Package: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.0.7~rc1-1
Severity: important
I have the following config:
target=sda1Crypt,source=/dev/sda1,key=none
target=sda2Crypt,source=/dev/sda2,key=sda1Crypt,keyscript=/lib/cryptsetup/scripts/decrypt_derived
sda1Crypt is root filesystem, sda2Crypt is my swap partition.
Package: kino
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
http://www.kinodv.org/article/view/163/1/7/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (800, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.5 (PREEMPT)
Locale: [EMAIL PROTEC
Package: guilt
Version: 0.25-1
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream release of guilt.
See http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jsipek/guilt/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (800, 'testing')
Architecture: i38
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.95+20070507-1
Severity: normal
At the installation I got this error messages:
Setting up grub-pc (1.95+20070507-1) ...
Updating /boot/grub/grub.cfg ...
grub-probe: error: Cannot get the real path of `/dev/fd0'
grub-probe: error: Cannot get the real path of `/dev/fd0'
g
Package: rkhunter
Version: 1.2.9-3
Severity: minor
On my debian-sid rkhunter gives the warning:
Warning: This operating system is not fully supported!
The log file contains:
Info: Full OS name = Debian lenny/sid (i386)
Info: OS ID = NA
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT pref
> The point is that your system has very akward things, as what lies in
> your /lib/tls:
> * _seems_ to come from a libc 2.3.2;
> * still has a libc-2.3.6.so too that has not the correct permissions
> _BUT_ the same size and date as the libc-2.3.2.so (which is
> completely absurd).
>
Am Samstag, 14. April 2007 18:46 schrieben Sie:
> > Here are the listing of /lib/tls:
> >
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2005-05-10 22:01 ld-2.3.2.so
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-07-14 00:59 ld-linux.so.2 ->
> > ld-2.3.2.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9324 2005-05-10 22:01
> > libanl-2
> > There are a lot of files in /lib/tls that belong to libc 2.3.2
> > (libdl-2.3.2.so ...). Perhaps they were not deleted by an old upgrade.
>
> Could you please give us the date of those files (ls -l /lib/tls would
> be the best), so that we can try to trace the problem to a libc6 version?
Here
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.5-1
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
> >
> > Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using
> > .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> > S
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: critical
If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
Setting up libc6 (2.5-1) ...
dpkg: relocation error: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_out
10 matches
Mail list logo
