Package: tar
Version: 1.34+dfsg-1
Severity: minor
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
thy typically steps tu build a pacage ist to run these steps as user "root":
# apt source tar
# cd tar-1.34+dfsg
# apt build-dep
> >snack.c:2:10: fatal error: Python.h: No such file or directory
> > 2 | #include "Python.h"
> > | ^~
> >compilation terminated.
>
> This is actually interesting as the build continues despite the error
> (which maybe RC itself). An easy way to reproduce is:
>
> sbuild
Package: newt
Version: 0.52.23-1
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear Maintainer,
if libpython*-dev is not installed, the build give an error
> snack.c:2:10: fatal error: Python.h: No such file or directory
> 2 | #include "Python.h"
> | ^~
> compilation terminated.
Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>Hi Henry,
>
>* Henry N. [2023-03-24 17:56]:
>>build in a minimal build environmet fails for docbook2html.
>>
>># apt source newt
>># cd newt-0.52.23
>># apt build-dep newt
>>... all dependency installed ...
>># dpkg-buildpackage -B "-Pnocheck noinsttest noudeb" -uc
Package: base-passwd
Version: 3.6.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Usertags: rebootstrap
Dear Maintainer,
build in a minimal build environmet fails for docbook2html.
# apt remove docbook && apt autoremove
# apt
Package: newt
Version: 0.52.23-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: rebootstrap
Dear Maintainer,
the build option "nopython" was not respected in all cases.
In rules exist a check for nopython in
Package: mpdecimal
Version: 2.4.2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: rebootstrap
Dear Maintainer,
Source information for mpdecimal are missing for Debian bookworm.
No Source package available. Detected by
7 matches
Mail list logo
