. The package description is: yamdi is a fast console application for adding various metadata to flv files. The program buffers its input file, rather than loading into memory in its entirety.

Bug#931930: firmware-misc-nonfree: Please, include i915/icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin

2020-01-31 Thread Todd Troxell
Is there a reason why it's not included? I can make a patch and try it...

Bug#352339: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#352339: sorry

2006-02-13 Thread Todd Troxell
files.. Sure that's not masked too? -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#353962: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#353962: integrate courier file in logcheck-database

2006-02-24 Thread Todd Troxell
rules for > > courier are incorrect? > > it's a wishlist bug, no? that's what they are for. > > courier already has its own rule files. thus it only makes sense. Ahh ok. Makes sense to pool our rules. At first I thought you were suggesting that we force a random sub

Bug#355949: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#355949: run-parts vs. find

2006-03-28 Thread Todd Troxell
f users depending on the old functionality, so I'm going to support run-parts anyway. It will also need to be documented that rule file names can only contain letters, numbers, underscores, and hyphens. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#241526: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#241526: logcheck: Logcheck ignoring by number of occurrences

2006-01-06 Thread Todd Troxell
gs like this in post-processing. I've added a note to the IdeaPool[0] about this. [0] http://wiki.logcheck.org/index.cgi/IdeaPool -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343631: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#343631: logcheck-database: sudo: Ignore jobs from vc too?

2006-01-10 Thread Todd Troxell
intiion is: "A patch or some other easy procedure for fixing the bug is included in the bug logs. If there's a patch, but it doesn't resolve the bug adequately or causes some other problems, this tag should not be used." Cheers, -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat --

Bug#307585: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#307585: ssh summaries for logcheck: a helper script

2005-12-31 Thread Todd Troxell
2.144 > User names tried: > 0002593w (1), 127 (1), 16 (1), 1a4 (1), 1dd (1), 22b (1), 2a (1), > 4ct (1), 511 (1), 561 (1), 587 (1), 72 (2), 75 (1), 9ia (1), > Aaron (2), Aba (2), Abel (2), Account (1), Barrera (1), Castro (1), > (cut...) > > Inverse mapping failures: 44 >

Bug#344553: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file

2005-12-31 Thread Todd Troxell
LE > + . $CONFFILE > +else > +error "Config file $CONFFILE not exists or readable" > fi The patch is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Markus. Your change will be in the next release. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#344620: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344620: ignore.server.d/postfix: 'address not listed for hostname' rule

2005-12-31 Thread Todd Troxell
:0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: warning: > ([0-9a-f.:]{3,39})+: address not listed for hostname [^[:space:]]+$ Thanks, Karl! I've made this change in CVS. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344553: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file

2006-01-01 Thread Todd Troxell
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 02:47:57PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 07:16:24AM -0500, Todd Troxell wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:21:53PM +0200, Markus Peuhkuri wrote: > > > Package: logcheck > > > Version: 1.2.42 > > &g

Bug#344553: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file

2006-01-02 Thread Todd Troxell
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 08:15:16PM +0200, Markus Peuhkuri wrote: > Todd Troxell wrote: > > I see your point. The config is not really essential. > > > > What do you think about this: > > > > if [ -f $CONFFILE -a -r $CONFFILE]; then > > The problem is sti

Bug#344716: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344716: logcheck: [INTL:nl] New Dutch po-debconf translation

2006-01-02 Thread Todd Troxell
ch team. > Please add it to your next package revision, it should be inserted in > your package build-tree as debian/po/nl.po, TIA. > > Feel free to mail me if this file needs updating at some future date. Thanks, Frans. I've added this file to CVS, and it will be included

Bug#371053: racoon: Please compile --with-libpam [patch]

2006-06-06 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: racoon Severity: wishlist Tags: patch It would be nice to have pam support. Cheers, -Todd -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.21-40.EL Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) diff -ru ipsec-tools-0.6.5-orig/debian/rules ipse

Bug#365121: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#365121: logcheck: Fails to ignore certain pattern

2006-05-10 Thread Todd Troxell
ration error. Please re-open this bug if you find otherwise. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#356644: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#356644: logcheck: "Lines skipped, " "Patterns to ignore, " "Ignored lines" are always zero

2006-05-10 Thread Todd Troxell
but I've > noticed that, in each logcheck report, the lines "Lines skipped," "Patterns > to ignore," and > "Ignored lines" are always "0". Maybe I'm misunderstanding the meaning of > those, but it doesn't make sense to me. Are

Bug#350242: Processed: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#350242: logcheck: does not handle filenames with dots in them (e.g. cyrus2.2)

2006-04-10 Thread Todd Troxell
hat kind of filename pattern would logcheck like run-parts to > validate against? We got a report on a user unable to use periods in a rule file. Is this something run-parts could support? Cheers, -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Bug#357841: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#357841: false positives for some lines longer than 503 characters

2006-04-10 Thread Todd Troxell
, > processed='destination(df_debug)=28' > > > > unfortunately the line length is not the only criteria. lines containing > only numbers and letters which are longer than 503 characters seem to be > ignored if they match a regex. I have tested this with a couple of versions of logcheck and I'm unable to reproduce. It is worth nothing that the string caught above contains substrings that would trigger a violation, and therefore needs a line in violations.ignore.d as well. I suspect this is a configuration issue. Please let me know your findings. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377618: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#377618: logcheck: Please do not abuse debconf

2006-07-25 Thread Todd Troxell
heck/changes note should stick around for backporting reasons, as maks mentioned. Any other opinions? -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#291395: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#291395: logcheck-database: Rules dirs are setuid, they should be setgid

2005-01-20 Thread Todd Troxell
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:20:29AM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote: > I just installed 1.2.33, and it made my rules dirs setuid, not setgid... Oops, good catch. I'll get this uploaded shortly. Cheers, -Todd > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 3.1 > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (900, '

Bug#342736: gthumb: --import should disable import button while initializing

2005-12-09 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: gthumb Severity: minor If "import" is clicked during the "initialization" phase, only some of the pictures will be imported. If there are a lot of pictures, this phase takes a while, so users will click "import" if it's active. I'd suggest either disabling it during initialzation or mak

Bug#340226: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#340226: logcheck does not succeessfully filter postfix/policy-spf or amavis

2005-11-21 Thread Todd Troxell
exes in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d files which also do > not filter as they are supposed to. However, the postfix/policy-spf and > amavis are the most problematic. I was unable to reproduce this. I dropped your noise file into my /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ and ran it through your samp

Bug#340226: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#340226: logcheck does not succeessfully filter postfix/policy-spf or amavis

2005-11-22 Thread Todd Troxell
629 2005-05-30 07:21 spamd -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#340226: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#340226: logcheck does not succeessfully filter postfix/policy-spf or amavis

2005-11-22 Thread Todd Troxell
glad it works. Logcheck should probably warn on unreadable rulefiles... I retitled this bug. -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312393: logcheck: Some more information that might help

2005-10-22 Thread Todd Troxell
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:34:19PM -0400, Todd Troxell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:10:57PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > On Thursday 06 Oct 2005 02:13, Todd Troxell wrote: > > > How does this make it clear that adduser is not the culprit? > > > > &

Bug#329688: Bug#312393: logcheck: Some more information that might help

2005-10-26 Thread Todd Troxell
, home=/var/lib/logcheck, shell=/bin/false > > Sep 22 22:37:30 laptop chage[19561]: changed password expiry for logcheck > > thanks for your feedback. I believe this is fixed in .42 which has entered unstable. Confirm? -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#336265: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#336265: logrotate detection, possible attack not checked by logcheck

2005-10-29 Thread Todd Troxell
and be in the clear. I think what we really need is something to handle multiple rotated files, and in that case, it might be better to extend logtail instead. Cheers, -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312393: logcheck: Some more information that might help

2005-10-05 Thread Todd Troxell
should hunt for the bug. How does this make it clear that adduser is not the culprit? Obviously there is some difference between the installation if it now works. Can you still reproduce the breakage? -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Bug#312393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312393: logcheck: Some more information that might help

2005-10-15 Thread Todd Troxell
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:10:57PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Thursday 06 Oct 2005 02:13, Todd Troxell wrote: > > How does this make it clear that adduser is not the culprit? > > > > If adduser was to be the culprit, it should have broken the installation of &

Bug#306913: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#306913: logcheck: please allow @ in "hostname" part of logs

2005-10-15 Thread Todd Troxell
OTECTED]:alnum: > \]-\]\+/" >> $i.new; done > > $ egrep -vf ../logcheck/rulefiles/linux/TEST_ignore.d.server/postfix.new > postfix.log | egrep > -vf ../logcheck/rulefiles/linux/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix > $ > > They work just as well as the old rules, they just match the additional > '@'.. > > However, if you'd rather wait for macro support, that's fine. Macros are on the way: http://wiki.logcheck.org/index.cgi/LogcheckTemplateSystem :) -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#330220: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#330220: logcheck: Fails to obtain lockfile

2005-10-15 Thread Todd Troxell
changing the lock line(595) to somehting like: lockfile-create --retry 1 $LOCKFILE >> /tmp/logcheck_error 2>&1 Cheers, -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295560: more info

2005-09-21 Thread Todd Troxell
There was a failed attempt at this: The reversion is here http://cvs.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/logcheck/src/logcheck.diff?r1=1.109&r2=1.110&cvsroot=logcheck -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of &quo

Bug#302379: use dh_installlogcheck in logcheck-database instead?

2005-09-21 Thread Todd Troxell
Perhaps we do not need to have logcheck user in base if we install our own rules with dh_installlogcheck. Related: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/2005-September/002096.html -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Bug#327100: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#327100: bind rules does not handle ipv6 correctly

2005-09-21 Thread Todd Troxell
:space:]]+, IN, SOA\) from \[[\.0-9]+\]\.[0-9]+$ > +^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: rcvd > NOTIFY\([^[:space:]]+, IN, SOA\) from \[[0-9a-f.:]+\]\.[0-9]+$ > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: late CNAME in answer > section for [^[:space:]]+$ &g

Bug#327114: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#327114: postfix rules does not work with ipv6

2005-09-21 Thread Todd Troxell
permitted sender$ > +^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/policy-spf\[[0-9]+\]: : SPF pass: > smtp_comment=.*: [.[:alnum:]]+ MX [.[:alnum:]]+ A [0-9a-f.:]+, > header_comment=[.[:alnum:]+: domain of [%[:punct:][:alnum:[EMAIL > PROTECTED]:alnum:]]+ designates [0-9a-f.:]{3,39}

Bug#295560: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#295560: logcheck: Please include filename when reporting "invalid regular expression"

2005-02-17 Thread Todd Troxell
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:15:24AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > What I suggest is that for each egrep over the filter files, you check > whether the return value is 2, and if yes send a message to stderr: > > "logcheck found an invalid regular expression in file $file" > > (ideally with the temp

Bug#296214: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#296214: logcheck-database: make real http links in copyright

2005-02-20 Thread Todd Troxell
tag 296214 pending thanks On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 03:03:40AM +0100, Martin Lohmeier wrote: > can you change > lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200102/msg01235.html > to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200102/msg01235.html > in the copyright file? > That would

Bug#299445: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#299445: logcheck: invalid regulart expression

2005-03-14 Thread Todd Troxell
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:14:25AM +0100, Slaanesh wrote: > Package: logcheck > Version: 1.2.35 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Command /usr/sbin/logcheck dies with following error message: > grep: invalid regular expression Yeah, we definitely need more info on th

Bug#307585: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#307585: ssh: background noise rules

2005-05-04 Thread Todd Troxell
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:55:32PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > tags 307585 wontfix > stop > > On Wed, 04 May 2005, Anand Kumria wrote: > > > Package: logcheck > > Version: 1.2.39 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Hi, > > > > With more and more Internet background radiation, entries like the

Bug#304978: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#304978: Failed to get lockfile: /var/lock/logcheck.lock

2005-04-18 Thread Todd Troxell
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:31:14AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > todd what do you think about that dir? > sounds ok for me, > but i don't get why you paranoid guy show your logcheck run > to world, why not use 750 above?? It sounds good to me. I think 755 is fine. nb: I've just tested this

Bug#302379: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#302379: dh_installlogcheck installs files as root:root 644, not root:logcheck 640

2005-04-18 Thread Todd Troxell
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:49:46PM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote: > Todd Troxell wrote: > > > >The deal with this is that we can't use gid logcheck in > >dh_installlogcheck because the logcheck user doesn't exist until > >logcheck gets installed. > > >

Bug#289801: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#289801: Logtail should output error messages to stderr, not stdout

2005-01-10 Thread Todd Troxell
Hi Peter On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 04:03:22PM +1100, Peter Hawkins wrote: > Logtail should not output error messages to standard output, since this > violates the principle of least surprise. Agreed! I'll get a patch in shortly. > In particular, my application was broken by the semantics of logt

Bug#270455: macros for logcheck.logfiles

2005-01-15 Thread Todd Troxell
Ok, I found a simple way to do this. This will be post-sarge. -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat`. `'

Bug#289025: debmirror news file

2005-02-03 Thread Todd Troxell
I ran into similar breakage, and I agree that this should happen by default. I also agree that a NEWS file is in order. I don't think it is release critical that it contains all changes since woody. I've attached a simple news file. Be sure to change the (version) part if you're going to use i

Bug#293513: init file patch

2005-02-05 Thread Todd Troxell
Attached is a working patch to the current anon-proxy.init Cheers, -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat`. `'

Bug#293513: init file patch

2005-02-05 Thread Todd Troxell
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:23:09PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > I guess you really want to use pidfiles, and not go (just) by name. I'd like it to do that too. Unfortunately the daemon forks from it's main process and so start-stop-daemon -m does not work. I patched proxytest.cpp to write a p

Bug#293513: init file patch

2005-02-06 Thread Todd Troxell
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:25:05AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > The solution then is to make a directory below var/run/ and run the > daemon as a dedicated user (or daemon). for instance > var/run/anon-proxy/foo.pid A patch to do this is attached. Cheers, -- [ Todd J. Troxell

Bug#293513: init file patch

2005-02-06 Thread Todd Troxell
Oops. Clean version attached. -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat`. `' `-

Bug#301175: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#301175: logcheck-databas: SSH rules for debug level

2005-03-24 Thread Todd Troxell
Hi Jari, On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:17:39AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > If it were possible, please add rules to ignore SSH debug level messages > like these: > > Mar 22 18:59:29 cante sshd[5673]: debug2: channel 4: rcvd adjust 66020 > Mar 22 18:59:34 cante sshd[5673]: debug2: channel 4: windo

Bug#301415: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#301415: PATCH: Updated 'udev' ignore pattern

2005-03-27 Thread Todd Troxell
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 11:32:06AM -0800, Matt Brubeck wrote: > This patch updates ignore.d.workstation/udev to properly ignore > creation/removal of devices in subdirectories (e.g. /dev/usb/lp0). Applied. Thanks, Matt! -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. S

Bug#302379: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#302379: dh_installlogcheck installs files as root:root 644, not root:logcheck 640

2005-03-31 Thread Todd Troxell
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:54:34AM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote: > Package: logcheck > Version: 1.2.35 > Severity: normal > > I reported a bug on a couple clamav packages (302253, 302254) which > noted that in Sarge, logcheck files are supposed to be root:logcheck > 640, not root:root 644. The clama

Bug#302689: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#302689: Patch for logcheck handling egrep return incorrectly

2005-04-02 Thread Todd Troxell
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 05:46:42PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Package: logcheck > Version: 1.2.36 > Followup-For: Bug #302689 > > > Logcheck will produce spurious errors at the moment, because egrep > returns 2 on error but 1 if no lines are returned. A patch is attached > to fix this. > >

Bug#312393: logcheck: error creating lockfile.lock

2005-09-01 Thread Todd Troxell
tag 312393 moreinfo thanks My guess on this is that the postinst script got interrupted. Is anyone able to reproduce this? -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rap

Bug#312393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312393: logcheck: The bug looks to be in the postinst script

2005-09-06 Thread Todd Troxell
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:12:59AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Package: logcheck > Version: 1.2.41 > Followup-For: Bug #312393 > > > This is an important bug, infact it should be a grave bug. > logcheck doesn't get installed properly. The postrm scripts are designed > to add the logcheck us

Bug#312393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312393: logcheck: Some more information that might help

2005-09-06 Thread Todd Troxell
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:21:23AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Error 3: > This error was during installation > > Setting up logcheck (1.2.41) ... > useradd: unknown group logcheck > adduser: `/usr/sbin/useradd -d /var/lib/logcheck -g logcheck -s > /bin/false -u 118 logcheck' returned error c

Bug#312393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312393: logcheck: Some more information that might help

2005-09-06 Thread Todd Troxell
I have tested the following scenarios and have been unable to reproduce this. -fresh install on unstable -dist-upgrade from stable version -dist-upgrade from woody version It will be helpful to know if your adduser is functioning correctly. On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:21:23AM +0530, Ritesh Raj S

Bug#312393: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312393: logcheck: Some more information that might help

2005-09-07 Thread Todd Troxell
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:18:27PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Wednesday 07 Sep 2005 09:04, Todd Troxell wrote: > > I have tested the following scenarios and have been unable to reproduce > > this. > > > > -fresh install on unstable > > -dist-upgrade from

Bug#321536: mozilla-firefox: make tabs draggable for relocatable pages

2005-08-05 Thread Todd Troxell
Package: mozilla-firebird Version 1.0.4-2 Severity: wishlist It would be cool to be able to drag tabs between browser windows. -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://