Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: sunweg
Version : 3.0.2
Upstream Author : rokam
* URL : https://github.com/rokam/sunweg
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Library to retrieve data from sunweg.net
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Scarlett Moore
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: futuresql
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Contact: Jonah Brüchert
* URL : https://invent.kde.org/libraries/futuresql
* License : LGPL
Programming
Package: lintian
Version: 2.117.1
Severity: normal
The check for deprecated Python stdlib imports seems to not be using
word boundary checks: "import uuid" generates the lintian info line
I: jupyter-client source: uses-deprecated-python-stdlib uu (deprecated in
Python 3.11, removed in Python
Package: usbmuxd
Version: 1.1.1-2
Tags: patch
User: p...@hungry.com
Usertags: appstream-modalias
The current appstream information is ignored because its license is not
compatible with the rest of the appstrean catalog (GPL-3+). This patch
change it to MIT used by most of the other appstream
Source: debcraft
Version: 0.1.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: environment
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that
debcraft could not be built
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-07-29 10:51:41)
> On 29.07.24 10:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Control: 2.3.1-6
Whoops, meant to write "Control: found -1 2.3.1-6"
> > NB! Please make sure to include version when reporting bugs.
> >
> > Thanks for reporting,
>
> Sorry, forgot to include the
Le lun. 29 juil. 2024 à 10:48, Kathara Sasikumar <
katharasasikumar...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Kathara Sasikumar
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: python-channels
> Version : 4.1.0
> Upstream Contact:
Hi,
On 26.07.24 15:05, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Starting with version 8.6.1-1, msc-generator takes a lot of time to
build, except for arch:all and amd64 architectures.
If I read the log correctly, it runs a ton of tests with 30m timeouts of
which a lot fail. And then there's a summary in the
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: deal...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:deal.ii
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Please remove deal.ii from arm64 where it FTBFS during the gsl transition.
Kind Regards,
Bas
Sorry it took so long to reply. Because I need to rebuild many libghc-*
packages.
With ghc-9.6.5-1~exp1, the error of R_LARCH_B26 overflowing also happened.
So can we change the options for loong64?
On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:01:13 +0800 zhangdandan wrote:
> diff --git a/debian/rules
On 29.07.24 10:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Control: 2.3.1-6
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-07-29 10:06:04)
thanks for fixing async-channels autopkgtest on armel. However, the std
feature on s390x still fails one test:
218s
218s failures:
218s
218s mpmc stdout
218s thread 'mpmc'
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kathara Sasikumar
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-channels
Version : 4.1.0
Upstream Contact: Django Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/django/channels
* License : BSD-3-clause
Control: 2.3.1-6
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-07-29 10:06:04)
> thanks for fixing async-channels autopkgtest on armel. However, the std
> feature on s390x still fails one test:
>
> 218s
> 218s failures:
> 218s
> 218s mpmc stdout
> 218s thread 'mpmc' panicked at tests/bounded.rs:468:9:
https://t.co/b9hrRPzykr
Espero que estés disfrutando de un día increíble
Recientemente te envié un mensaje con un enlace. No dejes pasar esta
oportunidad. Es posible que haya ido a tu carpeta de correo no deseado.
Creo que podría resultarte interesante.
Gracias por tu tiempo
Espero que estés teniendo un día fantástico
Recientemente te envié un mensaje con un enlace. No dejes pasar esta
oportunidad. Es posible que haya ido a tu carpeta de correo no deseado.
Creo que podría resultarte interesante.
Con todos mis buenos deseos
It's unfortunately going to have to wait. We're switching standard
libraries, and linking to external libs is a bit rocky right now.
On the plus side, I reduced the time it takes to generate the
orig.tar.xz from ~40 minutes to ~5 minutes, which should help a lot with
testing the deletion of
https://t.co/DbvQP39rFy
owner 1077324 Louis-Philippe Véronneau
thanks
Thanks for reporting this bug! I'll try to fix this during DebConf if I
find the time :)
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: surepy
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Ben Lebherz
* URL : https://github.com/benleb/surepy
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Library to interact with Sure
Package: chromium
Version: 126.0.6478.182-1
Followup-For: Bug #1067441
X-Debbugs-Cc: mal...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
it is possible to go around this bug by starting chromium with these arguments:
Package: mirrors
Severity: wishlist
User: mirr...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: mirror-submission
Submission-Type: new
Site: mirror.raiolanetworks.com
Archive-architecture: ALL amd64 arm64 armel armhf hurd-i386 hurd-amd64 i386
mips mips64el mipsel powerpc ppc64el riscv64 s390x
Archive-http:
Source: rust-async-channel
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: jbi...@debian.org, werdah...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Jonas,
thanks for fixing async-channels autopkgtest on armel. However, the std
feature on s390x still fails one test:
218s
218s failures:
218s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: tesla-powerwall
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : jrester
* URL : https://github.com/jrester/tesla_powerwall
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Library for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: tesla-wall-connector
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Einar Bragi Hauksson
* URL : https://github.com/einarhauks/tesla-wall-connector
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Espero que estés teniendo un gran día
Hace poco te envié un mensaje con un enlace. No pierdas esta oportunidad.
Es posible que el mensaje haya terminado en tu carpeta de correo no
deseado. Creo que podría resultarte interesante.
Cuídate
https://t.co/hsJdShx8hy
Package: mirrors
Severity: wishlist
User: mirr...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: mirror-submission
Submission-Type: new
Site: mirrors.nxthost.com
Archive-architecture: ALL amd64 arm64 armel armhf hurd-i386 hurd-amd64 i386
mips mips64el mipsel powerpc ppc64el riscv64 s390x
Archive-http: /debian/
https://t.co/gFhgSdqOS2
Espero de corazón que estés teniendo un día maravilloso
Recientemente te envié un mensaje con un enlace. No dejes pasar esta
oportunidad, ya que podría haber ido a tu carpeta de correo no deseado.
Creo que podría resultarte interesante.
Gracias
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:17:03PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Control: found -1 0.23.0-gtk3+dfsg-1
> Control: found -1 0.16.3+dfsg-1
>
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> Salvatore Bonaccorso, on 2024-07-28:
> > The following vulnerability was published for xmedcon.
> >
> > CVE-2024-29421[0]:
> > |
Package: python3-lsprotocol
Version: 2023.0.0-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
Hi,
I would like to see python3-lsprotocol backported to stable-backports. I
use it in my work on `debputy` and the lack of `python3-lsprotocol` in
the current stable reduces the functionality
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 eapoltest
> Control: found -1 2:2.10-8
>
> > freeradius with openssl 3.0.13-1~deb12u1 cannot successfully communicate
> > with eapol_test from bullseye (2:2.10-8~bpo11+2, openssl 1.1.1w-0+deb11u1).
> > eapol_test is used by our
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: tplink-omada-client
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Mark Godwin
* URL : https://github.com/MarkGodwin/tplink-omada-api
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Client
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: python-ttls
Version : 1.8.3
Upstream Author : Jakob Schlyter
* URL : https://github.com/jschlyter/ttls
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Asynchronous
29.07.2024 00:55:17 Michael Meskes :
> Hey Matthias,
>
>> * Package name : webext-passff
>> Version : 1.19.5
>> Upstream Contact: Johan Venant
>> * URL : https://codeberg.org/PassFF/passff
>> * License : GPL-2+
>> Programming Lang: JS
>> Description :
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 07:05:35AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On 28-07-2024 11:10, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > It's failing the autopkgtest on riscv64 quite badly. It's a new
> > package, and I have no idea where in the toolchain the problem lies;
> > given that pytest
Hi
Am 23.07.24 um 19:38 schrieb Olsak, Marek:
[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
Hi,
If you have a patch, I'd like to test it.
Here's the proposed change:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.116.3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I am a packager trying to package orphaned tty-clock, you can check here:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/tty-clock/
It just report my email address m...@eipi.fun as bogus-mail-host, I understand
cause it's personal domain
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: ultraheat-api
Version : 0.5.7
Upstream Author : vpathuis
* URL : https://github.com/vpathuis/ultraheat
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Reading usage data from
Hey Martin,
Sorry for the duplicated effort but 2.36 is already packaged. I was waiting for
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077190 to be resolved, which
is the reason you had to add a ton of new dependencies that are not actual
newsboat dependencies.
I'll upload now.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: vacuum-map-parser-roborock
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Piotr Machowski
* URL :
https://github.com/PiotrMachowski/Python-package-vacuum-map-parser-roborock
* License : Apache-2.0
Please note that the options are not configured in the current kernel
6.10.1-1~exp1 in Experimental.
# CONFIG_VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2 is not set
# CONFIG_VIDEO_INTEL_IPU6 is not set
# CONFIG_INTEL_VSC is not set
# CONFIG_IPU_BRIDGE is not set
Regards
Stephan
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: python-vehicle
Version : 2.2.2
Upstream Author : Franck Nijhof
* URL : https://github.com/frenck/python-vehicle
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Asynchronous
Thanks, Lucas! I'll check it out.
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024, 13:54 Lucas Nussbaum, wrote:
> Source: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab
> Version: 0.20050817-18
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
>
>
Control: tags 1077351 = moreinfo unreproducible
Hi,
I tried to reproduce this locally in clean sbuild (unstable) environment
with no luck. Let's see what Debian CI will show.
Regards,
Lev
Source: r-cran-backports
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of r-cran-backports the autopkgtest of
r-cran-backports fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the
binary packages of
Source: python-yamlfix
Version: 1.16.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: python-refurb
Version: 1.27.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: sentry-python
Version: 1.40.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-pytest-toolbox
Version: 0.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: python-itemadapter
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: bioperl-run
Version: 1.7.3-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: aflplusplus
Version: 4.21c-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: deheader
Version: 1.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: golang-github-gopacket-gopacket
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: glycin-loaders
Version: 0.1.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: cmake
Version: 3.30.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: cryfs
Version: 0.11.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libsyntax-infix-smartmatch-perl
Version: 0.005-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: php-dompdf
Version: 2.0.7+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-ajv
Version: 8.12.0~ds+~2.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: flask-babel
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: libzen
Version: 0.4.41-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: cmtk
Version: 3.3.1p2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: libsys-hostip-perl
Version: 2.120-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab
Version: 0.20050817-18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: lazygal
Version: 0.10.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: photocollage
Version: 1.4.5-0.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: python-autocommand
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: perlnavigator
Version: 0.6.0~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: unittest2
Version: 1.1.0-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules
Source: range-v3
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: mrpt
Version: 1:2.12.0+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: ruby-gon
Version: 6.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> NoMethodError:
>
Source: yad
Version: 0.40.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
Source: python-emmet-core
Version: 0.57.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: calculix-cgx
Version: 2.21+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++
Source: qt5ct
Version: 1.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -fPIC -g -O2
Source: persistent-cache-cpp
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: scilab
Version: 2024.1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash
Source: prelude-manager
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash
Source: fortunes-es
Version: 1.36
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -O2
Source: qgnomeplatform
Version: 0.9.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: ola
Version: 0.10.9.nojsmin-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ./libtool
Source: libervia-templates
Version: 0.9.0~hg396+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: simdjson
Version: 3.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: gnucash
Version: 1:5.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: gtk4-layer-shell
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: voikko-fi
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pcl
Version: 1.14.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: ruby-asciidoctor-kroki
Version: 0.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sitecopy
Version: 1:0.16.6-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -Wdate-time
Source: python-beartype
Version: 0.18.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: seqmagick
Version: 0.8.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: sendmail
Version: 8.18.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: galternatives
Version: 1.0.9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: cura-engine
Version: 1:5.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: mbedtls
Version: 2.28.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: pysodium
Version: 0.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240728 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules
701 - 800 of 1974307 matches
Mail list logo
