Hi,
2011/5/27 Ondřej Surý :
> there's a wishlist bug on tmail for a year, and you haven't touched
> the package since 2008. Are you still interested in active
> maintainership of it? If not I can move it under pkg-ruby-extras group
> maintenance. If yes, I'll just NMU the package (converting to ge
2010/8/26 Lucas Nussbaum :
> That worked fine until Ruby 1.9.1, but apparently a change in Ruby
> 1.9.2 broke Rubygems 1.3.7. This is exhibited by two bugs:
[...]
> - rubygems doesn't work:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588125
I trace the following error:
--
$ gem1.9.1 list
/
Hi,
> The existing ruby package simply sticks a symlink into /usr/bin/ruby
> to point to ruby1.8. I was surprised to find that this was not
> using the alternatives system, so that you can manage this yourself.
I have a rough idea about ruby* packages.
ruby package:
now:
provides /usr/bin/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: akira yamada
* Package name: ruby1.9.1
Version : 1.9.1
Upstream Author : Yukihiro Matsumoto
* URL : http://www.ruby-lang.org/
* License : Ruby's
Programming Lang: C
Description : Interpreter of object-ori
Hi,
> Thanks for the follow-up. Quantlib (upstream) and I figured out a workaround.
> In previous versions we had gotten by without the configure step -- and hence
> no Makefile was created and present. That did not seem to upset earlier
> versions but it set up the current versions. Switching t
Hi,
> Now, however, using what is in unstable, ie
>
> Get:33 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main libruby1.8 1.8.7.173-1 [1679kB]
> Get:34 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main ruby1.8 1.8.7.173-1 [290kB]
> Get:35 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main ruby 4.2 [20.6kB]
> Get:36 http://ftp.us
Hi,
> I know there's a freeze on new upstream version entering unstable, but
> with the pending release of Ruby 1.9.1 in a couple of months, it would
> be really useful to get the pre-release into experimental so we can play
> with it.
I already made prototype of ruby1.9_1.9.1~rc1 and ruby1.9_1.9
Hi,
Can someone please comment on the status of a fix for this bug in
Etch?
We are working on our svn-repos.
Thank you.
--
ay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
> After upgrading from ruby1.8_1.8.6.114-2 to ruby1.8_1.8.7-2, I noticed a rails
> webapp called "Tracks" v1.6, stopped working.
>
> The error is as mentioned in the subject line. Steps to reproduce:
> - download http://www.rousette.org.uk/projects/files/tracks-current.zip
> - unzip, and conf
Hi,
> Such a layout only makes sense if someone want to coinstall ruby 1.9.0 and
> ruby
> 1.9.1: if we have only one dir (for 1.9), then won't be able to install two
> versions of the same lib (one for 1.9.0, one for 1.9.1). On the other hand, if
> a lib was ported to 1.9.0, it's likely to be eas
Package: uim-tcode
Version: 1:1.5.1-1
Severity: important
uim-tcode should provide tutcode-custom.scm, tutcode-bushudic.scm and
tutcode-rule.scm in /usr/share/uim.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers oldstable
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500,
Hi,
>> According to a discussion thread on Google's ruby-talk [1], there are "a
>> couple serious bugs" in Ruby's thread implementation.
>
> Please provide precise pointers to the bugs (or code to reproduce them).
> The mailing list thread you are pointing to is very old, and only
> contains vagu
Package: libtokyocabinet-dev
Version: 1.1.10-1
Severity: normal
libtokyocabinet-dev does not provide tcadb.h.
$ dpkg --listfiles libtokyocabinet-dev | fgrep .h
/usr/include/tcbdb.h
/usr/include/tchdb.h
/usr/include/tcutil.h
$ dpkg-query -W libtokyocabinet-dev
libtokyocabinet-dev
Hi,
> upstream ruby removed file version.h . But we already have lots of fixes
> based on string RUBY_VERSION_CODE, so it's easier to recreate this
> version.h for ruby1.9 package. This patch fix this bug.
>
> It also fix another bug introduced by ruby1.9 upstream changes.
Basically, we should n
Hi,
> this bug was marked pending quite some time ago now.
> Any news for this one?
I made new packages and sent them to Debian security team.
I'm waiting for DSA...
Thank you.
--
ay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
> It's not:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:tmp$] LC_ALL=C apt-get source ruby1.8
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Need to get 4593kB of source archives.
> Get:1 http://debian.netcologne.de unstable/main ruby1.8 1.8.6.111-2 (dsc)
> [1061B]
> Get:
Hi,
> At least the telnets code in ruby1.8 (unstable) is not
> fixed. Do I miss anything?
The fix is in net/telnets.rb.
137 if @options['VerifyMode'] != OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_NONE
138@sock.post_connection_check(@options['Host'])
139 end
Thank y
Hi,
> Package: ruby1.8
> Version: 1.8.5-4
> Severity: important
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for ruby1.8.
>
> CVE-2007-5770[0]:
> | The (1) Net::ftptls, (2) Net::telnets, (3) Net::imap, (4) Net::pop,
> | and (5) Net::smtp li
Hi,
> There was a similar bug that will be fixed in ruby 1.8.7 in
> Matrix#inverse.
> See discussion at
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?group_id=426&atid=1698&func=detail&aid=9360
>
> Also, I've opened a bug on the ruby bug tracker about this issue. See
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?group_id=42
Hi,
> It is my intention to NMU libshadow-ruby to fix this problem in the next few
> days, unless a maintainer upload or some other responses to this bug report
> is made.
Thank you for your attention.
I uploaded new package which includes the patch to Debian.
--
ay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
# This is changes of ruby1.9, so Bug#441489 is of libinotify-ruby.
reassign 441489 libinotify-ruby
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't understand how 'bison' is involved here. The binary file
> 'byacc' is in package 'byacc', not in package 'bison'.
We make ruby1.8 package use biosn and not byacc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/downloads/ruby$ sudo pbuilder build ruby1.8_1.8.6-2.dsc
> [...]
> The following NEW packages will b
> Package: ruby1.8
> Version: 1.8.6-2
>
> dpkg-build -rfakeroot fails if byacc is not installed. As 'byacc' is
> not listed as a build-dependency in debian/control, building fails.
ruby1.8 build-depends on bison and it does not use bison.
Please show me your build log.
(Logs at http://buildd
age provides mkmf.rb.
I'll fix the README file.
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Please follow up this discussion in 399706. I agree Ruby is stupid
> here, but I don't intend to work around it.
I don't think so.
It is not a bug of Ruby and it is bug of apt-listbugs.
I think that the behaviour is intended by the upstream author of SOAP4r.
The current
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: akira yamada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdb4.4-ruby
Version : 0.5.8
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Programm
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
We're planning to remove ruby1.6 from etch release. See
http://wiki.debian.org/RemoveRuby16 and recent discussion on debian-ruby
lists.
It is the time to remove ruby1.6 itself. Please remove ruby1.6 from
testing and unstable.
Thanks,
-- System Informat
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Makefile:143: *** missing separator. Stop.
Does the line 143 contain "|#_!!_#|"?
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please remove ruby-manual package from testing/unstable.
Reason:
This package provides a manual and a FAQs of only Ruby 1.4.x.
And new upstream version is not provided.
The version "1.4.x" is very old vers
Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> Package: libhonyaku-damashii-ruby1.6
> Version: 0.20-4
>
> We're planning to remove ruby 1.6 from etch [1].
> Please consider to ugprade to ruby 1.8 or remove this package from
> testing and unstable.
I will reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org to request removing it from
D
".
- "Ruby's License" doesn't conflict with OpenSSL License.
- Programs cann't use libopenssl-ruby and other GPL'ed libraries.
But it is a problem of such programs,
it isn't a problem of ruby packages.
- policy 2.3 says "Every package must be accompanied
by a verbatim copy of its copyright and distribution license
in the file `/usr/share/doc//copyright'".
So, we will add a note of this fact in copyright
and close this bug.
--
akira yamada
think that debian/copyright has correct information.
We may add this point as a note to libopenssl-ruby1.8.README.Debian,
but I think that it is not a serious bug.
--
akira yamada
ded to the GPL.
Ruby is distributed with dual-license which is "Ruby's License" or GPL.
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt>
--
akira yamada
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/tk.rb:1102
> from ./tst.rb:2
This script works fine on my Debian-box.
> Same problem when doing 'require "tk"' from irb1.8
I could not reproduce the problem.
$ irb1.8
irb(main):001:0> require "tk"
=> true
Pleas
or
> Bignum (TypeError)
> from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `load'
> from /usr/bin/raggle:4795:in `load_config'
> from /usr/bin/raggle:5441:in `main'
> from /usr/bin/raggle:6461
I posted a workaround to ruby-core list:
http://blade.nagaokaut.
Martin Pitt wrote:
> There is a safe mode bypass in all Ruby versions:
I already prepared the new package and
sent a notice to security team.
But I cannot yet get DSA
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
(core dumped) $HTTPD -k start -DSSL
ruby1.8_1.8.3-1 is in unstable. please try it.
If you get SEGV with 1.8.3-1, please send the backtrace.
Thank you.
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Please remove libdb4.1-ruby from sid/testing.
Because libdb4.1 is obsoleted.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01570.html>
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500
tch changes
the dir to i386-linux-gnu. It is wrong.
Is this change necessary for GNU/kFreeBSD?
--
akira yamada http://arika.org>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb4.3-ruby
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 4.3 for Ruby
BDB is an i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb3-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 3 for Ruby 1.9
BDB is a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb4.1-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 4.1 for Ruby 1.9
BDB
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb4.3-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 4.3 for Ruby 1.9
BDB
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb4.2-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 4.2 for Ruby 1.9
BDB
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdb2-ruby1.9
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Guy Decoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html
* License : Ruby's
Description : Interface to Berkeley DB 2 for Ruby 1.9
BDB is a
Package: alexandria
(BVersion: 0.5.1-2
(BSeverity: important
(B
(BIn LANG=ja, Alexandria crashes at alexandria/ui/main_app.rb:125.
(B
(B $ LANG=ja LC_TIME=C alexandria
(B ---
(B Alexandria just crashed
(B ---
(B Timestamp: Fri Apr 08 17:54:10 J
Klaus Stein wrote:
> Package: libtk-ruby1.8
> Version: 1.8.1-7woody1
I think that this bug(?) is not for Debian.
Debian does not have libtk-ruby1.8_1.8.1-7woody1.
Thank you.
--
akira yamada http://arika.org>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &qu
ich patch precisely
> fixed the problem.
> Does Debian ruby1.8 use vanilla ruby 1.8.2 at the moment or a patched
> pre-version?
Tha changes of drb/drb.rb is for security.
So I think that we should use current drb/drb.rb.
--
akira yamada http://arika.org>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
48 matches
Mail list logo
