control: retitle -1 sequoia-chameleon-gnupg: unclear bug report, possibly
solved with new upstream version
control: severity -1 important
juliank: you reassigned #896834 to gpgv-from-sq amd made it serious,
while keeping the title ("apt-key fails in stretch") and in your last
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kari Pahula
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gecode-snapshot
Version : 6.2.0+gitMMDD
Upstream Contact: Guido Tack , Mikael Zayenz Lagerkvist
* URL : https://www.gecode.org/
* License :
Hi Emilio!
Il 2 luglio 2024 13:13:43 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha
scritto:
>Cool. btw I checked those packages and only these 3 are key packages:
>
>bctoolbox
>libgit2
>rustc
>
>It'd be nice to know if rustc will build if it wasn't for the disk space. Also
>it'd be good to have the other
Please upgrade to (or separately provide) branch v0.12.
This looks ready to go once rust-criterion and rust-test-case are fixed.
done
Package: btm
Package: elan
Package: git-delta
Package: hippotat
Package: precious
Package: python-maturin
Package: rust-av-metrics
Package: rust-cargo
Package:
Package: sploitscan
Version: 0.9.1-3
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
I have observed that sometimes sploitscan exits abnormally during
listing Further References:
$ sploitscan CVE-2024-6387
...
┌───[ Further References ]
|
├
Hi Andreas
> r-cran-spatstat.core was removed from Debian. R-cran-spatstat.geom does
> not depend from this package any more and the autopkgtest in Salsa CI is
> fine[1]. Any hint why it fails in testing would be welcome.
82s autopkgtest [21:16:20]: summary
82s
Le 02/07/2024 à 16:52, Roland Mas a écrit :
Hi Étienne,
I'm unable to reproduce your bug in a clean up-to-date cowbuilder sid
chroot. I uploaded a new upstream release while investigating
(0.5.0~a5-1), let's see if the buildds manage to build it before
comparing your log and mine
Package: rust-test-case
Version: 3.3.1-1
Tags: patch
We are currently looking at updating rust-itertools to 0.12,
the new version is available in experimental.
The Debian build-dependencies and test-dependencies have no
upper limit on the version, but the Cargo dev-dependency does,
so building
On 2024-07-02 07:29, Prusty, Badrikesh wrote:
I have created, "bp/docker26" branch in my fork, did some incremental
changes to fix override_dh_auto_install:
https://salsa.debian.org/badrikesh/docker/-/commits/bp%2Fdocker26
62f28e5 golang-github-docker-docker-dev.install: update install files
Hello Colin,
Here is the output of apt/term.log:
Log started: 2024-07-02 00:04:13
(Reading database ... 64456 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../openssh-sftp-server_1%3a9.2p1-2+deb12u3_amd64.deb
...
Unpacking openssh-sftp-server (1:9.2p1-2+deb12u3) over
I think I've tracked down the issue.
UM/Qt/qml/UM/SimpleButton.qml references a UI element called "ColorImage".
This class exists in Qt, but it's private and was probably changed/removed in
Qt6.
However, there's also a ColorImage class in Uranium (Cura's UI toolkit), and I
suspect they
On 02/07/2024 22:56, Matthias Geiger wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 20:07:39 +0100 Matthias Geiger
> wrote:
>
>> starship needs gix, added as blocking bug. Thanks to the awesome work by
>> captol and ncts this is mostly done from what I can tell. Apart from
>> that cargo-debstatus lists those as
Package: libpam-google-authenticator
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
Please update the libpam-google-authenticator package from the upstream
at https://github.com/google/google-authenticator-libpam
The google-authenticator binary points to a Google URL that's no longer
valid to
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 03:05:16PM +, John Wellesz wrote:
> I used apt upgrade to install the security update available for
> openssh-server
>
>* What was the outcome of this action?
>
> It overwrote /etc/ssh/sshd_config without promtping, erasing the custom
> settings
> and almost
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:9.2p1-2+deb12u3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
A security update was available for openssh-server
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Upgrading to the latest available
Package: fuse3
Version: 3.14.0-4
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: iconium6...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Installing fuse3 via apt, sudo apt install fuse3 -y ; It deleted GNOME and
FLATPAK.
only some messages have been logs, mainly the deletion logs of GNOME and other:
Removing
Am Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 05:01:27PM +0800 schrieb Bo YU:
>
> I can confirm it works(still during build but pass the failed stage on
> the issue).
>
> It seems tille had worked a lot on this, so hope this helps.
I'm fine with whatever solution you might find and you can
perfectly skip me when
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:9.2p1-2+deb12u3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrading to the latest security update
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 20:07:39 +0100 Matthias Geiger
wrote:
>
> starship needs gix, added as blocking bug. Thanks to the awesome work by
> captol and ncts this is mostly done from what I can tell. Apart from
> that cargo-debstatus lists those as missing:
>
> notify-rust, process-control,
Hi Étienne,
I'm unable to reproduce your bug in a clean up-to-date cowbuilder sid
chroot. I uploaded a new upstream release while investigating
(0.5.0~a5-1), let's see if the buildds manage to build it before
comparing your log and mine line-by-line :-)
Roland.
Package: nocache
Version: 1.1-1+b1
Severity: normal
joey@darkstar:~>nocache true
true: nocache.c:148: init_mutexes: Assertion `fds_lock != NULL' failed.
Aborted
- exit 134
Happens every time.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: libssl3
Version: 3.0.13-1~deb12u1
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 osslsigncode
Dear Maintainers,
Since the last upgrade of openssl on bookworm (version 3.0.13-1~deb12u1), code
signing using osslsigncode (and my Yubikey) now fails with a segmentation
fault. It was working
Source: cinder
Version: 2:21.1.0-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Title: Arbitrary file access through custom QCOW2 external data
Reporter: Martin Kaesberger
Products: Cinder, Glance, Nova
Description:
Martin Kaesberger reported a vulnerability in QCOW2 image processing
for Cinder, Glance and Nova.
Source: nova
Version: 2:26.1.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Title: Arbitrary file access through custom QCOW2 external data
Reporter: Martin Kaesberger
Products: Cinder, Glance, Nova
Description:
Martin Kaesberger reported a vulnerability in QCOW2 image processing
for Cinder, Glance and Nova.
Source: glance
Version: 2:25.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Title: Arbitrary file access through custom QCOW2 external data
Reporter: Martin Kaesberger
Products: Cinder, Glance, Nova
Description:
Martin Kaesberger reported a vulnerability in QCOW2 image processing
for Cinder, Glance and Nova.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "django-anymail":
* Package name : django-anymail
Version : 11.0-1
Upstream contact : Mike Edmunds
* URL : https://github.com/anymail/django-anymail
*
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 04:46:38PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 04:35:44PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 03:47:35PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> >>Could you please provide kmodsign tool like Ubuntu package does, so that
> >>we can sign
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: aio...@packages.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:aiodns
I intend to orphan the aiodns package.
The package description is:
aiodns provides a simple way for doing asynchronous DNS resolutions with a
synchronous
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pyca...@packages.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:pycares
I intend to orphan the pycares package.
The package description is:
pycares is a Python 3 module which provides an interface to c-ares. c-ares is
a C
reopen 1069130
tags 1069130 - patch
tags 1069130 + trixie sid
tags 1074660 + upstream
merge 1069130 1074660
thanks
On 7/2/24 2:51 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'mapnik-config'
The CMake build of Mapnik 4.0 no longer provides mapnik-config,
Source: nvram-wakeup
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: theme-d
Version: 5.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: razercfg
Version: 0.43-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: rust-breezyshim
Version: 0.1.92-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: cura
Version: 5.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: mate-power-manager
Version: 1.26.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]:
Source: vanguards
Version: 0.3.1-2.4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: meep-openmpi
Version: 1.25.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: mate-panel
Version: 1.27.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: python-skbio
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: rust-rand-core
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: nautilus-image-converter
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: shim-signed
Version: 1.43
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: meep-mpi-default
Version: 1.25.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]:
Source: org-roam
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: pyqi
Version: 0.3.2+dfsg-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: rust-byte-slice-cast
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: rust-eui48
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: quelcom
Version: 0.4.0-18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: node-chokidar
Version: 3.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ruff
Version: 0.0.291+dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: gtkhash
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory
Source: pyvo
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh
Source: ocaml-expect
Version: 0.0.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
Source: virtnbdbackup
Version: 2.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: meep
Version: 1.25.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory
Source: golang-github-safchain-ethtool
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ikiwiki
Version: 3.20200202.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: upstream-ontologist
Version: 0.1.37-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: poetry
Version: 1.8.3+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: magicgui
Version: 0.7.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: magic-wormhole-transit-relay
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rust-const-random
Version: 0.1.17-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: stdeb
Version: 0.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: xtrkcad
Version: 1:5.2.0Beta2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: rust-safe-transmute
Version: 0.11.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: bootcd
Version: 6.8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: libblkio
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Version: 11.5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: rust-pyo3-filelike
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: package-update-indicator
Version: 9-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: node-assume
Version: 2.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: rust-debian-analyzer
Version: 0.156.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: rootskel
Version: 1.136
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: python-marathon
Version: 0.13.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-handy-archives
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: rust-rustc-serialize
Version: 0.3.24-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: porechop
Version: 0.2.4+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
Source: wlgreet
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Running
Source: rust-malloc-buf
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: fpc
Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-33
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: termbox
Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: bdebstrap
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: rust-sequoia-gpg-agent
Version: 0.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: dfwinreg
Version: 20201006-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libdbd-mysql-perl
Version: 4.052-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /<>/debian/tests/pkg-perl/smoke-setup: 17: /usr/bin/mysqladmin:
> not
Source: nix
Version: 2.22.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -o
Source: buildstream
Version: 1.6.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
>
Source: mnemosyne
Version: 2.9+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: nordugrid-arc-nagios-plugins
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: starjava-datanode
Version: 1.0+2023.01.18-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gnome-mousetrap
Version: 3.17.3-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: osc
Version: 0.182.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules
Source: polib
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: gedit-latex-plugin
Version: 3.20.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]:
Source: rl-accel
Version: 0.9.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src
Version: 5.15.16+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pytest-salt
Version: 2019.6.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: aplpy
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ===
Source: amarok
Version: 3.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240702 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
901 - 1000 of 1970308 matches
Mail list logo