Package: automake1.9
Version: 1.9.6-2
Subject says all, with texinfo-4.2 I got build errors, because @tie
(used in automake.texi) is only supported in texinfo-4.3 or newer.
Regards,
Wolfram.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: samba
Version: 2.2.3a-14.2
Hi,
Unfortunately, todays 2.2.3a-14.2 samba update for stable did not fix
the DOS attack described in:
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0930
and
http://us4.samba.org/samba/news/#security_3.0.8
This bothered me a little, so I came
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-11
Hi,
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-11.diff.gz contains two identical patches,
182_linux-zlib-fixes.dif and 183_zisofs.diff.
When I do ./debian/rules patch both are actually applied, the second
time patch switches to "-R" behaviour and the two fixes c
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.28.4
I was trying to build the latest apt from sources today. I happened
to have gettext_0.11.5-1 installed (the minimum version from
Build-Depends), and the apt build failed because xgettext did not
support the --msgid-bugs-address switch.
Upgrading to gettext-0.14.1 l
Package: libfreetype6
Version: 2.1.7-2.5
Severity: grave
My xserver crashes with a FPE after upgrading freetype.
Cause:
The very last security-releated path in freetype_2.1.7-2.5
has this patch:
--- freetype-2.1.7.orig/src/raster/ftrend1.c2003-06-18 08:59:56.0
+0200
+++ freetype-2.1
Actually, here is an even more correct patch which applies on top
of the current ones in debian/patches.
Regards,
Wolfram.
--- freetype-2.1.7/src/raster/ftrend1.c~Wed Jun 14 16:03:26 2006
+++ freetype-2.1.7/src/raster/ftrend1.c Wed Jun 14 16:15:41 2006
@@ -176,8 +176,11 @@
bitmap->ro
Hi,
> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:44:00 +0100
> From: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks a lot for your reply. Unfortunately, it was apparently delayed
by more than a month somehow?!
> > Proposed solution:
> >
> > In debian/rules, the lines #25 and #32 reading
> >
> > # -$(MAKE) -C n
Package: libapache2-mod-jk
Version: 1.2.18-2
Severity: important
When doing some benchmarks on amd64, we noticed easily reproducible
apache2 crashes when mod_jk was used:
[Thu Jan 11 17:49:31 2007] [notice] Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_jk/1.2.18
mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8c configured -- resuming n
Hi,
I have just filed bug #406636, which might explain all sorts of
strange things in libapache2-mod-jk. When using a mod_jk built from
libapache-mod-jk_1.2.18-2 but against the correct apache2 headers
(take a look at my report), I have just tested and JkMountFile works
seemingly fine for me.
Re
Package: apache2
Version: 2.2.3-2
Hi,
The latest release has this line in debian/rules:
for pkg in `awk '/^Package:/ { print $$2 }' debian/control`; do \
find debian/$$pkg/ -name .svn -exec rm -rf {} + ; \
done
Unless I'm missing some strange new-fashioned find s
Package: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Version: 5.0.21-2
Mysql sources include a comprehensive test suite in the mysql-test
subdirectory. As part of the debian build process, this is not run.
I don't consider this fact a bug, because the test suite takes ages to
run even on a big machine.
However, running the
Hi,
Thanks for your ultra-fast reply!
> > However, running the test manually after building (before installing),
> > the test suite does not pass. The first test that fails is 'create':
> That should not be the case, afaik none of our patches influence the
> testsuite, especially not for:
Ok, g
> > > > However, running the test manually after building (before installing),
> > > > the test suite does not pass. The first test that fails is 'create':
> > > That should not be the case, afaik none of our patches influence the
> > > testsuite, especially not for:
> >
> > Ok, good to know. Do
13 matches
Mail list logo
